Results from three large-scale field studies and two controlled experiments show that consumers tend to be more self-disclosing when generating content on their smartphone versus personal computer. This tendency is found in a wide range of domains including social media posts, online restaurant reviews, open-ended survey responses, and compliance with requests for personal information in web advertisements. The authors show that this increased willingness to self-disclose on one’s smartphone arises from the psychological effects of two distinguishing properties of the device: (1) feelings of comfort that many associate with their smartphone and (2) a tendency to narrowly focus attention on the disclosure task at hand due to the relative difficulty of generating content on the smaller device. The enhancing effect of smartphones on self-disclosure yields several important marketing implications, including the creation of content that is perceived as more persuasive by outside readers. The authors explore implications for how these findings can be strategically leveraged by managers, including how they may generalize to other emerging technologies.
AltmanIrwinTaylorDalmas (1973), Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. Oxford, UK: Holt, Reinhart, and Winston.
2.
AndradeEduard B.KaltchevaVelitchkaWietzBarton (2002), “Self Disclosure on the Web: Impact of Privacy Policy, Reward, and Company Reputation,”Proceedings of the Association for Consumer Research, 29 (1), 350–53.
3.
AntounChristopherCouperMick P.ConradFrederick G. (2017), “Effects of Mobile Versus PC Web on Survey Response Quality: A Crossover Experiment in a Probability Web Panel,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 81 (S1), 280–306.
4.
BakJin YeongKimSuinOhAlice (2012), “Self-Disclosure and Relationship Strength in Twitter Conversations,” in Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Vol. 2: Short Papers), LiHaizhouLinChin-YewOsborneMilesLeeGary GeunbaeParkJong C., eds. Jeju Island, South Korea: Association for Computational Linguistics, 60–64.
5.
BakJin YeongLinChin-YewOhAlice (2014), “Self-Disclosure Topic Model for Classifying and Analyzing Twitter Conversations,” in Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), MoschittiAlessandroPangBoDaelemansWalter, eds. Doha: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1986–96.
6.
BalaniSairamChoudhuryMunmun De (2015), “Detecting and Characterizing Mental Health Related Self-Disclosure in Social Media,” in CHI ‘15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 1373–78.
7.
BarakAzyGluck-OfriOrit (2007), “Degree and Reciprocity of Self-Disclosure in Online Forums,”Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 10 (3), 407–17.
8.
BowlingAnn (2005), “Mode of Questionnaire Administration Can Have Serious Effects on Data Quality,”Journal of Public Health, 27 (3), 281–91.
9.
BrockmeyerTimoZimmermannJohannesKulessaDominikaHautzingerMartinBentsHinrichFriederichHans-Christoph, et al. (2015), “Me, Myself, and I: Self-Referent Word Use as an Indicator of Self-Focused Attention in Relation to Depression and Anxiety,”Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1564.
10.
BuskirkTrent D.AndrusCharles H. (2014), “Making Mobile Browser Surveys Smarter: Results from a Randomized Experiment Comparing Online Surveys Completed via Computer or Smartphone,”Field Methods, 26 (4), 322–42.
11.
CarverCharles S.ScheierMichael (1981), Attention and Self-Regulation: A Control Theory Approach to Human Behavior. New York: Springer.
12.
CastielloUmbertoUmiltàCarlo (1990), “Size of the Attentional Focus and Efficiency of Processing,”Acta Psychologica, 73 (3), 195–209.
13.
ChaikinAlan L.DerlegaValerianMillerSarah J. (1976), “Effects of Room Environment on Self-Disclosure in a Counseling Analogue,”Journal of Counseling Psychology, 23 (5), 479–81.
14.
CheeverNancyRosenLarryCarrierL. MarkChavezAmber (2014), “Out of Sight Is Not Out of Mind: The Impact of Restricting Wireless Mobile Device Use on Anxiety Levels Among Low, Moderate and High Users,”Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 290–97.
15.
ChenI-PingLiaoChia-NingYehShih-Hao (2011), “Effect of Display Size on Visual Attention,”Perceptual and Motor Skills, 112 (3), 959–74.
16.
ChenPing-LingPaiChih-Wei (2018), “Pedestrian Smartphone Overuse and Inattentional Blindness: An Observational Study in Taipei, Taiwan,”BMC Public Health, 18 (1), 1342.
17.
