Adams, D. (in press). Using research to guide the development and marketing of an African-American exhibit. In D. Thompson, A. Benefield, S. Bitgood, H. Shettel, & R. Williams (Eds.), Visitor studies: Theory, research, and practice (Vol. 5). Jacksonville, AL: Center for Social Design.
2.
Alt, M. (1980). Four years of visitor surveys at the British Museum (Natural History). Museums Journal, 80, 10-19.
3.
Bitgood, S. (1991). Suggested guidelines for designing interactive exhibits. Visitor Behavior, 6(4), 4-11.
4.
Bitgood, S. , & Shettel, H. (1993). Zum forschungstand der vorabevaluation. Karlsruher Schriften zur Besucherforschung, Heft4, 3-19.
5.
Bitgood, S. , Shettel, H., & Williams, R. (1991). Visitor evaluation of exhibits/programs: An overview. In Proceedings-Third Global Congress (pp. 27-29). Honolulu, HI: Heritage Interpretation International.
6.
Borun, M. (1977). Measuring the immeasurable: A pilot study of museum effectiveness. Washington, DC: Association of Science-Technology Centers.
7.
Borun, M. (1991). Naive notions and the design of science museum exhibits. In S. Bitgood, A. Benefield, & D. Patterson (Eds.), Visitor studies: Theory, research, and practice (Vol. 2, pp. 58-162). Jacksonville, AL: Center for Social Design.
8.
Borun, M. , Flexer, B., Casey, A., & Baum, L. (1983). Planets and pulleys: Studies of class visits to a science museum. Washington, DC: Association of Science-Technology Centers.
9.
Borun, M. , & Miller, M. (1980). What's in a name?Philadelphia: Franklin Institute of Science.
10.
Dagostino, J. , Loomis, R. J., & Webb, B. (1991). Attitudes, beliefs, intended behaviors, and exhibit evaluation. In A. Benefield, S. Bitgood, & H. Shettel (Eds.), Visitor studies: Theory, research, and practice (Vol. 4, pp. 92-102). Jacksonville, AL: Center for Social Design.
11.
Dana, J. C. (1917). The gloom of the museum. Woodstock, VT: Elm Tree Press.
12.
Diamond, J. (1982). Ethology in museums: Understanding the learning process. Journal of Museum Education: Roundtable Reports, 7(4), 13-15.
13.
Eason, L. , & Friedman, A. (1975). Elevator exhibit. The Physics Teacher, 13(8), 492-493.
14.
Eason, L. , & Lynn, M. (1976). Evaluation of the effectiveness of participatory exhibits. Curator, 19(1), 45-62.
15.
Edwards, R. , Loomis, R. J., Fusco, M., & McDermott, M. (1990). Motivation and information needs of art museum visitors: A cluster analytic study. ILVS Review: A Journal of Visitor Behavior, 1(2), 20-35.
16.
Falk, J. , & Balling, J. (1980). The school field trip: Where you go makes the difference. Science and Children, 17(6), 6-8.
17.
Falk, J. , & Balling, J. (1982). The field trip milieu: Learning and behavior as a function of contextual events. Journal of Educational Research, 76(1), 22-28.
18.
Falk, J. , Martin, W., & Balling, J. (1978). The novel field trip phenomena: Adjustment to novel settings interferes with task learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15, 127-134.
19.
Falk, J. H. (1993). Leisure decisions influence African-American use of museums. Washington, DC: Technical Information Service, American Association of Museums.
20.
Falk, J. H. , & Dierking, L. D. (1992). The museum experience. Washington, DC: Whalesback Books.
21.
Friedman, A. , Eason, L., & Sneider, G. (1979). Star games: A participatory astronomy exhibit. Planetarium, 8(3), 3-7.
22.
Gilman, B. I. (1916). Museum fatigue. Scientific Monthly, 12, 62-64.
23.
Gottfried, J. (1979). A naturalistic study of children's behavior in a free-choice learning environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
24.
Graft, C. (1989). Incorporating evaluation into the interpretive planning process at Colonial Williamsburg. In S. Bitgood, A. Benefield, & D. Patterson (Eds.), Visitor Studies: Theory, research, and practice (Vol. 2, pp. 133-139). Jacksonville, AL: Center for Social Design.
25.
Griggs, S. (1981). Formative evaluation of exhibits at the British Museum. Curator, 24(3), 189-202.
26.
Hood, M. (1983). Staying away: Why people choose not to visit museums. Museum News, 61(4), 50-57.
27.
Hutchinson, C. L. (1916). The democracy of art. American Magazine of Art, 7, 8.
28.
Jarrett, J. E. (1986). Learning from developmental testing of exhibits. Curator, 29(4), 295-306.
29.
Kennedy, J. (1990). User friendly: Hands-on exhibits that work. Washington, DC: Association of Science-Technology Centers.
30.
Klein, H. J. (1990). Der Glaseme Besucher. Berlin: Staatliche Museen Preussischer Kulturbesitz.
