Leadership talent development has been identified as a priority in national and state standards for gifted education. However, leadership programs in schools are not always supported by mandates or funding in individual states and implementation is not always feasible within the constraints of local gifted service models. Although some research has been devoted to leadership for gifted and high-ability adolescents and emerging adults, a limited number of studies on the identification, measurement, and development of leadership talent have been conducted. This systematic review of literature examined existing research on leadership talent development for adolescents and emerging adults. A database search identified 38 quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies that were screened, summarized, and synthesized for discussion. The review highlighted research contexts, definitions of leadership, and themes that captured the recommendations researchers made across studies. Implications for developing leadership talent and suggestions for future research are discussed.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469-480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
3.
BassB. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Collier Macmillan.
4.
*BernsteinB. O.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2019). Psychological constellations assessed at age 13 predict distinct forms of eminence 35 years later. Psychological Science, 30(3), 444-454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618822524
5.
BorlandJ. H. (2003). The death of giftedness: Gifted education without gifted children. In BorlandJ. H. (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 105-125). Teachers College Press.
BrownB. (2018). Dare to lead: Brave work: Tough conversations: Whole hearts. Random House.
8.
BrownM. E.TreviñoL. K.HarrisonD. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002
9.
*BushS. A.GroveB. B.JohnsonJ. C.PriceT. T.SeibelM. M. (2019). Cultivating innovative teen-leadership programming: Building evidence of impact. Journal of Leadership Education, 18(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.12806/V18/I2/R1
10.
*CarruthersC. P.BusserJ. A. (2000). A qualitative outcome study of Boys and Girls Club program leaders, club members, and parents. Journal of Parks and Recreation Administration, 18(1), 50-67. https://js.sagamorepub.com/jpra/article/view/1616
11.
*ChanD. W. (2003). Leadership skills training for Chinese secondary students in Hong Kong: Does training make a difference?Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14(3), 166-174. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2003-427
12.
*CoffeyA.LaveryS. (2018). Student leadership in the middle years: A matter of concern. Improving Schools, 21(2), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480217732223
13.
*CoffeyL.DavisA. (2019). The holistic approach to academia: Traditional classroom instruction and experiential learning of student athletes. Education Sciences, 9(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020125
14.
*ConnerJ. O.StrobelK. (2007). Leadership development: An examination of individual and programmatic growth. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22(3), 275-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558407299698
15.
CrocettiE.RubiniM.MeeusW. (2008). Capturing the dynamics of identity formation in various ethnic groups: Development and validation of a three-factor model. Journal of Adolescence, 31(2), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.09.002
16.
DaiD. Y. (2017). Envisioning a new foundation for gifted education: Evolving complexity theory (ECT) of talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(3), 172-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217701837
17.
DaiD. Y.ChenF. (2014). Paradigms of gifted education: A guide to theory-based, practice-focused research. Prufrock Press.
EriksonE. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. W. W. Norton.
22.
*EvaN.SendjayaS. (2012). Creating future leaders: An examination of youth leadership development in Australia. Education + Training, 55(6), 584-598. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-08-2012-0082
23.
*FeldhusenJ. F.KennedyD. M. (1988). Observing the nature and emergence of leadership talent among gifted youths. Gifted Child Today, 11(6), 2-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/107621758801100602
24.
*FullerR.HarrisonC. K.BuksteinS.MartinB. E.LawerenceM.ParksC. (2017). The impact of high school on the leadership development of African American male scholar-athletes. High School Journal, 100(2), 146-162. https://jstor.org/stable/90000753
25.
FunkR. C. (2002). Developing leaders through high school junior ROTC: Integrating theory with practice. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 8(4), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190200800404
26.
*GassmanJ.ReedD.WidnerA. (2014). Student association activities contribute to leadership development of students in nonprofit management and leadership. Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 4(2), 92-113. https://js.sagamorepub.com/jnel/article/view/5935/0
27.
GoughD.OliverS.ThomasJ. (Eds.). (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd ed.). Sage.
28.
GreenleafR. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press.
29.
*GuestA. M. (2018). The social organization of extracurricular activities: Interpreting developmental meanings in contrasting high schools. Qualitative Psychology, 5(1), 41-58. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000069
30.
*HalsallT.FornerisT. (2018). Evaluation of a leadership program for First Nations, Métis, and Inuit youth: Stories of positive youth development and community engagement. Applied Developmental Science, 22(2), 125-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2016.1231579
31.
*HartzellS. A.HongE. (2016). Exploring the relationship between adolescent activities and choice of graduate school discipline: Implications for creativity development. Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(2), 109-131. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.72
*HendersonK. A.WhitakerL. S.BialeschkiM. D.ScanlinM. M.ThurberC. (2007). Summer camp experiences: Parental perceptions of youth development outcomes. Journal of Family Issues, 28(8), 987-1007. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X07301428
34.
