The imposter phenomenon is characterized as difficulty internalizing success due to feelings of inauthenticity or phoniness despite contrary evidence of competence. Academically talented students in undergraduate honors programs could be more vulnerable to the imposter phenomenon as compared with other undergraduates because of experiences surrounding perfectionism and participation in highly selective programs. In this study, researchers examined the relationship between gender, honors program participation, perfectionism, and the imposter phenomenon among undergraduates. Results of a hierarchical regression analysis indicate that socially prescribed perfectionism and honors program participation relate to higher levels of imposter feelings in an undergraduate sample. Implications and practical recommendations for researchers, educators, school counselors, and college administrators are discussed.
AbramsonL. Y.SeligmanM. E.TeasdaleJ. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87(1), 49-74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.87.1.49
2.
AmesC. (1992). Achievement goals and the classroom motivational climate. In SchunkD. H.MeeceJ. L. (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 327-348). Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
AnthonyA. K.OkorieS.NormanL. (2016). When beauty brings out the beast: Female comparisons and the feminine rivalry. Gender Issues, 33(1), 311-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-016-9158-5
4.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469-480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
5.
BadawyR. L.GazdagB. A.BentleyJ. R.BrouerR. L. (2018). Are all impostors created equal? Exploring gender differences in the impostor phenomenon-performance link. Personality and Individual Differences, 131(September), 156-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.044
6.
BanduraA. (1994). Self-efficacy. In RamachaudranV. S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). Academic Press.
7.
BravataD. M.WattsS. A.KeeferA. L.MadhusudhanD. K.TaylorK. T.ClarkD. M.NelsonR. S.CokleyK. O.HaggH. K. (2019). Prevalence, predictors, and treatment of impostor syndrome: A systematic review. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 35(4), 1252-1275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05364-1
ChrismanS. M.PieperW. A.ClanceP. R.HollandC. L.HughesC. (1995). Validation of the Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65(3), 456-467. https://doi.irg/10.1207/s15327752jpa6503_6
10.
ClanceP. R. (1985). The impostor phenomenon: Overcoming the fear that haunts your success. Peachtree.
11.
ClanceP. R.ImesS. A. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 15(3), 241-247. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0086006
12.
ClanceP. R.O’TooleM. A. (1987). The impostor phenomenon: An internal barrier to empowerment and achievement. Women & Therapy, 87(3), 51-64. https://doi.org/10.1300/J015V06N03_05
13.
ClossonL. M.BoutilierR. R. (2017). Perfectionism, academic engagement, and procrastination among undergraduates: The moderating role of honors status. Learning and Individual Differences, 57(1), 157-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.04.010
14.
CokleyK.AwadG.SmithL.JacksonS.AwosogbaO.HurstA.StoneS.BlondeauL.RobertsD. (2015). The roles of gender stigma consciousness, imposter phenomenon, and academic self-concept in the academic outcomes of women and men. Sex Roles, 73(9), 414-426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0516-7
15.
ColvinJ. W.AshmanM. (2010). Roles, risks, and benefits of peer mentoring relationships in higher education. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 18(2), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611261003678879
16.
CourvilleT.ThompsonB. (2001). Use of structure coefficients in published multiple regression articles: β is not enough. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(2), 229-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164401612006
17.
CowieM. E.NealisL. J.SherryS. B.HewittP. L.FlettG. L. (2018). Perfectionism and academic difficulties in graduate students: Testing incremental prediction and gender moderation. Personality and Individual Differences, 123(March), 223-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.027
18.
CurranT.HillA. P. (2019). Perfectionism is increasing over time: A meta-analysis of birth cohort differences from 1989 to 2016. Psychological Bulletin, 145(4), 410-429. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000138
19.
CusackC. E.HughesJ. L.NuhuN. (2013). Connecting gender and mental health to imposter phenomenon feelings. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 18(2), 74-81. https://doi.org/10.24839/2164-8204.JN18.2.74
20.
DaiD. Y.RinnA. N. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond effect: What do we know and where do we go from here?Educational Psychology Review, 20, 283-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9071-x
21.
