Scholars have long conceptualized public support for war as the product of a cost–benefit calculation in which combat casualties factor significantly. This article argues that, when calculating the human costs of conflict, Americans care about more than just the number of war dead; they also care about the distribution of those casualties across society. Using two original survey experiments, we show that inequalities in sacrifice affect Americans’ casualty sensitivity. We find strong evidence that learning about socioeconomic inequalities in casualties in previous wars decreases Americans’ casualty tolerance toward future military endeavors. These effects are stronger for some mission types, particularly non-humanitarian interventions, than others. The effects are also concentrated among Americans from states that suffered high casualty rates in the Iraq War. Our results suggest that raising public awareness of inequalities in wartime sacrifice could significantly strengthen popular constraints on policy makers contemplating military solutions to future crises.
AldrichJohnGelpiChristopherFeaverPeterReiflerJasonSharpKristin. 2006. “Foreign Policy and the Electoral Connection.”Annual Review of Political Science9:477–502.
2.
AlthausScottBramletBrittanyGimpelJames. 2011. “When War Hits Home: The Geography of Military Losses and Support for War in Time and Space.”Journal of Conflict Resolution56:382–412.
3.
BarabasJasonJeritJennifer. 2010. “Are Survey Experiments Externally Valid?”American Political Science Review104:226–42.
4.
BarnettArnoldStanleyTimothyShoreMichael. 1992. “America’s Vietnam Casualties: Victims of a Class War?”Operations Research40:856–66.
5.
BartelsLarry. 2010. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
BerinskyAdam. 2007. “Assuming the Costs of War: Events, Elites, and American Public Support for Military Conflict.”Journal of Politics69:975–97.
7.
BerinskyAdam. 2009. In Time of War: Understanding American Public Opinion from World War II to Iraq. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
BoettcherWilliam A., IIICobbMichael D.. 2006. “Echoes of Vietnam? Casualty Framing and Public Perceptions of Success and Failure in Iraq.”Journal of Conflict Resolution50:831–54.
10.
BoettcherWilliam A., IIICobbMichael D.. 2009. “Don’t Let Them Die in Vain: Casualty Frames and Public Tolerance for Escalating Commitment in Iraq.”Journal of Conflict Resolution53:677–97.
11.
BrodyRichard. 1991. Assessing the President: The Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
Bueno de MesquitaBruceLalmanDavid. 1992. War and Reason: Domestic and International Imperatives. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
Bueno deMesquitaBruceJames MorrowSiversonRandolphSmithAlastair. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
BuhrmesterMichaelKwangTracyGoslingSamuel D.. 2011. “Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality Data?”Perspectives on Psychological Science6:3–5.
15.
CarsonJamieJenkinsJefferyRohdeDavidSouvaMark. 2001. “The Impact of National Tides and District-level Effects on Electoral Outcomes: The US Congressional Elections of 1862-63.”American Journal of Political Science45:887–98.
16.
CottonTimothy. 1986. “War and American Democracy: Electoral Costs of the Last Five Wars.”Journal of Conflict Resolution30:616–35.
17.
DruckmanJamesKamCindy. 2010. “Students as Experimental Participants: A Defense of the ‘Narrow Data Base.’” In Handbook of Experimental Political Science, edited by DruckmanJamesGreenDonKuklinski, JamesLupiaArthur, 41–57. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
EichenbergRichard. 2005. “Victory has Many Friends: US Public Opinion and the Use of Military Force 1981-2005.”International Security30:140–78.
19.
FeaverPeterGelpiChristopher. 2004. Choosing Your Battles: American Civil-Military Relations and the Use of Force. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
FoustBradyBottsHoward. 1991. “Age, Ethnicity and Class in the Vietnam War: Evidence from the Casualty File.”Vietnam Generation3:22–31.
21.
GainesBrianKuklinskiJamesQuirkPaul. 2007. “The Logic of the Survey Experiment Re-examined.”Political Analysis15:1–20.
22.
GartnerScott Sigmund. 2008. “The Multiple Effects of Casualties on Popular Support for War: An Experimental Approach.”American Political Science Review102:95–106.
23.
GartnerScott Sigmund. 2011. “On Behalf of a Grateful Nation: Conventionalized Images of Loss and Individual Opinion Change in War.”International Studies Quarterly55:545–61.