31.
Koran, J. , Koran, M. L., & Freeman, P. (1976). Acquisition of a concept: Effects of mode of instruction and length of exposure to biology examples. AV Communications Review, 24(4), 358-366.
32.
Koran, J. J., Jr. , Lehman, J., Shafer, L., & Koran, M. L. (1983). The relative effects of pre- and post-attention directing devices on learning from a `walk through' museum exhibit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(4), 341-346.
33.
Loomis, R. (1987). Museum visitor evaluation: New tool for managementNashville, TN: American Association for State and Local History.
34.
Martin, J., & O'Reilly, J. (Eds.). (1988). Zoological parks and environment-behavior research [Special issue]. Environment and Behavior, 20(4).
35.
Melton, A. (1933). Studies of installation at the Pennsylvania Museum of Art. Museum News, 10(14), 5-8.
36.
Melton, A. (1935). Problems of installation in museums of art (New Series No. 14). Washington, DC: American Association of Museums.
37.
Melton, A. (1972). Visitor behavior in museums: Some early research in environmental design. Human Factors, 14(5), 393-403.
38.
Miles, R. , & Alt, M. (1979). British Museum (Natural History): A new approach to the visiting public. Museums Journal, 78(4), 158-162.
39.
Miles, R. , Alt, M., Gosling, D., Lewis, B., & Tout, A. (1988). The design of educational exhibits (2nd ed.). London: Allen & Unwin.
40.
Miles, R. , & Tout, A. (1978). Human biology and the new exhibition scheme in the British Museum (Natural History). Curator, 21(1), 36-50.
41.
Norman, D. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
42.
Robinson, E. (1928). The behavior of the museum visitor (New Series No. 5). Washington, DC: American Association of Museums.
43.
Robinson, E. (1930). Psychological problems of the science museum. Museum News, 8(5), 9-11.
44.
Robinson, E. (1931). Exit the typical visitor. Journal of Adult Education, 3(4), 418-423.
45.
Rosenfeld, S. (1979). The context of informal learning in zoos. Journal of Museum Education: Roundtable Reports, 4(2), 1-3, 15-16.
46.
Rosenfeld, S. , & Turkel, A. (1982). A naturalistic study of visitors at an interpretive mini-zoo. Curator, 25(3), 187-212.
47.
Screven, C. G. (1969). The museum as a responsive learning environment. Museum News, 47(10), 7-10.
48.
Screven, C. G. (1974). The measurement and facilitation of learning in the museum environment: An experimental analysis. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Press.
49.
Screven, C. G. (1975). The effectiveness of guidance devices on visitor learning. Curator, 18(3), 219-243.
50.
Screven, C. G. (1990). Uses of evaluation before, during and after exhibit design. ILVS Review: A Journal of Visitor Behavior, 1(2), 36-67.
51.
Shettel, H. (1967). Atoms in Action Demonstration Center impact studies: Dublin, Ireland and Ankara, Turkey(Rep. No. AIR-F58-11/67-FR). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
52.
Shettel, H. (1973). Exhibits: Art form or educational medium?Museum News, 52, 32-41.
53.
Shettel, H. (1976). An evaluation of visitor response to "Man in his environment' (Rep. No. AIR-43200-7/76-FR). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
54.
Shettel, H. (1990). There's a worm in my com. Visitor Behavior, 5(3), 11-14.
55.
Shettel, H. , & Bitgood, S. (1993). The practical use of exhibit evaluation. Publics er Musees, No. 2.
56.
Shettel, H., Butcher, M., Cotton, T., Northrup, J., & Slough, D. (1968). Strategies for determining exhibit effectiveness (Rep. No. AIR E-95-4/68-FR). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
57.
Shettel, H., & Schumacher, S. (1969). Atoms in Action Demonstration Center impact studies: Caracas, Venezuela and Cordoba, Argentina (Rep. No. Al R-F58-3/69-FR). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
58.
Sneider, C. , Eason, L., & Friedman, A. (1979). Summative evaluation of a participatory science exhibit. Science Education, 63(1), 25-36.
59.
St. John, M. (1990). New metaphors for carrying out evaluations in the science museum setting. Visitor Behavior, 5(3), 4-8.
60.
Taylor, S. (1986). Understanding processes of informal education: A naturalistic study of visitors to a public aquarium. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
61.
Taylor, S. (1992). Try it! Improving exhibits through formative evaluation. New York: New York Hall of Science; Washington, DC: Association of Science-Technology Centers.
62.
Vukelich, R. (1984). Time language for interpreting history collections to children. Museum Studies Journal, 1(4), 43-50.
63.
Wagner, K. (1989). Maintaining a high quality visitor experience. In S. Bitgood, A. Benefield, & D. Patterson (Eds.), Visitor studies: Theory, research, and practice (Vol. 2, pp. 192-202). Jacksonville, AL: Center for Social Design.
64.
Wolf, R. (1980). A naturalistic view of evaluation. Museum News, 58(1), 39-45.
