How does armed conflict affect accountability and political trust in democratic governments? To answer this question, we present quasi-experimental evidence based on survey data which, coincidentally, were collected in the days surrounding an unanticipated violent attack by a rebel group in Mali. The chance occurrence of the attack five days into the survey demarcates respondents into two groups surveyed before and after the attack and allows us to examine how the attack affected approval of politicians and trust in political institutions. Our results show that people mainly attribute responsibility to the president and not to parliament or local government, while trust in institutions is largely unaffected. We also show that these effects are strongest in the region of the attack. These findings suggest that voters in new democracies are capable of attributing responsibility to individual politicians and governments while maintaining trust in the fundamental political institutions of democracy.
AbadieAlbertoDrukkerDavidHerrJane LeberImbensGuido W.. 2004. “Implementing matching estimators for average treatment effects in Stata.” The Stata Journal4 (3): 290–311.
2.
AchenChristopher H.BartelsLarry M.. 2004. Blind Retrospection: Electoral Response to Frought, Fly, and Shark Attacks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
3.
ArceMoisés. 2003. “Political Violence and Presidential Approval in Peru.” Journal of Politics65 (2): 572–83.
4.
ArcenauxKevinSteinRobert M.. 2006. “Who is Held Responsible When Disaster Strikes? The Attribution of Responsibility for a Natural Disaster in an Urban Election.” Journal of Urban Affairs28 (1): 43–53.
5.
AndersonChristopher J.2007. “The End of Economic Voting? Contingency Dilemmas and the Limits of Democratic Accountability.” Annual Review of Political Science10:271–96.
6.
BakerWilliam D.OnealJohn R.. 2001. “Patriotism or Opinion Leadership? The Nature and Origins of the “Rally Round the Flag” Effect.” Journal of Conflict Resolution45 (5): 661–87.
7.
BakkeKristin M.O’LoughlinJohnWardMichael D.. 2009. “Reconciliation in Conflict-affected Societies: Multilevel Modeling of Individual and Contextual Factors in the North Caucasus of Russia.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers99 (5): 1012–21.
BlattmanChristopher. 2009. “From Violence to Voting: War and Political Participation in Uganda.” American Political Science Review103 (2): 231–47.
10.
BrattonMichael. 2013. “Citizens and Cell Phones in Africa.” African Affairs112 (447): 304–19.
11.
BrattonMichaelBhavnaniRaviChenTse-Hsin. 2012. “Voting Intentions in Africa: Ethnic, Economic or Partisan?” Commonwealth and Comparative Politics50 (1): 27–52.
12.
CarlinRyan E.LoveGregory J.. 2018. “Political Competition, Partisanship and Interpersonal Trust in Electoral Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science48 (1): 115–39.
13.
CarlinRyan E.LoveGregory J.Martinez-GallardoCecilia. 2015. “Security, Clarity, and Presidential Approval.” Comparative Political Studies48 (4): 438–63.
14.
CarlinRyan E.LoveGregory J.ZechmeisterElizabeth J.. 2014a. “Natural Disaster and Democratic Legitimacy: The Public Opinion Consequences of Chile’s 2010 Earthquake and Tsunami.” Political Research Quarterly67 (1): 3–15.
15.
CarlinRyan E.LoveGregory J.ZechmeisterElizabeth J.. 2014b. “Trust Shaken: Earthquake Damage, State Capacity, and Interpersonal Trust in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Politics46 (4): 419–53.
16.
ChanleyVirginia A.2002. “Trust in Government in the Aftermath of 9/11: Determinants and Consequences.” Political Psychology23 (3): 469–83.
17.
De JuanAlexanderPierskallaJan Henryk. 2016. “Civil War Violence and Political Trust: Microlevel Evidence from Nepal.” Conflict Management and Peace Science31 (1): 67–88.
18.
DinesenPeter T.JægerMads M.. 2013. “The Effect of Terror on Institutional Trust: New Evidence from the 3/11 Madrid Terrorist Attack.” Political Psychology34 (6): 917–26.
19.
DuchRaymond M.2007. “Comparative Studies of the Economy and the Vote.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, edited by BoixCarlesStokesSusan C., 805–44. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
20.
DuchRaymond M.StevensonRandolph T.. 2008. The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Elections Results. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
DunningThad. 2012. Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences, A Design-based Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
DunningThadHarrisonL.. 2010. “Cross-cutting Cleavages and Ethnic Voting: An Experimental Study of Cousinage in Mali.” American Political Science Review104 (1): 21–39.
23.
DyrstadKarin. 2012. “After Ethnic Civil War: Ethno-nationalism in the Western Balkans.” Journal of Peace Research49 (6): 817–31.
24.
EastonDavid. 1975. “A Reassessment of the Concept of Political Support.” British Journal of Political Science5 (4): 435–57.
25.
GainesBrian J.KuklinskiJames H.QuirkPaul J.PeytonBuddyVerkuilenJay. 2007. “Same Facts, Different Interpretations: Partisan Motivation and Opinion on Iraq.” Journal of Politics69 (4): 957–74.
