This study aims to assess the views of Hungarian professors/associate professors regarding important student factors at the beginning of their scientific and academic careers. Two hundred seventy-three university faculty members who work with high-achieving students (e.g., gifted, honors) completed a questionnaire regarding the attributes of gifted students. The study highlights similarities and differences among these Hungarian faculty opinions on student attributes. Data was analyzed for talent-attributes with a logistic regression to discern the differences among different scientific disciplines (medicine, humanities, economics). A one way ANOVA model was used and indicated no difference between traits based on scientific discipline (F = 1.023; df = 5; p > 0.05). The conclusions of this research highlight key attributes of Hungarian honor students identified by Hungarian university teachers and these attributes are closer than we hypothesized related across scientific disciplines.
BaloghL (2012) Komplex tehetségfejlesztő programok. Hajdúböszörmény: Didakt Kiadó.
4.
BodnárGTakácsIBaloghÁ (2011) Tehetségmenedzsment a felsőoktatásban. Budapest: Magyar Tehetségsegítő Szervezetek Szövetsége.
5.
BoichenkoM (2015) Talent management programmes at British, American and Canadian universities: comparative study. Comparative Professional Pedagogy5(4): 68–72.
6.
Cognard-BlackAJSpisakAL (2019) Creating a profile of an honors student: a comparison of honors and non-honors students at public research universities in the United States. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council20(1): 123–157.
7.
DamonWLernerRMKuhnD, et al. (2008) Child and Adolescent Development: An Advanced Course. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
8.
FeistGJ (2006) The Psychology of Science and the Origins of the Scientific Mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
FeistGJ (2011) Psychology of science as a new subdiscipline in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science20(5): 330–334.
10.
GandyRHarrisonPGoldJ (2018) Talent management in higher education: is turnover relevant?European Journal of Training and Development42(9): 597–610.
11.
GyarmathyÉ (2010) Hátrányban az előny. A szociokulturálisan hátrányos tehetségek. Budapest: Magyar Tehetségsegítő Szervezetek Szövetsége, p. 148.
12.
HammerMH (2015) Towards a methodology to identify a talent by using psychological cognitive prototyping. Practice and Theory in Systems of Education10(4): 397–409.
13.
HébertTPMcBeeMT (2007) The impact of an undergraduate honors program on gifted university students. Gifted Child Quarterly51(2): 136–151.
14.
HelmreichRLSpenceJTBeaneWE, et al. (1980) Making it in academic psychology: demographic and personality correlates of attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology39: 896–908.
15.
HerskovitsM (1992) A tehetség felismerésének módszerei, lehetőségei a pályaválasztási tanácsadás hazai gyakorlatában. In: IllyésSRitoóknéÁM (eds) A nevelési és a pályaválasztási tanácsadás pszichológiája. Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest, pp. 241–270.
16.
HrubosI (1999) A felsőoktatás dilemmái a tömegessé válás korszakában. Oktatáskutató Intézet: Budapest.
17.
HuaOShoreBMMakarovaE (2014) Inquiry-based instruction within a community of practice for gifted—ADHD college students. Gifted Education International30(1): 74–86.
18.
LernerRMLernerLV (1999) Foundations and Biological Bases of Development in Adolescence. Shrewsbury: Garland Publishing.
19.
LevinsonDJDarrowCNKleinEB, et al. (1978) Season’s of a Man’s Life. New York, NY: Knopf.
20.
LubinskiDHumphreysLG (1992) Some bodily and medical correlates of mathematical giftedness and commensurate levels of socioeconomic status. Intelligence16: 99–115.
21.
MackintoshNJ (1998) IQ and Human Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford Univerity Press, pp. 103–198.
22.
NeriSWilkinsS (2019) Talent management in transnational higher education: strategies for managing academic staff at international branch campuses. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management41(1): 52–69.
23.
RodgersCRScottKH (2008) The development of the personal self and professional identity in learning to teach. In: Cochran-SmithMFeiman-NemserSMcIntyreDJDemersKE (eds) Handbook of Research on Teacher Education: Enduring Questions in Changing Contexts (3rd edn). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group/Association of Teacher Educators.
24.
ScagerKAkkermanSFKeesenF, et al. (2012) Do honors students have more potential for excellence in their professional lives?Higher Education64: 19–39.
25.
ShapinS (2009) The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
SiegelDJ (1999) The Developing Mind (Vol. 296). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
27.
SimontonDK (2004) Creativity in Science: Chance, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgeist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
SzabóJ (2017) A tehetség összetételének kérdése a magyar felsőoktatásban. In: NagyP (ed.) A Selye János Egyetem Nemzetközi Doktorandusz Konferenciája tanulmánykötet. Komarno: Selye János Egyetem, pp .355–365.
29.
SzabóJRévészGy (2018) Eternal questions of gifted education from the aspect of university teachers. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists6(1): 43–67.
30.
WolfensbergerM (2015) Talent Development in European Higher Education. Heidelberg: SpringerOpen.
