Do elite cues exert extensive, conditional or minimal influence on public support for military alliances in the United States? I assess the boundaries of elite leadership on public opinion towards alliances by dividing partisan respondents into wings based on isolationism and militant assertiveness. If co-partisan elite cues change public attitudes across three or four wings within their party, elites exert extensive influence. Elite cues exert conditional influence if they reach two party wings, and minimal influence if they impact one or no wings. Using two conjoint survey experiments to examine public attitudes towards forming and maintaining international alliances, I find that elite cues exert extensive influence, but some individuals hold rigid alliance attitudes. Staunch alliance supporters in the Democratic party and consistent alliance skeptics in the Republican party both discount elite cues. Therefore, elites can lead most party wings with alliance cues, but intra-party divisions can constrain their influence.
AlleyJoshuaFuhrmannMatthew. 2021. “Budget Breaker?: The Financial Cost of U.S. Military Alliances.” Security Studies30 (5): 661-690.
2.
BansakKirkHainmuellerJensHopkinsDaniel J.YamamotoTeppei. 2018. “The Number of Choice Tasks and Survey Satisficing in Conjoint Experiments.” Political Analysis26 (1):112-119.
3.
BansakKirkHainmuellerJensHopkinsDaniel J.YamamotoTeppei. 2019. “Beyond the Breaking Point? Survey Satisficing in Conjoint Experiments.” Political Science Research and Methods9: 1-19.
4.
BarberaPabloCasasAndreuNaglerJonathanEganPatrick J.BonneauRichardJostJohn T.TuckerJoshua A.. 2019. “Who Leads? Who Follows? Measuring Issue Attention and Agenda Setting by Legislators and the Mass Public Using Social Media Data.” American Political Science Review113 (4): 883-901.
5.
BaumMatthew A.PotterPhilip B. K.. 2019. “Media, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy in the Age of Social Media.” The Journal of Politics81 (2): 747-756.
6.
BaumMatthew A.PotterPhilip B. K.. 2008. “The Relationships Between Mass Media, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis.” Annual Review of Political Science11: 39-65.
7.
BerinskyAdam. 2007. “Assuming the Costs of War: Events, Elites, and American Public Support for Military Conflict.” The Journal of Politics69 (4): 975-997.
8.
BrandsHalFeaverPeter D.. 2017. “What are America’s Alliances Good for?” Parameters47 (2): 15-30.
9.
BrooksStephen G.IkenberryG. JohnWohlforthWilliam C.. 2013. “Don’t Come Home, America: The Case Against Retrenchment.” International Security37 (3): 7-51.
10.
BusbyJoshua W.MontenJonathan. 2012. “Republican Elites and Foreign Policy Attitudes.” Political Science Quarterly127 (1): 105-142.
11.
Canes-WroneBrandice. 2006. “Who Leads Whom?” Presidents, Policy, and the Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
ChibaDainaJohnsonJesse C.LeedsBrett Ashley. 2015. “Careful Commitments: Democratic States and Alliance Design.” The Journal of Politics77 (4): 968-982.
13.
ChuJonathan A.KoJiyoungLiuAdam. 2021. “Commanding Support: Values and Interests in the Rhetoric of Alliance Politics.” International Interactions47 (3): 477-503.
14.
ChuJonathan ArtRecchiaStefano. 2021. “Does Public Opinion Affect the Preferences of Foreign Policy Leaders? Experimental Evidence from the UK Parliament.” Journal of Politics84 (3).
15.
CoppockAlexanderMcClellanOliver A.. 2019. “Validating the Demographic, Political, Psychological, and Experimental Results Obtained From a New Source of Online Survey Respondents.” Research & Politics6 (1): 2053168018822174.
16.
CrescenziMark J. C.KathmanJacob D.KleinbergKatja B.WoodReed M.. 2012. “Reliability, Reputation, and Alliance Formation.” International Studies Quarterly56 (2): 259-274.
17.