24.
GartnerScott SigmundSeguraGary M.. 1998. “War, Casualties, and Public Opinion.”Journal of Conflict Resolution42:278–320.
25.
GartnerScott SigmundSeguraGary M.. 2008. “All Politics are Still Local: The Iraq War and the 2006 Midterm Elections.”PS: Political Science and Politics41:95–100.
26.
GartnerScott SigmundSeguraGary M.BarrattBethany. 2004. “War Casualties, Policy Positions, and the Fate of Legislators.”Political Research Quarterly53:467–77.
27.
GartnerScott SigmundSeguraGary M.WilkeningMichael. 1997. “All Politics Are Local: Local Losses and Individual Attitudes toward the Vietnam War.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution41:669–94.
28.
GelpiChristopherFeaverPeter D.ReiflerJason. 2005/2006. “Casualty Sensitivity and the War in Iraq.”International Security30:7–46.
29.
GelpiChristopherFeaverPeter D.ReiflerJason. 2009. Paying the Human Costs of War: American Public Opinion and Casualties in Military Conflicts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
GlazerNathan. 2003. “On Americans and Inequality.”Daedalus132:111–15.
31.
GroseChristianOppenheimerBruce. 2007. “The Iraq War, Partisanship, and Candidate Attributes: Variation in Partisan Swing in the 2006 Election.”Legislative Studies Quarterly32:531–57.
32.
HayesAndrewMyersTeresa. 2009. “Testing the ‘Proximate Casualties Hypothesis’: Local Troop Loss, Attention to News, and Support for Military Intervention.”Mass Communication and Society12:379–402.
33.
HochschildJennifer. 1981. What’s Fair? American Beliefs about Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
HerrmannRichardTetlockPhilipVisserPenny. 1999. “Mass Public Decisions to go to War: A Cognitive-Interactionist Framework.” American Political Science Review93: 553–573.
35.
HorowitzMichaelLevenduskyMatthew. 2011. “Drafting Support for War: Conscription and Mass Support for Warfare.”Journal of Politics73:1–11.
36.
HowellWilliamPevehouseJon. 2007. While Dangers Gather: Congressional Checks on Presidential War Powers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
JentlesonBruce. 1992. “The Pretty-Prudent Public: Post Post-Vietnam American Opinion on the Use of Military Force.”International Studies Quarterly36:49–73.
38.
JentlesonBruceBrittonRebecca. 1998. “Still Pretty Prudent: Post-Cold War American Public Opinion on the Use of Military Force.”Journal of Conflict Resolution42:395–417.
39.
KaneTim. 2005. “Who Bears the Burden? Demographic Characteristics of US military Recruits Before and After 9/11.”Heritage Center for Data Analysis Report 05-08, November 7, 2005, Heritage Foundation, Washington, DC.
40.
KarolDavidMiguelEdward. 2007. “The Electoral Cost of War: Iraq Casualties and the 2004 US Presidential Election.”Journal of Politics69:633–48.
41.
KitturAniketChiEd. H.SuhBongwon. 2008. “Crowdsourcing User Studies with Mechanical Turk.”Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI), Florence, Italy, April 5–10, 2008, 453-56. New York: ACM Press.
42.
KlarevasLouis. 2002. “The ‘Essential Domino’ of Military Operations: American Public Opinion and the Use of Force.”International Studies Perspectives3:417–37.
43.
KrinerDouglas. 2010. After the Rubicon: Congress, Presidents, and the Politics of Waging War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
KrinerDouglasShenFrancis. 2007. “Iraq Casualties and the 2006 Senate Elections.”Legislative Studies Quarterly32:507–30.
45.
KrinerDouglasShenFrancis. 2010. The Casualty Gap: The Causes and Consequences of American Wartime Inequalities. New York: Oxford University Press.
46.
KullStevenDestlerI. M.. 1999. Misreading the Public: The Myth of a New Isolationism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
47.
KullStevenRamsayClay. 2001. “The Myth of the Reactive Public: American Public Attitudes on Military Fatalities in the Post-Cold War Period.” In Public Opinion and the International Use of Force, edited by Everts, PhillipIsneriaPierangelo, 205–28. London: Routledge.
