Are leaders born or made? In this study of contemporary leadership development programmes, we find that leaders are not only made but also – in Ian Hacking’s sense – made up. Such programmes increasingly employ practices like personality profiling, appraisals, feedback and coaching aimed at creating knowledge about individual leaders in order for them to develop. The effects of these practices on participants have been theorized in terms of identity regulation and resistance, yet in our view the situated accomplishments of authority and identity remain inadequately theorized. This study follows a number of such practices as texts and conversations, and shows how a programme participant’s leader identity becomes authorized and acknowledged as participants and instructors ventriloquize texts in conversations. We theorize this as identity reconfiguration, as it entails the continual staging and authorizing of diverse figures. Our findings have implications for the relation between governmentality studies and studies of texts and conversations in leadership development programmes as well as for how we approach agency and context in this realm.
AlvessonMKärremanD (2000) Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations53(9): 1125–1149.
2.
AlvessonMSveningssonS (2003) Managers doing leadership: The extra-ordinarization of the mundane. Human Relations56(12): 1435–1459.
3.
AnderssonT (2012) Normative identity processes in managers’ personal development training. Personnel Review41(5–6): 572–589.
4.
BakkerABTimsMDerksD (2012) Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. Human Relations65(10): 1359–1378.
5.
Benoit-barnéCCoorenF (2009) The accomplishment of authority through presentification. Management Communication Quarterly23(1): 5–31.
6.
BoyleGJMatthewsGSaklofskeDH (2008) Critique of the five-factor model of personality contributors. In: BoyleGJMatthewsGSaklofskeDH (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment. London: SAGE, 295–312.
7.
BrummansBHJM (2007) Death by document: Tracing the agency of a text. Qualitative Inquiry13(5): 711–727.
8.
BrummansBHJM (ed.) (2018) The Agency of Organizing: Perspectives and Case Studies. New York: Routledge.
9.
CallonMLatourB (1981) Unscrewing the big Leviathan: How actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In: Knorr-CetinaKCicourelAV (eds) Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro and Macro-sociologies. London: Routledge, 277–302.
10.
CaroniaLMortariL (2015) The agency of things: How spaces and artefacts organize the moral order of an intensive care unit. Social Semiotics25(4): 401–422.
11.
CarrollBLevyL (2010) Leadership development as identity construction. Management Communication Quarterly24(2): 211–231.
12.
CarrollBNicholsonH (2014) Resistance and struggle in leadership development. Human Relations67(11): 1413–1436.
13.
CarrollBSmolović JonesO (2017) Mapping the aesthetics of leadership development through participant perspectives. Management Learning49(2): 187–203.
14.
CollinsDBHoltonEF (2004) The effectiveness of managerial leadership development programs: A meta-analysis of studies from 1982 to 2001. Human Resource Development Quarterly15(2): 217–248.
15.
CoorenF (2004) Textual agency: How texts do things in organizational settings. Organization11(3): 373–393.
16.
CoorenF (2006) The organizational world as a plenum of agencies. In: CoorenFTaylorJRVan EveryEJ (eds) Communication as Organizing: Empirical and Theoretical Explorations in the Dynamic of Text and Conversation. New York: Routledge, 81–100.
17.
CoorenF (2009) The haunting question of textual agency: Derrida and Garfinkel on iterability and eventfulness. Research on Language and Social Interaction42(1): 42–67.
18.
CoorenF (2010) Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
19.
CoorenF (2012) Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality. Journal of Communication62(1): 1–20.
20.
CoorenFBencherkiN (2011) How things do things with words: Ventriloquism, passion and technology. Encyclopaideia, Journal of Phenomenology and Education13(28): 35–61.
21.
CoorenFMatteF (2010) For a constitutive pragmatics: Obama, Médecins Sans Frontières and the measuring stick. Pragmatics and Society1(1): 9–31.
22.
CoorenFThompsonFCanestraroDBodorT (2006) From agency to structure: Analysis of an episode in a facilitation process. Human Relations59(4): 533–565.
23.
CoorenFKuhnTCornelissenJPClarkT (2011) Communication, organizing and organization: An overview and introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies32(9): 1149–1170.
DayDVFleenorJWAtwaterLESturmREMcKeeRA (2014) Advances in leader and leadership development: A review of 25 years of research and theory. The Leadership Quarterly25(1): 63–82.
27.
DeetzS (2003) Reclaiming the legacy of the linguistic turn. Organization10(3): 421–429.
28.
DerksenM (2001) Discipline, subjectivity and personality: An analysis of the manuals of four psychological tests. History of the Human Sciences14(1): 25–47.
29.
DrathWHMcCauleyCDPalusCJ, et al. (2008) Direction, alignment, commitment: Toward a more integrative ontology of leadership. Leadership Quarterly19(6): 635–653.
30.
EdwardsGElliottCIszatt-WhiteMSchedlitzkiD (2012) Critical and alternative approaches to leadership learning and development. Management Learning44(1): 3–10.
31.
ElyRJIbarraHKolbDM (2011) Taking gender into account: Theory and design for women’s leadership development programs. Academy of Management Learning and Education10(3): 474–493.
32.
FairhurstGT (2008) Discursive leadership: A communication alternative to leadership psychology. Management Communication Quarterly21(4): 510–521.
33.
FlyvbjergB (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry12(2): 219–245.
34.
FordJHardingN (2007) Move over management: We are all leaders now. Management Learning38(5): 475–493.
35.
FoucaultM (1994) Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984 (3rd edn). New York: The New Press.
36.
FoxS (2008) ‘That miracle of familiar organizational things’: Social and moral order in the MBA classroom. Organization Studies29(5): 733–761.
