Childcare providers’ work demands have been associated with high rates of stress and health conditions. Physical activity (PA) may help to alleviate some of these issues, yet few studies have explored this topic. The purpose of the study was to assess childcare providers’ PA levels and to explore their perceived barriers and facilitators to PA.
Methods:
This was a mixed-methods concurrent triangulation study with childcare providers (n = 27) from both family childcare homes and childcare centres from urban (n = 14) and rural (n = 13) areas. Accelerometers and the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) measured the amount of PA (leisure, transport-related, occupational), and a semi-structured interview explored barriers and facilitators to PA. Descriptive statistics were calculated for PA data. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic content analysis.
Results:
For accelerometer data, on average per day, childcare providers accumulated 199.5 ± 62.5 minutes of light activity, 125.9 ± 68.1 minutes of moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) and 666.3 ± 23.7 minutes of sedentary time. For GPAQ data, childcare providers reported 114.5 ± 48.4 minutes/day of MVPA and 295.6 ± 141.4 minutes/day of sedentary time. Common barriers included time constraints and health issues, while common facilitators included knowledge of PA health benefits and family/peer support.
Conclusion:
The study suggests an estimated 92% of childcare providers met the US national PA guidelines of 150 minutes of MVPA per week. However, they exhibited prolonged periods of sedentary behaviour (~11 hours). Programmes and interventions could address barriers to PA such as providing short movement breaks to decrease sedentary time and improve childcare providers’ health.
AdrianoR (2019) Physical activity levels of early childcare education (ECE) providers are associated with physical activity policies and practices in ECE centers. Doctoral Dissertation. Available at: https://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/handle/1773/44865
2.
AremHMooreSCPatelA, et al. (2015) Leisure time physical activity and mortality: A detailed pooled analysis of the dose-response relationship. JAMA Internal Medicine175(6): 959–967.
3.
ArmstrongTBullF (2006) Development of the World Health Organization Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ). Journal of Public Health14(2): 66–70.
4.
AtkinsLFrancisJIslamR, et al. (2017) A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implementation Science12(1): 77.
5.
BaumanAEReisRSSallisJF, et al. (2012) Correlates of physical activity: Why are some people physically active and others not?The Lancet380(9838): 258–271.
6.
BermúdezVJRojasJJCórdovaEB, et al. (2013) International physical activity questionnaire overestimation is ameliorated by individual analysis of the scores. American Journal of Therapeutics20(4): 448–458.
7.
BoothMLOwenNBaumanA, et al. (2000) Social–cognitive and perceived environment influences associated with physical activity in older Australians. Preventive Medicine31(1): 15–22.
8.
BoyleMHOlshoLEMendelsonMR, et al. (2022) Physical activity opportunities in US early child care programs. Pediatrics149(6): e2020048850.
9.
BrownWHPfeifferKAMcIverKL, et al. (2009) Social and environmental factors associated with preschoolers’ nonsedentary physical activity. Child Development80(1): 45–58.
10.
BruijnsBAAdamoKBBurkeSM, et al. (2020) Early childhood education candidates’ perspectives of their importance and responsibility for promoting physical activity and minimizing screen-viewing opportunities in childcare. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education43: 87–104.
11.
CaneJO’ConnorDMichieS (2012) Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implementation Science7(1): 37.
12.
ChanJSYLiuGLiangD, et al. (2019) Special issue–therapeutic benefits of physical activity for mood: A systematic review on the effects of exercise intensity, duration, and modality. The Journal of Psychology153(1): 102–125.
13.
ClemesSADavidBMZhaoY, et al. (2012) Validity of two self-report measures of sitting time. Journal of Physical Activity & Health9(4): 533–539.
14.
ClelandCLHunterRFKeeF, et al. (2014) Validity of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) in assessing levels and change in moderate-vigorous physical activity and sedentary behaviour. BMC Public Health14(1): 1255.
15.
ConnellyJAChampagneMManninghamS (2018) Early childhood educators’ perception of their role in children’s physical activity: Do we need to clarify expectations?Journal of Research in Childhood Education32(3): 283–294.
16.
CorcoranLSteinleyK (2017) Early childhood program participation, results from the National Household Education Surveys Program of 2016: First look. NCES 2017-101. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
17.
CostelloEKafchinskiMVrazelJ, et al. (2011) Motivators, barriers, and beliefs regarding physical activity in an older adult population. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy34(3): 138–147.
18.
CreswellJWPlanoClarkVLGutmannML, et al. (2003) Advanced mixed methods research designs. In: TashakkoriATeddlieC (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 209–240.
19.
CreswellJW (2013) Steps in conducting a scholarly mixed methods study.
20.
DavergneTTekayaRSellamJ, et al. (2021) Influence of perceived barriers and facilitators for physical activity on physical activity levels in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or spondyloarthritis: A cross-sectional study of 150 patients. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders22(1): 915.
21.
DijkstraFVan Der SluisGJager-WittenaarH, et al. (2022) Facilitators and barriers to enhancing physical activity in older patients during acute hospital stay: A systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity19(1): 99.
22.
DillonCBFitzgeraldAPKearneyPM, et al. (2016) Number of days required to estimate habitual activity using wrist-worn GENEActiv accelerometer: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One11(5): e0109913.
23.
DyrstadSMHansenBHHolmeIM, et al. (2014) Comparison of self-reported versus accelerometer-measured physical activity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise46(1): 99–106.
24.
