Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Adopting a sustainable lifestyle is challenging because people often perceive their pro-environmental actions as ineffective and unimpactful. To reduce disposable cups use for “to-go” drinks, we presented information that makes the effectiveness of one’s efforts visible. In three experiments, we demonstrated that presenting explicated effectiveness information (i.e., figures showing the number of disposable cups that could be saved over time by using a reusable cup instead) as accumulated (vs. daily) increased the perceived effectiveness of one’s action, which, in turn, was associated with enhanced intention to use a reusable cup. This effect was obtained when the accumulated information showed potential high (i.e., 20 cups saved in a month, Experiments 1 and 2), but not low (i.e., 48 cups saved in a year, Experiment 3) impact. Our findings underscore the importance of presenting information that makes the effectiveness of one’s efforts visible to promote sustainable consumption.

Keywords

effort effectiveness incremental information self-regulation pro-environmental behavior sustainable consumption waste reduction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Antonetti

Maklan

(2014). Feelings that make a difference: How guilt and pride convince consumers of the effectiveness of sustainable consumption choices. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(1), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1841-9

Bagchi

Davis

D. F.

(2016). The role of numerosity in judgments and decision-making. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 89–93.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.12.010

Bar-Anan

Moran

(2018). Simple first: A skeleton for an evaluative learning model. Social Psychological Bulletin, 13(3), 1–23.

Berger

I. E.

Corbin

R. M.

(1992). Perceived consumer effectiveness and faith in others as moderators of environmentally responsible behaviors. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 11(2), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569201100208

Blake

(1999). Overcoming the ‘value-action gap’ in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environment, 4(3), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839908725599

Bozorg-Haddad

Zolghadr-Asli

Sarzaeim

Aboutalebi

Chu

Loáiciga

H. A.

(2020). Evaluation of water shortage crisis in the Middle East and possible remedies. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-Aqua, 69(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2019.049

Brandstätter

Schüler

(2013). Action crisis and cost–benefit thinking: A cognitive analysis of a goal-disengagement phase. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 543–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.004

Brehm

J. W.

Self

E. A.

(1989). The intensity of motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 40(1), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.000545

Brendl

C. M.

Higgins

E. T.

(1996). Principles of judging valence: What makes events positive or negative? In Gawronski

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 95–160). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60237-3

10.

Bröder

(2003). Decision making with the “adaptive toolbox”: Influence of environmental structure, intelligence, and working memory load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(4), 611. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.611

11.

Carmi

Kimhi

(2015). Further than the eye can see: Psychological distance and perception of environmental threats. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 21(8), 2239–2257. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2015.1046419

12.

Carver

C. S.

Scheier

M. F.

(1982). Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality–social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92(1), 111–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.92.1.111

13.

Cohen Ben-Arye

Halali

. (2024). Giving farm animals a name and a face: Eliciting animal advocacy among omnivores using the identifiable victim effect. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 93, 102193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102193

14.

Cook

Nuccitelli

Green

S. A.

Richardson

Winkler

Painting

Way

Jacobs

Skuce

(2013). Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters, 8(2), 24024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024

15.

Cordts

Nitzko

Spiller

Cordts

Nitzko

Spiller

(2014). Consumer response to negative information on meat consumption in Germany. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 17, 83–106. https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.164599

16.

Dijkstra

Rotelli

(2022). Lowering red meat and processed meat consumption with environmental, animal welfare, and health arguments in Italy: An online experiment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 877911. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877911

17.

Domina

Koch

(2002). Convenience and frequency of recycling: Implications for including textiles in curbside recycling programs. Environment and Behavior, 34(2), 216–238.

18.

Eitam

Kennedy

P. M.

Tory Higgins

(2013). Motivation from control. Experimental Brain Research, 229(3), 475–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3370-7

19.

Emanuel

(2019). Perceived impact as the underpinning mechanism of the end-spurt and U-shape pacing patterns. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1082. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01082

20.

Erez

(1977). Feedback: A necessary condition for the goal setting-performance relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(5), 624–627. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.5.624

21.

Fagerlin

Zikmund-Fisher

B. J.

Ubel

P. A.

Jankovic

Derry

H. A.

Smith

D. M.

(2007). Measuring numeracy without a math test: Development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale. Medical Decision Making, 27(5), 672–680.

22.

