Are social media posts with pictures more popular than those without? Why do pictures with certain characteristics induce higher engagement than some other pictures? Using data sets of social media posts about major airlines and sport utility vehicle brands collected from Twitter and Instagram, the authors empirically examine the influence of image content on social media engagement. After accounting for selection bias on the inclusion of image content, the authors find a significant and robust positive mere presence effect of image content on user engagement in both product categories on Twitter. They also find that high-quality and professionally shot pictures consistently lead to higher engagement on both platforms for both product categories. However, the effect of colorfulness varies by product category, while the presence of human face and image–text fit can induce higher user engagement on Twitter but not on Instagram. These findings shed light on how to improve social media engagement using image content.
BergerJonah (2014), “Word-of-Mouth and Interpersonal Communication: An Organizing Framework and Directions for Future Research,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24 (4), 586–607.
2.
BergerJonahMilkmanKatherine L. (2012), “What Makes Online Content Viral?” Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (2), 192–205.
3.
BruceNorrisMurthiB.P.S.RaoRam C. (2017), “A Dynamic Model for Digital Advertising: The Effects of Creative Formats, Message Content and Targeting Engagement,” Journal of Marketing Research, 54 (2), 202–18.
4.
BuechelE.C.BergerJonah (2018), “Microblogging and the Value of Undirected Communication,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28 (1), 40–55.
ChevalierJudithMayzlinDina (2006), “The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews,” Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (3), 345–54.
7.
ChintaguntaPradeep K.GopinathShyamVenkataramanSriram (2010), “The Effects of Online User Reviews on Movie Box Office Performance: Accounting for Sequential Rollout and Aggregation across Local Markets,” Marketing Science, 29 (5), 944–57.
8.
ChungCindy M.Y.DarkePeter R. (2006), “The Consumer as Advocate: Self-Relevance, Culture, and Word-of-Mouth,” Marketing Letters, 17 (4), 267–79.
9.
CyrDianneHeadMilenaLariosHectorPanBing (2009), “Exploring Human Images in Website Design: A Multi-Method Approach,” MIS Quarterly, 33 (3), 539–66.
FinnAdam (1988), “Print Ad Recognition Readership Scores: An Information Processing Perspective,” Journal of Marketing Research, 25 (2), 168–77.
13.
GansJoshua S.GoldfarbAviLedermanMara (2017), “Exit, Tweets, and Loyalty,” Rotman School of Management Working Paper No. 2889388, University of Toronto.
HagtvedtHenrikPatrickVanessa M. (2008), “Air Infusion, The Influence of Visual Art on the Perception and Evaluation of Consumer Products,” Journal of Marketing Research, 45 (3), 379–89.
16.
HausmanJerryHallBronwyn H.GrilichesZvi (1984), “Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship,” Econometrica, 52 (4), 909–38.
17.
HecklerSusan E.ChildersTerry L. (1992), “The Role of Expectancy and Relevancy in Memory for Verbal and Visual Information: What Is Incongruency?” Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (4), 475–92.
18.
HoustonMichael J.ChildersTerry L.HecklerSusan E. (1987), “Picture-Word Consistency and the Elaborative Processing of Advertisements,” Journal of Marketing Research, 24 (4), 359–69.
19.
KumarAshishBezawadaRamRishikaRishikaJanakiramanRamkumarKannanP.K. (2016), “From Social to Sale: The Effects of Firm-Generated Content in Social Media on Customer Behavior,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (1), 7–25.
20.
LeeYih HwaiMasonCharlotte (1999), “Responses to Information Incongruency in Advertising: The Role of Expectancy, Relevancy, and Humor,” Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (2), 156–69.
MooreSarah G.McFerranBrent (2017), “She Said, She Said: Differential Interpersonal Similarities Predict Unique Linguistic Mimicry in Online Word of Mouth,” Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2 (2), 22945.
24.
NetzerOdedFeldmanRonenGoldenbergJacobFreskoMoshe (2012), “Mine Your Own Business: Market-Structure Surveillance Through Text Mining,” Marketing Science, 31 (3), 521–43.
25.
PangBoLeeLillian (2008), “Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis,” Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2 (1/2), 1–135.
26.
PetersKayChenYuboKaplanAndreas M.OgnibeniBjörnPauwelsKoen (2013), “Social Media Metrics—A Framework and Guidelines for Managing Social Media,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27 (4), 281–98.
27.
PietersRikWedelMichel (2004), “Attention Capture and Transfer in Advertising: Brand, Pictorial, and Text-Size Effects,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (2), 36–50.
28.
PurnawirawanNathaliaEisendMartinPelsmackerPatrick DeDensNathalie (2015), “A Meta-Analytic Investigation of the Role of Valence in Online Reviews,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 31, 17–27.
RosenbaumPaul R.RubinDonald B. (1983), “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects,” Biometrika, 70 (1), 41–55.
32.
SchweidelDavidMoeWendy W. (2014), “Listening in on Social Media: A Joint Model of Sentiment and Venue Format Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (4), 387–402.
StuartElizabeth A. (2010), “Matching Methods for Causal Inference: A Review and a Look Forward,” Statistical Science, 25 (1), 1–21.
35.
SzegedyChristianVanhouckeVincentIoffeSergeyShlensJonathonWojnaZbigniew (2016), “Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision,” Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016, 2818–26.
36.
TanChenhaoLeeLillianPangBo (2014), “The Effect of Wording on Message Propagation: Topic- and Author-Controlled Natural Experiments on Twitter,” in Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Baltimore: Association for Computational Linguistics.
37.
TirunillaiSeshadriTellisGerard J. (2012), “Does Chatter Really Matter? Dynamics of User-Generated Content and Stock Performance,” Marketing Science, 31 (2), 19–215.
WedelMichelPietersRik (2015), “The Buffer Effect: The Role of Color When Advertising Exposures Are Brief and Blurred,” Marketing Science, 34 (1), 134–43.
40.
WinkelmannRainer (2008), Econometric Analysis of Count Data. Berlin: Springer.
41.
XiaoLiDingMin (2014), “Just the Faces: Exploring the Effects of Facial Features in Print Advertising,” Marketing Science, 33 (3), 338–52.
42.
ZhangShunyuanLeeDokyunSinghParam VirSrinivasanKannan (2017), “How Much Is an Image Worth? Airbnb Property Demand Estimation Leveraging Large Scale Image Analytics,” working paper, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2976021.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