26.
Garcia-PonceO.PasqualeBenjamin. 2015. “How Political Repression Shapes Attitudes towards the State: Evidence from Zimbabwe.” Working paper. Accessed February 7, 2020. http://bit.ly/2gBkijF.
27.
GartnerScott S.SeguraGary M.. 1998. “War, Casualties, and Public Opinion.” Journal of Conflict Resolution42 (3): 278–300.
28.
GartnerScott S.SeguraGary M.. 2008. “All Politics are Still Local: The Iraq War and the 2006 Midterm Elections.” PS: Political Science and Politics41 (1): 95–100.
29.
GassebnerMartinJong-A-PinRichardMierauJochen. 2008. “Terrorism and Electoral Accountability: One Strike and You’re Out!” Economics Letters100:126–29.
30.
GroelingTimBaumMatthew A.. 2008. “Crossing the Water’s Edge: Elite Rhetoric, Media Coverage, and the Rally-round-the-flag Phenomenon.” Journal of Politics70 (4): 1065–85.
31.
HaririJacob GernerBjørnskovChristianJustesenMogens K.. 2016. “Economic Shocks and Subjective Well-being: Evidence from a Quasi-experiment.” World Bank Economic Review30 (1): 55–77.
32.
HegreHåvardEllingsenTanjaGatesScottGleditschNils Petter. 2001. “Towards a Democratic Civil Peace? Democracy, Political Change, and Civil War, 1816-1992.” American Political Science Review95 (1): 33–48.
33.
Hirsch-HoeflerSivanCanettiDaphnaRapaportCarmitHobfollStevan E.. 2016. “Conflict Will Harden Your Heart: Exposure to Violence, Psychological Distress, and Peace Barriers in Israel and Palestine.” British Journal of Political Science46 (4): 845–59.
34.
KeeleLukeMinozziWilliam. 2013. “How Much Is Minnesota Like Wisconsin? Assumptions and Counterfactuals in Causal Inference with Observational Data.” Political Analysis21 (2): 193–216.
35.
Kurrild-KlitgaardPeterJustesenMogens K.KlemmensenRobert. 2006. “The Political Economy of Freedom, Democracy, and Transnational Terrorism.” Public Choice128 (1): 289–315.
36.
MillerArthur H.ListhaugOla. 1990. “Political Parties and Confidence in Government: A Comparison of Norway, Sweden and the United States.” British Journal of Political Science20 (3): 357–86.
37.
MontalvoJose G.2011. “Voting after the Bombings: A Natural Experiment on the Effect of Terrorist Attacks on Democratic Elections.” Review of Economics and Statistics93 (4): 1146–54.
38.
MuellerJohn E.1973. War, Presidents and Public Opinion. New York: John Wiley.
39.
NewmanBrianForcehimesAndrew. 2010. “‘Rally Round the Flag’ Events for Presidential Approval Research.” Electoral Studies29:144–54.
40.
PowellG. B.WhittenGuy B.. 1993. “A Cross-national Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science37:391–414.
41.
ReevesAndrew. 2011. “Political Disaster: Unilateral Powers, Electoral Incentives, and Presidential Disaster Declarations.” Journal of Politics73 (4): 1142–51.
42.
RobinsonGregoryMcNultyJohn E.KrasnoJonathan S.. 2009. “Observing the Counterfactual? The Search for Political Experiments in Nature.” Political Analysis17 (4): 341–57.
43.
RomeroVidalMagaloniBeatrizDíaz-CayerosAlberto. 2016. “Presidential Approval and Public Security in Mexico’s War on Crime.” Latin American Politics and Society58 (2): 100–23.
44.
RothsteinBoStolleDietlind. 2008. “The State and Social Capital: An Institutional Theory of Generalized Trust.” Comparative Politics40 (4): 441–59.
SchmitterPhilippe C.KarlTerry Lynn. 1991. “What Democracy Is…And Is Not.” Journal of Democracy2 (3): 75–88.
47.
SchubertJames N.StewartPatrick A.CurranMargaret Ann. 2002. “A Defining Presidential Moment: 9/11 and the Rally Effect.” Political Psychology23 (3): 559–83.
48.
Uppsala Conflict Data Program. 2020. Accessed February 7, 2020. http://ucdp.uu.se/.
49.
Martinvan Vliet. 2014. “Weak Legislatures, Failing MPs, and the Collapse of Democracy in Mali.” African Affairs113 (450): 45–66.
50.
WingSusanna D.2013. “Briefing. Mali: Politics of a Crisis.” African Affairs113 (450): 45–66.
51.
WollebækDagEnjolrasBernardSteen-JohnsenKariØdegårdGuro. 2012. “After Utøya: How a High-trust Society Reacts to Terror—Trust and Civic Engagement in the Aftermath of July 22.” PS: Political Science and Politics45 (1): 32–37.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