*HilliardR. C.BlomL. C.SullivanM. A. (2019). Positive youth development and citizenship behaviors in young athletes: U.S. and Canadian coaches’ perspectives. The Physical Educator, 76(5), 1135-1156. https://doi.org/10.18666/TPE-2019-V76-I5-8008
35.
HongQ. N.FàbreguesS.BartlettG.BoardmanF.CargoM.DagenaisP.GagnonM.GriffithsF.NicolauB.O’CathainA.RousseauM.VedelI.PluyeP. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285-291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221
36.
*HowleyM.HowleyA. A.HelfrichS.HarrisonL.GillamM. B.SafranJ. (2012). A research-focused honors program for high-ability teacher education students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35(4), 319-343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353212459687
37.
IhrigL. M.LaneE.MahatmyaD.AssoulineS. G. (2018). STEM Excellence and Leadership Program: Increasing the level of STEM challenge and engagement for high-achieving students in economically disadvantaged rural communities. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 41(1), 24-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353217745158
38.
*Jones-MoralesJ.KonradA. M. (2018). Attaining elite leadership: Career development and childhood socioeconomic status. Career Development International, 23(3), 246-260. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-03-2017-0047
39.
*KagayR. B.MarxA. A.SimonsenJ. C. (2015). Student self-perceptions of leadership in two Missouri FFA chapters: A collective case study. Journal of Agricultural Education, 56(2), 76-92. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2015.02076
*KudoF. T.LonghoferJ. L.FloerschJ. E. (2012). On the origins of early leadership: The role of authoritative parenting practices and mastery orientation. Leadership, 84(3), 345-375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715012439431anus
42.
LakinJ. M. (2018). Making the cut in gifted selection: Score combination rules and their impact on program diversity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(2), 210-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217752099
43.
*LangramC. M. (1997). Adolescent voices—who’s listening? Psychosocial development of gifted minority students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 8(4), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X9700800405
44.
LeeS.-Y.MatthewsM. S.BooE.KimY.-K. (2020). Gifted students’ perceptions about leadership and leadership development. High Ability Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2020.1818554
45.
*LeeS.-Y.Olszewski-KubiliusP. (2006). The emotional intelligence, moral judgment, and leadership of academically gifted adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(1), 29-67. http://doi.org/10.1177/016235320603000103
46.
*LeeS.-Y.Olszewski-KubiliusP.DonahueR.WeimholtK. (2007). The effects of a service-learning program on the development of civic attitudes and behaviors among academically talented adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31(2), 165-197. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2007-674
47.
*LeeS.-Y.Olszewski-KubiliusP.DonahueR.WeimholtK. (2008). The Civic Leadership Institute: A service-learning program for academically gifted youth. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(2), 272-308. https://doi.org/10.4219/jaa-2008-773
48.
LiberatiA.AltmanD. G.TetzlaffJ.MulrowC.GotzscheP. C.IoannidisJ. P. A.ClarkeM.DevereauxP. J.KleijnenJ.MoherD. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), e1-e34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
49.
*LiuZ.RiggioR. E.DayD. V.ZhengC.DaiS.BianY. (2019). Leader development begins at home: Overparenting harms adolescent leader emergence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(10), 1226-1242. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000402
50.
LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2006). Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(4), 316-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00019.x
51.
*LucasN.GoodmanF. R. (2015). Well-being, leadership, and positive organizational scholarship: A case study of project-based learning in higher education. Journal of Leadership Education, 14(4), 138-152. https://doi.org/1012806/V14/I4/T2
52.
LuyckxK.GoossensL.SoenensB.BeyersW. (2006). Unpacking commitment and exploration: Preliminary validation of an integrative model of late adolescent identity formation. Journal of Adolescence, 29(3), 361-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.03.008
53.
*MakelM. C.KellH. J.LubinskiD.PutallazM.BenbowC. P. (2016). When lightning strikes twice: Profoundly gifted, profoundly accomplished. Psychological Science, 27(7), 1004-1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616644735
54.
MarciaJ. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In AdelsonJ. (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 159-187). John Wiley.
55.
MarlandS. P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented, volume 1: Report to the Congress of the United States by the US Commissioner of Education. U.S. Government Printing Office. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED056243
56.
MarshallG.SykesA. E. (2011). Systematic reviews: A guide for radiographers and other health care professionals. Radiography, 17(2), 158-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2010.08.007
57.
