The role that sourcing agents, autonomous peripheral actors located in developing economies, play in the governance of working conditions in global supply chains has been greatly underexplored in the literature. The present article reports on an in-depth qualitative study of garment supply chains that examined the boundary work of Indian sourcing agents aimed at dismantling or bridging the boundaries that affect the interaction between western buyers and local suppliers, in order to facilitate development and implementation of meaningful working conditions or social relations at work. We identify four types of boundary work that sourcing agents used to manage combinations of accommodative and non-accommodative buyers and suppliers in order to work through boundaries created by buyers’ liability of foreignness: reinforcing, flexing (type 1 and 2) and restoring. We also found four essential conditions for a sourcing agent to become an effective boundary spanner in practice: acquiring knowledge about the relevant fields and actors, gaining legitimacy in the relevant fields and in the opinion of the parties involved, effectively translating the expectations of each party to the other, and benefiting from satisfying incentives. We contribute to the literature on governance for working conditions in global supply chains, boundary theory and liability of foreignness.
AbbottKWLevi-FaurDSnidalD (2015) Intermediaries in regulatory governance. Paper presented at the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics 27th Annual Conference, London, UK.
2.
AmaeshiKMOsujiOKNnodimP (2008) Corporate social responsibility in supply chains of global brands: A boundaryless responsibility? Clarifications, exceptions and implications. Journal of Business Ethics81(1): 223–234.
3.
AzmehS (2014) Labour in global production networks: Workers in the qualifying industrial zones (QIZs) of Egypt and Jordan. Global Networks14(4): 495–513.
4.
BairJ (2005) Global capitalism and commodity chains: Looking back, going forward. Competition & Change9(2): 153–180.
5.
BairJ (2008) Surveying the post-MFA landscape: What prospects for the global south post-quota?Competition & Change12(1): 3–10.
6.
BairJPetersED (2006) Global commodity chains and endogenous growth: Export dynamism and development in Mexico and Honduras. World Development34(2): 203–221.
7.
BarrientosS (2013) ‘Labour chains’: Analysing the role of labour contractors in global production networks. The Journal of Development Studies49(8): 1058–1071.
8.
BarrientosSGereffiGPicklesJ (2016) New dynamics of upgrading in global value chains: Shifting terrain for suppliers and workers in the global south. Environment and Planning A48(7): 1214–1219.
9.
BartleyT (2011) Transnational governance as the layering of rules: Intersections of public and private standards. Theoretical Inquiries in Law12(2): 517–542.
10.
BerryHGuillénMFZhouN (2010) An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies41(9): 1460–1480.
11.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
12.
BurriRV (2008) Doing distinctions boundary work and symbolic capital in radiology. Social Studies of Science38(1): 35–62.
13.
CampbellJTEdenLMillerSR (2012) Multinationals and corporate social responsibility in host countries: Does distance matter?Journal of International Business Studies43(1): 84–106.
14.
CoeNMDickenPHessM (2008) Global production networks: Realizing the potential. Journal of Economic Geography8(3): 271–295.
15.
DickenP (1992) Global Shift: The Internationalization of Economic Activity. New York: Guilford Press.
16.
DonagheyJReineckeJNiforouCLawsonB (2014) From employment relations to consumption relations: Balancing labor governance in global supply chains. Human Resource Management53(2): 229–252.
17.
DunningJH (1997) A Business Analytic Approach to Governments and Globalisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
EssersCBenschopY (2009) Muslim businesswomen doing boundary work: The negotiation of Islam, gender and ethnicity within entrepreneurial contexts. Human Relations62(3): 403–423.
19.
FichterMHelfenMSydowJ (2011) Employment relations in global production networks: Initiating transfer of practices via union involvement. Human Relations64(4): 599–622.
20.
FlanaganRJ (2006) Globalization and Labor Conditions: Working Conditions and Worker Rights in a Global Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
GereffiG (1999) International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain. Journal of International Economics48(1): 37–70.
22.
GereffiGFrederickS (2010) The global apparel value chain, trade and the crisis: Challenges and opportunities for developing countries. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
23.
GereffiGHumphreyJSturgeonT (2005) The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy12(1): 78–104.
24.
GlaserBGStraussAL (2009) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
25.
HargadonASuttonRI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly42(4): 716–749.
26.
HendersonJDickenPHessMet al. (2002) Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Review of International Political Economy9(3): 436–464.
27.
HessMYeungHW (2006) Whither global production networks in economic geography? Past, present, and future. Environment and Planning A38(7): 1193–1204.
28.
HustedBWAllenDB (2006) Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: Strategic and institutional approaches. Journal of International Business Studies37(6): 838–849.
29.
HymerSH (1976) The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Foreign Direct Investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
JayJ (2013) Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal56(1): 137–159.
31.
JohansonJVahlneJE (1977) The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies8(1): 23–32.
32.
JohansonJWiedersheim-PaulF (1975) The internationalization of the firm: Four Swedish cases. Journal of Management Studies12(3): 305–322.
33.
KhanFRLund-ThomsenP (2011) CSR as imperialism: Towards a phenomenological approach to CSR in the developing world. Journal of Change Management11(1): 73–90.
34.
KhanFRWestwoodRBojeDM (2010) ‘I feel like a foreign agent’: NGOs and corporate social responsibility interventions into Third World child labour. Human Relations63(9): 1417–1438.
