Creativity and giftedness are frequently associated, and schools may use measures of creativity for identifying gifted and talented students. The researchers examined three aspects of elementary student creativity: (a) the relationship between a teacher’s rating of student creativity and rubric-scored student writing samples, (b) group differences regarding creativity between identified gifted and general education students, and (c) potential gender differences evident in teacher ratings of creativity as well as creative products. Participants in the study were 155 Grade 4 students in an urban district in a southwestern state. Teacher ratings on three different scales were related to student creative products, yielding Pearson correlations ranging from r = .20 to r = .27. Identified gifted students scored higher than general education students in both teacher ratings of creativity (d = 0.83) and written products (d = 0.53). Female students scored higher than male students in both teacher ratings of creativity (d = 0.22) and written products (d = 0.57). These findings suggest that teacher ratings moderately predict creative student products. Identified gifted students scored consistently higher than general education students in creativity, and females scored slightly higher than males on creativity measures.
BaerJ.KaufmanJ. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 75-105. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01289.x
2.
BarronF. (1963). Creativity and psychological health: Origins of personal vitality and creative freedom. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
3.
BarronF. (1969). Creative person and creative process. New York, NY: Hold, Rinehart, & Winston.
4.
BateyM.FurnhamA. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132, 355-429. doi:10.3200/MONO.132.4.355-430
5.
BesemerS. P.O’QuinK. (1986). Creative product analysis: Testing a model by developing a judging instrument. In IsaksenS. G. (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics (pp. 341-357). Buffalo, NY: Bearly.
6.
BesemerS. P.TreffingerD. J. (1981). Analysis of creative products: Review and synthesis. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 997-1013. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1981.tb00287.x
7.
BradfordK. L.NewlandA. C.RuleA. C.MontgomeryS. E. (2016). Rubrics as a tool in writing instruction: Effects on the opinion essays of first and second graders. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44, 463-472. doi:10.1007/s10643-015-0727-0
8.
CarsonS. H. (2011). Creativity and psychopathology: A shared vulnerability model. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56, 144-153. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139128902.017
9.
CheungP. C.LauS. (2010). Gender differences in the creativity of Hong Kong school children: Comparison by using the new electronic Wallach-Kogan creativity tests. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 194-199. doi:10.1080/10400419.2010.481522
10.
CropleyA. J. (2011). Definitions of creativity. In RuncoM. A.PritzkerS. R. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 511-524). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11.
CropleyD. H.KaufmanJ. C. (2012). Measuring functional creativity: Non-expert raters and the Creative Solutions Diagnosis Scale. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 119-137. doi:10.1002/jocb.9
12.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
13.
DawsonV. L.D’AndreaT.AffinitoR.WestbyE. L. (1999). Predicting creative behavior: A reexamination of the divergence between traditional and teacher-defined concepts of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 57-66. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1201_7
14.
DollingerS. J.ShafranM. (2005). Note on consensual assessment technique in creativity research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100, 592-598. doi:10.2466/pms.100.3.592-598
15.
FeldhusenJ. F. (2005). Giftedness, talent, expertise, and creative achievement. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 64-79). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16.
GardnerH. E. (2011). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New York, NY: Basic Books.
17.
GetzelsJ. W.JacksonP. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence. New York, NY: Wiley.
18.
GreifenederR.ZeltS.SeeleT.BottenbergK.AltA. (2012). Towards a better understanding of the legibility bias in performance assessments: The case of gender-based inferences. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 361-374. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02029
19.
GuilfordJ. P. (1959). Traits of creativity. In AndersonH. H. (Ed.), Creativity and its cultivation (pp. 142-161). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
20.
HunsakerS. L.CallahanC. M. (1995). Creativity and giftedness: Published instrument uses and abuses. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 110-114. doi:10.1177/001698629503900207
21.
JarosewichT.PfeifferS.MorrisJ. (2002). Identifying gifted students using teacher rating scales: A review of existing instruments. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20, 322-336. doi:10.1177/073428290202000401
22.
JungR. E.GasparovicC.ChavexR. S.FloresR. A.SmithS. M.CaprihanA.YeoR. A. (2009). Biochemical support for the “threshold” theory of creativity: A magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 5319-5325. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0588-09.2009
23.
KaufmanJ. C.WaterstreetM. A.AilabouniH. S.WhitcombH. J.RoeA. K.RiggsM. (2010). Personality and self-perceptions of creativity across domains. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 29, 193-209. doi:10.2190/IC.29.3.c
24.
KimK. H. (2005). Learning from each other: Creativity in East Asian and American education:Creativity Research Journal, 17, 337-347. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1704_5
25.
KokotsakiD. (2012). Pre-service student-teachers’ conceptions of creativity in the primary music classroom. Research Studies in Music Education, 34, 129-156. doi:10.1177/1321103X12466770
26.
KooT. K.LiM. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15, 155-163. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
27.