Fernbach

P. M.

Light

Scott

S. E.

Inbar

Rozin

(2019). Extreme opponents of genetically modified foods know the least but think they know the most. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(3), 251–256.

23.

Fischer

G. W.

Morgan

M. G.

Fischhoff

Nair

Lave

L. B.

(1991). What risks are people concerned about. Risk Analysis, 11(2), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1991.tb00606.x

24.

Fishbach

Zhang

Koo

(2009). The dynamics of self-regulation. European Review of Social Psychology, 20(1), 315–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280903275375

25.

Foteinis

(2020). How small daily choices play a huge role in climate change: The disposable paper cup environmental bane. Journal of Cleaner Production, 255, 120294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120294

26.

Frantz

C. M.

Mayer

F. S.

(2009). The emergency of climate change: Why are we failing to take action? Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 9(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2009.01180.x

27.

Freund

A. M.

Hennecke

(2015). On means and ends: The role of goal focus in successful goal pursuit. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(2), 149–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414559774

28.

Fröber

Dreisbach

(2014). The differential influences of positive affect, random reward, and performance-contingent reward on cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(2), 530–547. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-014-0259-x

29.

Gebuis

Reynvoet

(2012). The interplay between nonsymbolic number and its continuous visual properties. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(4), 642.‏ https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026218

30.

Gifford

(2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66(4), 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023566

31.

Hage

Söderholm

Berglund

(2009). Norms and economic motivation in household recycling: Empirical evidence from Sweden. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53(3), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.11.003

32.

Haggard

Clark

Kalogeras

(2002). Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 5(4), 382–385. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn827

33.

Halali

Perez

(2025). Binding the future boosts intergenerational sustainability. npj Climate Action, 4(1), 15.

34.

Hayes

A. F.

(2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.

35.

Hayes

A. F.

Rockwood

N. J.

(2017). Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations, and implementation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 98, 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.001

36.

Heath

Larrick

R. P.

(1999). Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 38(1), 79–109. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0708

37.

Henik

Gliksman

Kallai

Leibovich

(2017). Size perception and the foundation of numerical processing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416671323

38.

Hennecke

(2019). What doesn’t kill you . . .: Means for avoidance goal pursuit are less enjoyable than means for approach goal pursuit. Motivation Science, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000104

39.

Herziger

Berkessel

J. B.

Steinnes

K. K.

(2020). Wean off green: On the (in)effectiveness of biospheric appeals for consumption curtailment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69, 101415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101415

40.

Higgins

E. T.

(2012). Oxford series in social cognition and social neuroscience. Beyond pleasure and pain: How motivation works. Oxford University Press.

41.

Hofmann

Fisher

R. R.

(2012). How guilt and pride shape subsequent self-control. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 682–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611435136

42.

Hofmann

Kotabe

(2012). A general model of preventive and interventive self-control: PI-model of self-control. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(10), 707–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00461.x

43.

Josephs

R. A.

Giesler

R. B.

Silvera

D. H.

(1994). Judgment by quantity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.123.1.21

44.

Karsh

Eitam

(2015). Motivation from control: A response selection framework. In Haggard

Eitam

(Eds.), The sense of agency (pp. 265–286).

45.

Katzir

Emanuel

Liberman

(2020). Cognitive performance is enhanced if one knows when the task will end. Cognition, 197, 104189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104189

46.

Katzir

Liberman

(2021). Information on averted infections increased perceived efficacy of regulations and intentions to follow them. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620986288

47.

Keller

Köhler

J. K.

Eisen

Kleihauer

Hanss

(2021). Why consumers shift from single-use to reusable drink cups: An empirical application of the stage model of self-regulated behavioural change. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1672–1687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.001

48.

Kellstedt

P. M.

Zahran

Vedlitz

(2008). Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States. Risk Analysis, 28(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01010.x

49.

Kenny

D. A.

Judd

C. M.

(2014). Power anomalies in testing mediation. Psychological Science, 25(2), 334–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613502676

50.

Kivetz

Urminsky

Zheng

(2006). The goal-gradient hypothesis resurrected: Purchase acceleration, illusionary goal progress, and customer retention. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.1.39

51.

Kollmuss

Agyeman

(2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401

52.

Koo

Fishbach

(2012). The small-area hypothesis: Effects of progress monitoring on goal adherence. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 493–509. https://doi.org/10.1086/663827

53.

Kruglanski

A. W.

Shah

J. Y.

Fishbach

Friedman

Woo Young Chun

Sleeth-Keppler, D.

