Active labour market programmes (ALMPs) are critical preparation mechanisms to assist people to enter the workplace. This article analyses qualitative data from a hard-to-access group of individuals with mental health conditions (MHCs) participating in a large-scale UK ALMP, the Work Programme (WP). Using the lens of the ‘extended social model of disability’ and the concept of the ‘ideal worker’, the article demonstrates that ableist norms of the ‘ideal jobseeker’ were embedded within the Programme’s design, prioritising individuals with certain abilities and behaviour over others. Second, the article extends Acker’s framework of inequality regimes to demonstrate that formal and informal inequality practices within the Programme maintained, rather than challenged, disability inequality. This was visible along four dimensions: (1) ALMPs as organising processes producing disability inequality; (2) the visibility of disability inequality; (3) the legitimacy of disability inequality; and (4) control and compliance derived from hierarchical social relations within ALMP design and implementation, involving either stabilising or destabilising effects on disabled jobseekers. The theoretical and practical contributions of this article demonstrate that the design of the WP as an employment preparation mechanism pushed disabled jobseekers further away from paid employment, rather than towards workplace inclusion.
AckerJ (1990) Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society4(2): 139–158.
2.
AckerJ (1992) From sex roles to gendered institutions. Contemporary Sociology21(5): 565–569.
3.
AckerJ (2006) Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender and Society20(4): 441–464.
4.
AidenHMcCarthyA (2014) Current Attitudes towards Disabled People. London: Scope.
5.
AtheideDLJohnsonJM (1994) Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 485–499.
6.
BarnesC (1991) Disabled People in Britain: A Case for Anti-Discrimination Legislation. London: C Hurst & Co.
7.
BarnesC (1992) Qualitative research: Valuable or irrelevant?Disability, Handicap and Society7(2): 115–122.
8.
BarnesCMercerG (2005) Disability, work and welfare: Challenging the social exclusion of disabled people. Work, Employment and Society19(3): 527–545.
9.
BarrBTaylor-RobinsonDStucklerD, et al. (2016) ‘First, do no harm’: Are disability assessments associated with adverse trends in mental health? A longitudinal ecological study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health70(4): 339–345.
10.
Baumberg GeigerBGarthwaiteKWarrenJ, et al. (2018) Assessing work for social security benefits: International models for the direct assessment of work capacity. Disability and Rehabilitation40(24): 2962–2970.
11.
Bracken-RocheDBellEMacdonaldME, et al. (2017) The concept of ‘vulnerability’ in research ethics: An in-depth analysis of policies and guidelines. Health Research Policy and Systems15(1): 8.
12.
Business in the Community (BITC) (2019) Strength in numbers: Annual report. London: BITC.
13.
ButlerRParrH (1999) Mind and Body Spaces: Geographies of Illness, Impairment and Disability. Series: Critical geographies. London: Routledge.
14.
CampbellF (2001) Inciting legal fictions: Disability’s date with ontology and the ableist body of law. Griffith Law Review10(1): 42–62.
15.
CampbellF (2009) Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Demos (2019) Pathways from poverty: A case for institutional reform. London: Demos.
18.
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2017) Work Programme national statistics quarterly. London: DWP.
19.
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2020) StatXplore. Available at: stat-xplore.dwp.gov.uk (accessed 12 March 2020).
20.
ElrazH (2018) Identity, mental health and work: How employees with mental health conditions recount stigma and the pejorative discourse of mental illness. Human Relations71(5): 722–741.
21.
Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) (2014) Equality Act 2010: Summary guidance on services, public functions and associations. London: EHRC.
22.
ErevellesN (1996) Disability and the dialectics of difference. Disability & Society11(4): 519–537.
23.
EtheringtonDIngoldJ (2012) Welfare to work and the inclusive labour market: A comparative study of activation policies for sickness benefit claimants in the UK and Denmark. Journal of European Social Policy22(1): 30–44.
24.
FarmerMMacleodF (2011) Involving disabled people in social research: Guidance by the Office for Disability Issues. London: HM Government.
25.
FinkelsteinV (1980) Attitudes and Disabled People. New York: World Rehabilitation Fund.
26.
FosterDScottP (2015) Nobody’s responsibility: The precarious position of disabled employees in the UK workplace. Industrial Relations Journal46(4): 328–343.
27.
FosterDWassV (2013) Disability in the labour market: An exploration of concepts of the ideal worker and organizational fit that disadvantage employees with impairments. Sociology47(4): 705–721.
28.
FuertesVLindsayC (2016) Personalization and street-level practice in activation: The case of the UK’s Work Programme. Public Administration94(2): 526–541.
29.
GarthwaiteK (2014) Fear of the brown envelope: Exploring welfare reform with long-term sickness benefits recipients. Social Policy and Administration48(7): 782–798.
30.
GrantA (2013) Welfare reform, increased conditionality and discretion: Jobcentre Plus advisers’ experiences of targets and sanctions. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice21(2): 165–176.
31.