DellmuthLisa MarieTallbergJonas. 2015. “The social Legitimacy of International Organisations: Interest Representation, Institutional Performance, and Confidence Extrapolation in the United Nations.” Review of International Studies41 (3): 451-475.
18.
DruckmanJames N.2001. “The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence.” Political Behavior23 (3): 225-256.
19.
DruckmanJames N.2014. “Pathologies of Studying Public Opinion, Political Communication, and Democratic Responsiveness.” Political Communication31 (3): 467-492.
20.
DruckmanJames N.PetersonErikSlothuusRune. 2013. “How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation.” American Political Science Review107 (1): 57-79.
21.
DueckColin. 2019. Age of Iron: On Conservative Nationalism. Oxford University Press.
22.
EdwardsMartin S.2009. “Public Support for the International Economic Organizations: Evidence From Developing Countries.” The Review of International Organizations4 (2): 185-209.
23.
FaganMoiraPoushterJacob. 2020. NATO Seen Favorably Across Member States. Technical report Pew Research Center.
24.
FjelstulJoshua C.ReiterDan. 2019. “Explaining Incompleteness and Conditionality in Alliance Agreements.” International Interactions45 (6): 976-1002.
25.
FordhamBenjamin O.2010. “Trade and Asymmetric Alliances.” Journal of Peace Research47 (6): 685-696.
26.
GannonJ. AndresKentDaniel. 2020. “Keeping Your Friends Close, but Acquaintances Closer: Why Weakly Allied States Make Committed Coalition Partners.” Journal of Conflict Resolution65: 889-918.
27.
GartzkeErikGleditschKristian Skrede. 2004. “Why Democracies may Actually be Less Reliable Allies.” American Journal of Political Science48 (4): 775-795.
28.
GaubatzKurt Taylor. 1996. “Democratic States and Commitment in International Relations.” International Organization50 (1): 109-139.
29.
GolbyJamesFeaverPeterDroppKyle. 2018. “Elite Military Cues and Public Opinion About the Use of Military Force.” Armed Forces and Society44: 44-71.
30.
GreenhillBrian. 2020. “How can International Organizations Shape Public Opinion? Analysis of a Pair of Survey-based Experiments.” The Review of International Organizations15 (1): 165-188.
31.
GriecoJoseph M.GelpiChristopherReiflerJasonFeaverPeter D.. 2011. “Let’s Get a Second Opinion: International Institutions and American Public Support for War.” International Studies Quarterly55 (2): 563-583.
32.
GriesPeter. 2014. The Politics of American Foreign Policy. Stanford University Press.
33.
GuisingerAlexandraSaundersElizabeth N.. 2017. “Mapping the Boundaries of Elite Cues: How Elites Shape Mass Opinion across International Issues.” International Studies Quarterly61 (2): 425-441.
34.
HaesebrouckTim. 2019. “Who Follows Whom? A Coincidence Analysis of Military Action, Public Opinion and Threats.” Journal of Peace Research56 (6): 753-766.
35.
HagerAnslemHilbigHanno. 2020. “Does Public Opinion Affect Political Speech?” American Journal of Political Science64 (4): 921-937.
36.
HainmuellerJensHopkinsDaniel J.YamamotoTeppei. 2014. “Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments.” Political Analysis22 (1): 1-30.
37.
HerrmannRichard K.TetlockPhilip E.VisserPenny S.. 1999. “Mass Public Decisions to Go to War: A Cognitive-Interactionist Framework.” American Political Science Review93 (3): 553-573.
38.
HolstiOle R.1992. “Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippmann Consensus.” International Studies Quarterly36: 439-466.
39.
JacobsLawrence R.ShapiroRobert Y.. 2000. Politicians Don’t Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Vol. 32Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
JohnsonJesse C.LeedsBrett AshleyWuAhra. 2015. “Capability, Credibility, and Extended General Deterrence.” International Interactions41 (2): 309-336.
41.
KaplanLawrence S.2007. NATO 1948: The Birth of the Transatlantic Alliance. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
42.
KayaAyseWalkerJames T.. 2014. “How do multilateral institutions influence individual perceptions of international affairs? Evidence from Europe and Asia.” European Journal of Development Research26 (5): 832-852.
