Despite the growing popularity of cocreation approaches to innovation, the bottom-line results of these efforts continue to frustrate many firms. Marketing communications are one important tool in stimulating consumer adoption, yet marketers to date have not taken advantage of a unique phenomenon associated with many cocreated innovations: the presence of a genesis story in the words of the creator, which can be combined in different ways with traditional marketing messaging. Using mixed methods, the authors demonstrate a crossover effect in which a “mismatch” of the fundamental motivations behind authentic creation narratives and traditional persuasive messages enhances adoption of the cocreated innovation. This effect is mediated by potential adopters’ self-referencing of their own stories about similar experiences or consumption episodes. Furthermore, the effect of a motivation mismatch strategy is attenuated for expert consumers. Finally, this motivation mismatch strategy triggers “takeoff” of cocreated innovations. This research offers substantial implications for research on cocreated innovation, narrative persuasion, and firm-generated and user-generated communication. It provides managers specific guidance on enhancing the success of cocreation programs through an integrated communications strategy.
AvnetTamarTory HigginsE. (2006), “How Regulatory Fit Affects Value in Consumer Choices and Opinions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (1), 1–10.
6.
BaldwinCarlissHippelEric von (2011), “Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation,” Organization Science, 22 (6), 1399–1417.
7.
BassFrank M. (2004) “Comments on ‘A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables the Bass Model,’” Management Science, 50 (12 Suppl), 1833–1840.
CampbellMargaret C.KellerKevin Lane (2003), “Brand Familiarity and Advertising Repetition Effects,” Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (2), 292–304.
10.
ChesbroughHenryBrunswickerSabine (2014), “A Fad or a Phenomenon?: The Adoption of Open Innovation Practices in Large Firms,” Research-Technology Management, 57 (2), 16–25.
11.
DahlDarren W.FuchsChristophSchreierMartin (2014), “Why and When Consumers Prefer Products of User-Driven Firms: A Social Identification Account,” Management Science, 61 (8), 1978–88.
ElliotAndrew J. (1999), “Approach and Avoidance Motivation and Achievement Goals,” Educational Psychologist, 34 (3), 169–89.
14.
EscalasJennifer Edson (2007), “Self-Referencing and Persuasion: Narrative Transportation Versus Analytical Elaboration,” Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (4), 421–29.
15.
FörsterJensHigginsE.ToryIdsonLorraine Chen (1998), “Approach and Avoidance Strength During Goal Attainment: Regulatory Focus and the ‘Goal Looms Larger’ Effect,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75 (5), 1115–31.
16.
GolderPeter N.TellisGerard J. (1997), “Will It Ever Fly? Modeling the Takeoff of Really New Consumer Durables,” Marketing Science, 16 (3), 256–70.
17.
GolderPeter N.TellisGerard J. (2004), “Growing, Growing, Gone: Cascades, Diffusion, and Turning Points in the Product Life Cycle,” Marketing Science, 23 (2), 207–18.
18.
GortMichaelKlepperSteven (1982), “Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovations,” Economic Journal, 92 (367), 630–53.
19.
GreenMelanie C.BrockTimothy C. (2000), “The Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (5), 701–21.
20.
GreenMelanie C.DonahueJohn K. (2009), “Simulated Worlds: Transportation into Narratives,” in Handbook of Imagination and Mental Simulation, MarkmanKeith D.KleinWilliam M.P.SuhrJulie A., eds. New York: Psychology Press, 241–56.
21.
HamiltonDavid L.ShermanSteven J.RuvoloCatherine M. (1990), “Stereotype-Based Expectancies: Effects on Information Processing and Social Behavior,” Journal of Social Issues, 46 (2), 35–60.
22.
HayesAndrew F. (2012), “PROCESS: A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Modeling,” white paper, www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
23.
HennesseyBeth A. (2010), “The Creativity-Motivation Connection,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, KaufmanJames C.SternbergRobert J., eds. New York: Cambridge University Press, 342–65.
24.
HewettKellyRandWilliamRustRoland T.van HeerdeHarald J. (2016), “Brand Buzz in the Echoverse,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (3), 1–24.
25.
KornishLaura J.UlrichKarl T. (2014), “The Importance of the Raw Idea in Innovation: Testing the Sow’s Ear Hypothesis,” Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (1), 14–26.
26.
KrishnamurthyParthasarathySujanMita (1999), “Retrospection Versus Anticipation: The Role of the Ad Under Retrospective and Anticipatory Self-Referencing,” Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (1), 55–69.
27.
KumarAshishBezawadaRamRishikaRamkumar JanakiramanKannanP.K. (2016), “From Social to Sale: The Effects of Firm-Generated Content in Social Media on Customer Behavior,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (1), 7–25.
28.