HarlanSRobertP (1998) The social construction of disability in organizations. Work and Occupations25(4): 397–435.
32.
Health and Safety Executive (HSE) (2018) Work-related stress, depression or anxiety statistics in Great Britain 2018. London: HSE.
33.
House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts (2013) Department for Work and Pensions: Work Programme Outcome Statistics Thirty-third Report of Session 2012–13. London: House of Commons.
34.
IngoldJ (2020) Employers’ perspectives on benefit conditionality in the UK and Denmark. Social Policy & Administration54(2): 236–249.
35.
IngoldJValizadeD (2017) Employers’ recruitment of disadvantaged groups: Exploring the effect of active labour market programme agencies as labour market intermediaries. Human Resource Management Journal27(4): 530–547.
36.
JammaersEZanoniPHardonkS (2016) Constructing positive identities in ableist workplaces: Disabled employees’ discursive practices engaging with the discourse of lower productivity. Human Relations69(6): 1365–1386.
37.
JordanDJ (2018) Welfare grunters and workfare monsters? An empirical review of the operation of two UK ‘Work Programme’ centres. Journal of Social Policy47(3): 583–601.
38.
LazarJOlalereAWentzB (2012) Investigating the accessibility and usability of job application web sites for blind users. Journal of Usability Studies7(2): 68–87.
39.
Learning and Work Institute (LWI) (2018) Work Programme statistics: Our analysis. London: LWI.
40.
LindsayCDuttonM (2013) Promoting healthy pathways to employability: Lessons for the UK’s welfare-to-work agenda. Policy and Politics41(2): 183–200.
41.
McNeillJMJonesKScullionL, et al. (2017) Welfare conditionality and disabled people in the UK: Claimants’ perspectives. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice25(2): 177–180.
42.
OliverM (1990) The cultural production of impairment and disability. In: LeonardP (ed.) The Politics of Disablement. London: Macmillan Education, 12–24.
43.
ReeveD (2004) Psycho-emotional dimensions of disability and the social model. In: BarnesCMercerG (eds) Implementing the Social Model of Disability: Theory and Research. Leeds: The Disability Press, 83–100.
44.
ReeveD (2012) Psycho-emotional disablism: The missing link? In: WatsonNRoulstoneAThomasC (eds) Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies. London: Routledge, 78–92.
ReeveD (2014) Psycho-emotional disablism and internalised oppression. In: SwainJFrenchSBarnesC, et al. (eds) Disabling Barriers – Enabling Environments. London: SAGE, 92–98.
47.
RitchieJLewisJ (2003) Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students. London: SAGE.
48.
RoulstoneA (2002) Disabling pasts, enabling futures? How does the changing nature of capitalism impact on the disabled worker and jobseeker?Disability and Society17(6): 627–642.
49.
RoulstoneAWilliamsJ (2013) Being disabled being a manager: Glass partitions and conditional identities in the contemporary workplace. Disability & Society29(1): 16–29.
50.
SainsburyRD (2017) Activation in the UK: The front line and the ‘black box’ of employment service provision. In: Van BerkelRCaswellDKupkaP, et al. (eds) Frontline Delivery of Welfare-to-Work Policies in Europe: Activating the Unemployed. London: Routledge, 53–69.
51.
ScholzF (2017) Disability inequality and the recruitment process: Responding to legal and technological developments. PhD Thesis, University of Leeds, UK.
52.
ScholzF (2020) Taken for granted ableist norms embedded in the design of online recruitment practices. In: FieldenSMooreMBendG (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Disability at Work. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
53.
ScholzFYalcinBPriestleyM (2017) Internet access for disabled people: Understanding socio-relational factors in Europe. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace11(1): 1–13.
54.
SmithVNeuwirthEB (2008) The Good Temp. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
55.
StevensonD (2017) Thriving at work: The Stevenson/Farmer review of mental health and employers. London: HM Government.
56.
StoneEPriestleyM (1996) Pawns and partners: Disability research and the role of non-disabled researcher. British Journal of Sociology47(4): 699–716.
57.
TewJ (2005) Social Perspectives in Mental Health: Developing Social Models to Understand and Work with Mental Distress. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
58.
ThomasC (1999) Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
59.
ThomasC (2004) How is disability understood? An examination of sociological approaches. Disability and Society19(6): 569–583.
60.
ToerienMSainsburyRDrewP, et al. (2013) Putting personalisation into practice: Work-focused interviews in Jobcentre Plus. Journal of Social Policy42(2): 309–327.
61.
WilliamsJ (2000) Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do about It. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62.
WilliamsJMavinS (2012) Disability as constructed difference: A literature review and research agenda for management and organization studies. International Journal of Management Reviews14(2): 159–179.
63.
World Health Organisation (WHO) (2005) Mental health policies and programmes in the workplace: Mental health policy and service guidance package. Geneva: WHO.
64.
WrightS (2016) Conceptualising the active welfare subject: Welfare reform in discourse, policy and lived experience. Policy & Politics 44(2): 235–252.
