In the early stages of the counterinsurgency campaign in Iraq, military leaders resisted the release of body count and “casualty ratio” data. However, in the spring of 2004, the U.S. military (and American media) began to focus on the “limited” American casualties in specific operations versus the “significant” number of insurgents killed. This article examines the extent to which body count/casualty ratio “frames” and individual casualty tolerance influence public perceptions about the war and the success or failure of U.S. military operations. Two experiments were conducted pitting alternative casualty frames against one another to measure their relative impact. The results demonstrate the influence of framing effects on public perceptions and clarify understanding of the determinants and impact of casualty tolerance.
Aday, S. 2004. The real war will never get on television: An analysis of casualty imagery in American television coverage of the Iraq War. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, March, Montreal, Canada.
2.
Aday, S., S. Livingston, and M. Hebert. 2005. Embedding the truth: A cross-cultural analysis of objectivity and television coverage of the Iraq War. Press/Politics10: 3-21.
3.
Baker, P., and D. Balz. 2005. Bush words reflect public opinion strategy. The Washington Post, June 30.
4.
Bennett, W. L., and D. L. Paletz, eds. 1994. Taken by storm: The media, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy in the Gulf War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Berenson, A., and S. Tavernise. 2004. Radical cleric in Iraq sets off day of fighting. The New York Times, August 6.
6.
Berinsky, A. J. 2005. Assuming the costs of war: Events, elites, and American public support for military conflict. Unpublished manuscript.
7.
Boettcher, W. A.2004. Military intervention decisions regarding humanitarian crises: Framing induced risk behavior. Journal of Conflict Resolution48: 331-355.
8.
Burk, J.1999. Public support for peacekeeping in Lebanon and Somalia: Assessing the casualties hypothesis. Political Science Quarterly114: 53-78.
9.
Dao, J.2004. How many deaths are too many? The New York Times, September 12.
10.
Davey, M., and T. Torok. 2004. For 1,000 troops, there is no going home. The New York Times, September 9.
11.
Delli Carpini, M. X., and S. Keeter. 1996. What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12.
Druckman, J. N.2004. Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing effects. American Political Science Review98: 671-686.
13.
Eichenberg, R. C.2005. Victory has many friends: U.S. public opinion and the use of military force, 1981-2005. International Security30: 140-177.
14.
Entman, R. M.2004. Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Feaver, P. D., and C. Gelpi. 2004. Choosing your battles: American civil-military relations and the use of force. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
Fisher, I.2004. Attacks on Basra extend violence to a calm region. The New York Times, April 22.
17.
Fisher, I., and E. Wong. 2004. Battles in Najaf and Karbala near Shiites’ religious sites. The New York Times, May 15.
18.
Freudenburg, W. R., C. Coleman, J. Gonzales, and C. Helgeland. 1996. Media coverage of hazard events: Analyzing the assumptions. Risk Analysis16: 31-41.
19.
Gartner, S. S.2004. Making the international local: The terrorist attack on the USS Cole, local casualties, and media coverage. Political Communication21: 139-159.
20.
Gartner, S. S., and M. E. Myers. 1995. Body counts and “success” in the Vietnam and Korean Wars. Journal of Interdisciplinary History25: 377-395.
21.
Gartner, S. S., and G. M. Segura. 1998. War, casualties, and public opinion. Journal of Conflict Resolution42: 278-301.
22.
Gartner, S. S., and G. M. Segura. 2000. Race, casualties, and opinion in the Vietnam War. Journal of Politics62: 115-146.
23.
Gartner, S. S., G. M. Segura, and B. A. Barratt. 2003. War casualties, policy positions, and the fate of legislators. Political Research Quarterly53: 467-477.
24.
Gelpi, C., P. D. Feaver, and J. Reifler. 2005-2006. Success matters: Casualty sensitivity and the war in Iraq. International Security30: 7-46.
25.
Gelpi, C., and J. E. Mueller. 2006. The cost of war (response): How many casualties will Americans tolerate. Foreign Affairs85: 139-144.
