This article presents a case of the gender digital divide in the use of mobile phones in a small community of Latino immigrant farm workers in Southeast Ohio in the US. Contrary to the findings of previous studies that rural women around the world are using information and communi-cation technologies (ICTs) for empowerment, this research reveals that immigration status interacts with gender and class identities such that Latina immigrant women who work in horticulture nurseries face limits of access, use, and distribution of knowledge for their own purposes and needs. The findings suggest that mobile phones are not inherently empowering to women, and under specific circumstances such as un-documented migration, they can serve as a device that strengthens hierarchical power relations between women and men.
Acker, Joan. (1992). From sex roles to gendered institutions. Contemporary Sociology, 21(5), 565–569.
2.
Agustin, Laura. (2007) Sex at the margins: Migration, labor markets, and the rescue industry. London: Zed Books.
3.
Arun, Shoba, Heeks, Richard, & Morgan, Sharon. (2006). Improved livelihoods and empowerment for poor women through IT-sector intervention. In Nancy Hafkin & Sophia Huyer (Eds), Cinderella or Cyberella? Empowering women in the knowledge society (pp. 141–164). Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press, Inc.
4.
Bock, Bettina. (2006). Gender and rural migration: An overview. In Bettina Bock & Sally Shortall (Eds), Rural gender relations: Issues and case studies (pp. 155–164), Cambridge, MA: CABI Publishing.
5.
Bullock, Heather, & Morales, Irma. (2005). Beliefs about poverty and opportunity among Mexican immigrant farm workers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(6), 1132–1149.
6.
Castañeda, Xochitl, & Zavella, Patricia. (2007). Changing constructions of sexuality and risks: Migrant Mexican women farmworkers in California. In Denise Segura & Patricia Zavella (Eds), Women and migration in the U.S.-Mexico borderlands (pp. 249–268). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
7.
Castells, Manuel. (2006). Information technology, globalization and social development. In Alfonso Gumucio-Dragon & Thomas Tufte (Eds), Communication for social change anthology: Historical and contemporary readings. (pp. 950–959). New Jersey: Communication for Social Change Consortium.
8.
Clingerman, Evelyn M., & Brown, Adama. (2011). Stress in migrant farmworkers during premigration. Biological Research for Nursing, 13(1), 1–11.
Connell, Raewyn, & Messerschmidt, James (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender and Society, 19(6): 829–859.
11.
Escobar, Arturo. (1995) Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
Granqvist, Manne. (2005). Assessing ICT in development: A critical perspective. In Oscar Hemer & Thomas Tufte (Eds), Media & glocal change: Rethinking communication for development (pp. 285–296). Buenos Aires, Argentina: CLACSO.
13.
Hambly, Helen. (2005). Introduction: Gender and ICT for development: Set-ting the context. In Koninklijk Instituut voor de Tropen & Oxfam GB (Eds), Gender and ICTs for Development, a global sourcebook (pp. 13–24). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: KIT (Royal Tropical Institute).
14.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, Pierrette. (1994) Gender transitions: Mexican experiences with immigration. Berkely, CA: University of California Press.
15.
Hudson, Heather. (2006) From rural village to global village: Telecommuni-cations for development in the information age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
16.
Jorge, Sonia. (2006). Engendering ICT policy and regulation: Prioritizing universal access for women’s empowerment. In Nancy Hafkin & Sophia Huyer (Eds), Cinderella or Cyberella? Empowering women in the knowledge society (pp. 71–95). Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press, Inc.
17.
Leonardi, Paul. (2003). Problematizing “new media”: Culturally based perceptions of cell phones, computers, and the Internet among United States Latinos. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 20(2), 160–179.
18.
Mantle, Ross. (2008) Between lives: Hispanic migration into Appalachia Ohio. San Francisco, CA: Blurb.
19.
Martin, Philip. (2009) Importing poverty? Immigration and the changing face of rural America. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
20.
Melkote, Srinivas. (2001). Communication for development in the Third World: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
21.
Menjivar, Cecilia. (2006). Liminal legality: Salvadorian and Guatemalan immigrants’ lives in the United States. The American Journal of Sociology, 111(4), 999–1037.
22.
Mobileactive. (n.d.) Case studies. Retrieved February 22, 2011, from www.mobileactive.org
23.
Mohanty, Chandra T. (2003) Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Durham: Duke University Press.
24.
Muse-Orlinoff, Leah, Matus, Maximo, Ambort, Chelsea, & Cardenas, John. (2009). Long distance lives: International migrant networks and technology in the United States and Mexico. In Wayne Cornelius, David Fitzerald, Jorge Hernandez-Diaz, & Scott Borgen (Eds), Migration from the Mexican Mixteca: A transnational community in Oaxaca and California (pp. 87–120). San Diego, CA: University of California.
25.
Panagakos, Anastasia, & Horst, Heather. (2006). Return to Cyberia: Technology and the social worlds of transnational migrants. Global Networks, 6(2), 109–124.
26.
Parrado, Emilio, & Flippen, Chenoa. (2005). Migration and gender among Mexican women. American Sociological Review, 70(4), 606–632.
27.
Sandhu, Jaspal, Hey, Jonathan, Newman, Catherine, & Agogino, Alice. (2005, July 5–8). Informal health and legal rights education in rural, agricultural communities using mobile devices. In Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 988–992) (ICALT05), Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
28.
Schmalzbauer, Leah. (2005) Striving and surviving: A daily life analysis of Honduran transnational families. New York & London: Routledge.
29.
Seif, Hinda. (2008). Wearing union T-shirts: Undocumented women farm workers and gendered circuits of political power. Latin America Perspectives, 35(1), 78–98.
30.
Stewart, Julianne. (2004). Gender as a factor in the uptake and use of ICTs on family farms in southern Queensland, Australia. Gender, Technology and Development, 8(1), 97–117.
31.
Suarez-Orozco, Marcelo, & Paez, Mariela. (2002) Latinos remaking America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
32.
The Economist. (2009). Mobile marvels: A special report on telecoms in emerging markets. Retrieved February 11, 2011, from http://www.economist.com/node/14483896
33.
The Hispanic Institute. (2009). Hispanic broadband access: Making the most of the mobile, connected future (pp. 1–20). Retrieved February 22, 2011, from http://www.thehispanicinstitute.net/node/1820.
34.
Unwin, Tim. (2009) ICT4D: Information and communication technology for development. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
35.
US Census Bureau. (2009). American community survey. Washington, DC. Retrieved February 13, 2011, from http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DTTable?_bm=y&-geo_id=01000US&-ds_name=ACS_2009_1YR_G00_&-SubjectID=18597980&-_lang=en&-mt_name=ACS_2009_1YR_G2000_C03002&-mt_name=ACS_2009_1YR_G2000_B03002&-format=&-CONTEXT=dt
36.
Vertovec, Steven. (2004). Cheap calls: The social glue of migrant transnationalism. Global Networks, 4(2), 219–224.