48.
LarsonEric. 1996. Casualties and Consensus: The Historical Role of Casualties in Domestic Support for US Military Operations. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
49.
LarsonEricSavychBogdan. 2005. American Public Support for US Military Interventions from Mogadishu to Baghdad. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
50.
LipsetSeymour Martin. 1996. American Exceptionalism: A Double-edged Sword. New York: W. W. Norton.
51.
LuttwakEdward. 1994. “Where are the Great Powers? At Home with the Kids.”Foreign Affairs73:23–29.
52.
MandelDavid. 2006. “Economic Transactions among Friends: Asymmetric Generosity but Not in Agreement in Buyers’ and Sellers’ Offers.”Journal of Conflict Resolution50:584–606.
53.
MaozIfatWardAndrewKatzMichaelRossLess. 2002. “Reactive Devaluation of an ‘Israeli’ vs. ‘Palestinian’ Peace Proposal.”Journal of Conflict Resolution46:515–46.
54.
MaozZeevRussettBruce. 1993. “Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–1986.”American Political Science Review87:624–38.
55.
MasonWinterSuriSiddharth. 2010. “Conducting Behavioral Research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk.”Behavior Research Methods5:411–19.
56.
MayerAlbert J.HoultThomas Ford. 1955. “Social Stratification and Combat Survival.”Social Forces34:155–59.
57.
McCloskyHerbertZallerJohn. 1984. The American Ethos: Public Attitudes toward Capitalism and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58.
MorganCliftonCampbellSally. 1991. “Domestic Structures, Decisional Constraints, and War.”Journal of Conflict Resolution35:187–211.
59.
MuellerJohn. 1970. “Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson.”American Political Science Review64:18–34.
60.
MuellerJohn. 1973. War, Presidents, and Public Opinion. New York: John Wiley.
61.
MuellerJohn. 2002. “American Foreign Policy and Public Opinion in a New Era: Eleven Propositions.” In Understanding Public Opinion, 2nd ed., edited by Norrander, BarbaraWilcoxClyde, 149–72. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
62.
NincicDonnaNincicMiroslav. 1995. “Commitment to Military Intervention: The Democratic Government as Economic Investor.”Journal of Peace Research32:413–26.
63.
NyhanBrendanReiflerJason. 2010. “When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions.”Political Behavior32:303–30.
64.
OppenheimerDaniel M.MeyvisTomDavidenkNicolas. 2009. “Instructional Manipulation Checks: Detecting Satisficing to Increase Statistical Power.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology45:867–72.
65.
PageBenjaminShapiroRobertDempseyGlenn. 1987. “What Moves Public Opinion?”American Political Science Review81:23–44.
66.
PaolacciGabrieleChandlerJesseIpeirotisPanagiotis. 2010. “Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk.”Judgment and Decision Making5:411–19.
67.
RayJames Lee. 1995. Democracy and International Conflict: An Evaluation of the Democratic Peace Proposition. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
68.
ReiterDanStamAlan. 1998. “Democracy, War Initiation, and Victory.”American Political Science Review92:377–89.
69.
RossJoelZaldivarAndrewIraniLillyTomlinsonBillSix SilbermanM.. 2010. “Who Are the Crowdworkers? Shifting Demographics in Mechanical Turk.”Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI): Imagine All the People, Atlanta, GA, April 10–15, 2010, 2863–72.
70.
RousseauDavid.2002. “Motivations for Choice: The Salience of Relative Gains in International Relations.”Journal of Conflict Resolution46:394–426.
71.
RussettBruce. 1990. Controlling the Sword: The Democratic Governance of National Security. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
72.
TomzMichael. 2007. “Domestic Audience Costs in International Relations: An Experimental Approach.”International Organization61:821–40.
73.
VerbaSidneyOrrenGary. 1985. Equality in America: The View from the Top. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
74.
ZallerJohn. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
75.
ZallerJohnChiuDennis. 1996. “Government’s Little Helper: US Press Coverage of Foreign Policy Crises, 1945-1991.”Political Communication13:385–405.
76.
ZeitlinM.LuttermanK. G.RussellJ. W.. 1973. “Death in Vietnam: Class, Poverty, and the Risks of War.”Politics and Society3:313–28.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
