Working with data from the decadal US Census and the annual American Community Survey (ACS), the authors document four decades of increasing participation in registered nursing among US men and explore reasons for this change. Increasing educational attainment, rising labor demand in health care, rising urbanization, and liberalizing gender role attitudes explain approximately 50% of the growth. Results show that a large component of the increase occurs when men switched into nursing during their 20s and early 30s. Important countervailing factors include poor early labor market conditions and immigrant inflows, both of which are associated with less movement into nursing by men. The authors discuss the implications of their findings for policies that encourage men to take up high growth, non-traditional skilled jobs.
[AACN] American Association of Colleges of Nursing. Various years. Enrollment and graduations in baccalaureate and graduate degrees in nursing. Report years: 1990–1991 through 2016–2017. Washington DC.
4.
AdamacheKillard W.SloanFrank A.1982. Unions and hospitals: Some unresolved issues. Journal of Health Economics1(1): 81–108.
5.
AltonjiJoseph G.BlomEricaMeghirCostas. 2012. Heterogeneity in human capital investments: High school curriculum, college major and careers. Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, Vol. 4(1): 185–223.
6.
ArcidiaconoPeter. 2004. Ability sorting and the returns to college major. Journal of Econometrics121: 343–75.
7.
AuerbachDavid I.BuerhausPeter I.StaigerDouglas O.2017. Millennials almost twice as likely to be registered nurses as baby boomers were. Health Affairs36(10): 1804–7.
8.
BartikTimothy. 1991. Who benefits from state and local economic development policies?Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute.
9.
BensonAlan. 2013a. Firm-sponsored general education and mobility frictions: Evidence from hospital sponsorship of nursing schools and faculty. Journal of Health Economics32(1): 149–59.
10.
BensonAlan. 2013b. Labor market trends among registered nurses: 2008–2011. Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice13: 4205–13.
11.
BlauFrancineBrummundPeterYung-Hsu LiuAlbert. 2013. Trends in occupational segregation by gender 1970–2009: Adjusting for the impact of change in the occupational coding system. Demography50(2): 471–92.
12.
BlomEricaCadenaBrian C.KeysBenjamin J.2015. Investment over the business cycle: Insights from college major choice. IZA Discussion Paper No. 9167. Bonn, Germany: Institute of Labor Economics.
13.
BuerhausPeter I.AuerbachDavid I.StaigerDouglas O.2007. Recent trends in the registered nurse labor market in the US: Short-run swings on top of long-term trends. Nursing Economics25(2): 59–67.
14.
BuerhausPeter I.AuerbachDavid I.StaigerDouglas O.2009. The recent surge in nurse employment: Causes and implications. Health Affairs28(4): w657–w668.
15.
BuerhausPeter I.StaigerDouglas O.AuerbachDavid I.2000. Implications of an aging registered nurse workforce. Journal of the American Medical Association283(22): 2948–54.
16.
BuerhausPeter I.StaigerDouglas O.AuerbachDavid I.2003. Trends: Is the current shortage of hospital nurses ending?Health Affairs22(6): 191–98.
CortésPatriciaPanJessica. 2014. Foreign nurse importation and the supply of native nurses. Journal of Health Economics37: 164–80.
21.
D’AntonioPatricia. 2010. American Nursing: A History of Knowledge, Authority, and the Meaning of Work. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
22.
DePasqualeChristinaStangeKevin. 2016. Labor supply effects of occupational regulation: Evidence from the nurse licensure compact. NBER Working Paper No. 22344. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
23.
EgenesKaren. 2009. History of nursing. In RouxGayleHalsteadJudith A. (Eds.), Issues and Trends in Nursing: Essential Knowledge for Today and Tomorrow, pp. 1–26. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
FortinNicole. 2015. Gender role attitudes and women’s labor force participation: Opting-out, AIDS, and the persistent appeal of housewifery. Annals of Economics and Statistics 117-118: 379–401.
26.
GoldinClaudia. 2006. The rising (and then declining) significance of gender. In BlauFrancine D.BrintonMary C.GruskyDavid (Eds.), The Declining Significance of Gender? pp. 67–101. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
27.
