Economics can be used to analyze public sector decision making because individuals make these decisions within a framework of incentives and constraints that are a product of individual preferences and institutional structure. Considering the emphasis on law enforcement in U.S. drug policy in this context, this paper presents an analysis of the incentives and constraints affecting drug policy that explains a reluctance to change the policy even in the face of considerable evidence that some reforms could be cost effective. Two specific incentives for an emphasis on enforcement are presented. First, police agencies have an incentive to allocate more resources to drug enforcement due to the factors that determine police budgets. Second, asset forfeiture laws give police agencies a direct monetary reward for making drug arrests. We conclude that understanding drug policy requires an examination of the incentives and constraints that affect the behavior of those who are responsible for policy development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenD.F.1987Introduction in The Cocaine Crisis. New York: Plenum Press.
2.
BarnettR.E.1986Pursuing justice in a free society, part two: Crime prevention and the legal order. Criminal Justice Ethics (Winter/Spring): 30–53.
3.
BenjaminD.K.MillerR.L.1991Undoing Drugs: Beyond Legalization. New York: Basic Books.
4.
BensonB.L.1988Corruption in law enforcement: One consequence of ‘the tragedy of the commons’ arising with public allocation processes. International Review of Law and Economics8: 73–84.
5.
BensonB.L.1990The Enterprise of Law: Justice Without the State. San Francisco: Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy.
6.
BensonB.L.1994Are public goods really common pools: Considerations of the evolution of policing and highways in England. Economic Inquiry32(April): 249–271.
7.
BensonB.L.1995Understanding bureaucratic behavior: Implications from the public choice literature. Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice8(December): 89–117.
8.
BensonB.L.KimI.RasmussenD.W.1998Deterrence and public policy: Trade-offs in the allocation of police resources. International Review of Law and Economics18(March): 77–100
9.
BensonB.L.KimI.RasmussenD.W.ZuehlkeT.W.1992Is property crime caused by drug use or drug enforcement policy?Applied Economics24(July): 679–692.
10.
BensonB.L.RasmussenD.W.1991The relationship between illicit drug enforcement policy and property crimes. Contemporary Policy Issues9(October): 106–115.
11.
BensonB.L.RasmussenD.W.1994Intermediate Sanctions: A Policy Analysis Based on Program Evaluations, Report to the Florida Task Force for the Review of the Criminal Justice and Corrections Systems.
12.
BensonB.L.RasmussenD.W.SollarsD.L.1995Police bureaucrats, their incentives, and the war on drugs. Public Choice83(April): 21–45.
13.
BensonB.L.WollanL.A.Jr.1989Prison crowding and judicial incentives. Madison Paper Series3(May): 1–21.
14.
BlackstoneE.A.HakimS.1966Police services. Independent Policy Report. Oakland, CA: The Independent Institute.
15.
BlumsteinA.KadaneJ.A.1983An approach to the allocation of scarce imprisonment resources. Crime and Delinquency29(October): 546–560.
16.
BlumsteinA.PetersiliaJ.1995Investing in criminal justice research. In Crime, eds. WilsonJ. Q.PetersiliaJ., San Francisco: ICS Press.
17.
BretonA.WintrobeR.1982The Logic of Bureaucratic Control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
BromleyD.W. ed. 1992Making the Commons Work. San Francisco: ICS Press.
19.
EricksonP. n.d. Neglected and rejected: A case study of the impact of social research on Canadian drug policy. Canadian Journal of Sociology (forthcoming).
20.
EveringhamS.S.RydellP.1994Modeling the Demand for Cocaine. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
21.
FiorinaM.NollR.1978Voters, legislators, and bureaucrats: Institutional design for the public sector. American Economic Review68: 256–260.
22.
GordonD.R.1994The Return of the Dangerous Classes. New York: W.W. Norton.
23.
HaagaJ.G.ReuterP.1990The limits of the Czar's ukase: Drug policy at the local level. Yale Law and Policy Review8: 36–74.
24.
