Under what conditions do rebel organizations control territory during civil war? How do civilians influence the distribution of territorial control? This article introduces a civilian agency theory, emphasizing community collective action capacity (CAC) defined by underlying social network structure, to complement existing explanations of territorial control. I argue communities with greater CAC mobilize information and resources more efficiently, increasing belligerents’ incentives to control territory. However, CAC also increases community bargaining power to demand costly investments in governance, partially offsetting these gains. CAC increases rebel control in areas of state neglect. But, as state service provision increases, communities leverage CAC to demand prohibitively costly rebel governance, deterring rebel control. This article tests the theory in the context of the communist insurgency in the Philippines, using military intelligence reports from 2011 to 2014 to measure village-level communist insurgent territorial control and a household-level census (2008–2010) to measure village CAC. Interviews with village elders in Eastern Mindanao illustrate causal mechanisms and explore alternative explanations.
AbinalesPatricio N.AmorosoDonna J.. 2005. State and Society in the Philippines. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
2.
ArjonaAna. 2015. “Civilian Resistance to Rebel Governance.” In Rebel Governance in Civil War, Chap. 1, edited by ArjonaAnaKasfirNelsonMampillyZachariah, 1–20. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3.
ArjonaAna. 2016. Rebelocracy: Social Order in the Colombian Civil War. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
ArjonaAnaKasfirNelsonMampillyZachariah. 2015. Rebel Governance in Civil War. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BalcellsLaia. 2017. Rivalry and Revenge. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BermanEliCallenMichaelFelterJoseph H.ShapiroJacob N.. 2011. “Do Working Men Rebel? Insurgency and Unemployment in Afghanistan, Iraq, and the Philippines.” Journal of Conflict Resolution55 (4): 496–528.
7.
BermanEliFelterJosephKapsteinEthanTrolandErin. 2013, August. “Predation, Taxation, Investment and Violence: Evidence from the Philippines.” Working Paper 19266. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
8.
BermanEliShapiroJacob N.FelterJoseph H.. 2011. “Can Hearts and Minds Be Bought? The Economics of Counterinsurgency in Iraq.” Journal of Political Economy119 (4): 766–819.
9.
BouldingKenneth E.1962. Conflict and Defense: A General Theory. New York: Harper & Row.
10.
BuhaugHalvard. 2010. “Dude, Where’s My Conflict? LSG, Relative Strength, and the Location of Civil War.” Conflict Management and Peace Science27 (2): 107–28.
11.
BuhaugHalvardCedermanLars-ErikRødJan Ketil. 2008. “Disaggregating Ethno-nationalist Civil Wars: A Dyadic Test of Exclusion Theory.” International Organization62 (3): 531–51.
12.
BuhaugHalvardGatesScottLujalaPäivi. 2009. “Geography, Rebel Capability, and the Duration of Civil Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution53 (4): 544–69.
13.
CedermanLars-ErikWeidmannNils B.GleditschKristian Skrede. 2011. “Horizontal Inequalities and Ethnonationalist Civil War: A Global Comparison.” American Political Science Review105 (03): 478–95.
14.
ChweMichael Suk-Young. 1999. “Structure and Strategy in Collective Action.” American Journal of Sociology105 (1): 128–56.
15.
ChweMichael Suk-Young. 2000. “Communication and Coordination in Social Networks.” The Review of Economic Studies67 (1): 1–16.
16.
ClausetAaronNewmanMark E. J.MooreCristopher. 2004. “Finding Community Structure in Very Large Networks.” Physical Review E70 (6): 066111.
17.
CollierPaulHoefflerAnke. 2004. “Greed and Grievance in Civil War.” Oxford Economic Papers56 (4): 563–95.
18.
CondraLuke N.ShapiroJacob N.. 2012. “Who Takes the Blame? The Strategic Effects of Collateral Damage.” American Journal of Political Science56 (1): 167–87.
19.
CorpuzOnofre D.1965. The Philippines. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20.
CrostBenjaminFelterJosephJohnstonPatrick. 2014. “Aid Under Fire: Development Projects and Civil Conflict.” The American Economic Review104 (6): 1833–56.
21.
CruzCesi. 2019. “Social Networks and the Targeting of Vote Buying.” Comparative Political Studies52 (3): 382–411.
22.
CruzCesiLabonneJulienQuerubinPablo. 2017. “Politician Family Networks and Electoral Outcomes: Evidence from the Philippines.” American Economic Review107 (10): 3006–37.
23.
CullinaneMichael. 1998. “Accounting for Souls: Ecclesiastical Sources for the Study of Philippines Demographic History.” In Population and History: The Demographic Origins of the Modern Philippines, Chap. 10, edited by DoeppersDaniel F.XenosPeter, 281–346. Manila, Philippines: Ateneo de Manila Press.
24.
