As consumers move through their decision journey, they adopt different goals (e.g., transactional vs. informational). In this research, the authors propose that consumer goals can be detected through textual analysis of online search queries and that both marketers and consumers can benefit when paid search results and advertisements match consumer search–related goals. In bridging construal level theory and textual analysis, the authors show that consumers at different stages of the decision journey tend to assume different levels of mental construal, or mindsets (i.e., abstract vs. concrete). They find evidence of a fluency-driven matching effect in online search such that when consumer mindsets are more abstract (more concrete), consumers generate textual search queries that use more abstract (more concrete) language. Furthermore, they are more likely to click on search engine results and ad content that matches their mindset, thereby experiencing more search satisfaction and perceiving greater goal progress. Six empirical studies, including a pilot study, a survey, three lab experiments, and a field experiment involving over 128,000 ad impressions provide support for this construal matching effect in online search.
AlterAdam L.OppenheimerDaniel M. (2009), “Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation,” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13 (3), 219–35.
2.
BatraRajeevKellerKevin Lane (2016), “Integrating Marketing Communications: New Findings, New Lessons, and New Ideas,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (6), 122–45.
3.
BergerJonahHumphreysAshleeLudwigStephanMoeWendy W.NetzerOdedSchweidelDavid A. (2020), “Uniting the Tribes: Using Text for Marketing Insight,” Journal of Marketing, 84 (1), 1–25.
4.
BrysbaertMarcWarrinerAmy BethKupermanVictor (2014), “Concreteness Ratings for 40 Thousand Generally Known English Word Lemmas,” Behavior Research Methods, 46 (3), 904–11.
5.
CamachoChristopher J.HigginsE.ToryLugerLindsay (2003), “Moral Value Transfer from Regulatory Fit: What Feels Right Is Right and What Feels Wrong Is Wrong,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84 (3), 498–510.
6.
ColtheartMax (1981), “The MRC Psycholinguistic Database,” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 33 (4), 497–505.
FreitasAntonio L.GollwitzerPeterTropeYaacov (2004), “The Influence of Abstract and Concrete Mindsets on Anticipating and Guiding Others’ Self-Regulatory Efforts,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40 (6), 739–52.
9.
FujitaKentaroTropeYaacovLibermanNiraLevin-SagiMaya (2006), “Construal Levels and Self-Control,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90 (3), 351–67.
10.
GrafLaura K.M.MayerStefanLandwehrJan R. (2018), “Measuring Processing Fluency: One Versus Five Items,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28 (3), 393–411.
11.
HamiltonRebecca W.PriceLinda L. (2019), “Consumer Journeys: Developing Consumer- Based Strategy,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47 (2), 187–91.
12.
HamiltonRebeccaThompsonDeboraBoneSterlingChaplinLan NguyenGriskeviciusVladasGoldsmithKelly, et al. (2019), “The Effects of Scarcity on Consumer Decision Journeys,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47 (3), 532–50.
13.
HamiltonRyanChernevAlexander (2010), “The Impact of Product Line Extensions and Consumer Goals on the Formation of Price Image,” Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (1), 51–62.
14.
HansenJochimWänkeMichaela (2010), “Truth from Language and Truth from Fit: The Impact of Linguistic Concreteness and Level of Construal on Subjective Truth,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36 (11), 1576–88.
15.
HansenJochimWänkeMichaela (2011), “The Abstractness of Luxury,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 32 (5), 789–96.
16.
HayesAndrew F. (2017), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press.
17.
HigginsE. Tory (2000), “Making a Good Decision: Value from Fit,” American Psychologist, 55 (11), 1217–30.
18.
HigginsE. ToryIdsonLorraine ChenFreitasAntonio L.SpiegelScottMoldenDaniel C. (2003), “Transfer of Value from Fit,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84 (6), 1140–53.
19.
HigginsE. ToryKruglanskiArie W.PierroAntonio (2003), “Regulatory Mode: Locomotion and Assessment as Distinct Orientations,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 35, ZannaM.P., ed. Cambridge: Elsevier Academic Press, 293–344.
20.
HobanPaul R.BucklinRandolph E. (2015), “Effects of Internet Display Advertising in the Purchase Funnel: Model-Based Insights from a Randomized Field Experiment,” Journal of Marketing Research, 52 (3), 375–93.
21.
HuangNiBurtchGordonHongYiliPolmanEvan (2016), “Effects of Multiple Psychological Distances on Construal and Consumer Evaluation: A Field Study of Online Reviews,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26 (4), 474–82.
22.
HumphreysAshleeWangRebecca Jen-Hui (2017), “Automated Text Analysis for Consumer Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (6), 1274–306.
23.
JerathKinshukMaLiyeParkYoung-Hoon (2014), “Consumer Click Behavior at a Search Engine: The Role of Keyword Popularity,” Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (4), 480–86.
24.
JoshiPriyanka D.WakslakCheryl J. (2014), “Communicating with the Crowd: Speakers Use Abstract Messages When Addressing Larger Audiences.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143 (1), 351–62.
25.
KhanUzmaZhuMengKalraAjay (2011), “When Trade-Offs Matter: The Effect of Choice Construal on Context Effects,” Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (1), 62–71.
26.
