Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Parent-led, home-based education, or homeschooling, has grown rapidly over recent decades with participation rates increasing more than 100-fold to now nearly one in 25 students nationwide in the United States. However, the research base has not grown correspondingly, and homeschoolers remain understudied. We systematically surveyed a population of homeschooling families (N = 881 responses) who had reported homeschooling a high-ability student to learn more about their characteristics and perceptions. Specifically, we report a mixed-methods analysis of the survey responses addressing whether and why these parents would or would not consider returning their child to a traditional school setting. Respondents were predominantly mothers who reported a high level of formal education and who were primarily responsible for implementing homeschooling with their child. Qualitative thematic analysis of open-ended responses yielded five main themes: preference, academics, concerns about future educational opportunities, satisfaction, and well-being. Findings both support and extend prior research with this population.

Keywords

gifted children decision-making parents and families content analysis homeschooling advanced academics school choice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bielick

Chandler

Broughman

S. P.

(2001). Homeschooling in the United States: 1999. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED455926.pdf

Blair

(2010). Online learning for gifted students from the parents’ perspectives. Gifted Child Today, 34(3), 28–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/107621751103400308

Cardel

M. I.

Dean

Montoya-Williams

(2020). Preventing a secondary epidemic of lost early career scientists. Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on women with children. Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 17(11), 1366–1370. https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/full/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202006-589IP

Carlson

J. F.

(2020). Context and regulation of homeschooling: Issues, evidence, and assessment practices. School Psychology, 35(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000335

Carpenter

Gann

(2016). Educational activities and the role of the parent in homeschool families with high school students. Educational Review, 68(3), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2015.1087971

Chen

Hinton

VanderWeele

T. J.

(2021). School types in adolescence and subsequent health and well-being in young adulthood: An outcome-wide analysis. PLOS ONE, 16(11), Article e0258723. https://doi-org.libdata.lib.ua.edu/10.1371/journal.pone.0258723

Cheng

Donnelly

(2019). New frontiers in research and practice on homeschooling. Peabody Journal of Education, 94(3), 259–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2019.1617576

Cheng

Tuchman

Walf

P. J.

(2016). Homeschool parents and satisfaction with special education services. Journal of School Choice, 10(3), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2016.1202076

Collom

(2005). The ins and outs of homeschooling: The determinants of parental motivations and student achievement. Education and Urban Society, 37(3), 307–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/001312450427419

10.

Dai

D. Y.

Swanson

J. A.

Cheng

(2011). State of research on giftedness and gifted education: A survey of empirical studies published during 1998–2010 (April). Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(2), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210397831

11.

Dennison

Lasser

Madres

Lerma

(2020). Understanding families who choose to homeschool: Agency in context. School Psychology, 35(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000341

12.

Dwyer

J. G.

Peters

S. F.

(2019). Homeschooling: The history and philosophy of a controversial practice. University of Chicago Press.

13.

Fan

Zheng

(2010). Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review. Computer in Human Behavior, 26(2), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.015

14.

Fields-Smith

Kisura

M. W.

(2013). Resisting the status quo: The narratives of black homeschoolers in metro Atlanta and metro DC. Peabody Journal of Education, 88, 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2013.796823

15.

Gagné

(2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 15(2), 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813042000314682

16.

Glaser

B. G.

(1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436–445. https://doi.org/10.2307/798843

17.

Hamlin

Cheng

(2022). Homeschooling, perceived social isolation, and life trajectories: An analysis of formerly homeschooled adults. Journal of School Choice, 16(2), 332–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2022.2028338

18.

Hamlin

Peterson

P. E.

(2022). Homeschooling skyrocketed during the pandemic, but what does the future hold? Education Next, 22(2), 18–24. https://www.educationnext.org/homeschooling-skyrocketed-during-pandemic-what-does-future-hold-online-neighborhood-pods-cooperatives/

19.

Hanna

(2012). Homeschooling education: Longitudinal study of methods, materials and curricula. Education and Urban Society, 44(5), 609–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124511404886

20.

Home School Legal Defense Association. (2019). What we do: How do we make homeschooling possible? https://hslda.org/post/what-we-do

21.

Hurlbutt

(2012). Special education teachers’ perceptions and beliefs regarding homeschooling children with autism spectrum disorders. Home School Researcher, 27(1), 1–9.