DennehyT. C.DasguptaN. (2017). Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(23), 5964-5969. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613117114
22.
DweckC. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
23.
EaglyA. H.NaterC.MillerD. I.KaufmannM.SczesnyS. (2020). Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. American Psychologist, 75(3), 301-315. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000494
24.
EndersC. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. Guilford Press.
25.
EriksonE. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. W. W. Norton.
26.
EriksonE. H. (1982). The life cycle completed. W. W. Norton.
27.
FergusonC. J. (2009). Is psychological research really as good as medical research? Effect size comparisons between psychology and medicine. Review of General Psychology, 13(2), 130-136. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015103
28.
FlettG. L.HewittP. L. (2014). Proposed framework for preventing perfectionism and promoting resilience and mental health among vulnerable children and adolescents. Psychology in Schools, 51(9), 899-912. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21792
29.
FlettG. L.HewittP. L.OliverJ. M.MacdonaldS. (2002). Perfectionism in children and their parents: A developmental analysis. In FlettG. L.HewittP. L. (Eds.), Perfectionism: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 89-132). American Psychological Association.
30.
FraenzaC. B. (2016). The role of social influence in anxiety and the imposter phenomenon. Online Learning, 20(2), 230-243. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i2.618
31.
FrostR. O.MartenP. A.LahartC.RosenblateR. (1990). The dimensions of perfectionism. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14(5), 449-468. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01172967
32.
Gibson-BeverlyG.SchwartzJ. P. (2008). Attachment, entitlement, and the imposter phenomenon in female graduate students. Journal of College Counseling, 11(2), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1882.2008.tb00029.x
33.
GrahamJ. W.OlchowskiA. E. (2007). How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science, 8(3), 206-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-007-0070-9
34.
HamachekD. E. (1978). Psychodynamics of normal and neurotic perfectionism. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 15(1), 27-33.
35.
HenningK.EyS.ShawD. (1998). Perfectionism, the imposter phenomenon and psychological adjustment in medical, dental, nursing and pharmacy students. Medical Education, 32(5), 456-464. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.1998.00234.x
36.
HensonR. K. (2002). The logic and interpretation of structure coefficients in multivariate general linear model analyses [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, United States. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED467381
37.
HensonR. K. (2006). Effect-size measures and meta-analytic thinking in counseling psychology research. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 601-629. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000005283558
38.
HernandezP. R.BloodhartB.BarnesR. T.AdamsA. S.ClintonS. M.PollackI.GodfreyE.BurtM.FischerE. V. (2017). Promoting professional identity, motivation, and persistence: Benefits of an informal mentoring program for female undergraduate students. PloS One, 12(11), e0187531. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187531
39.
HewittP. L.FlettG. L. (1991). Perfectionism in the self and social contexts: Conceptualization, assessment, and association with psychopathology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(3), 456-470. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.3.456
HewittP. L.FlettG. L.MikailS. F. (2017). Perfectionism: A relational approach to conceptualization, assessment, and treatment. Guilford Press.
42.
JacobsonR.JoelD. (2019). Self-reported gender identity and sexuality in an online sample of cisgender, transgender, and gender-diverse individuals: An exploratory study. Journal of Sex Research, 56(2), 249-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2018.1523998
43.
KellyJ. R.Hutson-ComeauxS. L. (2000). The appropriateness of emotional expression in women and men: The double-bind of emotion. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15(1), 515-528.
44.
KemL.NavanJ. L. (2006). Gifted students in college: Suggestions for advisors and faculty members. NACADA Journal, 26(2), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.12930/0271-9517-26.2.21
45.
KumarS.JagacinskiC. M. (2006). Imposters have goals too: The imposter phenomenon and its relationship to achievement goal theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(1), 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.05.014
46.
LaneJ. A. (2015). The imposter phenomenon among emerging adults transitioning into professional life: Developing a grounded theory. Adultspan Journal, 14(2), 114-128. https://doi.org/10.1002/adsp.12009
47.