KimHakkyunRaoAkshay R.LeeAngela Y. (2009), “It’s Time to Vote: The Effect of Matching Message Orientation and Temporal Frame on Political Persuasion,” Journal of Consumer Research, 35 (6), 877–89.
27.
KruglanskiArie W.PierroAntonioThompsonErik P. (2000), “To ‘Do the Right Thing’ or To ‘Just Do It’: Locomotion and Assessment as Distinct Self-Regulatory Imperatives,” Journal of Personality-and Social Psychology, 79 (5), 793–815.
28.
LeeAngela Y.AakerJennifer L. (2004), “Bringing the Frame into Focus: The Influence of Regulatory Fit on Processing Fluency and Persuasion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86 (2), 205–18.
29.
LeeAngela Y.KellerPunam AnandSternthalBrian (2010), “Value from Regulatory Construal Fit: The Persuasive Impact of Fit Between Consumer Goals and Message Concreteness,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (5), 735–47.
30.
LeeAngela Y.LabrooAparna A. (2004), “The Effect of Conceptual and Perceptual Fluency on Brand Evaluation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 41 (2), 151–65.
31.
LemonKatherine N.VerhoefPeter C. (2016), “Understanding Customer Experience Throughout the Customer Journey,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (6), 69–96.
32.
LibermanNiraTropeYaacov (1998), “The Role of Feasibility and Desirability Considerations in Near and Distant Future Decisions: A Test of Temporal Construal Theory,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75 (1), 5–18.
33.
LibermanNiraTropeYaacovStephanElena (2007), “Psychological Distance,” in Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, 2nd ed., KruglanskiA.W.HigginsE.T., eds. Vol. 2. New York: Guilford Press, 353–433.
34.
MalaviyaPrashanSternthalBrian (2009), “Parity Product Features Can Enhance or Dilute Brand Evaluation: The Influence of Goal Orientation and Presentation Format,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (1), 112–21.
35.
MendeMartinScottMaura L.GarveyAaron M.BoltonLisa E. (2019), “The Marketing of Love: How Attachment Styles Affect Romantic Consumption Journeys,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47 (2), 255–73.
36.
NakataCherylIzberk-BilginElifSharpLisaSpanjolJelenaCuiAnna ShaojieCrawfordStephanie Y., et al. (2019), “Chronic Illness Medication Compliance: A Liminal and Contextual Consumer Journey,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47 (2), 192–215.
37.
PackardGrantBergerJonah (2020), “How Concrete Language Shapes Customer Satisfaction,” Journal of Consumer Research(published online July 18, 2020), DOI: 10.1093/jcr/ucaa038.
38.
PaetzoldGustavoSpeciaLucia (2016), “Inferring Psycholinguistic Properties of Words,” in Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 435–40.
39.
PalmeiraMauricio (2015), “Abstract Language Signals Power, but Also Lack of Action Orientation,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 59–63.
40.
PhamMichel TuanHungIris W.GornGerald J. (2011), “Relaxation Increases Monetary Valuations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (5), 814–26.
41.
ReberRolfSchwarzNorbertWinkielmanPiotr (2004), “Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver’s Processing Experience?” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8 (4), 364–82.
42.
ReberRolfWurtzPascalZimmermannThomas D. (2004), “Exploring “Fringe” Consciousness: The Subjective Experience of Perceptual Fluency and its Objective Bases,” Consciousness and Cognition, 13 (1), 47–60.
43.
SnefjellaBryorKupermanVictor (2015), “Concreteness and Psychological Distance in Natural Language Use,” Psychological Science, 26 (9), 1449–60.
44.
SpassovaGerriLeeAngela Y. (2013), “Looking into the Future: A Match Between Self-View and Temporal Distance,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (1), 159–71.
45.
StephanElenaLibermanNiraTropeYaacov (2010), “Politeness and Psychological Distance: A Construal Level Perspective,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98 (2), 268–80.
46.
TropeYaacovLibermanNira (2000), “Temporal Construal and Time-Dependent Changes in Preference,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (6), 876–89.
TropeYaacovLibermanNira (2010), “Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance,” Psychological Review, 117 (2), 440–63.
49.
TropeYaacovLibermanNiraWakslakCheryl (2007), “Construal Levels and Psychological Distance: Effects on Representation, Prediction, Evaluation, and Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17 (2), 83–95.
50.
ÜlkümenGüldenCheemaAmar (2011), “Framing Goals to Influence Personal Savings: The Role of Specificity and Construal Level,” Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (6), 958–69.
51.
VallacherRobin R.WegnerDaniel M. (1989), “Levels of Personal Agency: Individual Variation in Action Identification,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 (4), 660–71.
52.
WhiteKatherineMacDonnellRhiannonDahlDarren W. (2011), “It’s the Mind-Set That Matters: The Role of Construal Level and Message Framing in Influencing Consumer Efficacy and Conservation Behaviors,” Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (3), 473–85.
53.
WilsonM. (1988), “MRC Psycholinguistic Database: Machine-Usable Dictionary, Version 2.00,” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20 (1), 6–10.
54.
XuJingJiangZixiDharRavi (2013), “Mental Representation and Perceived Similarity: How Abstract Mindset Aids Choice from Large Assortments,” Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (4), 548–59.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
