In this paper we examine whether features of the operation of retail methamphetamine markets affects communities in three domain areas (public safety, health, and economy). We use data from a national survey of law enforcement agencies (n= 1,367) with narcotics officers to examine the operational characteristics of methamphetamine markets. We found that the operational features of a market (the source of methamphetamine and the most common location for selling methamphetamine) can have a significant impact on the types of public safety, health, and economic problems that communities are experiencing. In particular, jurisdictions distinguished by largely semi-private markets (strip clubs and bars) are more likely to be characterized as localities that have a large public safety and health problem. Jurisdictions that are supplied by multiple local and international sources (compared to a single source) were more likely to be characterized as jurisdictions that have problems in the three domains.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdlerP.1993Wheeling and dealing: An ethnography of an upper level drug dealing and smuggling community.New York: Columbia University Press.
2.
AltschulerD.M., & BrounsteinP.J.1991Patterns of drug use, drug trafficking, and other delinquency among inner-city adolescent males in Washington, D.C., Criminology, 29, 589–621.
3.
BellairP.E., & McNultyT.L.2009Gang membership, drug selling, and violence in neighborhood context. Justice Quarterly, 26, 644–69.
4.
BergM.T., & RengifoA.F.2009Rethinking community organization and robbery: Considering illicit drug market dynamics. Justice Quarterly, 26, 211–237.
5.
BergerP.L., & LuckmannT.1966The social construction of reality—A treatise in the sociology of knowledge.Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Co.
6.
BourgoisP.1995In search of respect—Selling crack in el barrio.New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BrownsteinH.H.1996The rise and fall of a violent crime wave—Crack cocaine and the social construction of a crime problem.Guilderland, NY: Harrow and Heston, Publishers.
8.
BrownsteinH.H.2000Drug distribution and sales as a work system. In FaupelC.E., & RomanP.M. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Criminology and Deviant Behavior, Volume IV, Self-Destructive Behavior and Disvalued Identity.London: Taylor and Francis.
9.
BrownsteinH.H., BaxiH.R.S., GoldsteinP.J., & RyanP.J.1992The relationship of drugs, drug trafficking, and drug traffickers to homicide. Journal of Crime and Justice, 15, 25–44.
10.
BrownsteinH.H., CrimminsS.M., & SpuntB.J.2000A conceptual framework for operationalizing the relationship between violence and drug market stability. Contemporary Drug Problems, 27, 867–890.
11.
BrownsteinH.H., & TaylorB.G.2007aMeasuring the stability of illicit drug markets: Why does it matter?Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 90S, 52–60.
12.
BrownsteinH.H., & TaylorB.G.2007bMethamphetamine markets: Type of market instability and level of drug use. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Study of Social Problems, New York, August, 2007.
13.
CurtisR.1998The improbable transformation of inner-city neighborhoods: Crime, violence, drugs, and youth in the 1990s. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, 1233–1276.
14.
CurtisR., FriedmanS.R., NeaigusA.JoseB., GoldsteinM., & IldefonsoG.1995Street-level drug markets: Network structure and HIV risk. Social Networks, 17, 229–249.
15.
CurtisR., & WendellT2002 Final report: Drug markets on the lower east side of Manhattan.Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
16.
DemboR.M., WothkeW.W., SchmeidlerJ., GetreuA., BerryE., WishE.D., & ChristensenC.1990The relationship between cocaine use, drug sales, and other delinquency among a cohort of high risk youths over time. In De La RosaM., LambertE.Y., & GropperB. (Eds.). Drugs and Violence: Causes, Correlates, and Consequences, pp. 112–35 NIDA Research Monograph No. 103. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
17.
DillmanD.A.2007Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method.Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
18.
FaganJ.1989The social organization of drug use and drug dealing among urban gangs. Criminology, 27, 633–69.
19.