43.
KertzerJoshua D.2013. “Making Sense of Isolationism: Foreign Policy Mood as a Multilevel Phenomenon.” The Journal of Politics75 (1): 225-240.
44.
KertzerJoshua D.TingleyDustin. 2018. “Political Psychology in International Relations: Beyond the Paradigms.” Annual Review of Political Science21: 319-339.
45.
KertzerJoshua D.PowersKathleen E.RathbunBrian C.IyerRavi. 2014. “Moral Support: How Moral Values Shape Foreign Policy Attitudes.” The Journal of Politics76 (3): 825-840.
46.
KertzerJoshua D.BrutgerRyan. 2016. “Decomposing Audience Costs: Bringing the Audience Back into Audience Cost Theory.” American Journal of Political Science60 (1): 234-249.
47.
KertzerJoshua D.ZeitzoffThomas. 2017. “A Bottom-Up Theory of Public Opinion About Foreign Policy.” American Journal of Political Science61 (3): 543-558.
48.
KrepsSarah. 2010. “Elite Consensus as a Determinant of Alliance Cohesion: Why Public Opinion Hardly Matters for NATO-led Operations in Afghanistan.” Foreign Policy Analysis6 (1): 191-215.
49.
KupchanCharles.2020. Isolationism: A History of America’s Efforts to Shield Itself from the World. Oxford University Press.
50.
LeedsBrett AshleyAnacSezi. 2005. “Alliance Institutionalization and Alliance Performance.” International Interactions31 (3): 183-202.
51.
LeeperThomas J.HoboltSara B.TilleyJames. 2020. “Measuring Subgroup Preferences in Conjoint Experiments.” Political Analysis28: 207-221.
52.
Lin-GreenbergErik. 2021. “Soldiers, Pollsters, and International Crises: Public Opinion and the Military’s Advice on the Use of Force.” Foreign Policy Analysis17 (3): 1–20.
53.
MorrowJames D.1994. “Alliances, Credibility, and Peacetime Costs.” Journal of Conflict Resolution38 (2): 270-297.
54.
PageBenjamin I.ShapiroRobert Y.. 1992. The Rational Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55.
PetersonErik. 2017. “The Role of the Information Environment in Partisan Voting.” The Journal of Politics79 (4): 1191-1204.
56.
PoastPaul. 2012. “Does Issue Linkage Work? Evidence from European Alliance Negotiations, 1860 to 1945.” International Organization66 (1): 277-310.
57.
PosenBarry R.2014. Restraint: A New Foundation for U.S. Grand Strategy. Cornell University Press.
58.
PrebleChristopher A.2009. The Power Problem: How American Military Dominance Makes Us Less Safe, Less Prosperous, and Less Free. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
59.
RecchiaStefanoChuJonathan. 2021. “Validating Threat: IO Approval and Public Support for Joining Military Counterterrorism Coalitions.” International Studies Quarterly65 (4): 919-928.
SayleTimothy Andrews. 2019. Enduring Alliance: A History of NATO and the Postwar Global Order. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
62.
SnyderGlenn H.1997. Alliance Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
63.
ThiesWallace J.2015. Friendly Rivals: Bargaining and Burden-shifting in NATO. Routledge.
64.
TomzMichaelWeeksJessica L. P.. 2021. “Military Alliances and Public Support for War.” International Studies Quarterly65 (3): 811-824.
65.
TomzMichaelWeeksJessica L. P.Yarhi-MiloKeren. 2020. “Public Opinion and Decisions About Military Force in Democracies.” International Organization74 (1): 119-143.
66.
TorglerBenno. 2008. “Trust in International Organizations: An Empirical Investigation Focusing on the United Nations.” Review of International Organizations3 (1): 65-93.
67.
ZwaldZacharyBerejikianJeffrey D.. 2021. “Is There a Public–Military Gap in the United States? Evaluating Foundational Foreign Policy Beliefs.” Armed Forces & Society48 (4): 0–21.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