37.
GagnonS (2008) Compelling identity: Selves and insecurity in global, corporate management development. Management Learning39(4): 375–391.
38.
GagnonSCollinsonD (2014) Rethinking global leadership development programmes: The interrelated significance of power, context and identity. Organization Studies35(5): 645–670.
39.
GagnonSCollinsonD (2017) Resistance through difference: The co-constitution of dissent and inclusion. Organization Studies38(9): 1253–1276.
40.
GarfinkelH (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
41.
GarfinkelH (2002) Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working Out Durkheim’s Aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
42.
GherardiS (2001) From organizational learning to practice-based knowing. Human Relations54(1): 131–139.
43.
GiddensA (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
44.
GrimshavAD (1982) Sound-image data records for research on social interaction. Sociological Methods & Research11(2): 121–144.
45.
HackingI (2002) Historical ontology. In: GärdenforsPWolenskiJKijania-PlacekK (eds) In the Scope of Logic: Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Vol. II. New York, NY: Springer, 583–600.
46.
HackingI (2004) Between Michel Foucault and Erving Goffman: Between discourse in the abstract and face-to-face interaction. Economy and Society33(3): 277–302.
47.
HackingI (2007) Kinds of people: Moving targets. Proceedings of the British Academy151: 285–318.
48.
HardingN (2004) The Social Construction of Management: Texts and Identities. London: Routledge.
49.
HeritageJ (2012) Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction45(1): 1–29.
50.
HindmarshJLlewellynN (2018) Video in sociomaterial investigations: A solution to the problem of relevance for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods21(2): 412–437.
51.
Iszatt-WhiteMKempsterSCarrollB (2017) An educator’s perspective on reflexive pedagogy: Identity undoing and issues of power. Management Learning48(5): 582–596.
52.
JudgeTABonoJEIliesRGerhardtMW (2002) Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology87(4): 765–780.
53.
KnoblauchH (2005) Focused ethnography. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung6(3): 1–12.
54.
LatourB (1984) The powers of association. The Sociological Review32(1): 264–280.
55.
LynchM (2013) Ontography: Investigating the production of things, deflating ontology. Social Studies of Science43(3): 444–462.
56.
MichellJ (2008) Is psychometrics pathological science?Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective6(1–2): 7–24.
57.
MorgesonFPCampionMADipboyeRL, et al. (2007a) Are we getting fooled again? Coming to terms with limitations in the use of personality test for personnel selection. Personnel Psychology60: 1029–1049.
58.
MorgesonFPCampionMADipboyeRL, et al. (2007b) Reconsiderung the use of personality tests in personell selection contexts. Personnel Psychology60: 683–729.
59.
NicholsonHCarrollB (2013) Identity undoing and power relations in leadership development. Human Relations66(9): 1225–1248.
60.
NicoliniD (2009) Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organization Studies30(12): 1391–1418.
61.
O’BoyleEHHumphreyRHPollackJM, et al, (2011) The relation between emotional intelligence and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior32(5): 788–818.
62.
PetriglieriGWoodJDPetriglieriJL (2011) Up close and personal: Building foundations for leaders’ development through the personalization of management learning. Academy of Management Learning & Education10(3): 430–450.
63.
RoseN (1998) Inventing our Selves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64.
RoseNAbi-RachedJ (2014) Governing through the brain: Neuropolitics, neuroscience and subjectivity. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology32(1): 3–23.
65.
SacksHSchegloffEAJeffersonG (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50(4): 696–735.
66.
SchedlitzkiDEdwardsG (2014) Studying Leadership: Traditional and Critical Approaches. London: SAGE.
67.
SilvermanD (2006) Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: SAGE.
68.
SinclairA (2009) Seducing leadership: Stories of leadership development. Gender, Work and Organization16(2): 266–284.
69.
SmithDE (2005) Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
70.
Smolović JonesOGrintKCammockP (2015) Public leadership development facilitation and the crossroads blues. Management Learning46(4): 391–411.
71.
SuchmanLA (2006) Human–Machine Reconfigurations (2nd edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72.
SveningssonSAlvessonM (2003) Managing managerial identities: Organizational fragmentation, discourse and identity struggle. Human Relations56(10): 1163–1193.
73.
SveningssonSLarssonM (2006) Fantasies of leadership: Identity work. Leadership2(2): 203–224.
74.
TaylorJR (1999) What is ‘organizational communication’? Communication as a dialogic of text and conversation. The Communication Review3(1–2): 21–63.
75.
TaylorJRVan EveryEJ (2014) When Organization Fails: Why Authority Matters. New York, NY: Routledge.
76.
ten HaveP (2002) The notion of member is the heart of the matter: On the role of membership knowledge in ethnomethodological inquiry. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung3(3): 1–19.
TownleyB (1993) Foucault, power/knowledge, and its relevance for human resource management. The Academy of Management Review18(3): 518–545.
79.
VásquezCSchoenebornDSergiV (2016) Summoning the spirits: Organizational texts and the (dis)ordering properties of communication. Human Relations69(3): 629–659.
80.
VásquezCBencherkiNCoorenFSergiV (2018) From ‘matters of concern’ to ‘matters of authority’: Studying the performativity of strategy from a communicative constitution of organization (CCO) approach. Long Range Planning51(3): 417–435.
81.
VikkelsøS (2012) The fragility of a robust therapeutic technique: The case of Bion’s experience group. Theory & Psychology22(2): 213–233.
82.
WalkerR (2018) Leadership development as organisational rehabilitation: Shaping middle managers as double agents. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
