Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Very early in their education, law students are introduced to the two necessary components of a crime—mens rea and actus reus—that is, one is not guilty of a crime unless culpable in both thought and action. In Inferno 27, however, we meet Guido da Montefeltro whose promised absolution should, in theory, deprive him of mens rea: his conscience is clear. Yet Dante puts him in hell. Indeed, Guido’s condemnation comes as quite a surprise not only to the sinner but also to St Francis’s own cherub. This article will explore that moment and consider how Dante uses the episode to interpret the intersection of guilty thoughts (mens rea) and guilty acts (actus reus) and in so doing, creates a code of law to justify the Inferno’s anticipatory condemnation of Boniface VIII.

Keywords

absolution Boniface VIII Dante Guido da Montefeltro guilt St Augustine St Francis Ulysses

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alford JA (1977) Literature and Law in Medieval England. PMLA 9: 941–951.

Alighieri D (1991) Divina Commedia. 3 vols. Edited by N Sapegno. Florence: La Nuova Italia.

Barolini T (2018a) Inferno 26: The quest. Commento Baroliniano, Digital Dante. New York, NY: Columbia University Libraries. Available at: https://digitaldante.columbia.edu/dante/divine-comedy/inferno/inferno-26/ (accessed 3 January 2019).

Barolini T (2018b) Inferno 27: A failed conversion. Commento Baroliniano, Digital Dante. New York, NY: Columbia University Libraries. Available at: https://digitaldante.columbia.edu/dante/divine-comedy/inferno/inferno-27/ (accessed 12 January 2019).

Hatcher A (1970) Dante’s Ulysses and Guido da Montefeltro. Dante Studies 88: 109–117.

Herzman R (2005) ‘Io non Enea, Io non Paolo Sono’: Ulysses, Guido Da Montefeltro, and Franciscan traditions in the Commedia. Dante Studies 123: 23–69.

Markulin J (1982) Dante’s Guido da Montefeltro: A reconsideration. Dante Studies 100: 25–40.

Pennington KL Jr (1970) Bartolome de Las Casas and the tradition of medieval law. Church History 39(2): 149–161.

Ryan LV (1977) Ulysses, Guido and the betrayal of community. Italica 54(2): 227–249.

10.

Thompson D (1974) A note on the fraudulent counsel. Dante Studies 92: 149–152.

11.

Tosti L (1911) History of Pope Boniface VIII and His Times: With Notes and Documentary Evidence in Six Books. New York: Christian Press Association Publishing Company..

12.

Verdicchio M (2015) Irony and desire in Dante’s Inferno 27. Italica 92(2): 285–297.

13.

Villani G (1906) Chroniche Fiorentine. Translated by R Selfe. Edited by P Wicksteed. London: Constable.

14.

Woywod S (1918) The new canon law: A commentary and summary of the new code of canon law. New York: JF Wagner. Available at: https://archive.org/details/newcanonlaw00woywuoft/page/18 (accessed 21 February 2019).

Guido and the guilty mind: Mens rea and actus reus in Inferno 27

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References