This article examines the determinants of India’s information and communications technology (ICT) access. We use the second wave of the India Human Development Survey (IHDS) of 2011–2012, a nationally representative survey at the individual level, and find that ICT ownership and usage are abysmally low for women compared to men. Using probit and sample selection models to capture determinants of ICT access, we find women are disadvantaged in owning and using ICT systems. By re-estimating our models separately for men and women, we find that marriage has an opposite effect on the two genders—it has a positive impact on men owning and using ICT systems and a negative effect on women. As an extension, we also find that networks strongly influence ICT access. While social networks improve the probability of owning ICT devices for women, political connections enhance the propensity to use ICTs for men.
AgrawalA., & AsraniC. (2018). Digital divide among the Indian households: Extent and correlates. Economics Bulletin, 38(4), 2444–2466.
2.
AshrafM. M., HanischJ., & SwatmanP. (2008). ICT intervention and its impact in village areas of a developing country (pp. 345–352). IADIS Press.
3.
AsraniC. (2021). Spanning the digital divide in India: Barriers to ICT adoption and usage. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(4), e2598.
4.
AsraniC., & KarA. K. (2022). Diffusion and adoption of digital communications services in India. Information Technology for Development, 28(3), 1–23.
5.
BarboniG., FieldE., PandeR., RigolN., SchanerS., & MooreC. T. (2018). A tough call: Understanding barriers to and impacts of women’s mobile phone adoption in India. Harvard Kennedy School.
6.
ChatterjeeS., GuptaS. D., & UpadhyayP. (2020). Technology adoption and entrepreneurial orientation for rural women: Evidence from India. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160, 120236.
7.
ChenM. A. (1997). A guide for assessing the impact of microenterprise services at the individual level. Assessing the Impact of Microenterprise Services (AIMS).
8.
DemoussisM., & GiannakopoulosN. (2006). Facets of the digital divide in Europe: Determination and extent of internet use. Economic Innovation and New Technology, 15(3), 235–246.
9.
ElnaggarA. (2008). Towards gender equal access to ICT. Information Technology for Development, 14(4), 280–293.
10.
GillwaldA., MilekA., & StorkC. (2010). Towards evidence-based ICT policy and regulation: Gender assessment of ICT access and usage in Africa(Vol. 1, Policy Paper 5). Research ICT Africa.
11.
GuptaR., & JainK. (2015). Adoption behavior of rural India for mobile telephony: A multigroup study. Telecommunications Policy, 39(8), 691–704.
12.
GurumurthyA. (2006). Promoting gender equality? Some development-related uses of ICTs by women. Development in Practice, 16(6), 611–616.
13.
HashemE. A. (2015). The impact of ICT investment on human development. International Journal of Management Sciences, 5(1), 111–124.
14.
HeckmanJ. J. (1977). Sample selection bias as a specification error (with an application to the estimation of labor supply functions)(Working Paper 0172). National Bureau of Economic Research.
15.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. (2021). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), India, 2019–20. IIPS.
16.
JainR. (2020). Information and communication technology adoption and the demand for female labor: The case of Indian industry. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 21(2), 695–722.
17.
JosephM. K. (2013). Critical theory for women empowerment through ICT studies. Qualitative Research Journal, 13(2), 163–177.
18.
KabeerN. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464.
19.
KapoorK. K., DwivediY. K., & WilliamsM. D. (2015). Empirical examination of the role of three sets of innovation attributes for determining adoption of IRCTC mobile ticketing service. Information Systems Management, 32(2), 153–173.
20.
LondonT., & HartS. L. (2010). Next generation business strategies for the base of the pyramid: New approaches for building mutual value. Pearson Education.
21.
MariscalJ., MayneG., AnejaU., & SorgnerA. (2019). Bridging the gender digital gap. Economics, 13(1), 1–12.
22.
MilekA., StorkC., & GillwaldA. (2011). Engendering communication: A perspective on ICT access and usage in Africa. info. 13(3), 125–141.
23.
OnoH. (2006). Digital inequality in East Asia: Evidence from Japan, South Korea, and Singapore. Asian Economic Papers, 4(3), 116–142.
24.
OnoH., & ZavodnyM. (2007). Digital inequality: A five country comparison using microdata. Social Science Research, 36(3), 1135–1155.
25.
QuibriaM. G., AhmedS. N., TschangT., & Reyes-MacasaquitM. L. (2003). Digital divide: Determinants and policies with special reference to Asia. Journal of Asian Economics, 13(6), 811–825.
26.
QureshiS. (2013). What is the role of mobile phones in bringing about growth?Information Technology for Development, 19(1), 1–4.
27.
SenA. (2000). Social exclusion: Concept, application, and scrutiny(Social Development Papers No. 1). Office of Environment and Social Development Asian Development Bank. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/29778/social-exclusion.pdf
28.
VicenteM. R., & LópezA. J. (2011). Assessing the regional digital divide across the European Union-27. Telecommunications Policy, 35(3), 220–237.
