Analysing 1,055 female- and 2,207 male-owned businesses in Germany, the authors found that the former underperformed compared with the latter in terms of employment growth and firm innovativeness. Controlling for endogeneity, ie feedback effects between employment growth and innovation, it was demonstrated that the lower employment growth in women-owned businesses was mainly due to women's lower commitment to product and process innovations, a phenomenon that is referred to in this study as the ‘female–male innovation gap’. The female–male innovation gap apparently goes back to occupational sex segregation, with women populating occupations and choosing fields of study or apprenticeship training that are less technical or technology-oriented and thus less likely to provide them with important resources (eg technical know-how) and favourable conditions needed for the development and implementation of product and process innovations.
AcsZ. J.AudretschD. B. (1990), ‘The determinants of small-firm growth in US manufacturing’, Applied Economics, Vol 22, No 2, pp 143–153.
2.
AlmusM.NerlingerE. A.SteilF. (1999), ‘Growth determinants of start-ups in Eastern Germany: A comparison between innovative and non-innovative firms’, in OakeyR.DuringW.MukhtarS. M., eds, New Technology-Based Firms in the 1990s, Bd. M. VI, Amsterdam, pp 283–296.
3.
AnkerR. (1997), ‘Theories of occupational segregation by sex: An overview’, International Labour Review, Vol 136, No 3, pp 315–340.
4.
BielbyW. T.BaronJ. N. (1986), ‘Men and women at work: Sex segregation and statistical discrimination’, The American Journal of Sociology, Vol 91, No 4, pp 759–799.
5.
BrüderlJ.PreisendörferP. (1998), ‘Network support and success of newly founded businesses’, Small Business Economics, Vol 10, No 3, pp 213–225.
6.
BrüderlJ.PreisendörferP. (2000), ‘Fast-growing businesses: Empirical evidence from a German study’, International Journal of Sociology, Vol 30, No 3, pp 45–70.
7.
BrüderlJ.PreisendörferP.ZieglerR. (1996), Der Erfolg neugegründeter Betriebe: Eine empirische Studie zu den Chancen und Risiken von Unternehmensgründungen, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin.
8.
BrushC. G. (1992), ‘Research on women business owners: Past trends, a new perspective and future directions’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol 16, No 2, pp 5–30.
9.
BrushC. D.HisrichR. D. (1988), ‘Women entrepreneurs: Strategic origins impact on growth’, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson College, Wellesley, MA.
10.
BrushC. G.HisrichR. D. (2000), ‘Women-owned businesses: An exploratory study comparing factors affecting performance’, Research Institute for Small and Emerging Business, Inc, Washington, DC.
11.
ButtnerH.MooreD. (1997), ‘Women's organizational exodus to entrepreneurship: Self-reported motivations and correlation with success’, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol 35, No 1, pp 35–46.
12.
ChagantiR.ChagantiR. (1983), ‘A profile of profitable and not-so-profitable small businesses’, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol 21, No 3, pp 43–51.
13.
ChagantiR.ParasuramanS. (1996), ‘A study of the impacts of gender on business performance and management patterns in small businesses’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol 21, No 2, pp 73–75.
14.
CharlesM. (1992), ‘Cross-national variation in occupational sex segregation’, American Sociological Review, Vol 57, No 4, pp 483–502.
15.
CharlesM. (2003), ‘Deciphering sex segregation – vertical and horizontal inequalities in ten national labor markets’, Acta Sociologica, Vol 46, No 4, pp 267–287.
16.
CooperA. C.Gimeno-GasconF. J.WooC. Y. (1994), ‘Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance’, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol 9, No 5, pp 371–395.
17.
DavidssonP.KirchhoffB.HatemiJ. A.GustavssonH. (2002), ‘Empirical analysis of business growth factors using Swedish data’, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol 40, No 4, pp 332–349.
18.
Du RietzA.HenreksonM. (2000), ‘Testing the female underperformance hypothesis’, Small Business Economics, Vol 14, No 1, pp 1–10.
19.
FehrenbachS.LeichtR. (2002), ‘Strukturmerkmale und Potentiale der von Frauen geführten Betriebe in Deutschland. Eine empirische Untersuchung anhand der Daten des IAB-Betriebspanels’, Discussion Paper 47, Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Mittelstandsforschung, Universität Mannheim.
20.
FischerE. M.ReuberA. R.DykeL. S. (1993), ‘A theoretical overview and extension of research on sex, gender, and entrepreneurship’, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol 8, No 2, pp 151–168.
HakimC. (1992), ‘Explaining trends in occupational segregation: The measurement, causes and consequences of the sexual division of labour’, European Sociological Review, Vol 8, No 2, pp 127–152.
23.
HakimC. (1997), ‘A sociological perspective on part-time work’, in BlossfeldH.-P.HakimC., eds, Between Equalization and Modernization. Women Working Part-Time in Europe and the United States of America, Oxford University Press, New York, pp 23–70.
24.
HakimC. (1998), Social Change and Innovation in the Labour Market, Routledge, London.
25.
HeshmatiA. (2001), ‘On the growth of micro and small firms: Evidence from Sweden’, Small Business Economics, Vol 17, No 3, pp 213–228.
26.
HisrichR. D.BrushC. (1984), ‘The woman entrepreneur: Management skills and business problems’, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol 22, No 1, pp 30–37.