ClaytonRussellLeshnerGlennAlmondAnthony (2015), “The Extended iSelf: The Impact of iPhone Separation on Cognition, Emotion, and Physiology,”Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20 (2), 119–35.
18.
CozbyPaul C. (1973), “Self-Disclosure: A Literature Review,”Psychological Bulletin, 79 (2), 73–91.
19.
DavisDeborahBrockTimothy C. (1975), “Use of First-Person Pronouns as a Function of Increased Objective Self-Awareness and Performance Feedback,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11 (4), 381–88.
20.
DerlegaValerian J.ChaikinAlan L. (1977), “Privacy and Self-Disclosure in Social Relationships,”Journal of Social Issues, 33 (3), 102–15.
21.
DerlegaValerian J.MettsSandraPetronioSandraMargulisStephen (1993), Self-Disclosure. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
22.
DienlinTobias (2014), “The Privacy Process Model,” in Media and Privacy, GarnettSimonHalftStefanHerzMatthiasMönigJ.-M., eds. Passau, Germany: Stutz, 105–22.
23.
Faraji-RadAliSamuelsenM.BendikM.WarlopLuk (2015), “On the Persuasiveness of Similar Others: The Role of Mentalizing and the Feeling of Certainty,”Journal of Consumer Research, 42 (3), 458–71.
24.
ForgasJoseph P. (2011), “Affective Influences on Self-Disclosure: Mood Effects on the Intimacy and Reciprocity of Disclosing Personal Information,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100 (3), 449–61.
25.
GiffordRobert (1988), “Light, Décor, Arousal, Comfort, and Communication,”Journal of Environmental Psychology, 8 (3), 177–89.
26.
GrewalLaurenStephenAndrew T. (2019), “In Mobile We Trust: The Effects of Mobile Versus Nonmobile Reviews on Consumer Purchase Intentions,”Journal of Marketing Research, 56 (5), 791–808.
27.
HeberleinThomas A.BaumgartnerRobert M. (1978), “Factors Affecting Response Rates to Mailed Questionnaires: A Quantitative Analysis of the Published Literature,”American Sociological Review, 43 (4), 447–62.
28.
HoughtonDavid J.JoinsonAdam N. (2012), “Linguistic Markers of Secrets and Sensitive Self-Disclosure in Twitter,” in 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS). Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 3480–89.
29.
HymanIra E.Matthew BossS.WiseBreanne M.McKenzieKira E.CaggianoJenna M. (2010), “Did You See the Unicycling Clown? Inattentional Blindness While Walking and Talking on a Cell Phone,”Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24 (5), 597–607.
30.
JiangLanHoeggJoandreaDahlDarren W.ChattopadhyayAmitava (2010), “The Persuasive Role of Incidental Similarity on Attitudes and Purchase Intentions in a Sales Context,”Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (5), 778–91.
31.
JohnLeslie K.AcquistiAlessandroLoewensteinGeorge (2011), “Strangers on a Plane: Context-Dependent Willingness to Share Sensitive Information,”Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (5), 858–73.
32.
JoinsonAdam N. (2001), “Self-Disclosure in Computer-Mediated Communication: The Role of Self-Awareness and Visual Anonymity,”European Journal of Social Psychology, 31 (2), 177–92.
33.
JourardSydney M.LasakowP. (1958), “Some Factors in Self-Disclosure,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 56 (1), 91–98.
34.
KieslerSaraSiegelJaneMcGuireTimothy W. (1984), “Social Psychological Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication,”American Psychologist, 39 (10), 1123–34.
35.
KimJinsukDindiaKathryn (2011), “Online Self-Disclosure: A Review of Research,” in Computer-Mediated Communication in Personal Relationships, WhileK. B.WebL. M., eds. New York: Peter Lang, 156–80.
LinMing-I BrandonHuangYu-Pin (2017), “The Impact of Walking While Using a Smartphone on Pedestrians’ Awareness of Roadside Events,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, 101, 87–96.
38.
ManchandaPuneetDubéJean-PierreGohKhum YongChintaguntaPradeep K. (2006), “The Effect of Banner Advertising on Internet Purchasing,”Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (1), 98–108.
39.
MavletovaAigulCouperMick P. (2013), “Sensitive Topics in PC Web and Mobile Web Surveys: Is There a Difference?”Survey Research Methods, 7 (3), 191–205.
40.
MelumadShiriInmanJ.JeffreyPhamMichel Tuan (2019), “Selectively Emotional: How Smartphone Use Changes User-Generated Content,”Journal of Marketing Research, 56 (2), 259–75.
