School personnel’s experiences with implementing Texas House Bill 114 on vaping: A qualitative study

Abstract

Background:

In 2023, the US state of Texas passed a bill on vaping in school – House Bill 114 (HB 114) – which took effect in Texas public schools on 1 September of that year. HB 114 mandates that any student caught vaping in school be placed on a Disciplinary Alternative Education Program (DAEP). The efficacy of HB 114 may be contingent, at least in part, on the manner in which it is implemented at the school level. This study examined school personnel’s experiences implementing HB 114 in Texas public schools.

Methods:

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 13 school personnel performing a variety of roles in a Texas public school district.

Findings:

Thematic analysis of interview data revealed eight themes covering three topics of interest. School personnel reported mixed attitudes towards HB 114 and expressed concern about students adopting more sophisticated covert behaviours to continue vaping undetected. Although vaping prevalence was not measured directly, school personnel did not believe that the policy was reducing the prevalence of student vaping. Schools used diverse strategies to inform students and parents about the policy (e.g. flyers, emails, and social media posting). While some middle and high schools provided vaping prevention education and training for students and school personnel, elementary schools almost exclusively did not have one. The most often cited facilitators for policy implementation were school personnel being cooperative and having the funding to purchase vape detectors. Barriers include limited space and staffing in DAEP, the need for training for school personnel on vaping, and financial strain for more vape detectors.

Conclusions:

Findings suggest future efforts discouraging vaping should provide additional resources (e.g. financial support) to schools, update school personnel on vaping, offer more prevention and cessation education, and call for more parental and community engagement.

Keywords

Adolescents barriers facilitators policy implementation school vaping

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

Reupert

Oades

(2021) Implementing school policy effectively. In: Allen

Reupert

Oades

(eds) Building Better Schools with Evidence-Based Policy. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 1–9.

Balfour

DJK

Benowitz

Colby

, et al (2021) Balancing consideration of the risks and benefits of e-cigarettes. American Journal of Public Health 111(9): 1661–1672.

Bauma

(2024) Hundreds of Houston-area students disciplined for vaping under new Texas law. Houston Chronic. Available at: https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/education/article/texas-law-punishes-hundreds-houston-area-students-18568376.php

Berry

Fetterman

Benjamin

, et al (2019) Association of electronic cigarette use with subsequent initiation of tobacco cigarettes in US youths. JAMA Network Open 2(2): e187794.

Black

(2016) Reforming school discipline. Northwestern University Law Review 111: 1.

Bold

Kong

Cavallo

, et al (2022) School-based e-cigarette cessation programs: What do youth want? Addictive Behaviors 125: 107167.

Braun

Clarke

(2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2018) Best Practices User Guide: Health Communications in Tobacco Prevention and Control. Atlanta, GA: CDC.

Cruz

(2023) Texas law serves disciplinary action for vaping. Available at: https://eaglenationonline.com/51618/news/texas-law-serves-state-disciplinary-action-forvaping/#:~:text=A%20graphic%20design%20made%20on,to%20all%20Texas%20public%20schools

10.

Dai

(2021) Youth observation of e-cigarette use in or around school, 2019. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 60(2): 241–249.

11.

Dai

Ramos

Tamrakar

, et al (2021) School personnel’s responses to school-based vaping prevention program: A qualitative study. Health Behavior and Policy Review 8(2): 130–147.

12.

Dallas ISD News Hub (2023) Dallas ISD trustees amend policy for e-cigarettes. Available at: https://thehub.dallasisd.org/2023/08/25/dallas-isd-trustees-amend-policy-for-e-cigarettes/ (accessed 25 November 2024).

13.

Evans-Whipp

Bond

Ukoumunne

, et al (2010) The impact of school tobacco policies on student smoking in Washington State, United States and Victoria, Australia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 7(3): 698–710.

14.

Feltracco

Gutierrez

(2007) Campaign Development Tool Kit: An International Guide for Planning and Implementing Stop Smoking Campaigns. Branford, ON: Global Dialogue for Effective Stop Smoking Campaigns.

15.

Galanti

Coppo

Jonsson

, et al (2014). Anti-tobacco policy in schools: Upcoming preventive strategy or prevention myth? A review of 31 studies. Tobacco Control 23(4): 295–301.

16.

Geronimo

(2010) Deconstructing the marginalization of ‘underclass’ students: Disciplinary alternative education. The University of Toledo Law Review 42(2): 429–465.

17.

Grapevine-Colleyville Independent School District (2024) Changes to school policy regarding e-cigarettes, vaping and related substances. Available at: https://www.gcisd.net/page/school-policy-regarding-vaping (accessed 25 November 2024).

18.

Jupp

(2006) The SAGE Dictionary of Social Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Available at: https://methods.sagepub.com/reference/the-sage-dictionary-of-social-research-methods (accessed 4 August 2024)

19.

Justice Center (2011) Breaking schools’ rules. Available at: https://csgjusticecenter.org/publications/breaking-schools-rules/ (accessed 25 November 2024).

