A detailed critique of American official record studies of marijuana arrests casts doubt on the widely accepted “coincidental” explanation of police intervention. The empirical base appears inadequate to sustain previous assertations that most marijuana arrests occur by chance when the police suspect some other type of offence. Alternative explanations which allow for deliberate marijuana enforcement activity merit further consideration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlackDonaldJ.1970“Production of crime rates.”American Sociological Review35 (August): 733–748.
2.
BlackDonaldJ.AlbertJ. ReissJr.1970“Police control of juveniles.”American Sociological Review35 (February): 63–77.
3.
CrowIain1973“Two groups of cannabis users in south London.”Drugs and Society2 (June): 10–14.
4.
EricksonPatriciaG.1980Cannabis Criminals: The Social Effects of Punishment on Drug Users. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation.
5.
GlaserDaniel1974“Interlocking dualities in drug use, drug control and crime.” Chapter In InciardiJ. A.ChambersC. D. (eds.), Drugs and the Criminal Justice System, Beverly Hills: Sage.
6.
GoodeErich1970The Marijuana Smokers. New York: Basic Books.
7.
HellmanA. D.1975Laws Against Marijuana: The Price We Pay. Urbana: The University of Illinois Press.
8.
JohnsonBruceD.1973Marijuana Users and Drug Subcultures. New York: Wiley.
9.
JohnsonWeldonT.BogomolnyR.1972“The crime of cannabis: From detection to disposition.” in Marijuana: A Signal of Misunderstanding, Technical Papers of the First Report of the National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse, Appendix 2. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
10.
JohnsonWeldonT.RobertE. PetersenWellsL. Edward1977“Arrest probabilities for marijuana users as indicators of selective law enforcement.”American Journal of Sociology83 (3): 681–699.
11.
Le Dain Commission of Inquiry into the Non-Medical Use of Drugs1972Cannabis. Ottawa: Information Canada.
MortonAllanS.OhlgrenJoelRogerW. PearsonWeiselSheldon1968“Marijuana laws: An empirical study of enforcement and administration in Los Angeles County.”U.C.L.A. Law Review15: 1507–1585.
14.
SandersClintonR.1975“Caught in the con-game: The young, white drug user's contact with the legal system.”Law and Society Review9 (Winter): 197–217.
