Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Although it has been hypothesized that gifted students are at risk for adopting a fixed mind-set, research revealed inconsistent results. We aimed to clarify this by differentiating between two operationalizations of giftedness (high cognitive ability and formal identification as gifted) and how these relate to students’ beliefs about intelligence and effort. Also, we examined the role of parental antecedents on students’ beliefs. Participants were 3,329 seventh-grade students and their parents. Only being labeled as gifted was related to adopting a fixed mind-set. Regarding parental antecedents, parents’ intelligence and effort beliefs were related to students’ corresponding beliefs. Furthermore, parental feedback was associated with students’ beliefs, which was most pronounced when student-reports of feedback were used. In particular, person-oriented feedback related positively to a fixed mind-set and negatively to students’ appreciation of the role of effort in academic performance, while process-oriented feedback showed the opposite pattern. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Keywords

education giftedness implicit beliefs latent mean differences parenting structural equation modeling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acee

T. W.

Kim

H. J.

Kim

J.-I.

Chu

H.-N. R.

Kim

. . . Wicker

F. W.

(2010). Academic boredom in under-and over-challenging situations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.08.002

Amemiya

Wang

M. T.

(2018). Why effort praise can backfire in adolescence. Child Development Perspectives, 12(3), 199–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12284

Baker

J. A.

Bridger

Evans

(1998). Models of underachievement among gifted preadolescents: The role of personal, family, and school factors. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629804200102

Blackwell

L. S.

Trzesniewski

K. H.

Dweck

C. S.

(2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x

Burgoyne

A. P.

Hambrick

D. Z.

Macnamara

B. N.

(2020). How firm are the foundations of mind-set theory? The claims appear stronger than the evidence. Psychological Science, 31(3), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0956797619897588

Burnette

J. L.

O’boyle

E. H.

VanEpps

E. M.

Pollack

J. M.

Finkel

E. J.

(2013). Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139(3), 655–701. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029531

Chen

F. F.

(2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834

Claro

Paunesku

Dweck

C. S.

(2016). Growth mindset tempers the effects of poverty on academic achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(31), 8664–8668. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1608207113

Cornell

D. G.

(1989). Child adjustment and parent use of the term” gifted.” Gifted Child Quarterly, 33(2), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628903300202

10.

Costa

Faria

(2018). Implicit theories of intelligence and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 829. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00829

11.

Cutumisu

Lou

N. M.

(2020). The roles of generic and domain-specific mindsets in learning graphic design principles. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1857787

12.

Dwairy

(2004). Parenting styles and mental health of Arab gifted adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(4), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620404800403

13.

Dweck

C. S.

(2002). The development of ability conceptions. In Wigfield

Eccles

(Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (Vol. 17, pp. 57–88). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50005-X

14.

Dweck

C. S.

Chiu

Hong

(1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1

15.

Dweck

C. S.

Leggett

E. L.

(1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256

16.

Dweck

C. S.

Yeager

D. S.

(in press). A simple re-analysis overturns a “failure to replicate” and highlights an opportunity to improve scientific practice: Commentary on Li and Bates. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337856605_A_Simple_Re-Analysis_Overturns_a_Failure_to_Replicate_and_Highlights_an_Opportunity_to_Improve_Scientific_Practice_Commentary_on_Li_and_Bates_2019

17.

Eccles

J. S.

(1999). The development of children ages 6 to 14. The Future of Children, 9(2), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/1602703

18.

Eccles

J. S.

Midgley

Wigeld

Buchanan

Reuman

Flanagan

(1993). The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48, 90101. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.48.2.90

19.

Esparza

Shumow

Schmidt

J. A

. (2014). Growth mindset of gifted seventh grade students in science. NCSSSMST Journal, 19(1), 6–13.

20.

Freeman

(2006). Giftedness in the long term. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29(4), 384–403. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2006-246

21.

Furnham

. (2014). Increasing your intelligence: Entity and incremental beliefs about the multiple “intelligences.” Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 163–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.03.001

22.

Gagné

(2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 15(2), 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813042000314682

23.

Gates

(2010). Children with gifts and talents: Looking beyond traditional labels. Roeper Review, 32(3), 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2010.485308

24.

Gregorich

S. E.

(2006). Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework. Medical Care, 44(11, Suppl. 3), S78–S94. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000245454.12228.8f

25.

Gunderson

E. A.

Gripshover

S. J.

Romero

Dweck

C. S.

Goldin-Meadow

Levine

S. C.

(2013). Parent praise to 1-to 3-year-olds predicts children’s motivational frameworks 5 years later. Child Development, 84(5), 1526–1541. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12064

26.

