Recent organizational theorizing contends that loosely structured fluid social collectives may attain degrees of “organizationality” depending on whether or not they achieve certain organization-like elements. The organizationality approach offers a compelling account for the persistence of fluid social collectives, but the framework could be strengthened by moving beyond language-centered explanations and including into theorizing a plurality of “entities” that differ in ontological status. Based on a case study within the context of a fluid user-built recreation space, this study adopts a relational ontology viewpoint on materiality to show how dynamic aspects of natural elements, expectations, feelings, and the cyclicality of nature can be theorized as material, and thus mattering, to organizing processes. Findings reveal that the degree of durability of these entities is key for understanding interconnected decision-making, identity, and ultimately how the fluid collective achieves or degrades organizationality.
AhrneGöranBrunssonNils (2011). Organization outside organizations: The significance of partial organization. Organization, 18, 83–104.
2.
AlvessonMatsKärremanDan (2007). Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1265–1281.
3.
AlvessonMatsSandbergJörgen (2022). Pre-understanding: An interpretation-enhancer and horizon-expander in research. Organization Studies, 43, 395–412.
4.
AshcraftKaren L.KuhnTimothy R.CoorenFrançois (2009). Constitutional amendments: “Materializing” organizational communication. Academy of Management Annals, 3, 1–64.
5.
AxleyStephen R. (1984). Managerial and organizational communication metaphor. Academy of Management Review, 9, 428–437.
6.
BaradKaren (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28, 801–831.
7.
BaradKaren (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
8.
BencherkiNicolasSnackJames P. (2016). Contributorship and partial inclusion. Management Communication Quarterly, 30, 279–304.
9.
BlagoevBlagoyCostasJanaKärremanDan (2019). “We are all herd animals”: Community and organizationality in coworking spaces. Organization, 26, 894–916.
10.
CarlilePaul R. (2015). The irony of making materiality of consequence. British Journal of Management, 26(S1), S22–S25.
CnossenBoukjeBencherkiNicolas (2019). The role of space in the emergence and endurance of organizing: How independent workers and material assemblages constitute organizations. Human Relations, 72, 1057–1080.
CoorenFrançois (2006). The organizational world as a plenum of agencies. In CoorenFrançoisTaylorJames R.Van EveryElizabeth J. (Eds.), Communication as organizing: Empirical and theoretical explorations in the dynamic of text and conversation (pp. 81–100). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
CoorenFrançois (2010). Action and agency in dialogue: Passion, incarnation and ventriloquism. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
16.
CoorenFrançois (2015). In medias res: Communication, existence, and materiality. Communication Research and Practice, 1, 307–321.
17.
CoorenFrançois (2018). Materializing communication: Making the case for a relational ontology. Journal of Communication, 68, 278–288.
18.
CoorenFrançois (2020). A Communicative Constitutive Perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility: Ventriloquism, undecidability, and surprisability. Business and Society, 59, 175–197.
19.
CoorenFrançoisFairhurstGail T. (2009). Dislocation and stabilization: How to scale up from interactions to organization. In PutnamLinda L.NicoteraAnne M. (Eds.), Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication (pp. 117–152). Hoboken, NJ: Taylor & Francis.
20.
DeweyJohnBentleyArthur F. (1949). Knowing and the known (Vol. III). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
21.
DobuschLeonhardSchoenebornDennis (2015). Fluidity, identity, and organizationality: The communicative constitution of Anonymous. Journal of Management Studies, 52, 1005–1035.
22.
EmirbayerMustafa (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 281–317.
23.
GarfinkelHarold (1988). Evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomena of order, logic, reason, meaning, method, etc. In and as of the essential quiddity of immortal society (I of IV): An announcement of studies. Sociological Theory, 6, 103–109.
24.
KeytonJoann (2001). Communication research: Asking questions, finding answers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
25.
KingBrayden G.FelinTeppoWhettenDavid A. (2010). Finding the organization in organizational theory: A meta-theory of the organization as a social actor. Organization Science, 21, 290–305.
26.
KuhnTimothy R.AshcraftKaren L.CoorenFrançois (2017). The work of communication: Relational perspectives on working and organizing in contemporary capitalism. New York: Routledge.
27.
LangleyAnnLindbergKajsaMørkBjørn E.NicoliniDavideRaviolaElenaWalterLars (2019). Boundary work among groups, occupations, and organizations: From cartography to process. Academy of Management Annals, 13, 704–736.
28.
LatourBruno (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
LawJohnMolAnnemarie (1995). Notes on materiality and sociality. Sociological Review, 43, 274–294.
30.
LindlofThomas R.TaylorBryan C. (2011). Qualitative communication research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
31.
LockeKarenGolden-BiddleKarenFeldmanMartha S. (2008). Perspective—making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process. Organization Science, 19, 907–918.
32.
LuhmannNiklas (2018) Organization and decision (BarrettR., Trans; BaeckerD., Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
MantereSakuKetokiviMikko (2013). Reasoning in organization science. Academy of Management Review, 38, 70–89.
34.
MarchJames G.SimonHerbert A. (1958). Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
35.
MatteFrédérikBencherkiNicolas (2019). Being followed by an organization: A hauntological perspective on organizational ethnography. In CoorenFrançoisMalboisFabienne (Eds.), Methodological and ontological principles of observation and analysis: Following and analyzing things and beings in our everyday world (pp. 202–232). New York: Routledge.
36.
McPheeRobert D.ZaugPamela (2009). The communicative constitution of organizations: A framework for explanation. In PutnamLinda L.NicoteraAnne M. (Eds.), Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication (pp. 21–47). New York: Routledge.
37.
O’DohertyDamianDe CockChristianRehnAlfAshcraftKaren L. (2011). Special issue on new sites/sights: Exploring the white spaces of organization. Organization Studies, 32, 712–714.
38.
SchadlerCornelia (2019). Enactments of a new materialist ethnography: Methodological framework and research processes. Qualitative Research, 19, 215–230.
39.
SchoenebornDennisKuhnTimothy R.KärremanDan (2019). The communicative constitution of organization, organizing, and organizationality. Organization Studies, 40, 475–496.
40.
SchreyöggGeorgSydowJörg (2010). Organizing for fluidity? Dilemmas of new organizational forms. Organization Science, 21, 1251–1262.
41.
SearleJohn R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
TaylorJames R.Van EveryElizabeth J. (2000). The emergent organization: Communication at its site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
TimmermansStefanTavoryIddo (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186.
44.
VásquezConsueloKuhnTimothy R. (Eds.) (2019). Dis/organization as communication: Exploring the disordering, disruptive and chaotic properties of communication. London: Routledge.
45.
VásquezConsueloPlourdeMarie-Claude (2017). Materiality and organizing. In ScottCraigLewisLaurie (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of organizational communication (pp. 1–21). New York: Wiley & Sons.
46.
VisserLaura M.DaviesOlivia E. (2021). The becoming of online healthcare through entangled power and performativity: A posthumanist agential realist perspective. Organization Studies, 42, 1817–1837.
47.
WilhoitElizabeth D.KisselburghLorraine G. (2015). Collective action without organization: The material constitution of bike commuters as collective. Organization Studies, 36, 573–592.
48.
WilhoitElizabeth D.KisselburghLorraine G. (2019). The relational ontology of resistance: Hybridity, ventriloquism, and materiality in the production of bike commuting as resistance. Organization, 26, 873–893.