JohnsonR.N.LibecapG.D.1994The Federal Civil Service System and the Problem of Bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
KleimanM.A.R.1995Book reviewJournal of Policy Analysis and Management14 (Summer): 473–480.
26.
LevittS.D.1998Why do increased arrest rates appear to reduce crime: Deterrence, incapacitation, or measurement error?Economic Inquiry36 (July): 353–372.
27.
MacCounR.J.ReuterP.SchellingT.1996Assessing alternative drug control regimes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management15(Summer): 330–352.
28.
MastB.D.BensonB.L.RasmussenD.W. n.d. Entrepreneurial police and drug enforcement policy. Florida State University Department of Economics Working Paper.
29.
McCubbinsM.D.NollR.G.WeingastB.R.1987Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization3: 243–277.
30.
McCubbinsM.D.NollR.G.WeingastB.R.1989Structure and process, politics and policy: Administrative arrangements and the political control of agencies. Virginia Law Review75: 432–482.
31.
MiczekK.A.DeBoldJ.F.HaneyM.TideyJ.VivianJ.WeertsE.M.1994Alcohol Drugs and Violence.
32.
MilakovichM.WeisK.1975Politics and measures of success in the war on crime. Crime and Delinquency21 (January): 1–10.
33.
MironJ.A.1998Economic analysis of alcohol prohibition. Journal of Drug Issues28(3): 741–762.
34.
MironJ.A.ZwiebelJ.1995The economics case against drug prohibition. The Journal of Economic Perspectives9(Fall): 175–192.
35.
MustoD.F.1987The American Disease: Origins of Narcotic Control. New Haven: Yale University Press.
36.
NeelyR.1982Why Courts Don't Work. New York: McGraw-Hill.
37.
NiskanenW.A.1968The peculiar economics of bureaucracy. American Economic Review58(May): 293–305.
38.
NiskanenW.A.1975Bureaucrats and politicians. Journal of Law and Economics18(December): 617–643.
39.
NorthD.C.1990Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40.
OstromE.1990Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
RasmussenD.W.BensonB.L.1994The Economic Anatomy of a Drug War: Criminal Justice in the Commons. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
42.
RasmussenD.W.BensonB.L.SollarsD.L.1993Spatial competition in illicit drug markets: The consequences of increased drug law enforcement. Review of Regional Studies23: 219–236.
43.
ReissA.J.RothJ.A., eds. 1994Understanding and Preventing Violence, vol. 3: Social Influences. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 377–570.
44.
ReuterP.1991On the consequences of toughness. In Searching for Alternatives: Drug Control Policy in the United States, edited by LazearE.KraussM., Palo Alto, CA: Hoover Press.
45.
ShermanL.W.1983Patrol strategies for police. In Crime and Public Policy, edited by WilsonJ.Q., San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
46.
ShermanL.W.1995The police. In Crime, eds. WilsonJ. Q.PetersiliaJ., 327–348. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
47.
SimonH. n.d. Human nature in politics: The dialogue of psychology with political science. American Political Science Review79: 293–304.
48.
StroupC.1964Standards for distributing a free government service: Crime prevention. Public Finance19: 383–392.
49.
StumpfH.P.1988American Judicial Politics. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
50.
StutmannR.M.EspositoR.1992Dead on Delivery: Inside the Drug Wars, Straight from the Street. New York: Warner Books.
51.
ThorntonM.1991The Economics of Prohibition. Salt Lake: University of Utah Press.
52.
TullockG.1965The Politics of Bureaucracy. Washington, D.C.: Public Affairs Press.
53.
U.S. Department of Justice. Office of the Attorney General1992Combatting Violent Crime: 24 Recommendations to Strengthen Criminal Justice. Washington, D.C.: GPO.
54.
WeingastB.R.MoranM.J.1983Bureaucratic discretion or congressional control? Regulatory policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission. Journal of Political Economy91(October): 765–800.
55.
WilliamsG.H.1984The Law and Politics of Police Discretion. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
56.
ZimringF.E.HawkinsG.1992The Search for Rational Drug Control. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