MatthewsM. S. (2004). Leadership education for gifted and talented youth: A review of the literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28(1), 77-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320402800105
58.
MatthewsM. S. (2015). Creativity and leadership’s role in gifted identification and programming in the USA: A pilot study. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(2), 247-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9373-x
59.
MeeusW.IedemaJ.MaassenG.EngelsR. (2005). Separation-individuation revisited: On the interplay in parent-adolescent relations, identity and emotional adjustment in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 28(1), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.07.003
60.
MeyerM. S.CranmoreJ.RinnA. N.HodgesJ. (2021). College choice: Considerations for academically advanced high school seniors. Gifted Child Quarterly, 65(1), 52-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220957258
61.
*MitraD. L.SandersF. C.PerkinsD. F. (2010). Providing spark and stability: The role of intermediary organizations in establishing school-based youth-adult partnerships. Applied Developmental Science, 14(2), 106-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691003738285
62.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS MEDICINE, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
PemaE.MehayS. (2009). The effect of high school JROTC on student achievement, educational attainment, and enlistment. Southern Economic Journal, 76(2), 533-552. https://doi.org/10.4284/sej.2009.76.2.533
66.
PfeifferS. I.WechslerS. M. (2013). Youth leadership: A proposal for identifying and developing creativity and giftedness. Estudos de Psicologica, 30(2), 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-166X2013000200008
67.
*PreusB.PayneR.WickC.GlomskiE. (2016). Listening to the voices of civically engaged high school students. High School Journal, 100(1), 66-84. https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2016.0021
68.
QianS.YuanQ.LimV. K. G.NiuW.LiuZ. (2020). Do job insecure leaders perform less transformational leadership? The roles of emotional exhaustion and trait mindfulness. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 27(4), 376-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051820938327
RenzulliJ. S. (2012). Reexamining the role of gifted education and talent development for the 21st century: A four-part theoretical approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(3), 150-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212444901
71.
RidellP. M. (2017). Reward and threat in the adolescent brain: Implications for leadership development. Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 38(4), 530-548. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-03-2015-0062
72.
RinnA. N. (2020). Social, emotional, and psychosocial development of gifted and talented individuals. Prufrock Academic Press.
73.
RinnA. N.MunR. U.HodgesJ. (2020). 2018-2019 State of the states in gifted education. National Association of Gifted Children and the Council of State Directors for Programs for the Gifted. https://www.nagc.org/2018-2019-state-states-gifted-education
SaldanaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
78.
SaleemF.ZhangY. Z.GopinathC.AdeelA. (2020). Impact of servant leadership on performance: The mediating role of affective and cognitive trust. SAGE Open, 10(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900562
79.
*SalisburyM. H.PascarellaE. T.PadgettR. D.BlaichC. (2012). The effects of work on leadership development among first-year college students. Journal of College Student Development, 53(2), 300-324. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2012.0021
80.
SchardtC.AdamsM. B.OwensT.KeitzS.FonteloP. (2007). Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 7(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-7-16
81.
*SchillingT.MartinekT.CarsonS. (2007). Youth leaders’ perceptions of commitment to a responsibility based physical activity program. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78(1), 48-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2007.10599403
82.
*SchneiderB.PaulM. C.WhiteS. S.HolcombeK. M. (1999). Understanding high school student leaders, I: Predicting teacher ratings of leader behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 10(4), 609-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00038-7
83.
SchreierM. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage.
SimontonD. K. (2008). Childhood giftedness and adult genius: A historiometric analysis of 291 eminent African Americans. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(3), 243-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208319294
87.
SinekS. (2009). Start with why: How great leaders inspire everyone to take action. Penguin.
88.
SubotnikR. F. (2015). Psychosocial strength training: The missing piece in talent development. Gifted Child Today, 38(1), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217514556530
89.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusR.WorrellF. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056
90.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2018). The talent development framework: Overview of components and implications for policy and practice. In Olszewski-KubiliusP.SubotnikR. F.WorrellF. C. (Eds.), Talent development as a framework for gifted education: Implications for best practices and applications in schools (pp. 7-23). Prufrock Academic Press.
91.
ThomasD. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
92.
*WeinbergerC. (2014). Are there racial gaps in high school leadership opportunities? Do academics matter more?Review of Black Political Economy, 41(4), 393-409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12114-014-9198-6
93.
*WhittingtonA.GarstB. A.GagnonR. J.BaughmanS. (2017). Living without boys: A retrospective analysis of the benefits and skills gained at all-female camps. Journal of Experiential Education, 40(2), 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825916689266
94.
YuklG.van FleetG. G. (1992). Theory and research on leadership in organizations. In DunetteM. D.HoughL. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 147-198). Consulting Psychologists Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