LittleR. J. A. (1988). Missing data adjustments in large surveys (with discussion). Journal of Business Economics and Statistics, 6(1), 287-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1988.10509663
48.
LombardoW. K.CretserG. A.RoeschS. C. (2001). For crying out loud—The differences persist into the ’90s. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 45(7), 529-547. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014862714833
MakelM. C.SmithK. N.McBeeM. T.PetersS. J.MillerE. M. (2019). A path to greater credibility: Large-scale collaborative education research. AERA Open, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419891963
51.
MammadovS.HertzogN. B.MunR. U. (2018). An examination of self-determination within an alumni of an early college entrance program. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 41(3), 273-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353218781745
52.
MarciaJ. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(5), 551-558. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023281
53.
MarciaJ. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In AdelsonJ. (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 109-137). Wiley.
54.
MarshH. W.ParkerJ. W. (1984). Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don’t learn to swim as well?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(1), 213-231. https://doi.org/10/1037/00222-3514.47.1.213
55.
MarshH. W.PekrunR.MurayamaK.ArensA. K.ParkerP. D.GuoJ.DickeT. (2017). An integrated model of academic self-concept development: Academic self-concept, grades, test scores, and tracking over 6 years. Developmental Psychology, 54(2), 263-280. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000393
56.
MillerA. L.LambertA. D.Speirs NeumeisterK. L. (2012). Parenting style, perfectionism, and creativity in high-ability and high-achieving young adults. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35(4), 344-365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353212459257
57.
MillerA. L.Speirs NeumeisterK. L. (2017). The influence of personality, parenting styles, and perfectionism on performance goal orientation in high ability students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 28(4), 313-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X17730567
58.
MofieldE. L.Parker PetersM. (2015). The relationship between perfectionism and overexcitabilities in gifted adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38(4), 405-427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353215607324
59.
MorrisT. P.WhiteI. R.RoystonP. (2014). Tuning multiple imputation by predictive mean matching and local residual draws. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14(75), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-75
60.
MunR. U.HertzogN. B. (2019). The influence of parental and self-expectations on Asian American women who entered college early. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(2), 120-140. https://doi.10.1177/0016986218823559
Olszewski-KubiliusP.SubotnikR. F.WorrellF. C. (2018). Talent development as a framework for gifted education: Implications for best practices and applications in schools. Prufrock Press.
64.
ParkmanA. (2016). The imposter phenomenon in higher education: Incidence and impact. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 16(1), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/hea.12061_11
65.
PeughJ. L.EndersC. K. (2004). Missing data in educational research: A review of reporting practices and suggestions for improvement. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 525-556. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074004525
66.
RamseyE.BrownD. (2018). Feeling like a fraud: Helping students renegotiate their academic identities. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 25(1), 86-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2017.1364080
67.
RamseyJ. L.SpencerA. L. (2019). Interns and imposter syndrome: Proactively addressing resilience. Medical Education, 53(5), 504-505. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13852
68.
RiceK. G.LeeverB. A.ChristopherJ.PorterJ. D. (2006). Perfectionism, stress, and social (dis)connection: A short-term study of hopelessness, depression, and academic adjustment among honors students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(4), 524-534. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.4.524
69.
RinnA. N. (2020). Social, emotional, and psychosocial development of gifted and talented individuals. Prufrock Academic Press.
70.
RinnA. N.PluckerJ. A. (2004). We recruit them, but then what? The educational and psychological experiences of academically talented undergraduates. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620404800106
71.
RinnA. N.PluckerJ. A. (2019). High-ability college students and undergraduate honors programs: A systematic review. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 42(3), 187-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353219855678
72.
RinnA. N.SolesK. L.FergusonS.SmithK. N. (2019). Psychological profiles among high ability undergraduate students. High Ability Studies, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2019.1607721
73.
RStudio Team. (2019). RStudio: Integrated development for R (Version 1.2.1335). https://rstudio.com
SeifertT. A.PascarellaE. T.ColangeloN.AssoulineS. G. (2007). The effects of honors college participation on experiences of good practices and learning outcomes. Journal of College Student Development, 45(1), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2007.0007
77.
