Consumers’ choices about health products are heavily influenced by public information, such as news articles, research articles, online customer reviews, online product discussion, and TV shows. Dr. Oz, a celebrity physician, often makes medical recommendations with limited or marginal scientific evidence. Although reputable news agencies have traditionally acted as gatekeepers of reliable information, they face the intense pressure of “the eyeball game.” Customer reviews, despite their authenticity, may come from deceived consumers. Therefore, it remains unclear whether public information sources can correct the misleading health information. In the context of over-the-counter weight loss products, the authors carefully analyze the cascading of information post endorsement. The analysis of extensive textual content with deep-learning methods reveals that legitimate news outlets respond to Dr. Oz's endorsement by generating more news articles about the ingredient; on average, articles after the endorsement contain higher sentiment, so news agencies seem to amplify rather than rectify the misleading endorsement. The finding highlights a serious concern: the risk of hype news diffusion. Research articles react too slowly to mitigate the problem, and online customer reviews and product discussions provide only marginal corrections. The findings underscore the importance of oversight to mitigate the risk of cascading hype news.
AbadieAlbertoDiamondAlexisHainmuellerJens (2010), “Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies : Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105 (490), 493–505.
2.
AbadieAlbertoDiamondAlexisHainmuellerJens (2015), “Comparative Politics and the Synthetic Control Method,” American Journal of Political Science, 59 (2), 495–510.
3.
AgrawalJagdishKamakuraWagner A. (1995), “The Economic Worth of Celebrity Endorsers: An Event Study Analysis,” Journal of Marketing, 59 (3), 56–62.
4.
BergerJonah (2014), “Word of Mouth and Interpersonal Communication: A Review and Directions for Future Research,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24 (4), 586–607.
5.
BergerJonahMilkmanKatherine L. (2012), “What Makes Online Content Viral?” Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (2), 192–205.
ChenYixingLeeJu-YeonSridharShrihariMittalVikasMcCallisterKatherineSingalAmit G. (2020), “Improving Cancer Outreach Effectiveness Through Targeting and Economic Assessments: Insights from a Randomized Field Experiment,” Journal of Marketing, 84 (3), 1–27.
9.
ChenZhaoweiHuJijiaZhangZongweiJiangShanHanShoumengYanDandan, (2020), “Efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine in Patients with COVID-19: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial,” medRxiv (April 10), https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.22.20040758.
10.
ChingAndrewClarkRobertHorstmannIgnatiusLimHyunwoo (2016), “The Effects of Publicity on Demand: The Case of Anti-Cholesterol Drugs,” Marketing Science, 35 (1), 158–81.
11.
ChintaguntaPradeepJiangRennaJinGinger Z. (2009), “Information, Learning, and Drug Diffusion: The Case of Cox-2 Inhibitors,” Quantitative Marketing and Economics,7, 399–443.
12.
ChungKevin Y.C.DerdengerTimothy P.SrinivasanKannan (2013), “Economic Value of Celebrity Endorsements: Tiger Woods’ Impact on Sales of Nike Golf Balls,” Marketing Science, 32 (2), 271–93.
13.
D’AndreaAlessiaFerriFernandoGrifoniPatriziaGuzzoTiziana (2015), “Approaches, Tools and Applications for Sentiment Analysis Implementation,” International Journal of Computer Applications, 125 (3), 26–33.
GentzkowMatthewShapiroJesse M. (2006), “Media Bias and Reputation,” Journal of Political Economy, 114 (2).
18.
GentzkowMatthewShapiroJesse M. (2010), “What Drives Media Slant? Evidence from U.S. Daily Newspapers,” Econometrica, 78 (1), 35–71.
19.
GoelSharadWattsDuncan J.GoldsteinDaniel (2012), “The Structure of Online Diffusion Networks,” Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, 1 (212), 623–38.
20.
GovindRahulChatterjeeRabikarMittalVikas (2008), “Timely Access to Healthcare: Customer-Focused Resource Allocation in a Hospital Network,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25, 294–300.
21.
HausmanCatherineRapsonDavid (2018), “Regression Discontinuity in Time: Considerations for Empirical Applications,” Annual Review of Resource Economics, 10 (1), 533–52.
22.
HernandezAdrian V.RomanYuani M.PasupuletiVinayBarbozaJoshuan J.White C.Michael (2020), “Hydroxychloroquine or Chloroquine for Treatment or Prophylaxis of COVID-19,” Annals of Internal Medicine (August 18), https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-2496.
23.
IslamM. SaifulSarkarTonmoyKhanSazzadKamalA.H.HasanS.M.SealeHolly (2020), “COVID-19–Related Infodemic and Its Impact on Public Health: A Global Social Media Analysis,” American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 103 (4), 1621–29.
24.
JangSunghaPrasadAshutoshRatchfordBrian (2017), “Consumer Search of Multiple Information Sources and Its Impact on Consumer Price Satisfaction,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 40 (November), 24–40.
25.
KalraAjayLiShiboZhangWei (2011), “Understanding Responses to Contradictory Information About Products,” Marketing Science, 30 (6), 1098–1114.
KimEvgenyKlingerRoman (2018), “A Survey on Sentiment and Emotion Analysis for Computational Literary Studies,” arXiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.03137.
28.
KorownykChristinaKolberMichaelMcCormackJamesLamVanessaOverboKateCottonCandra, et al. (2014), “Televised Medical Talk Shows—What They Recommend and the Evidence to Support Their Recommendations: A Prospective Observational Study,” British Medical Journal, 349 (December), 1–9.
LazerDavid M.J.BaumMatthew A.BenklerYochaiBerinskyAdam J.GreenhillKelly M.MenczerFilippo (2018), “The Science of Fake News,” Science, 359 (6380), 1094–96.
31.
LeeDokyunHosanagarKartikNairHarikesh S. (2018), “Advertising Content and Consumer Engagement on Social Media: Evidence from Facebook,” Management Science, 64 (11), 5105–31.
32.
LeeDavid S.LemieuxThomas (2010), “Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics,” Journal of Economic Literature, 48 (2), 281–355.
33.
LiuBing (2012), Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
34.
LiuLiuDzyaburaDariaMizikNatalie (2020), “Visual Listening In: Extracting Brand Image Portrayed on Social Media,” Marketing Science, 39 (4), 669–86.
35.
LiuXiaoLeeDokyunSrinivasanKannan (2019), “Large Scale Cross Category Analysis of Consumer Review Content on Sales Conversion Leveraging Deep Learning,” Journal of Marketing Research, 56 (6), 918–43.
36.
MaYuAilawadiKusum L.GrewalDhruv (2013), “Soda Versus Cereal and Sugar Versus Fat: Drivers of Healthful Food Diagnosis,” Journal of Marketing, 77 (3), 101–20.
37.
MittalVikasHuppertzJohn W.KhareAdwait (2008), “Customer Complaining: The Role of Tie Strength and Information Control,” Journal of Retailing, 84 (2), 195–204.
38.
PorterLanceGolanGuy J. (2006), “From Subservient Chickens to Brawny Men: A Comparison of Viral Advertising to Television Advertising,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6 (2), 4–33.
39.
PowellKendall (2016), “Does It Take Too Long to Publish Research?” Nature, 530, 148–51.
40.
RaoAnita (2021), “Deceptive Claims Using Fake News Advertising: The Impact on Consumers,” Journal of Marketing Research (published online August 4), https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437211039804.
ZuckermanDiana (2003), “Hype in Health Reporting: ‘Checkbook Science’ Buys Distortion of Medical News,” International Journal of Health Services, 33 (2), 383–89.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