27.
JohannissonB. (2000), ‘Networking and entrepreneurial growth’, in SextonD.LandströmH., eds, The Blackwell Handbook of Entrepreneurship, Blackwell, Oxford, MA, pp 26–44.
28.
JohnsonS.StoreyD. (1993), ‘Male and female entrepreneurs and their businesses: A comparative study’, in AllenS.TrumanC., eds, Women in Business: Perspectives on Women Entrepreneurs, Routledge, London.
29.
JonungC. (1996), ‘Economic theories of occupational segregation by sex – implications for change over time’, in BeckP., ed, Gender Specific Occupational Segregation, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB) der Bundesanstalt für Arbeit, Nürnberg, pp 16–54.
30.
Jungbauer-GansM.PreisendörferP. (1992), ‘Frauen in der beruflichen Selbständigkeit’, Zeitschrift für Soziologie, Vol 21, No 1, pp 61–77.
31.
KallebergA. L.LeichtK. T. (1991), ‘Gender and organizational performance: Determinants of small business survival and success’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 34, No 1, pp 136–161.
32.
KrausV. (2003), ‘On self-employed women in Israel, 1970–2000’, paper presented at the CR28 Meeting, 22–23 August, New York.
33.
Lauxen-UlbrichM.LeichtR. (2002), ‘Entwicklung and Tätigkeitsprofil selbständiger Frauen in Deutschland. Eine empirische Untersuchung anhand der Daten des Mikrozensus’, Discussion Paper 46, Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Mittelstandsforschung der Universität Mannheim.
34.
LessatV.WoywodeM. (2001), ‘Schnell wachsende Unternehmen in Deutschland: Empirische Ergebnisse und politische Implikationen’, in MerzJ., ed, Existenzgründung 2, FFB/Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 28–94.
35.
LohmannH. (2001), ‘Self-employed or employee, full-time or part-time? Gender differences in the determinants and conditions for self-employment in Europe and the US’, Discussion Paper No 38, Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung (MZES), Mannheim.
36.
LohmannH.LuberS. (2000), ‘Die Folgen beruflicher Segregation für weibliche und männliche Selbständige. Ein Vergleich zwischen der Bundesrepublik und dem Vereinigten Königreich’, Beitrag zur 2. Mikrozensus–Nutzerkonferenz: Forschung mit dem Mikrozensus. Analysen zur Sozialstruktur und dem Arbeitsmarkt, 12–13 October, Mannheim.
37.
MelkasH.AnkerR. (1997), ‘Occupational segregation by sex in Nordic countries: An empirical investigation’, International Labour Review, Vol 136, No 3, pp 341–364.
38.
PenroseE. T. (1959), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Basil Blackwell, London.
39.
PrestonJ. A. (1999), ‘Occupational gender segregation – trends and explanations’, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol 39, No 5, pp 611–624.
40.
RosaP.CarterS.HamiltonD. (1996), ‘Gender as a determinant of small business performance: Insights from a British study’, Small Business Economics, Vol 8, No 6, pp 463–478.
41.
SonfieldM.LussierR.CormanJ.McKinneyM. (2001), ‘Gender comparison in strategic decision-making: An empirical analysis of the entrepreneurial strategy matrix’, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol 39, No 2, pp 165–173.
42.
StoreyD. J. (1994), Understanding the Small Business Sector, Routledge, London.
43.
StrohmeyerR. (2003), ‘Gender differences in self-employment: Does education matter?’paper presented at the 48th World International Conference on Small Business (ICSB), 15–18 June, Belfast.
44.
StrohmeyerR. (2004), ‘Studienfachwahl und berufliche Platzierung von selbständigen Akademikerinnen’, in LeichtR.WelterF., eds, Gründerinnen und selbständige Frauen. Potenziale, Strukturen und Entwicklungen in Deutschland, von Loeper Literaturverlag, Karlsruhe, pp 119–138.
45.
StrohmeyerR.Lauxen-UlbrichM. (2003), ‘Die Wirkung partner- und familienbezogener Ressourcen und Restriktionen auf die Gründungsaktivitäten von Frauen’, Beitrag zur 3. Mikrozensus-Nutzerkonferenz: Forschung mit dem Mikrozensus: Analysen zur Sozialstruktur und zum Arbeitsmarkt, 10–11 October, Mannheim.
46.
StrohmeyerR.TonoyanV. (2004), ‘Determinants of employment growth in small ventures: Comparison of female vs. male owned businesses in Germany’, paper presented at the 2004 Babson–Kauffman Entrepreneurship Research Conference, 2–6 June, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.
47.
StrohmeyerR.TonoyanV. (2005), ‘Gender gap and gender differences in potential entrepreneurship across Western Europe: The role of occupational segregation and job characteristics’, paper presented at the 2005 G-Forum Jahreskonferenz: 9.te Interdisziplinäre Jahreskonferenz zur Gründungsforschung, 10–11 November, Friedrich-SchillerUniversität Jena, Jena.
48.
TonoyanV.StrohmeyerR. (2004), ‘How difficult is it to start own businesses? An examination by gender in 22 Western European countries’, paper presented at the International Conference on Entrepreneurship: Contexts, Locales and Values, 22–24 September, University of Paris Dauphine, Paris.