MaZhenfengYangZhiyongMouraliMehdi (2014), “Consumer Adoption of New Products: Independent Versus Interdependent Self-Perspectives,” Journal of Marketing, 78 (2), 101–17.
29.
MaheswaranDurairajChaikenShelly (1991), “Promoting Systematic Processing in Low-Motivation Settings: Effect of Incongruent Information on Processing and Judgment,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61 (1), 13–25.
30.
MattilaAnna S. (2000), “The Role of Narratives in the Advertising of Experiential Services,” Journal of Service Research, 3 (1), 35–45.
31.
McQuarrieEdward F.MillerJessicaPhillipsBarbara J. (2013), “The Megaphone Effect: Taste and Audience in Fashion Blogging,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (1), 136–58.
32.
NielsenJesper H.EscalasJennifer Edson (2010), “Easier Is Not Always Better: The Moderating Role of Processing Type on Preference Fluency,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20 (3), 295–305.
33.
NishikawaHidehikoSchreierMartinFuchsChristophOgawaSusumu (2017), “The Value of Marketing Crowdsourced New Products as Such: Evidence from Two Randomized Field Experiments,” Journal of Marketing Research, 54 (4), 525–39.
34.
PaivioAllan (1991), “Dual Coding Theory: Retrospect and Current Status,” Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45 (3), 255–87.
35.
PeracchioLaura A.TyboutAlice M. (1996), “The Moderating Role of Prior Knowledge in Schema-Based Product Evaluation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 23 (3), 177–92.
36.
PeresRenanaMullerEitanMahajanVijay (2010), “Innovation Diffusion and New Product Growth Models: A Critical Review and Research Directions,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27 (2), 91–106.
37.
PetrinAmilTrainKenneth (2010), “A Control Function Approach to Endogeneity in Consumer Choice Models,” Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (1), 3–13.
38.
PhillipsBarbara J.McQuarrieEdward F. (2010), “Narrative and Persuasion in Fashion Advertising,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (3), 368–92.
39.
PreacherKristopher J.HayesAndrew F. (2004), “SPSS and SAS Procedures for Estimating Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models,” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36 (4), 717–31.
40.
RogersEverett M. (2010), Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press.
41.
RoskesMariekeDe DreuCarsten K.W.NijstadBernard A. (2012), “Necessity Is the Mother of Invention: Avoidance Motivation Stimulates Creativity Through Cognitive Effort,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103 (2), 242–56.
42.
SadoskiMarkPaivioAllan (2013), Imagery and Text: A Dual Coding Theory of Reading and Writing. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
43.
SchreierMartinFuchsChristophDahlDarren W. (2012), “The Innovation Effect of User Design: Exploring Consumers’ Innovation Perceptions of Firms Selling Products Designed by Users,” Journal of Marketing, 76 (5), 18–32.
44.
SchreierMartinPrüglReinhard (2008), “Extending Lead-User Theory: Antecedents and Consequences of Consumers’ Lead Userness,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25 (4), 331–46.
SinghVishal P.HansenKarsten T.BlattbergRobert C. (2006), “Market Entry and Consumer Behavior: An Investigation of a Wal-Mart Supercenter,” Marketing Science, 25 (5), 457–76.
48.
SrullThomas K.LichtensteinMerylRothbartMyron (1985), “Associative Storage and Retrieval Processes in Person Memory,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11 (2), 316–45.
49.
TechatassanasoontornAngsana A.KauffmanRobert J. (2014), “Examining the Growth of Digital Wireless Phone Technology: A Take-Off Theory Analysis,” Decision Support Systems, 58 (February), 53–67.
50.
TrusovMichaelBucklinRandolph E.PauwelsKoen (2009), “Effects of Word-of-Mouth Versus Traditional Marketing: Findings From an Internet Social Networking Site.” Journal of Marketing, 73 (5), 90–102.
51.
UrbanGlen L.HippelEric von (1988), “Lead User Analyses for the Development of New Industrial Products,” Management Science, 34 (5), 569–82.
52.
Von HippelEric (2005), “Democratizing Innovation: The Evolving Phenomenon of User Innovation,” Journal für Betriebswirtschaft, 55 (1), 63–78.
53.
Van LaerTomDe RuyterKoViscontiLuca M.WetzelsMartin (2014), “The Extended Transportation-Imagery Model: A Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents and Consequences of Consumers’ Narrative Transportation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (5), 797–817.
54.
WentzelDanielTomczakTorstenHerrmannAndreas (2010), “The Moderating Effect of Manipulative Intent and Cognitive Resources on the Evaluation of Narrative Ads,” Psychology & Marketing, 27 (5), 510–30.
ZwarunLaraHallAlice (2012), “Narrative Persuasion, Transportation, and the Role of Need for Cognition in Online Viewing of Fantastical Films,” Media Psychology, 15 (3), 327–55.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