DubeOeindrilaVargasJuan F.. 2013. “Commodity Price Shocks and Civil Conflict: Evidence from Colombia.” The Review of Economic Studies80 (4): 1384–421.
25.
FearonJames D.LaitinDavid D.. 1996. “Explaining Interethnic Cooperation.” American Political Science Review90 (04): 715–35.
26.
FearonJames D.LaitinDavid D.. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.” American Political Science Review97 (1): 75–90.
27.
FelterJoseph H.2005. “Taking Guns to a Knife Fight: A Case for Empirical Study of Counterin-surgency.” PhD thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
28.
FernandezLuisa. 2012, June. “Design and Implementation Features of the National Household Targeting System in the Philippines.” World Bank—Philippines, Social Protection Note No. 5. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
29.
FortnaVirginia PageLotitoNicholas J.RubinMichael A.. 2018. “Don’t Bite the Hand That Feeds: Rebel Funding Sources and the Use of Terrorism in Civil Wars.” International Studies Quarterly62 (4): 782–94.
30.
GalulaDavid. (1964) 2006. Counterinsurgency Warfare: Theory and Practice. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
31.
GelmanAndrewHillJennifer. 2006. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multi-level/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
GouldRoger V.1993. “Collective Action and Network Structure.” American Sociological Review58 (2): 182–96.
33.
GublerJoshua R.SelwayJoel Sawat. 2012. “Horizontal Inequality, Crosscutting Cleavages, and Civil War.” Journal of Conflict Resolution56 (2): 206–32.
GurrTed R.1970. Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
HabyarimanaJamesHumphreysMacartanPosnerDaniel N.WeinsteinJeremy M.. 2009. Coethnicity: Diversity and the Dilemmas of Collective Action: Diversity and the Dilemmas of Collective Action. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
37.
HainmuellerJensMummoloJonathanXuYiqing. 2019. “How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models? Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice.” Political Analysis27 (2): 163–92.
38.
HiroseKentaroImaiKosukeLyallJason. 2017. “Can Civilian Attitudes Predict Insurgent Violence? Ideology and Insurgent Tactical Choice in Civil War.” Journal of Peace Research54 (1): 47–63.
39.
HoltermannHelge. 2016. “Relative Capacity and the Spread of Rebellion: Insights from Nepal.” Journal of Conflict Resolution60 (3): 501–29.
40.
HorowitzDonald L.1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.
41.
HumphreysMacartan. 2005. “Natural Resources, Conflict, and Conflict Resolution: Uncovering the Mechanisms.” Journal of Conflict Resolution49 (4): 508–37.
42.
HumphreysMacartanWeinsteinJeremy M.. 2006. “Handling and Manhandling Civilians in Civil War.” American Political Science Review100 (3): 429.
43.
HumphreysMacartanWeinsteinJeremy M.. 2008. “Who Fights? The Determinants of Participation in Civil War.” American Journal of Political Science52 (2): 436–55.
44.
JacksonMatthew O.Rodriguez-BarraquerTomasTanXu. 2012. “Social Capital and Social Quilts: Network Patterns of Favor Exchange.” The American Economic Review102 (5): 1857–97.
45.
KalyvasStathis. 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46.
KalyvasStathis N.2008. “Ethnic Defection in Civil War.” Comparative Political Studies41 (8): 1043–68.
47.
KalyvasStathis N.2012. “Micro-level Studies of Violence in Civil War: Refining and Extending the Control-collaboration Model.” Terrorism and Political Violence24 (4): 658–68.
48.
KalyvasStathis N.2015. “Is ISIS a Revolutionary Group and If Yes, What Are the Implications?” Perspectives on Terrorism9 (4): 42–47.
49.
KaplanOliver. 2017. Resisting War: How Communities Protect Themselves. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
50.
KasfirNelson. 2015. “Rebel Governance—Constructing a Field of Inquiry: Definitions, Scope, Patterns, Order, Causes.” In Rebel Governance in Civil War, Chap. 2, edited by ArjonaAnaKasfirNelsonMampillyZachariah, 21–46. New York: Cambridge University Press.
51.
KesslerRichard J.1989. Rebellion and Repression in the Philippines. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
52.
LarsonJennifer M.LewisJanet I.. 2018. “Rumors, Kinship Networks, and Rebel Group Formation.” International Organization72 (4): 871–903.
53.
Le BillonPhilippe. 2001. “The Political Ecology of War: Natural Resources and Armed Conflicts.” Political Geography20 (5): 561–84.
54.
MampillyZachariah Cherian. 2011. Rebel Rulers: Insurgent Governance and Civilian Life during War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
55.
MaoTse-TungGriffithtranslated by Samuel B. (1937) 2000. On Guerrilla Warfare. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
56.
McCoyAlfred W.1993. An Anarchy of Families: State and Family in the Philippines. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
57.