Haimovitz

Dweck

C. S.

(2016). Parents’ views of failure predict children’s fixed and growth intelligence mind-sets. Psychological Science, 27(6), 859–869. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616639727

27.

Haimovitz

Dweck

C. S.

(2017). The origins of children’s growth and fixed mindsets: New research and a new proposal. Child Development, 88(6), 1849–1859. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12955

28.

Haimovitz

Henderlong Corpus

(2011). Effects of person versus process praise on student motivation: Stability and change in emerging adulthood. Educational Psychology, 31(5), 595–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2011.585950

29.

Haimovitz

Wormington

S. V.

Corpus

J. H.

(2011). Dangerous mindsets: How beliefs about intelligence predict motivational change. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(6), 747–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.09.002

30.

Harder

Vialle

Ziegler

(2014). Conceptions of giftedness and expertise put to the empirical test. High Ability Studies, 25(2), 83–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2014.968462

31.

Henderlong Corpus

Lepper

M. R

. (2007). The effects of person versus performance praise on children’s motivation: Gender and age as moderating factors. Educational Psychology, 27(4), 487–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410601159852

32.

Henderlong Corpus

Ogle

C. M.

Love-Geiger

K. E

. (2006). The effects of social-comparison versus mastery praise on children’s intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30(4), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9039-4

33.

Hong

Y.-y.

Chiu

C.-y.

Dweck

C. S.

Lin

D. M.-S.

Wan

(1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.588

34.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

35.

Kammer

P. P.

(1986). Attribution for academic successes and failures of students participating and not participating in programs for the gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 9(2), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235328600900203

36.

Kanevsky

Keighley

(2003). To produce or not to produce? Understanding boredom and the honor in underachievement. Roeper Review, 26(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190309554235

37.

Kim

(2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of enrichment programs on gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(2), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216630607

38.

Kline

R. B.

(2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.

39.

Kline

(2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. SAGE.

40.

Bates

T. C.

(2019). You can’t change your basic ability, but you work at things, and that’s how we get hard things done: Testing the role of growth mindset on response to setbacks, educational attainment, and cognitive ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(9), 1640–1655. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000669

41.

Little

R. J. A.

(1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722

42.

Macnamara

B. N.

Rupani

N. S.

(2017). The relationship between intelligence and mindset. Intelligence, 64, 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.07.003

43.

Magez

Tierens

Van Huynegem

Van Parijs

Decaluwé

Bos

(2015). CoVaT-CHC Basisversie: Cognitieve vaardigheidstest volgens het CHC-model. [CoVaT-CHC basic version: Cognitive ability test based on the CHC-model]. Psychodiagnostisch Centrum en CAPvzw.

44.

Makel

M. C.

Snyder

K. E.

Thomas

Malone

P. S.

Putallaz

(2015). Gifted students’ implicit beliefs about intelligence and giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(4), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215599057

45.

McCoach

D. B.

Siegle

(2003). Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high-achieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(2), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620304700205

46.

Meade

A. W.

Johnson

E. C.

Braddy

P. W.

(2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 568–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568

47.

Mofield

E. L.

Parker Peters

(2018). Mindset misconception? Comparing mindsets, perfectionism, and attitudes of achievement in gifted, advanced, and typical students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(4), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986218758440

48.

Mofield

E. L.

Parker Peters

(2019). Understanding underachievement: Mind-set, perfectionism, and achievement attitudes among gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 42(2), 107–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353219836737

49.

Morsbach

S. K.

Prinz

R. J.

(2006). Understanding and improving the validity of self-report of parenting. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 9(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-006-0001-5

50.

Mueller

C. M.

Dweck

C. S.

(1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.33

51.

Muenks

Miele

D. B.

(2017). Students’ thinking about effort and ability: The role of developmental, contextual, and individual difference factors. Review of Educational Research, 87(4), 707–735. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316689328

52.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.).

53.

Nicholls

J. G.

(1978). The development of the concepts of effort and ability, perception of academic attainment, and the understanding that difficult tasks require more ability. Child Development, 49(3), 800–814. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128250

54.

Paunesku

Walton

G. M.

Romero

Smith

E. N.

Yeager

D. S.

Dweck

C. S.

(2015). Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychological Science, 26(6), 784–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615571017

55.

Pomerantz

E. M.

Kempner

S. G.

(2013). Mothers’ daily person and process praise: Implications for children’s theory of intelligence and motivation. Developmental Psychology, 49(11), 2040–2046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031840

56.