LemonsG. (2011). Diverse perspectives of creativity testing: Controversial issues when used for inclusion into gifted programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35, 742-772. doi:10.1177/0162353211417221
28.
LimG. S. (2011). The development and maintenance of rating quality in performance writing assessment: A longitudinal study of new and experienced raters. Language Testing, 28, 543-560. doi:10.1177/0265532211406422
29.
MozaffariH. (2013). An analytical rubric for assessing creativity in creative writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3, 2214-2219. doi:10.4304/tpls.3.12.2214-2219
30.
MulletD. R.WillersonA.LambK. N.KettlerT. (2016). Examining teacher perceptions of creativity: A systematic review of the literature. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 9-30. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.001
PishghadamR.MehrF. J. (2011). Learner creativity and performance in written narrative tasks. World Journal of Education, 1, 115-125. doi:10.5430/wje.v1n2p115
36.
PluckerJ. A. (1998). Beware of simple conclusions: The case for the content generality of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 179-182. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1102_8
37.
PluckerJ. A.BeghettoR.DowG. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83-96. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1
38.
PluckerJ. A.RuncoM. A. (1998). The death of creativity measurement has been greatly exaggerated: Current issues, recent advances, and future directions in creativity assessment. Roeper Review, 21, 36-39. doi:10.1080/02783199809553924
39.
PreckelF.HollingH.WieseM. (2006). Relationship of intelligence and creativity in gifted and non-gifted students: An investigation of threshold theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 159-170. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.06.022
40.
ProctorR. M. J.BurnettP. C. (2004). Measuring cognitive and dispositional characteristics of creativity in elementary students. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 421-429. doi:10.1080/10400410409534553
41.
ProudfootD.KayA. C.KovalC. Z. (2015). A gender bias in the attribution of creativity: Archival and experimental evidence for the perceived association between masculinity and creative thinking. Psychological Science, 26, 1751-1761. doi:10.1177/0956797615598739
42.
PurcellJ.EckertR. (2006). Designing services and programs for high-ability learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
43.
QianM.PluckerJ. A. (2017). Creativity assessment. In PluckerJ. A. (Ed.), Creativity and innovation: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 223-234). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
44.
RenzulliJ. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Re-examining a definition. Phi Delta Kappa, 60, 180-181.
45.
RenzulliJ. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 332-357). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
46.
RenzulliJ. S. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 246-279). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
47.
RenzulliJ. S.ReisS. M. (1991). The assessment of creative products in programs for gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 128-134. doi:10.1177/001698629103500304
48.
RenzulliJ. S.SmithL. H.WhiteA. J.CallahanC. M.HartmanR. K.WestbergK. L.. . . ReedR. E. S. (2010). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students: Technical and administration manual (3rd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
49.
RosenY.MosharrafM. (2014, May). Online performance assessment of creativity skills: Findings from international pilot study. Paper presented at the meeting of International Association for Educational Assessment (IAEA), Singapore.
50.
RuncoM. A. (1987). The generality of creative performance in gifted and nongifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 121-125.
51.
RuncoM. A. (1991). Divergent thinking. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
52.
RuncoM. A. (2005). Creative giftedness. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 295-311). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
53.
RuncoM. A.CramondB.PagnaniA. R. (2010). Sex differences in creative potential and creative performance. In McCrearyD. (Ed.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 343-357). New York, NY: Springer.
54.
RussoC. F. (2004). A comparative study of creativity and cognitive problem-solving strategies of high-IQ and average students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 179-190. doi:10.1177/001698620404800303
SimontonD. K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
60.
SqualliJ.WilsonK. (2014). Intelligence, creativity, and innovation. Intelligence, 46, 250-257. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2014.07.005
61.
StarkoA. J. (2014). Creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
62.
SternbergR. J. (2005). The WICS model of giftedness. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 327-342). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
63.
SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.). (2005). Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
64.
TorranceE. P. (1979). The search for Satori and creativity. New York, NY: Creative Education Foundation.
65.
TraceJ.JanssenG.MeierV. (2015). Measuring the impact of rater negotiation in writing performance assessment. Language Testing, 34, 3-22. doi:10.1177/0265532215594830
66.
TraceJ.MeierV.JanssenG. (2016). “I can see that:” Developing shared rubric category interpretations through score negotiation. Assessing Writing, 30, 32-43. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.08.001
67.
TreffingerD. (2009). Myth 5: Creativity is too difficult to measure. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 245-247. doi:10.1177/0016986209346829
68.
WeisbergR. W. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. New York, NY: Freeman.
69.
WestbyE. L.DawsonV. L. (1995). Creativity: Asset or burden in the classroom?Creativity Research Journal, 8, 1-10. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj0801_1
70.
WolfK.StevensE. (2007). The role of rubrics in advancing and assessing student learning. Journal of Effective Teaching, 7(1), 3-14. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1055646