FaganJ. & ChinK.L.1990Violence as regulation and social control in the distribution of crack. pp. 8–13 in De La RosaM., LambertE.Y., & GropperB. (Eds.). Drugs and Violence: Causes, Correlates, and Consequences, pp. 8-43. NIDA Research Monograph No. 103. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
20.
FendrichM., Mackesy-AmitiM.E., GoldsteinP.J., SpuntB.J., & BrownsteinH.H.1995Substance involvement among juvenile murderers: Comparisons with older offenders based on interviews with prison inmates. The International Journal of the Addictions, 30, 1363–1382.
21.
ForsythA., HammersleyR., LavelleT., & MurrayK.1992Geographical aspects of scoring illegal drugs. British Journal of Criminology, 32, 292–309.
22.
GoldsteinP.J., BrownsteinH.H., & RyanP.J.1992Drug-related homicide in New York: 1984 and 1988. Crime and Delinquency, 38, 459–476.
23.
GoldsteinP.J., BrownsteinH.H., RyanP.J., & BellucciP.A.1989Crack and homicide in New York City: A conceptually-based event analysis. Contemporary Drug Problems, 4(Winter), 651–687.
24.
GolubA., & JohnsonB.D.1997Crack's Decline: Some Surprises Across U.S. Cities. Research in Brief July. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.
25.
GranovetterM.S.1973The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
26.
HarocoposA., & HoughM.2006Drug dealing in open-air markets. Problem-oriented guides for police problem-specific guides series, No. 31. Washington, DC: Community Oriented Policing Services, USDOJ.
27.
HeffernanR., MartinJ.M. & RomanoA.T.1982Homicide related to drug trafficking. Federal Probation, 46, 3–7.
28.
HerzD.C.2000Drugs in the heartland: Methamphetamine use in rural nebraska. Research in Brief.Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
29.
HughesP.1977Behind the wall of respect—Community experiments in heroin addiction.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
JacobsB.A.1999Dealing crack—The social world of street corner selling.Boston: Northeastern University Press.
31.
JacquesS.2010The necessary conditions for retaliation: Toward a theory of non-violent and violent forms in drug markets. Justice Quarterly, 27, 186–205.
32.
JohnsonB.D., HamidA., & SanabriaH.1992Emerging models of crack distribution. In MieczkowskiT. (Ed.), Drugs, Crime, and Social Policy: Research Issues and Concerns.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
33.
KerrT., SmallW., & WoodE.2005The public health and social impacts of drug market enforcement: A review of the evidence. International journal of Drug Policy, 16, 210–220.
34.
KingeryP.M., PruittB.E., & HurleyR.S.1992Violence and illegal drug use among adolescents: Evidence from the U.S. National Adolescent Student Health Survey. International Journal of the Addictions, 27, 1445–1464.
35.
LattimoreP.K., TrudeauJ., RileyK.J., LeiterJ., & EdwardsS.1997Homicide in eight U.S. cities: Trends, context, and policy implications. November, NCJ 167262, Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.
36.
LevittS.D., & VenkateshS.A.2000An economic analysis of a drug-selling gang's finances. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 755–789.
37.
LiX., StantonB., & FeigelmanS.1999Exposure to drug trafficking among urban, low-income African American children and adolescents. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 153, 2, 161–168.
38.
MaherL.2000Sexed work: Gender, race, and resistance in a Brooklyn drug market.New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
MayT., & HoughH.2004Drug markets and distribution systems. Addiction Research and Theory, 12, 549–563.
40.
McKetinR., McLarenJ., & KellyE.2005The Sydney methamphetamine market: Patterns of supply, use, personal harms and social consequences. Monograph Series No. 13. Commonwealth of Australia: National Drug Law Enforcement Research Fund.
41.
MieczkowskiT.1990Crack distribution in Detroit. Contemporary Drug Problems, 17, 9–29.
42.
MieczkowskiT.1992Crack dealing on the street—The crew system and the crack house. Justice Quarterly, 9, 151–163.
43.