35.
KhanZLewYKSinkovicsRR (2015a) International joint ventures as boundary spanners: Technological knowledge transfer in an emerging economy. Global Strategy Journal5(1): 48–68.
36.
KhanZLewYKParkBI (2015b) Institutional legitimacy and norms-based CSR marketing practices: Insights from MNCs operating in a developing economy. International Marketing Review32(5): 463–491.
37.
KhannaTPalepuK (1997) Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review75(4): 41–54.
38.
KostovaTZaheerS (1999) Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review24(1): 64–81.
39.
KreinerGEHollensbeECSheepML (2009) Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of Management Journal52(4): 704–730.
40.
LamontMMolnárV (2002) The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology28: 167–195.
41.
LeiferRDelbecqA (1978) Organizational/environmental interchange: A model of boundary spanning activity. Academy of Management Review3(1): 40–50.
42.
LevinaNVaastE (2005) The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quarterly29(2): 335–363.
43.
LevyDL (2008) Political contestation in global production networks. Academy of Management Review33(4): 943–963.
44.
LlewellynS (1998) Boundary work: Costing and caring in the social services. Accounting, Organizations and Society23(1): 23–47.
45.
LockeRM (2013) The Promise and Limits of Private Power: Promoting Labor Standards in a Global Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
46.
LuoYShenkarONyawMK (2002) Mitigating liabilities of foreignness: Defensive versus offensive approaches. Journal of International Management8(3): 283–300.
47.
Lund-ThomsenPLindgreenA (2014) Corporate social responsibility in global value chains: Where are we now and where are we going?Journal of Business Ethics123(1): 11–22.
48.
Lund-ThomsenPNadviK (2010) Clusters, chains and compliance: Corporate social responsibility and governance in football manufacturing in South Asia. Journal of Business Ethics93(2): 201–222.
49.
MenaSPalazzoG (2012) Input and output legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiatives. Business Ethics Quarterly22(3): 527–556.
50.
MeziasJM (2002) Identifying liabilities of foreignness and strategies to minimize their effects: The case of labor judgments in the United States. Strategic Management Journal23(3): 229–244.
51.
MorrisMStaritzC (2014) Industrialization trajectories in Madagascar’s export apparel industry: Ownership, embeddedness, markets, and upgrading. World Development56: 243–257.
52.
NadviK (2008) Global standards, global governance and the organization of global value chains. Journal of Economic Geography8(3): 323–343.
53.
NeilsonJPritchardBYeungHW (2014) Global value chains and global production networks in the changing international political economy: An introduction. Review of International Political Economy21(1): 1–8.
54.
PagellMShevchenkoA (2014) Why research in sustainable supply chain management should have no future. Journal of Supply Chain Management50(1): 44–55.
55.
PavlínekPŽenkaJ (2011) Upgrading in the automotive industry: Firm-level evidence from Central Europe. Journal of Economic Geography11(3): 559–586.
56.
PawlowskiSDRobeyD (2004) Bridging user organizations: Knowledge brokering and the work of information technology professionals. MIS Quarterly28(4): 645–672.
57.
PicklesJPlankLStaritzCGlasmeierA (2015) Trade policy and regionalisms in global clothing production networks. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society8(3): 381–402.
58.
PlankLStaritzC (2015) Global competition, institutional context and regional production networks: Up-and downgrading experiences in Romania’s apparel industry. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society8(3): 421–438.
59.
ReineckeJManningSVon HagenO (2012) The emergence of a standards market: Multiplicity of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry. Organization Studies33(5–6): 791–814.
60.
RichterAWWestMAVan DickRet al. (2006) Boundary spanners’ identification, intergroup contact, and effective intergroup relations. Academy of Management Journal49(6): 1252–1269.
61.
RugmanAMD’CruzJR (2000) Multinationals as Flagship Firms: Regional Business Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
SeuringSMüllerM (2008) From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production16(15): 1699–1710.
64.
ShenkarO (2001) Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies32(3): 519–535.
65.
SoundararajanVBrownJA (2016) Voluntary governance mechanisms in global supply chains: Beyond CSR to a stakeholder utility perspective. Journal of Business Ethics134(1): 83–102.
66.
SoundararajanVSpenceLJReesC (2016) Small business and social irresponsibility in developing countries: Working conditions and ‘evasion’ institutional work. Business & Society, DOI: 10.1177/0007650316644261.
67.
TouboulicAWalkerH (2016) A relational, transformative and engaged approach to sustainable supply chain management: The potential of action research. Human Relations69(2): 301–343.
68.
WhittingtonR (1996) Strategy as practice. Long Range Planning29(5): 731–735.
69.
ZaheerS (1995) Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal38(2): 341–363.
70.
ZaheerS (2002) The liability of foreignness, redux: A commentary.Journal of International Management8: 351–358.
71.
ZaheerSMosakowskiE (1997) The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: A global study of survival in financial services. Strategic Management Journal18(6): 439–464.
72.
ZhaoZJAnandJ (2013) Beyond boundary spanners: The ‘collective bridge’ as an efficient interunit structure for transferring collective knowledge. Strategic Management Journal34(13): 1513–1530.
73.
ZietsmaCLawrenceTB (2010) Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. Administrative Science Quarterly55(2): 189–221.
