How do citizens hold their leader accountable during an ongoing war? The authors distinguish between two models of accountability—the “decision maker” and “managerial” models—and investigate their implications in the context of the current war in Iraq. They employ a novel measurement model and a database of survey marginals to estimate weekly time series of aggregate beliefs about various aspects of the war. Consistent with the “decision maker” model, they find that shifts in aggregate support for the war have a greater impact on presidential approval than do equivalent shifts in perceptions of war success or approval of the president’s handling of the war. Conversely, aggregate perceptions of success are more responsive to casualties and key events than are aggregate beliefs about the war’s merits. This suggests that the link from casualties and events to presidential approval is less direct than previously assumed.
Barro, Robert. 1973. The control of politicians: An economic model. Public Choice14(1): 19-42.
2.
Beck, Nathaniel. 1993. The methodology of cointegration. In Political analysis, vol. 4, edited by John R. Freeman, 237-248. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
3.
Bennett, James. 2003. In debate on foreign policy, wide gulf or splitting hairs? The New York Times, September 30, A1-A1.
4.
Berinsky, Adam J.1999. The two faces of public opinion. American Journal of Political Science43(4): 1209-1230.
5.
Berinsky, Adam J.2002. Silent voices: Social welfare policy opinions and political equality in America. American Journal of Political Science46(2): 276-287.
6.
Berinsky, Adam J. 2004. Assuming the costs of war: Events, elites, and the American public. Unpublished manuscript, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
7.
Brody, Richard A.1991. Assessing the president: The media, elite opinion, and public support. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
Brody, Richard A.1994. Crisis, war, and public opinion. In Taken by storm: The media, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy in the Gulf War, edited by W. Lance Bennett and David L. Paletz, 210-227. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Boettcher, William A., III, and Michael D. Cobb. Echoes of Vietnam? Casualty framing and public perceptions of success and failure in Iraq. Journal of Conflict Resolution50(6): 831-854.
10.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Alastair Smith, Randolph M. Siverson, and James D. Morrow. 2003. The logic of political survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
Clarke, Harold D., Marianne Stewart, and Paul Whiteley. 1998. New models for new Labour: The political economy of Labour Party support, January 1992-April 1997. American Political Science Review92(3): 559-575.
12.
Davidson, Russell, and James G. MacKinnon. 1993. Estimation and inference in econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
DeBoef, Suzanna. 2001. Modeling equilibrium relationships: Error correction models with strongly autoregressive data. Political Analysis9(1): 78-94.
14.
DeBoef, Suzanna, and Jim Granato. 1997. Near-integrated data and the analysis of political relationships. American Journal of Political Science41(2): 619-640.
15.
DeBoef, Suzanna, and Paul M. Kellstedt. 2004. The political (and economic) origins of consumer confidence. American Journal of Political Science48(4): 633-649.
16.
Downs, George W., and David M. Rocke. 1994. Conflict, agency, and gambling for resurrection: The principal-agent problem goes to war. American Journal of Political Science38(1): 362-380.
17.
Eichenberg, Richard C.2005. Victory has many friends: U.S. public opinion and the use of military force, 1981-2005. International Security30(1): 140-177.
18.
Eichenberg, Richard C., and Richard J. Stoll. 2004. The political fortunes of war: Iraq and the domestic standing of President George W. Bush. London: The Foreign Policy Centre.
19.
Eichenberg, Richard C., and Richard J. Stoll. 2006. War president: The approval ratings of George W. Bush. Journal of Conflict Resolution50(6): 783-808.
20.
Engle, Robert F., and Clive W. J. Granger. 1987. Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica55(2): 251-276.
21.
Erikson, Robert S. 2004. Macro vs. micro-level perspectives on economic voting: Is the micro-level evidence endogenously induced? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Political Methodology, July, Stanford, CA.
22.
Erikson, Robert S., Michael B. MacKuen, and James A. Stimson. 2002. The macro polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Feaver, Peter, and Christopher Gelpi. 2004. Choosing your battles: American civil-military relations and the use of force. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
Ferejohn, John. 1986. Incumbent performance and electoral control. Public Choice50(1): 5-26.
25.
Gartner, Scott Sigmund, and Gary M. Segura. 1998. War, casualties and public opinion. Journal of Conflict Resolution42(3): 278-300.
26.
Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor. 1999. Elections and war: The electoral incentive in the democratic politics of war and peace. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
27.
Gelpi, Christopher, Peter D. Feaver, and Jason Reifler. 2006. Success matters: Casualty sensitivity and the war in Iraq. International Security30(3): 7-46.
28.
Gelpi, Christopher, Jason Reifler, and Peter D. Feaver. 2005. Iraq the vote: Retrospective and prospective foreign policy judgments on candidate choice and casualty tolerance. Unpublished manuscript, Duke University, Durham, NC.
29.
Halbfinger, David M.2004. Kerry attacks Bush over loss of explosives. The New York Times, October 27, A17-A17.
30.
Hess, Gregor D., and Athanasios Orphanides. 1995. War politics: An economic, rational-voter framework. American Economic Review85(4): 828-846.
31.
Keech, William. 1995. Economic politics: The costs of democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Kinder, Donald R., and D. Roderick Kiewiet. 1979. Economic grievances and political behavior: The role of personal discontents and collective judgments in congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science23: 495-515.
33.
Kramer, Gerald. 1983. The ecological fallacy revisited: Aggregate vs. individual-level findings on economics and elections, and sociotropic voting. American Political Science Review77 (1): 92-111.
34.
Kull, Steven, Clay Ramsay, and Evan Lewis. 2004. Misperceptions, the media, and the Iraq War. Political Science Quarterly118(4): 569-598.
35.
Larson, Eric V.1996. Casualties and consensus: The historical role of casualties in domestic support for U.S. military operations. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
36.
Larson, Eric V., and Bogdan Savych. 2005. American public support for U.S. military operations from Mogadishu to Baghdad. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
37.
MacKuen, Michael B., Robert S. Erikson, and James A. Stimson. 1992. Peasants or bankers? The American electorate and the U.S. economy. American Political Science Review86(3): 597-611.
38.
Mueller, John E.1970. Presidential popularity from Truman to Johnson. American Political Science Review64(1): 18-34.
39.
Mueller, John E.1973. War, presidents, and public opinion. New York: John Wiley.
40.
Mueller, John E.1994. Policy and opinion in the Gulf War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
Oneal, John R., and Anna Lillian Bryan. 1995. The rally ’round the flag effect in U.S. foreign policy crises, 1950-1985. Political Behavior17(4): 379-401.
42.
Page, Benjamin I., and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1992. The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43.
Reiter, Dan, and Allan C. Stam. 2002. Democracies at war. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
Russett, Bruce. 1990. Controlling the sword. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
Shane, Scott. 2005. Bush’s speech on Iraq War echoes voices of an analyst. The New York Times, December 4.
46.
Stimson, James A.1999. Public opinion in America. 2nd ed.Boulder, CO: Westview.
47.
Stimson, James A., Michael Mackuen, and Robert S. Erikson. 1995. Dynamic representation. American Political Science Review89(3): 543-565.
48.
Stoll, Richard. 1984. The guns of November: Presidential reelections and the use of force, 1947-82. Journal of Conflict Resolution28(2): 231-246.
49.
Zaller, John R.1992. The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