26.
Gelpi, C., J. Reifler, and P. D. Feaver. 2005. Iraq the vote: Retrospective and prospective foreign policy judgments on candidate choice and casualty tolerance. Unpublished manuscript.
27.
Graham, B.2005. Enemy body counts revived: U.S. is citing tolls to show success in Iraq. The Washington Post, October 24.
28.
Jacobson, G. C. 2005. The public, the president, and the war in Iraq. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April, Chicago.
29.
Jentleson, B. W.1992. The pretty prudent public: Post post-Vietnam American opinion on the use of military force. International Studies Quarterly36: 49-74.
30.
Jervis, R.1992. Political implications of loss aversion. Political Psychology13: 187-204.
31.
Johnson, D. D. P., and D. R. Tierney. Forthcoming. Failing to win: Perceptions of victory and defeat in international politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica47: 263-291.
33.
Kaplan, L. F.2003. Willpower: Why the public can stomach casualties in Iraq. The New Republic229: 19-22.
34.
Karol, D., and E. Miguel. 2005. Iraq War casualties and the 2004 U.S. presidential election. Unpublished manuscript.
35.
Klarevas, L.2002. The “essential domino” of military operations: American public opinion and the use of force. International Studies Perspectives3: 417-437.
36.
Knickmeyer, E.2005a. American forces kill 24 militants in West Iraq. The Washington Post, May 4.
37.
Knickmeyer, E.2005b. U.S. claims success in Iraq despite onslaught: Body counts now cited as benchmarks. The Washington Post, September 19.
38.
Kull, S.2003. Misperceptions, the media and the Iraq War. PIPA/Knowledge Networks Poll, October 2.
39.
Kull, S.2004. U.S. public beliefs and attitudes about Iraq. PIPA/Knowledge Networks Poll, August 20.
40.
Kull, S.2006. Americans on Iraq: Three years on. PIPA/Knowledge Networks Poll, March 15.
41.
Larson, E. V.1996. Casualties and consensus: The historical role of casualties in domestic support for U.S. military operations. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
42.
Levy, J. S.1992. An introduction to prospect theory. Political Psychology13: 171-186.
43.
Lizza, R.1999. Numbers game. The New Republic221: 16-18.
44.
Luttwak, E. N.1994. Where are the great powers? Foreign Affairs73: 23-28.
45.
Mueller, J. E.1973. War, presidents and public opinion. New York: John Wiley.
46.
Mueller, J. E.1994. Policy and opinion in the Gulf War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47.
Mueller, J. E.2005. The Iraq syndrome. Foreign Affairs84: 44-54.
48.
Ricks, T. E.2003. U.S. tolerance of deaths tested: Key factor is whether public believes victory is likely. The Washington Post, November 16.
49.
Shanker, T.2004. At Iraqi prison, Rumsfeld vows to punish abuse. The New York Times, May 14.
50.
Spinner, J.2005. Iraq town yields arms, not men: Troops find few insurgents in second day of sweep in West. The Washington Post, October 3.
51.
Thrall, A. T. 2005. War, news, and public opinion. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April, Chicago.
52.
Voeten, E., and P. R. Brewer. 2006. Public opinion, the war in Iraq, and presidential accountability. Journal of Conflict Resolution50: 809-830.
53.
Wong, E.2004a. U.S. forces, under attack, strike rebel cleric’s fighters near shrine. The New York Times, May 18.
54.
Wong, E.2004b. G.I.’s report killing 36 insurgents around Kufa mosque that held arms. The New York Times, May 24.
55.
Wong, E.2005. 24 Insurgents die in attack near Baghdad. The New York Times, March 21.
56.
Yankelovich, D.2005. Poll positions: What Americans really think about U.S. foreign policy. Foreign Affairs84: 2-16.
57.
Yankelovich, D.2006. The tipping points. Foreign Affairs85: 115-125.
58.
Zaller, J. R.1992. The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