MorelliMassimoRohnerDominic. 2015. “Resource Concentration and Civil Wars.” Journal of Development Economics117:32–47.
58.
NaglJohn A.AmosJames F.SewallSarahPetraeusDavid H.. 2008. US Army/Marine Corps Counterinsurgency Field Manual: 3-24. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
59.
NielsenRichard A.FindleyMichael G.DavisZachary S.CandlandTaraNielsonDaniel L.. 2011. “Foreign Aid Shocks as a Cause of Violent Armed Conflict.” American Journal of Political Science55 (2): 219–32.
60.
NunnNathanQianNancy. 2014. “US Food Aid and Civil Conflict.” The American Economic Review104 (6): 1630–66.
61.
OberJosiah. 2008. Democracy and Knowledge: Innovation and Learning in Classical Athens. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
62.
OstromElinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
63.
OstromElinor. 2000. “Social Capital: A Fad or a Fundamental Concept.” Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective172 (173): 195–98.
64.
ParkinsonSarah Elizabeth. 2013. “Organizing Rebellion: Rethinking High-risk Mobilization and Social Networks in War.” American Political Science Review107 (03): 418–32.
65.
PetersenRoger D.2001. Resistance and Rebellion: Lessons from Eastern Europe. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
66.
PutnamRobert D.2001. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
67.
PutnamRobert D.LeonardiRobertNanettiRaffaella Y.. 1994. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
68.
RaceJeffrey. 1973. War Comes to Long An: Revolutionary Conflict in a Vietnamese Province. Berkeley: University of California Press.
69.
RisseThomas. 2012. “Governance in Areas of Limited Statehood.” In The Oxford Handbook of Governance, edited by Levi-FaurDavid, 699–715. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
70.
RubinMichael A. 2018. “Rebel Territorial Control, Governance, and Political Accountability in Civil War: Evidence from the Communist Insurgency in the Philippines.” Doctoral Dissertation, Columbia University. https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D86H60VJ.
71.
SantosSoliman M.SantosPaz Verdades M.DinampoOctavio A.RodriguezDiana. 2010. Primed and Purposeful: Armed Groups and Human Security Efforts in the Philippines. Geneva, Switzerland: Small Arms Survey, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies.
72.
SarbahiAnoop K.2014. “Insurgent-population Ties and the Variation in the Trajectory of Peripheral Civil Wars.” Comparative Political Studies47 (10): 1470–500.
73.
ScottJames C.2009. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
74.
SextonRenard. 2016. “Aid as a Tool against Insurgency: Evidence from Contested and Controlled Territory in Afghanistan.” American Political Science Review110 (4): 731–49.
ShesterininaAnastasia. 2016. “Collective Threat Framing and Mobilization in Civil War.” American Political Science Review110 (3): 411–27.
77.
SiegelDavid A.2009. “Social Networks and Collective Action.” American Journal of Political Science53 (1): 122–38.
78.
SouleimanovEmil AslanSirokyDavid S.. 2016. “Random or Retributive? Indiscriminate Violence in the Chechen Wars.” World Politics68 (4): 677–712.
79.
StanilandPaul. 2012a. “Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Insurgent Fratricide, Ethnic Defection, and the Rise of Pro-state Paramilitaries.” Journal of Conflict Resolution56 (1): 1640.
80.
StanilandPaul. 2012b. “States, Insurgents, and Wartime Political Orders.” Perspectives on Politics10 (02): 243–64.
81.
StanilandPaul. 2014. Networks of Rebellion: Explaining Insurgent Cohesion and Collapse. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
82.
StewartMegan A.2018. “Civil War as State-making: Strategic Governance in Civil War.” International Organization72 (1): 205–26.
83.
TarrowSidney. 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Mass Politics in the Modern State. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
84.
TorresErnesto C.Jr. 2011. “A Success Story of Philippine Counterinsurgency: A Study of Bohol.” Technical report DTIC Document. Master’s thesis. Kansas City: US Army General Staff College.
85.
VarshneyAshutosh. 2001. “Ethnic Conflict and Civil Society: India and Beyond.” World Politics53 (03): 362–98.
86.
WeinsteinJeremy M.2007. Inside Rebellion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
87.
Wickham-CrowleyTimothy P.1992. Guerrillas and Revolution in Latin America: A Comparative Study of Insurgents and Regimes Since 1956. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
88.
WoodElisabeth Jean. 2003. Insurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
89.
WoolcockMichaelNarayanDeepa. 2000. “Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and policy.” The World Bank Research Observer15 (2): 225–49.
90.
WucherpfennigJulianMetternichNils W.CedermanLars-ErikGled-itschKristian Skrede. 2012. “Ethnicity, the State, and the Duration of Civil War.” World Politics64 (01): 79–115.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