20.

Keane

(2023) Parents warned about vapes disguised as school highlighters, USB drives and ballpoint pens. New York Post. Available at: https://nypost.com/2023/08/27/parents-warned-about-vapes-disguised-as-school-highlighters-usb-drives-and-pens/

21.

Kong

Cavallo

Bold

, et al (2017) Adolescent and young adult perceptions on cigar packaging: A qualitative study. Tobacco Regulatory Science 3(3): 333–346.

22.

Kralevich

Slate

Tejeda-Delgado

, et al (2010) Disciplinary methods and student achievement: A statewide study of middle school students. International Journal of Educational Leadership 5(1): 1–20.

23.

Levy

Warner

Cummings

, et al (2019) Examining the relationship of vaping to smoking initiation among US youth and young adults: A reality check. Tobacco Control 28(6): 629–635.

24.

Liu

Reynolds

Hartman

, et al (2022) The first state tobacco flavor ban: High school tobacco control needs in a changing landscape. The Journal of School Health 92(7): 720–727.

25.

McGinley

(2018) FDA chief calls youth e-cigarettes an ‘epidemic’. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/fda-chief-calls-youth-use-of-juul-other-e-cigarettes-an-epidemic/2018/09/12/ddaa6612-b5c8-11e8-a7b5-adaaa5b2a57f_story.html (accessed 13 June 2022).

26.

Minnesota Department of Health (2023) Why schools should implement alternatives to suspension for use and possession of commercial tobacco products. Available at: https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/tobacco/ecigarettes/schools/suspension.html

27.

Murnaghan

Leatherdale

Sihvonen

, et al (2008) A multilevel analysis examining the association between school-based smoking policies, prevention programs and youth smoking behavior: Evaluating a provincial tobacco control strategy. Health Education Research 23(6): 1016–1028.

28.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2018) Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/24952.

29.

Paek

Hove

(2013) Multilevel analysis of the impact of school-level tobacco policies on adolescent smoking: The case of Michigan. The Journal of School Health 83(10): 679–689.

30.

Pastrana

Baum

Hawkins

(2023) Associations between e-cigarette policies and adolescent use and access to e-cigarettes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports 7: 100157.

31.

Patel

Donovan

Simard

, et al (2022) E-cigarette school policy and staff training: Knowledge and school policy experiences with e-cigarette products among a national sample of US middle and high school staff. PLoS ONE 17(3): e0264378.

32.

Sallis

Owen

Fisher

(2015) Ecological models of health behavior. In: Glantz

Rimer

Viswanath

(eds) Health Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 43–64.

33.

Schillo

Cuccia

Patel

, et al (2020) JUUL in school: Teacher and administrator awareness and policies of e-cigarettes and JUUL in U.S. middle and high schools. Health Promotion Practice 21(1): 20–24.

34.

Schreuders

van den Putte

Mlinarić

, et al (2020) The association between smoke-free school policies and adolescents’ perceived antismoking norms: Moderation by school connectedness. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 22(11): 1964–1972.

35.

Simons-Morton

Chen

(2009) Peer and parent influences on school engagement mong early adolescents. Youth & Society 41(1): 3–25.

36.

Simson

(2014) Exclusion, punishment, racism, and our schools: A critical race theory perspective on school discipline. UCLA Law Review 61. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2129117 (accessed 25 November 2024).

37.

Singh

Windle

Filion

, et al (2020) E-cigarettes and youth: Patterns of use, potential harms, and recommendations. Preventive Medicine 133: 106009.

38.

Tan

Chen

, et al (2022) Awareness of tobacco control policies and anti-tobacco attitudes and behaviors among school personnel. Tobacco Induced Diseases 20: 54.

39.

Texas Legislature Online (2023) A bill to be entitled. Available at: https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/88R/billtext/html/HB00114S.htm

40.

Thirlway

(2018) How will e-cigarettes affect health inequalities? Applying Bourdieu to smoking and cessation. The International Journal on Drug Policy 54: 99–104.

41.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2016) E-cigarette use among youth and young adults: A report of the Surgeon General. Available at: https://e-cigarettes.surgeongeneral.gov/resources.html

42.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2022) E-cigarette use among youth and young adults: A report of the Surgeon General. Available at: https://e-cigarettes.surgeongeneral.gov/documents/2016_SGR_Full_Report_non-508.pdf

43.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2020) FDA finalizes enforcement policy on unauthorized flavored cartridge-based e-cigarettes that appeal to children, including fruit and mint. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-finalizes-enforcement-policy-unauthorized-flavored-cartridge-based-e-cigarettes-appeal-children

44.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2021) Tobacco 21. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/tobacco-products/retail-sales-tobacco-products/tobacco-21

45.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2024) Results from the annual National Youth Tobacco Survey. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/tobacco-products/youth-and-tobacco/results-annual-national-youth-tobacco-survey (accessed 25 November 2024).

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

0.05 MB