SlaneyR. B.RiceK. G.MobleyM.TrippiJ.AshbyJ. S. (2001). The Revised Almost Perfect Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34(3), 130-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2002.12069030
Speirs NeumeisterK. L. (2004a). Factors influencing the development of perfectionism in gifted college students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(4), 259-274. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620404800402
80.
Speirs NeumeisterK. L. (2004b). Interpreting successes and failures: The influence of perfectionism on perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(4), 311-335. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2004-320
81.
Speirs NeumeisterK. L. (2004c). Understanding the relationship between perfectionism and achievement motivation in gifted college students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(3), 219-231. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620404800306
82.
Speirs NeumeisterK. L. (2018). Perfectionism in gifted students. In StoeberJ. (Ed.), The psychology of perfectionism: Theory, research, applications (pp. 135-154). Routledge.
83.
Speirs NeumeisterK. L.FinchH. (2006). Perfectionism in high-ability students: Relational precursors and influences on achievement motivation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(3), 238-251. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620605000304
84.
Speirs NeumeisterK. L.FletcherK. L.BurneyV. H. (2015). Perfectionism and achievement motivation in high-ability students: An examination of the 2 × 2 model of perfectionism. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38(3), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353215592502
85.
StairsA. M.SmithG. T.ZapolskiT. C. B.CombsJ. L.SettlesR. E. (2012). Clarifying the construct of perfectionism. Assessment, 19(2), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111411663
86.
StoeberJ. (2012). The 2× 2 model of perfectionism: A critical comment and some suggestions. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(5), 541-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.029
87.
StoeberJ. (2016). Comparing two short forms of the Hewitt–Flett multidimensional perfectionism scale. Assessment, 25(5), 578-588. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116659740
88.
StoeberJ.OttoK. (2006). Positive conceptions of perfectionism: Approaches, evidence, challenges. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(4), 295-319. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_2
89.
StoeberJ.OttoK.DalbertC. (2009). Perfectionism and the big five: Conscientiousness predicts longitudinal increases in self-oriented perfectionism. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(4), 363-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.004
90.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056
91.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (Eds.). (2018). The psychology of high performance: Developing human potential into domain-specific talent. American Psychological Association.
92.
ThompsonT.DavisH.DavidsonJ. (1998). Attributional and affective responses of impostors to academic success and failure outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(2), 381-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00065-8
93.
ThompsonT.ForemanP.MartinF. (2000). Impostor fears and perfectionistic concern over mistakes. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(4), 629-647. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00218-4
94.
Van BuurenS.Groothuis-OudshoornK.VinkG.SchoutenR.RobitzschA.DooveL.JolaniS.Moreno-BetancurM.WhiteI.GaffertP.MeinfelderF.GrayB. (2020). Mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations (Version 3.9.0). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mice/mice.pdf
95.
VaughnA. R.TaasoobshiraziG.JohnsonM. L. (2020). Impostor phenomenon and motivation: Women in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 45(4), 780-795. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1568976
96.
VergauweJ.WilleB.FeysM.De FruytF.AnseelF. (2015). Fear of being exposed: The trait-relatedness of the imposter phenomenon and its relevance in the work context. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(3), 565-581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9382-5
97.
WangK. T.ShevelevaM. S.PermyakovaT. M. (2019). Imposter syndrome among Russian students: The link between perfectionism and psychological distress. Personality and Individual Differences, 143(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.005
98.
WardG. R. (1990). The relationships among attributional styles, motivational orientations and the impostor phenomenon among high-achieving undergraduate students [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of New Mexico.
99.
WilsonH. E.SiegleD.McCoachD. B.LittleC. A.ReisS. M. (2014). A model of academic self-concept: Perceived difficulty and social comparison among academically accelerated secondary school students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(2), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214522858
100.
YeattsP. E.BartonM.HensonR. K.MartinS. B. (2017). The use of structure coefficients to address multicollinearity in sport and exercise science. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 21(2), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2016.1259162
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
