Our assessment research suggests that quantitative business courses that rely primarily on algorithmic problem solving may not produce the deep learning required for addressing real-world business problems. This article illustrates a strategy, supported by recent learning theory, for promoting deep learning by moving students gradually from “well-structured” algorithmic problems with single correct answers to “ill-structured” real-world business problems that may have multiple correct answers and require an argument addressed to a specific audience. We show how these scaffolded communication assignments promote deep learning, and suggest ways that interested faculty can adapt the assignments to their own courses.
ArumR.RoksaJ.(2011).Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
2.
BeanJ. C.(2011a).Backward design: Towards an effective model of staff development in writing in the disciplines. InDeaneM.O’NeillP.(Eds.),Writing in the disciplines: Universities into the 21st century(pp.215-236).Houndmills, England:Palgrave Macmillan.
3.
BeanJ. C.(2011b).Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom(2nd ed.).San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
4.
BeaufortA.(2007).College writing and beyond: A new framework for university writing instruction.Logan:Utah State University Press.
5.
BeckerW. E.(1998).Engaging students in quantitative analysis with short case examples from the academic and popular press.American Economic Review,88,480-486.
6.
BransfordJ.BrownA. L.CockingR. R., &National Research Council Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning. (2000).How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school.Washington, DC:National Academies Press.
7.
ButlerR. S.(1998).On the failure of the widespread use of statistics.AmstatNews,251,84.
8.
CarrithersD.BeanJ. C.(2008).Using a client memo to assess critical thinking of finance majors.Business Communication Quarterly,71,10-26.
9.
CarrithersD.LingT.BeanJ. C.(2008).Messy problems and lay audiences: Teaching critical thinking within the finance curriculum.Business Communication Quarterly,71,152-170.
10.
CroweD.YougaJ.(1986).Using writing as a tool for learning economics.Journal of Economic Education,17,218-222.
11.
DvorakT.(2007).An annotated sample paper in econometrics.Journal of Economic Education,38,124-133.
12.
EmigJ.(1977).Writing as a mode of learning.College Composition and Communication,28,122-128.
13.
EntwistleN. J.(2009).Teaching for understanding at university: Deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking.New York, NY:Palgrave Macmillan.
HulsizerM. R.WoolfL. M.(2009).A guide to teaching statistics: Innovations and best practices.Chichester, England:Wiley-Blackwell.
16.
KelloggR. T.WhitefordA. P.(2009).Training advanced writing skills: The case for deliberate practice.Educational Psychologist,44,250-266
17.
KellyA.SloaneF.WhittakerA.(1997).Simple approaches to assessing underlying understanding of statistical concepts. InGalI.GarfieldJ. B.(Eds.),The assessment challenge in statistics education(pp.85-109).Amsterdam, Netherlands:IOS Press.
18.
KirschnerP. A.SwellerJ.ClarkR. E.(2006).Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching.Educational Psychologist,41,75-86.
19.
KurfissJ. G.(1988).Critical thinking: Theory, research, practice, and possibilities.Washington, DC:ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education and the Association for the Study of Higher Education. Retrieved fromhttp://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED304041.pdf
20.
MarzanoR. J.PickeringD. J.PollockJ. E.(2001).Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
21.
Nelson LairdT. F.GarverA. K.(2010).The effect of teaching general education courses on deep approaches to learning: How disciplinary context matters.Research in Higher Education,51,248-265.
22.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.LeechN. L.(2003).Assessment in statistics courses: More than a tool for evaluation.Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,28,115-128.
23.
PalminiD. J.(1996).Using rhetorical cases to teach writing skills and enhance economic learning.Journal of Economic Education,27,205-216.
24.
PuntambekarS.HübscherR.(2005).Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed?Educational Psychologist,40,1-12.
25.
ReiserB. J.(2004).Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work.Journal of the Learning Sciences,13,273-304.
26.
RiordanD. A.RiordanM. P.SullivanM. C.(2000).Writing across the accounting curriculum: An experiment.Business Communication Quarterly,63(3),49-58.
StrombergA. J.RamanathanS.(1996).Easy implementation of writing in introductory statistics courses.American Statistician,50,159-163.
29.
VygotskyL. S.(1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
30.
WigginsG. P.McTigheJ.(2005).Understanding by design(2nd ed.).Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
31.
WillinghamD. T.(2009).Why don’t students like school? A cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for the classroom.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
32.
WolfeJ.OlsonB.WilderL.(2014).Knowing what we know about writing in the disciplines: A new approach to FYC.WAC Journal,25,42-77.
