This study investigated how Canadian university student interns in three disciplines perceived their educational preparation for workplace writing. The students' perceptions differed markedly according to disciplinary background, with Management students responding very positively about their preparation, Political Science students responding positively, and Communications Studies students responding negatively. The authors discuss how these responses potentially reflect differing student expectations; theorypractice linkages; and patterns of integrating instruction and practice in research, analysis, and workplace genres across these disciplines. The results suggest that universities can prepare students for workplace writing by providing them with instruction and practice in common workplace genres, relevant research and analytic skills, experience in collaborative writing, ample feedback on their writing, and an appreciation for the socially situated nature of genres and genre acquisition. The authors also point to the benefits of work placement and internship programs and suggest directions for further research.
Adam, C. (2000). What do we learn from the reader: Factors in determining successful transitions between academic and workplace writing. In P. Dias & A. Paré (Eds.), Transitions: Writing in academic and workplace settings(pp. 167-182). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
2.
Anson, C. M., & Forsberg, L. L. (1990). Moving beyond the academic community: Transitional stages in professional writing. Written Communication, 7, 200-231.
3.
Bazerman, C. (1999). Introduction: Changing regularities of genre. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 42, 1-2.
4.
Couture, B., & Rymer, J. (1993). Situational exigence: Composing processes on the job by writer's role and task value. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives(pp. 4-20). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
5.
Dannels, D. (2000). Learning to be professional: Technical classroom discourse, practice, and professional identity construction. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 14(1), 5-37.
6.
Dias, P., Freedman, A., Medway, P., & Paré, A. (1999). Worlds apart: Acting and writing in academic and workplace contexts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Faigley, L., & Miller, T. P. (1982). What we learn from writing on the job. College English, 44, 557-569.
8.
Freedman, A. (1993). Showand tell: The role of explicit teaching in the learning of newgenres. Research in the Teaching of English, 27, 222-251.
9.
Freedman, A. (1994). “Do as I say”: The relationship between teaching and learning new genres. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric(pp. 191-210). London: Taylor and Francis.
10.
Freedman, A., & Adam, C. (1996). Learning to write professionally: “Situated learning” and the transition from university to professional discourse. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 10, 395-427.
11.
Freedman, A., & Adam, C. (2000). Write where you are: Situating learning to write in university and workplace settings. In P. Dias& A. Paré (Eds.), Transitions: Writing in academic and workplace settings(pp. 31-60). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
12.
Freedman, A., Adam, C., & Smart, G. (1994). Wearing suits to class: Simulating genres and simulations as genre. Written Communication, 11, 193-226.
13.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
14.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Locker, K. O. (1992). What makes a collaborative writing team successful? A case study of lawyers and socialworkers in a state agency. In J. Forman (Ed.), New visions of collaborative writing(pp. 37-61). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
16.
Lunsford, A., & Ede, L. (1990). Singular texts/plural authors: Perspectives on collaborative writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
17.
Lutz, J. A. (1989). Writers in organizations and howthey learn the image: Theory, research, and implications. In C. B. Matalene (Ed.), Worlds of writing: Teaching and learning in discourse communities of work(pp. 113-135). New York: Random House.
18.
MacKinnon, J. (1993). Becoming a rhetor: Developing writing ability in a mature, writing-intensive organization. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives(pp. 41-55). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
19.
Miller, C. (1994). Genre as social action. In A. Freedman& P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis. (Original work published 1984)
20.
Noguchi, R. R. (1991). Grammar and the teaching of writing: Limits and possibilities. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
21.
Paré, A. (2000). Writing as a way into socialwork: Genre sets, genre systems, and distributed cognition. In P. Dias& A. Paré (Eds.), Transitions: Writing in academic and workplace settings(pp. 145-166). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
22.
Paré, A., & Smart, G. (1994). Observing genres in action: Towards a research methodology. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric(pp. 146-154). London: Taylor and Francis.
23.
Schreiber, E. J. (1993). From academic writing to job-related writing: Achieving a smooth transition. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 36, 178-184.
24.
Smart, G. (2000). Responding on-line to students' writtenwork: When and howdoes it add value?Newsletter of the Canadian Association for the Study of Language and Learning, 18(3), 10-13.
25.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Teich, N. (1987). Transfer of writing skills: Implications of the theory of lateral and vertical transfer. Written Communication, 4, 193-208.
27.
Vest, D., Long, M., Thomas, L., & Palmquist, M. E. (1995). Relating communication training to workplace requirements: The perspective of new engineers. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 38, 11-17.
28.
Wallace, D. L. (1994). Collaborative planning and transforming knowledge. Journal of Business Communication, 3(1), 41-60.
29.
Winsor, D. A. (1996). Writing like an engineer: A rhetorical education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
Winsor, D. (2001). Learning to do knowledgework in systems of distributed cognition. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15, 5-28.