Ratelle

C. F.

Duchesne

Guay

(2017). Predicting school adjustment from multiple perspectives on parental behaviors. Journal of Adolescence, 54, 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.11.008

57.

Rattan

Good

Dweck

C. S.

(2012). “It’s ok—Not everyone can be good at math”: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 731–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.012

58.

Reis

S. M.

Boeve

(2009). How academically gifted elementary, urban students respond to challenge in an enriched, differentiated reading program. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33(2), 203–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320903300204

59.

Reis

S. M.

McCoach

D. B.

(2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620004400302

60.

Renzulli

J. S.

Delcourt

M. A

. (1986). The legacy and logic of research on the identification of gifted persons. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30(1), 20–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628603000104

61.

Satorra

(2000). Scaled and adjusted restricted tests in multi-sample analysis of moment structures. In Heijmans

R. D. H.

Pollock

D. S. G.

Satorra

(Eds.), Innovations in multivariate statistical analysis: A festschrift for Heinz Neudecker (pp. 233–247). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4603-0_17

62.

Scherrer

Preckel

(2019). Development of motivational variables and self-esteem during the school career: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Review of Educational Research, 89(2), 211–258. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318819127

63.

Siegle

Rubenstein

L. D. V.

Pollard

Romey

(2010). Exploring the relationship of college freshmen honors students’ effort and ability attribution, interest, and implicit theory of intelligence with perceived ability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(2), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209355975

64.

Sisk

V. F.

Burgoyne

A. P.

Sun

Butler

J. L.

Macnamara

B. N.

(2018). To what extent and under which circumstances are growth mind-sets important to academic achievement? Two meta-analyses. Psychological Science, 29(4), 549–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617739704

65.

Snyder

K. E.

Barger

M. M.

Wormington

S. V.

Schwartz-Bloom

Linnenbrink-Garcia

(2013). Identification as gifted and implicit beliefs about intelligence: An examination of potential moderators. Journal of Advanced Academics, 24(4), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X13507971

66.

Snyder

K. E.

Linnenbrink-Garcia

(2013). A developmental, person-centered approach to exploring multiple motivational pathways in gifted underachievement. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.835597

67.

Snyder

K. E.

Makel

M. C.

Adelson

J. L.

Crawford

B. F.

Barger

M. M.

(2021). Concordance and discordance in implicit beliefs about intelligence and giftedness. Learning and Individual Differences, 86, 101971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.101971

68.

Snyder

K. E.

Malin

J. L.

Dent

A. L.

Linnenbrink-Garcia

(2014). The message matters: The role of implicit beliefs about giftedness and failure experiences in academic self-handicapping. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034553

69.

Spinath

F. M.

Riemann

Angleitner

(2003). Implicit theories about personality and intelligence and their relationship to actual personality and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(4), 939–951. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00310-0

70.

Steenbergen-Hu

Makel

M. C.

Olszewski-Kubilius

(2016). What one hundred years of research says about the effects of ability grouping and acceleration on K–12 students’ academic achievement: Findings of two second-order meta-analyses. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 849–899. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316675417

71.

Subotnik

R. F.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Worrell

F. C.

(2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psycho-logical Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056

72.

Tempelaar

D. T.

Rienties

Giesbers

Gijselaers

W. H.

(2015). The pivotal role of effort beliefs in mediating implicit theories of intelligence and achievement goals and academic motivations. Social Psychology of Education, 18(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-014-9281-7

73.

Tierens

(2015). Onderzoeksrapport Constructvaliditeit [Research report construct validity]. Thomas More.

74.

van Bemmel

A. W

. (2015). Implicit theories of intelligence of gifted students in secondary education. Universiteit Utrecht.

75.

van de Schoot

Lugtig

Hox

(2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(4), 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.686740

76.

Vermote

Aelterman

Beyers

Aper

Buysschaert

Vansteenkiste

(2020). The role of teachers’ motivation and mindsets in predicting a (de)motivating teaching style in higher education: A circumplex approach. Motivation and Emotion, 44(2), 270–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-020-09827-5

77.

Yeager

D. S.

Dweck

C. S.

(2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722805

78.

Yeager

D. S.

Dweck

C. S.

(2020). What can be learned from growth mindset controversies? American Psychologist, 75(9), 1269–1284. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000794

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.05 MB

“You Are so Smart!”: The Role of Giftedness,Parental Feedback,and Parents’ Mindsets in Predicting Students’ Mindsets

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material