This study describes the importance of creativity in the identification of gifted elementary-aged children and presents the process of validating a scale for rating the creativity of the students through the teachers’ responses. The results show the instrument’s unifactorial structure, satisfactory levels of internal consistency, as well as convergent and discriminant validity. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for the work of school psychologists.
AtkinsonC. (2009). Promoting high school boys’ reading engagement and motivation: The role of the school psychologist in real world research. School Psychology International, 30, 237–254. doi: 10.1177/0143034309106494.
2.
BeemanN.(1999). Strengthening the links between science and practice: Reading, evaluating, and applying research in school psychology. In: ReynoldsC. R.GutkinT. B. (eds) Handbook of school psychology, (3rd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, pp. 56–77.
3.
BentlerP. M.WuE. J. C. (1995). EQS for Macintosh users. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
4.
BoatmanT. A.DavisK. G.BenbowC. P.(1995). Best practices in gifted education. In: ThomasA.GrimesJ. (eds) Best practices in school psychology III. Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists, pp. 1083–1095.
5.
CallahanC. M.(2004). Intelligence and giftedness. In: SternbergR. J. (eds) Handbook of intelligence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 159–175.
6.
CookC. R.JimersonS. R.BegenyJ. C. (2010). A model for predicting the presence of school psychology: An international examination of sociocultural, sociopolitical and socioeconomic influences. School Psychology International, 31, 438–461. doi: 10.1177/0143034310377580.
7.
DavisG. A.RimmS. B. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented, (5th ed). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
FarrellP.JimersonS. R.OaklandT. D.(2007). School psychology internationally: A synthesis of findings. In: JimersonS. R.OaklandT. D.FarrellP. (eds) The handbook of international school psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 501–509.
9.
GagnéF. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 15, 119–147. doi: 10.1080/1359813042000314682.
10.
GilliamJ. E.CarpenterB. O.ChristensenJ. R. (1996). Gifted and talented evaluation scales. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
11.
JarosewichT.PfeifferS. I.MorrisJ. (2002). Identifying gifted students using teacher rating scales: A review of existing instruments. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20, 322–336. doi: 10.1177/073428290202000401.
12.
JimersonS. R.StewartK.SkokutM.CardenasS.MaloneH. (2009). How many school psychologists are there in each country of the world?: International estimates of school psychologists and school psychologist-to-student ratios. School Psychology International, 30, 555–567. doi: 10.1177/0143034309107077.
13.
KeoghB. K.MacMillanD. L.(1996). Exceptionality. In: BerlinerD. C.CalfeeR. C. (eds) Handbook of educational psychology. New York, NY: McMillan, pp. 311–330.
Pérez-GonzálezF. (2006). Proceso de detección de sujetos con altas capacidades en la Enseñanza Obligatoria: Validación de un modelo de identificación y propuestas para la intervención. Universidad de Valencia: Informe técnico GV05/251.
16.
PiirtoJ. (2004). Understanding creativity. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press, Inc.
17.
RavenJ. C.CourtJ. H.RavenJ. (1996). Matrices progresivas. Escalas color (CPM), General (SPM) y Superior (APM). Manual de administración. Madrid: TEA.
18.
RenzulliJ. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180–184.
19.
RenzulliJ. S.(1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In: SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. (eds) Conceptions of giftedness. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 53–92.
20.
RenzulliJ. S. (1990). A practical system for identifying gifted and talented students. Early Child Development and Care, 63, 9–18. doi: 10.1080/0300443900630103.
21.
RenzulliJ. S.SmithL. H.WhiteA. J.CallahanC. M.HartmanR. K.WestbergK. L. (2002). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students. Technical and administration manual, (revised ed.). Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.
22.
RuncoM. A.(2005). Creative giftedness. In: SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (eds) Conceptions of giftedness. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 295–311.
23.
SiegelD.PowellT. (2004). Exploring teacher biases when nominating students for gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 21–29. doi: 10.1177/001698620404800103.
24.
SternbergR. J. (2010). WISC: A new model for school psychology. School Psychology International, 31, 599–616. doi: 10.1177/0143034310386534.
25.
TalayaI.Pérez-GonzálezF.García-RosR. (2006). Análisis de las nominaciones de pares en el proceso de identificación de sujetos con altas capacidades. Actas del XIII Congreso INFAD. (Bilbao).
26.
TannenbaumA. J.(1996). The IQ controversy and the gifted. In: BenbowP.LubinskiD. (eds) Intellectual talent. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press, pp. 44–77.
27.
TorranceE. P. (1979). Torrance test of creative thinking: Norms and technical manual. Lexington, MA: Personnel Press/Ginn-Xerox.
28.
TourónJ.PeraltaF.ReparazC. (1998). La superdotación intelectual: Modelos, identificación y estrategias educativas. Navarra: Eunsa.
29.
YeoL. S.ChoiP. M. (2011). Cognitive-behavioural therapy for children with behavioural difficulties in the Singapore mainstream school setting. School Psychology International. published online ahead of print putlication, doi: 10.1177/0143034311406820.