MurphyS., SalesP., DuterteM., & JacintoC.2005A qualitative study of ecstasy sellers in the San Francisco Bay area. Document 209267. Report to the National Institute of Justice. Washington, DC: USDOJ.
44.
National Institute of Justice2003Toward a drugs and crime research agenda for the 21st century. Special Report.Washington, DC: USDOJ.
45.
National Research Council2001Informing America's policy on illegal drugs: What we don't know keeps hurting us. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
46.
Office of Applied Studies2006Results from the 2005 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National findings (DHHS Publication No. SMA 06-4194, NSDUH Series H-30). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
47.
OlligschlaegerA.1997Spatial analysis of crime using GIS-based data: Weighted spatial adaptive filtering and chaotic cellular forecasting with applications to street level drug markets. A dissertation submitted to the H. John Heinz III School of Public Policy and Management, Carnegie Mellon University.
48.
OuseyG.C., & LeeM.R.2007Homicide trends and illicit drug markets: Exploring differences across time. Justice Quarterly, 24, 48–79.
49.
ParsonsT.1956aSuggestions for a sociological approach to the theory of organizations—I. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1, 63–85.
50.
ParsonsT.1956bSuggestions for a sociological approach to the theory of organizations, II. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1, 225–239.
51.
PettiwayL.E.1995Copping crack: The travel behavior of crack users. Justice Quarterly, 12, 499–524.
52.
ReuterP.2001The need for dynamic models of drug markets. Bulletin on Narcotics, 103, 1–7.
53.
ReuterP., MacCounR., & MurphyP.1990Money from crime—A study of the economics of drug dealing in Washington, DC.Sand Monica: RAND Drug Policy Research Center.
54.
RyanP.J., GoldsteinP.J., BrownsteinH.H., BellucciP.A.1990Who's right: Different outcomes when police and scientists view the same set of homicide events, in De La RosaM., LambertE.Y., & GropperB. (Eds.), Drugs and Violence: Causes, Correlates, and Consequences, pp. 239–264. National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph 103, Rockville, MD, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
55.
SanerH., MacCounR., & ReuterP.1995On the ubiquity of drug selling among youthful offenders in Washington, D.C., 1985-1991: Age, period, or cohort effect?Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 11, 337–362.
56.
ScottJ., & WrightR.2008The relevance of peace to studies of drug market violence. Criminology, 46, 221–253.
57.
SimeoneR., RhodesW., HuntD., & TruittL.1997Methodology for estimating the number of hardcore drug users. Report submitted to the Office of National Drug Control Policy. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
58.
SommersI., & BaskinD.2004The social consequences of methamphetamine use, N.Y.: Edwin Mellen Press.
59.
SommersI., BaskinD., & Baskin-SommersA.2006Methamphetamine use among young adults: Health and social consequences. Addictive Behaviors, 31(8), 1469–1476.
60.
TaniguchiT.A., RengertG.F., & McCordE.S.2009Where size matters: Agglomeration economies of illegal drug markets in Philadelphia. Justice Quarterly, 26, 670–694.
61.
TaylorB.G., & BrownsteinH.H.2003Toward the operationalization of drug market stability: An illustration using arrestee data from crack cocaine markets in four urban communities. Journal of Drug Issues, Winter, 73–98.
62.
ThompsonP.M., HayashiK.M., & SimonS.L.2004Structural abnormalities in the brains of human subjects who use methamphetamine. Journal of Neuroscience, 24(26), 6028–6036.
63.
VenkateshS.A.2008Gang leader for a day: A rogue sociologist takes to the streets.New York: Penguin Press.
64.
WeisheitR., & WhiteW.L.2009Methamphetamine: Its history, pharmacology, and treatment.Center City, MN: Hazelden.
65.
ZahnM.A.1980Homicide in the twentieth century United States. In InciardiJ.A., & FaupelC.E. (Eds.), History and Crime, pp. 111–112. Beverly Hills: Sage.