GoldinClaudia. 2015. A pollution theory of discrimination: Male and female differences in occupations and earnings. In BoustanLeah PlattFrydmanCarolaMargoRobert A. (Eds.), Human Capital in History: The American Record, pp. 313–48. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
GoldinClaudiaKatzLawrence. 2016. A most egalitarian profession: Pharmacy and the evolution of a family friendly occupation. Journal of Labor Economics34(3): 705–45.
29.
Goldsmith-PinkhamPaulSorkinIsaacSwiftHenry. 2017. Bartik instruments: What, when, why and how. NBER Working Paper No. 24408. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
30.
HirschBarry T.SchumacherEdward J.1995. Monopsony power and relative wages in the labor market for nurses. Journal of Health Economics14(4): 443–76.
31.
HirschBarry T.SchumacherEdward J.2012. Underpaid or overpaid? Wage analysis for nurses using job and worker attributes. Southern Economic Journal78(4): 1096–119.
32.
Institute of Medicine. 2011. The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
33.
JonesCheryl BlandGatesMichael. 2004. Gender-based wage differentials in a predominantly female profession: Observations from nursing. Economics of Education Review23(6): 615–31.
34.
KalistDavid E.2002. The gender earnings gap in the RN labor market. Nursing Economics20(4): 155–62.
35.
KearneyMelissa S.LevinePhillip B.2015. Investigating recent trends in the US teen birth rate. Journal of Health Economics41: 15–29.
36.
MarkBarbaraHarlessDavid W.SpetzJoanne. 2009. California’s minimum-nurse-staffing legislation and nurses’ wages. Health Affairs28(2): w326–w334.
37.
MatsudairaJordan D.2014. Monopsony in the low-wage labor market? Evidence from minimum nurse staffing regulations. Review of Economics and Statistics96(1): 92–102.
38.
MuenchUlrikeSindelarJodyBuschSusan H.BuerhausPeter I.2015. Salary differences between male and female registered nurses in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association313(12): 1265–67.
39.
MunnichElizabeth L.2014. The labor market effects of California’s minimum nurse staffing law. Health Economics23(8): 935–50.
40.
MunnichElizabethWozniakAbigail. 2017. What explains the rising share of U.S. men in registered nursing? Working Paper 2017-10. Washington, DC: Washington Center for Equitable Growth.
41.
O’LynnChad E.TranbargerRussell E. (Eds.). 2006. Men in Nursing: History, Challenges, and Opportunities. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
42.
PanJessica. 2015. Gender segregation in occupations: The role of tipping and social interactions. Journal of Labor Economics33(2): 365–408.
43.
RugglesStevenGenadekKatieGoekenRonaldGroverJosiahSobekMatthew. 2015. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 6.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota. Accessed athttp://doi.org/10.18128/D010.V6.0.
44.
SeaburySeth A.ChandraAmitabhJenaAnupam B.2013. Trends in the earnings of male and female health care professionals in the United States, 1987 to 2010. JAMA Internal Medicine173(18): 1748–50.
45.
StaigerDouglas O.AuerbachDavid I.BuerhausPeter I.2012. Registered nurse labor supply and the recession: Are we in a bubble?New England Journal of Medicine366(16): 1463–65.
46.
StaigerDouglasSpetzJoannePhibbsCiaran. 1999. Is there monopsony in the labor market?Evidence from a natural experiment. Working Paper No. w7258. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economics Research.
47.
SullivanDaniel. 1989. Monopsony power in the market for nurses. Journal of Law and Economics32: S135–S178.
48.
TongPatricia K.2011. The effects of California minimum nurse staffing laws on nurse labor and patient mortality in skilled nursing facilities. Health Economics20(7): 802–16.
US Surgeon General’s Consultant Group on Nursing. 1963. Toward quality in nursing needs and goals: Report. Public Health Service Publication No. 992. Washington, DC.
52.
WinkDiane M.2005. Accelerated nursing programs for non-college graduates. In OermannMarilyn H.HeinrichKathleen (Eds.), Annual Review of Nursing Education, Vol. 3, pp. 271–97. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