22.

Jeynes

(2012). The rise of homeschooling as a modern educational phenomenon in American Protestant education. In Jeynes

Robinson

D. W.

(Eds.), International handbook of protestant education (pp. 77–92). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2397-0_5

23.

Jolly

J. L.

Makel

M. C.

(2010). No child left behind: The inadvertent costs for high-achieving and gifted students. Childhood Education, 87, 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2010.10521436

24.

Jolly

J. L

Matthews

M. S.

(2012). A critique of the literature on parenting gifted learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35(3), 259–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353212451703

25.

Jolly

J. L.

Matthews

M. S.

(2017). Why we blog: Homeschooling mothers of gifted children. Roeper Review, 39, 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2017.1289579

26.

Jolly

J. L.

Matthews

M. S.

(2018). The chronicles of homeschooling gifted learners. Journal of School Choice, 12(1), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2017.1354644

27.

Jolly

J. L.

Matthews

M. S.

(2020a). The intersection of homeschooling and gifted education. In Plucker

Callahan

C. A.

(Eds.), Critical issues in gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 249–259). Prufrock Press.

28.

Jolly

J. L.

Matthews

M. S.

(2020b). The shifting landscape of the homeschooling continuum. Educational Review, 72(3), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1552661

29.

Jolly

J. L.

Matthews

M. S.

Makel

(2019). Homeschooling of academically talented students [Paper presentation]. National Association for Gifted Children, Albuquerque, NM, United States.

30.

Jolly

J. L.

Matthews

M. S.

Nester

(2013). Homeschooling the gifted: A parent’s perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212469999

31.

Kekeya

(2016). Analyzing qualitative data using an iterative process. DWU Research Journal, 24, 86–94.

32.

Kunzman

(2012). Education, schooling, and children’s rights: The complexity of homeschooling. Educational Theory, 62(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2011.00436.x

33.

Kunzman

Gaither

(2020). Homeschooling: An updated comprehensive survey of the research. Other Education: The Journal of Educational Alternatives, 9(1), 253–336. https://www.othereducation.org/index.php/OE/article/view/259/261

34.

Lee

S.-Y.

Matthews

M. S.

Olszewski-Kubilius

(2008). A national picture of talent search and talent search educational programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207311152

35.

Logan

S. R.

(2018). A historical and political look at the modern school choice movement. International Journal of Educational Reform, 27(1), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678791802700101

36.

Lubienski

Puckett

Brewer

T. J.

(2013). Does homeschooling “work”? A critique of the empirical claims and agenda of advocacy organizations. Peabody Journal of Education, 88, 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2013.798516

37.

Makel

M. C.

Corwith

Olszewski-Kubilius

(2020). Talent search programs. In Plucker

J. A.

Callahan

C. M.

(Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 457–469). Prufrock Press.

38.

Matthews

M. S.

(2006). Gifted students dropping out: Recent findings from a southeastern state. Roeper Review, 28(4), 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190609554367

39.

Matthews

M. S.

Ritchotte

J. A.

Jolly

(2014). What’s wrong with giftedness? Parents’ perceptions of the gifted label. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 24(4), 372–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2014.990225

40.

Mazama

Lundy

(2015). African American homeschooling and the quest for quality education. Education and Urban Society, 47(2), 160–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124513495273

41.

McBee

M. T.

Makel

M. C.

(2019). The quantitative implications of definitions of giftedness. AERA Open, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419831007

42.

McClain

M.-C.

Pfeiffer

(2012). Identification of gifted students in the United States today: A look at state definitions, policies, and practices. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 28(1), 59–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2012.643757

43.

McDonald

(2019). Homeschooling and educational freedom: Why school choice is a good choice for homeschoolers [Briefing Paper]. CATO Institute. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED602797.pdf

44.

McQuiggan

Megra

Grady

(2017). Parent and family involvement in education: Results from the National Household Education Surveys Program of 2016. National Center for Education Statistics. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED575972.pdf

45.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

Saldaña

(2014). Qualitative data analysis (3rd ed.). Sage.

46.

Mojtabai

Olfson

Han

(2016). National trends in the prevalence and treatment of depression in adolescents and young adults. Pediatrics, 138(6), Article e20161878. https://doi.org/10.1542peds.2016-1878

47.