41.
MelumadShiriPhamMichel Tuan (2020), “The Smartphone as a Pacifying Technology,” Journal of Consumer Research, forthcoming.
42.
MiwaYoshikoHanyuKazunori (2006), “The Effects of Interior Design on Communication and Impressions of a Counselor in a Counseling Room,”Environment and Behavior, 38 (4), 484–502.
43.
MoonYoungme (2000), “Intimate Exchanges: Using Computers to Elicit Self-Disclosure from Consumers,”Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (4), 323–39.
44.
MurphyGillianGroegerJohn A.GreeneCiara M. (2016), “Twenty Years of Load Theory—Where Are We Now, and Where Should We Go Next?”Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23 (5), 1316–40.
45.
OkdieBradley (2011), Blogging and Self-Disclosure: The Role of Anonymity, Self-Awareness, and Perceived Audience, doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Alabama.
46.
OmarzuJulia (2000), “A Disclosure Decision Model: Determining How and When Individuals Will Self-Disclose,”Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4 (2), 174–85.
47.
PanovaTayanaCarbonellXavier (2018), “Is Smartphone Addiction Really an Addiction?”Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7 (2), 252–59.
48.
PennebakerJames W.GraybealAnna (2001), “Patterns of Natural Language Use: Disclosure, Personality, and Social Integration,”Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10 (3), 90–93.
49.
PennebakerJames W.BoydRyan L.JordanKayla (2015), The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC 2015. Austin: University of Texas at Austin.
50.
RansbothamSamLurieNicholas H.LiuHongju (2019), “Creation and Consumption of Mobile Word of Mouth: How Are Mobile Reviews Different?”Marketing Science, 38 (5), 773–92.
51.
RavichanderAbhilashaBlackAlan (2018), “An Empirical Study of Self-Disclosure in Spoken Dialogue Systems,”Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2018 Conference, 253–63.
RuppelErin K.GrossClaireStollArringtonPeckBrittnie S.AllenMikeKimSang-Yeong (2017), “Reflecting on Connecting: Meta-Analysis of Differences Between Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Self-Disclosure,”Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22 (1), 18–34.
54.
SassenbergKaiBoosMargareteRabungSven (2005), “Attitude Change in Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Communication: Private Self-Awareness as Mediator and Moderator,”European Journal of Social Psychology, 35 (3), 361–74.
55.
ShortJohnWilliamsEderynChristieBruce (1976), The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons.
56.
SkierkowskiDorothyWoodRebecca M. (2012), “To Text or Not to Text? The Importance of Text Messaging Among College-Aged Youth,”Computers in Human Behavior, 28 (2), 744–56.
57.
SpearsRussellLeaMartin (1994), “Panacea or Panopticon? The Hidden Power of Computer-Mediated Communication,”Communication Research, 21 (4), 427–59.
58.
ToninelliDanieleRevillaMelanie (2016), “Smartphones vs. PCs: Does the Device Affect the Web Survey Experience and the Measurement Error for Sensitive Topics? A Replication of the Mavletova & Couper’s 2013 Experiment,”Survey Research Methods, 10 (2), 153–69.
59.
VahediZahraSaiphooAlyssa (2018), “The Association Between Smartphone Use, Stress, and Anxiety: A Meta-Analytic Review,”Stress and Health, 34 (1), 347–58.
60.
VeltriGuiseppe A.IvchenkoAndriy (2017), “The Impact of Different Forms of Cognitive Scarcity on Online Privacy Disclosure,”Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 238–46.
61.
WallacePatricia (1999), The Psychology of the Internet. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
62.
WaltherJoseph B. (1996), “Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction,”Communication Research, 23 (1), 3–43.
63.
WangYi-ChiaBurkeMoiraKrautRobert (2016), “Modeling Self-Disclosure in Social Networking Sites,”Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference, 74–85.
64.
WedelMichelKannanP.K. (2016), “Marketing Analytics for Data-Rich Environments,”Journal of Marketing, 80 (6), 97–121.
65.
WeisbandSuzanne P.KieslerSara (1996), “Self-Disclosure on Computer Forms: Meta-Analysis and Implications,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 3–10.
66.
WellsTomBaileyJustin T.LinkMichael W. (2014), “Comparison of Smartphone and Online Computer Survey Administration,”Social Science Computer Review, 32 (2), 238–55.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
