This research is an attempt to examine the everyday experiences of water insecurity among poor women in urban India. Their everyday living around a limited amount of water was captured visually to exhibit local idioms of struggling. There is empirical evidence that the narratives of becoming a global city often exacerbate the presence of social polarization and inequality in cities of the Global South. This includes unequal access to water, especially among subordinate groups. Drawing from fieldwork conducted in Hyderabad and Bangalore on water insecurity, the findings show that the impacts of water insecurity are highly gendered and contentious. It is in the landscape of gender division of labour that women have to negotiate their everyday lives around water. Deploying photography as the primary method, this article demonstrates the social dimension of water insecurity and the impact on women’s lives who bear the majority of domestic water issues. It is concluded that lack of efforts by the state and its agencies to improve understanding of the lived experience of water insecurity would aggravate the water issues in urban India and leave poorer urban women to be highly water insecure.
CrowB.SultanaF. (2002). Gender, class and access to water: Three cases in a poor and crowded delta. Society and Natural Resources, 15(8), 709–724.
3.
DasD. (2015). Making of high-tech Hyderabad: Mapping neoliberal networks and splintering effects. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 36(2), 231–248.
4.
DasD.LoonJ. H. B.RaoA. N.SubbaraoG. N. (2016). Understanding geographies of water accessibility in Hyderabad. Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International, 5(3), 1–9.
5.
DunnK. (2005). Interviewing. In HayI. (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in human geography (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
FAO. (2004). The state of food insecurity in the world, 2004. Rome: Food & Agriculture Organization. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/007/y5650e/y5650e00.pdf
7.
HallT. (2009). The camera never lies? Photographic research methods in human geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(3), 453–462.
8.
JohnsenS.MayJ.ClokeP. (2008). Imag(in)ing ‘homeless places’: Using auto-photography to (re)examine the geographies of homelessness. Royal Geographical Society, 40(2), 194–207.
9.
KamatS. (2011). Neoliberalism, urbanism and the education economy: Producing Hyderabad as a ‘Global city’. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(2), 187–202.
10.
KumarN.AggarwalS. C. (2008). Level of poverty and employment pattern in slums: A case of Gwalior in Central India. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 51(2), 323–338.
11.
KumarS.JhaP.BaierK.JhaR.AzzamR. (2012). Pollution of Ganga river due to urbanization of Varanasi: Adverse conditions faced by the slum population. Environment and Urbanization Asia, 3 (2), 343–352.
12.
MannanF. (2018). Are organizations accountable? Disconnect between gender and sanitation in Bangladesh. Environment and Urbanization Asia, 9(1), 1–6.
13.
MarionJ. S.CrowderJ. W. (2013). Visual research. New York, NY: Bloomsbury
14.
NastarM. (2014). The quest to become a world city: Implications for access to water. Cities, 41, 1–9.
15.
NefJ.RoblesW. (2000). Globalization, neoliberalism and the state of underdevelopment in the new periphery. Journal of Developing Societies, 16(1), 27–48.
16.
PrakashA.SinghS.BrouwerL. (2015). Water transfer from peri-urban to the urban areas: Conflict over water for Hyderabad city in South India. Environment and Urbanization Asia, 6(1), 41–58.
17.
PelosoM.MorinvilleC. (2014). ‘Chasing for water’: Everyday practices of water access in peri-urban Ashaiman, Ghana. Water Alternatives, 7(1), 121–139.
18.
RamachandraiahC.PrasadS. (2008). The makeover of Hyderabad: Is it the ‘model’ IT city? In RamachandraiahC.WestenA. C. M. v.PrasadS. (Eds.), High-tech urban spaces: Asian and European perspective (pp. 260–293). New Delhi: Manohar.
19.
RoseG. (2008). Using photographs as illustrations in human geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32(1), 151–160.
20.
RoyD. (2013). Negotiating marginalities: Right to water in Delhi. Urban Water Journal, 10(2), 97–104.
21.
ScottL. M. (2015). Gendered participation in community-level water governance in Syrian refugee host communities in Jordan. London: King’s College London.
22.
SenS. (2017). Neo-liberal urbanization, work participation and women: Comparing the urban and peri-urban contexts of Delhi with Mumbai and Kolkata. In AcharyaS.S.SenS.PuniaM.ReddyS. (Eds.), Marginalization in globalizing Delhi: Issues of land, livelihoods & health (p. 129). New Delhi, India: Springer.
23.
SidawayJ. D. (2002). Photography as geographical fieldwork. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 26(1), 95–103.
24.
StevensonE. G. J.AmbeluA.CarusoB. A.TesfayeY.FreemanM. C. (2016). Community water improvement, household water insecurity, and women’s psychological distress: An intervention and control study in Ethiopia. PLoS ONE, 11(4), 1–13. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153432.
25.
StevensonE. J.GreeneL. E.MaesK. C.AmbeluA.TesfayeY. A.RheingansR.HadleyC. (2012). Water insecurity in 3 dimensions: An anthropological perspective on water and women’s psychosocial distress in Ethiopia. Social Science & Medicine, 75(2), 392–400.
26.
SultanaF. (2009). Fluid lives: Subjectivities, gender and water in rural Bangladesh. Gender, Place and Culture, 16(4), 427–444.
27.
TharaK. (2017). In troubled waters: Water commodification, law, gender, and poverty in Bangalore. Gender & Development, 25(2), 253–268.
World Health Organisation (WHO) and United Nation Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2011). Drinking water: Equity, safety and sustainability. New York, NY: WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water and Sanitation.
WutichA. (2009). Intrahousehold disparities in women and men’s experiences of water insecurity and emotional distress in urban Bolivia. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 23(4), 436–454.