EkelundUSeppHBrageS, et al. (2006) Criterion-related validity of the last 7-day, short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire in Swedish adults. Public Health Nutrition9(2): 258–265.
25.
EloSKääriäinenMKansteO, et al. (2014) Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open4(1): 2158244014522633.
26.
FaircloughSJNoonanRRowlandsAV, et al. (2016) Wear compliance and activity in children wearing wrist and hip mounted accelerometers. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise48(2): 245–253.
27.
GratzRRClaffeyA (1996) Adult health in child care: Health status, behaviors, and concerns of teachers, directors, and family child care providers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly11(2): 243–267.
28.
GuettermanTCFettersMDCreswellJW (2015) Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. Annals of Family Medicine13(6): 554–561.
29.
GuptaNChristiansenCHanischC, et al. (2017) Is questionnaire-based sitting time inaccurate and can it be improved? A cross-sectional investigation using accelerometer-based sitting time. BMJ Open7(1): e013251.
30.
HsiehHFShannonSE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research15(9): 1277–1288.
31.
KahnEBRamseyLTBrownsonRC, et al. (2002) The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine22(4): 73–107.
32.
KwonKAFordTGJeonL, et al. (2021) Testing a holistic conceptual framework for early childhood teacher well-being. Journal of School Psychology86: 178–197.
33.
KwonKAFordTGSalvatoreA, et al. (2022) Neglected elements of a high-quality early childhood workforce: Whole teacher well-being and working conditions. Early Childhood Education Journal50: 157–168.
34.
LessardLMWilkinsKRose-MalmJ, et al. (2020) The health status of the early care and education workforce in the USA: A scoping review of the evidence and current practice. Public Health Reviews41(1): 2.
35.
LingJ (2018) Behavioral and psychosocial characteristics among Head Start childcare providers. The Journal of School Nursing34(6): 435–441.
36.
LinnanLArandiaGBatemanLA, et al. (2017) The health and working conditions of women employed in child care. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health14(3): 283.
37.
MontoyeAHKClevengerKAPfeifferKA, et al. (2020) Development of cut-points for determining activity intensity from a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer in free-living adults. Journal of Sports Sciences38(22): 2569–2578.
38.
MontoyeAHKPivarnikJMMuddLM, et al. (2016) Validation and comparison of accelerometers worn on the hip, thigh, and wrists for measuring physical activity and sedentary behavior. AIMS Public Health3(2): 298–312.
39.
Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) (2013) Title 391 Children’s services licensing, Chapter 3: child care center. Available at: https://dhhs.ne.gov/licensure/Documents/CCC391-3.pdf (accessed 5 March 2023).
40.
OttenJJBradfordVAStoverB, et al. (2019) The culture of health in early care and education: Workers’ wages, health, and job characteristics. Health Affairs38(5): 709–720.
41.
PiercyKLTroianoRPBallardRM, et al. (2018) The physical activity guidelines for Americans. Journal of the American Medical Association320(19): 2020–2028.
42.
PinckardKBaskinKKStanfordKI (2019) Effects of exercise to improve cardiovascular health. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine6: 69.
RandallKKwonKAFordTG, et al. (2023) Physical well-being in early childhood teachers: Correlates of work-related musculoskeletal issues and fitness among these ‘educational athletes’. Early Education and Development34(2): 551–571.
45.
SantosLElliott-SaleKJSaleC (2017) Exercise and bone health across the lifespan. Biogerontology18(6): 931–946.
46.
SallisJFBullFGutholdR, et al. (2016) Progress in physical activity over the Olympic quadrennium. The Lancet388(10051): 1325–1336.
47.
SnyderKRidaZHulseE, et al. (2019) Exploring rural and urban Go NAP SACC trained child care providers perceptions and needs regarding the promotion of physical activity and healthy eating. Cogent Social Sciences5(1): 1650412.
48.
TovarAVaughnAEGrummonA, et al. (2017) Family child care home providers as role models for children: Cause for concern?Preventive Medicine Reports5: 308–313.
49.
TusoP (2015) Strategies to increase physical activity. The Permanente Journal19(4): 84–88.
50.
Van StralenMMDe VriesHMuddeAN, et al. (2009) Determinants of initiation and maintenance of physical activity among older adults: A literature review. Health Psychology Review3(2): 147–207.
51.
WardDSVaughnAEHalesD, et al. (2018) Workplace health and safety intervention for child care staff: Rationale, design, and baseline results from the CARE cluster randomized control trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials68: 116–126.
52.
WeberKSGodkinFECornishBF, et al. (2023) Wrist accelerometer estimates of physical activity intensity during walking in older adults and people living with complex health conditions: Retrospective observational data analysis study. JMIR Formative Research7(1): e41685.
53.
WendenEJPearceNGeorgeP, et al. (2022) Educators’ barriers and facilitators to physical activity policy implementation in the childcare setting: Qualitative findings from the Play Active Project. American Journal of Health Promotion36(8): 1326–1334.
54.
WillisGB (2004) Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
WhitebookMMcLeanCAustinLJ, et al. (2018) Early Childhood Workforce Index 2018. Berkeley, CA: Center for the Study of Child Care Employment, University of California, Berkeley.
56.
WoodJAHutchinsonNTPowersSK, et al. (2020) The COVID-19 pandemic and physical activity. Sports Medicine and Health Science2(2): 55–64.
57.
YangYSchumannMLeS, et al. (2018) Reliability and validity of a new accelerometer-based device for detecting physical activities and energy expenditure. PeerJ6: e5775.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