Murphy

(2014). The social and educational outcomes of homeschooling. Sociological Spectrum, 34(3), 244–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2014.895640

48.

National Association for Gifted Children. (n.d.). What is giftedness? https://www.nagc.org/resources-publications/resources/what-giftedness

49.

Nicholas

(2010). A progressive pedagogy for online learning with high-ability secondary students: A case study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(3), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209355973

50.

North Carolina Department of Administration. (2023a). NC division of non-public education North Carolina home school statistical history. https://ncadmin.nc.gov/dnpe/2021-22-statewide-home-school-statistical-historypdf/download?attachment

51.

North Carolina Department of Administration. (2023b). NC division of non-public education North Carolina statistical summary for home schools 2022-23. https://ncadmin.nc.gov/divisions/non-public-education-home-private/home-school-statistics

52.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Subotnik

R. F.

Worrell

F. C.

(2020). Programming for talent development beyond the classroom. In Robins

J. H.

Jolly

J. L.

Karnes

Bean

(Eds.), Methods and materials (5th ed., pp. 439–456). Prufrock Press.

53.

Patton

M. Q.

(2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.

54.

Periathiruvadi

Rinn

A. N.

(2012). Technology in gifted education: A review of best practices and empirical research. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(2), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2012.10782601

55.

Peters

S. J.

Rambo-Hernandez

Makel

M. C.

Matthews

M. S.

Plucker

J. A.

(2017). Should millions of students take a gap year? Large numbers of students start the school year above grade level. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(3), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217701834

56.

Pianta

R. C.

Ansari

(2018). Does attendance in private schools predict student outcomes at age 15? Evidence from a longitudinal study. Educational Researcher, 47(7), 419–434. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18785632

57.

Pyryt

M. C.

(2005). The vision of Julian Stanley. Roeper Review, 28(2), 62–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190609554339

58.

Ray

B. D.

(2017a). A systematic review of empirical research on selected aspects of homeschooling as a school choice. Journal of School Choice, 11(4), 604–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2017.1395638

59.

Ray

B. D.

(2017b). Review of research on homeschooling and what might educators learn? Pro-Posições, 28(2), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-6248-2016-0009

60.

Ray

B. D.

(2022, September 15). How many homeschool students are there in the United States during the 2021-2022 school year? [Blog post]. https://www.nheri.org/how-many-homeschool-students-are-there-in-the-united-states-during-the-2021-2022-school-year/

61.

Riley

(2022). A unique education: Unschooling to adulthood. Routledge.

62.

Shernoff

E. S.

Lewka

A. J.

Reddy

L. A.

Coccaro

(2017). Examining teachers’ attitudes and experiences with coaching to inform research-based practice: An iterative developmental design. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 27(4), 459–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2016.1255850

63.

Slater

Burton

McKillop

(2022). Reason for homeschooling in Australia: Who and why? Educational Review, 74(2), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2020.1728232

64.

Srivastava

Hopwood

(2009). A practical iterative framework for qualitative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800107

65.

Staniscuaski

Reichert

Werneck

F. P.

de Oliveira

Mello-Carpes

P. B.

Soletti

R. C.

Infanger Almeida

Zandona

Klein Ricachenevsky

Neumann

Schwartz

I. V. D.

Tamajusuku

A. S. K.

Seixas

Kmetzsch

, & Parent in Science Movement. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on academic mothers. Science, 368(6492), 724–725. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc2740

66.

Toporek

(2013, April 3). “Tebow Bills” for homeschooled athletes advance in three states. Education Week. https://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/schooled_in_sports/2013/04/tebow_bills_for_homeschooled_athletes_advance_in_three_states.html

67.

Van Galen

J. A

. (1988). Ideology, curriculum, and pedagogy in home education. Education and Urban Society, 21(1), 52–68.

68.

Wearne

(2019). A survey of families in a charter hybrid homeschool. Peabody Journal of Education, 94(3), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2019.1617581

69.

Winstanley

(2009). Too cool for school? Gifted children and homeschooling. Theory and Research in Education, 7, 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509343736

70.

Wixom

M. A.

(2015). State homeschool policies: A patchwork of provisions. 50-state reviews. Education Commission of States. https://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/01/20/42/12042.pdf

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB

Considerations of Academically Talented Students’ Homeschooling Families for Returning to Traditional Schools

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material