Although women earn approximately 50% of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) bachelor’s degrees, more than 70% of scientists and engineers are men. The authors explore a potential determinant of this STEM gender gap using newly collected data on the career trajectories of United States Air Force Academy students. Specifically, they examine the effects of being assigned female math and science professors on occupation choice and postgraduate education. The results indicate that, among high-ability female students, being assigned a female professor leads to substantial increases in the probability of working in a STEM occupation and the probability of receiving a STEM master’s degree.
BeedeDavidJulianTiffanyLangdonDavidMcKittrickGeorgeKhanBeethikaDomsMark. 2011. Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation (ESA Issue Brief 04–11). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
2.
BettingerEricLongBridget T.2005. Do faculty serve as role models? The impact of instructor gender on female students. American Economic Review95(3): 152–57.
3.
BilimoriaDianaJoySimyLiangXiangfen. 2008. Breaking barriers and creating inclusiveness: Lessons of organizational transformation to advance women faculty in academic science and engineering. Human Resource Management47(3): 423–41.
4.
BlickenstaffJacob Clark. 2005. Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter?Gender and Education17(4): 369–86.
5.
BoringAnne. 2017. Gender biases in student evaluations of teachers. Journal of Public Economics145: 27–41.
6.
CanaanSerenaMouganiePierre. 2019. Female science advisors and the STEM gender gap. IZA Discussion Paper No. 12415. Bonn, Germany: Institute of Labor Economics.
7.
CanesBrandiceRosenHarvey. 1995. Following in her footsteps? Faculty gender composition and women’s choices of college majors. Industrial and Labor Relations Review48(3): 486–504.
8.
CarloneHeidi B.JohnsonAngela. 2007. Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching44(8): 1187–218.
9.
CarrellScott E.PageMarianne E.WestJames E.2010. Sex and science: How professor gender perpetuates the gender gap. Quarterly Journal of Economics125(3): 1101–44.
10.
CroninCatherineRogerAngela. 1999. Theorizing progress: Women in science, engineering, and technology in higher education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching36(6): 639–61.
11.
DworkinTerry MoreheadKwolek-FollandAngelMaurerVirginiaSchipaniCindy A.2008. Pathways to success for women scientists in the US. In GrenzSabineKortendiekBeateKriszioMarianneLötherAndrea (Eds.), Gender Equality Programmes in Higher Education, pp. 69–86. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
12.
FairlieRobert W.HoffmannFlorianOreopoulosPhilip. 2014. A community college instructor like me: Race and ethnicity interactions in the classroom. American Economic Review104(8): 2567–91.
13.
GaulePatrickPiacentiniMario. 2018. An advisor like me? Advisor gender and post-graduate careers in science. Research Policy47(4): 805–13.
14.
GershensonSethHartCassandra M. D.HymanJoshuaLindsayConstancePapageorgeNicholas W.2018. The long-run impacts of same-sex teachers. NBER Working Paper No. 25254. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
15.
HandelsmanJoCantorNancyCarnesMollyDentonDeniceFineEveGroszBarbaraHinshawVirginiaMarrettCoraRosserSueShalalaDonnaSheridanJennifer. 2005. More women in science. Science309(5738): 1190–91.
16.
HoffmannFlorianOreopoulosPhilip. 2009. A professor like me. Journal of Human Resources44(2): 479–94.
17.
JagsiReshmaGriffithKent A.DeCastroRochelle A.UbelPeter. 2014. Sex, role models, and specialty choices among graduates of US medical schools in 2006–2008. Journal of the American College of Surgeons218(3): 345–52.
18.
JohnsonAngela C.2007. Unintended consequences: How science professors discourage women of color. Science Education91(5): 805–21.
19.
KatoTakaoSongYang. 2018. An advisor like me? Does gender matter?IZA Working Paper No. 11575. Bonn, Germany: Institute of Labor Economics.
20.
KofoedMichael S.McGovneyElizabeth. 2019. The effect of same-gender and same-race role models on occupation choice: Evidence from randomly assigned mentors at West Point. Journal of Human Resources54(2): 430–67.
21.
LagesenVivian Anette. 2007. The strength of numbers: Strategies to include women into computer science. Social Studies of Science37(1): 67–92.
22.
LimJaegeumMeerJonathan. 2019. Persistent effects of teacher–student gender matches. Journal of Human Resources. Published online before print, January10. doi:10.3368/jhr.55.3.0218-9314R4.
23.
MavriplisCatherineHellerRachelleBeilCherylDamKimYassinskayaNatalyaShawMeganSorensenCharlene. 2010. Mind the gap: Women in STEM career breaks. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation5(1): 140–51.
24.
MengelFriederikeSauermannJanZölitzUlf. 2019. Gender bias in teaching evaluations. Journal of the European Economic Association17(2): 535–66.
25.
MuralidharanKarthikShethKetki. 2016. Bridging education gender gaps in developing countries: The role of female teachers. Journal of Human Resources51(2): 269–97.
26.
National Science Foundation. 2017. Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2017. Special Report NSF 17-310. Arlington, VA. Accessible at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.
27.
NeumarkDavidGardeckiRosella. 1998. Women helping women? Role model and mentoring effects on female Ph.D. students in economics. Journal of Human Resources33(1): 220–46.
28.
RaskKevin N.BaileyElizabeth M.2002. Are faculty role models? Evidence from major choice in an undergraduate institution. Journal of Economic Education33(2): 99–124.
RothsteinDonna S.1995. Do female faculty influence female students’ educational and labor market attainments?Industrial and Labor Relations Review48(3): 515–30.
31.
SwitzerTobias. 2011. Air Force policy for advanced education: Production of human capital or cheap signals?Air and Space Power Journal25(4): 29–42.
32.
ThiryHeatherLaursenSandra L.HunterAnne. 2011. What experiences help students become scientists? A comparative study of research and other sources of personal and professional gains for STEM undergraduates. Journal of Higher Education82(4): 357–88.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