(2002). A theory of goal systems. In Kruglanski

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 331–378). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80008-9

54.

Lebrecht

Bar

Barrett

L. F.

Tarr

M. J.

(2012). Micro-valences: Perceiving affective valence in everyday objects. Frontiers in psychology, 3, 107. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00107

55.

Leibovich

Kallai

A. Y.

Itamar

(2016). What do we measure when we measure magnitudes? In Henik

(Ed.), Continuous issues in numerical cognition (pp. 355–373). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801637-4.00016-0

56.

Leibovich

Katzin

Harel

Henik

(2017). From “sense of number” to “sense of magnitude”: The role of continuous magnitudes in numerical cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16000960

57.

Lewin

(1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers ( Cartwright

, Ed.). Harper & Row.

58.

Zhao

Shao

Zhang

(2019). What influences an individual’s pro-environmental behavior? A literature review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.024

59.

Liberman

Dar

(2009). Normal and pathological consequences of encountering difficulties in monitoring progress toward goals. In Moskowitz

G. B.

Grant

(Eds.), The psychology of goals (pp. 277–303). Guilford Press.

60.

Locke

E. A.

Latham

G. P.

(2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705

61.

Locke

E. A.

Latham

G. P.

Erez

(1988). The determinants of goal commitment. Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306771

62.

López-Mosquera

Lera-López

Sánchez

(2015). Key factors to explain recycling, car use and environmentally responsible purchase behaviors: A comparative perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 99, 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.03.007

63.

Loschelder

D. D.

Siepelmeyer

Fischer

Rubel

J. A.

(2019). Dynamic norms drive sustainable consumption: Norm-based nudging helps café customers to avoid disposable to-go-cups. Journal of Economic Psychology, 75, 102146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2019.02.002

64.

Meijers

M. H. C.

Wonneberger

Azrout

Torfadóttir

R. “Heather”

Brick

(2023). Introducing and testing the personal-collective-governmental efficacy typology: How personal, collective, and governmental efficacy subtypes are associated with differential environmental actions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 85, 101915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101915

65.

Moran

Bar-Anan

(2018a). How actions change liking: The effect of an action’s outcome on the evaluation of the action’s object. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(11), 1597–1618. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000419

66.

Moran

Bar-Anan

(2018b). How actions change liking: The effect of an action’s outcome on the evaluation of the action’s object. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(11), 1597.

67.

Novoradovskaya

Mullan

Hasking

Uren

H. V.

(2021). My cup of tea: Behaviour change intervention to promote use of reusable hot drink cups. Journal of Cleaner Production, 284, 124675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124675

68.

Ohtomo

Ohnuma

(2014). Psychological interventional approach for reduce resource consumption: Reducing plastic bag usage at supermarkets. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 84, 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.12.014

69.

Osbaldiston

Schott

J. P.

(2012). Environmental sustainability and behavioral science: Meta-analysis of proenvironmental behavior experiments. Environment and behavior, 44(2), 257–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511402673

70.

Pelham

B. W.

Sumarta

T. T.

Myaskovsky

(1994). The easy path from many to the numerosity heuristic. Cognitive Psychology, 26(2), 103–133. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1994.1004

71.

Prochaska

J. O.

DiClemente

C. C.

(1984). The transtheoretical approach: Crossing traditional boundaries of therapy. Dow Jones-Irwin (No Title).

72.

Richter

Gendolla

G. H. E.

Wright

R. A.

(2016). Three decades of research on motivational intensity theory. Advances in Motivation Science, 3, 149–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2016.02.001

73.

Roberts

J. A.

(1996). Green consumers in the 1990s: Profile and implications for advertising. Journal of Business Research, 36(3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(95)00150-6

74.

Rucker

D. D.

Preacher

K. J.

Tormala

Z. L.

Petty

R. E.

(2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(6), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x

75.

Samaddar

Chatterjee

Misra

Tatano

(2014). Outcome-expectancy and self-efficacy: Reasons or results of flood preparedness intention? International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 8, 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.02.002

76.

Seffen

A. E.

Dohle

(2023). What motivates German consumers to reduce their meat consumption? Identifying relevant beliefs. Appetite, 187, 106593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2023.106593

77.

Sidique

S. F.

Lupi

Joshi

S. V.

(2010). The effects of behavior and attitudes on drop-off recycling activities. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(3), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.07.012

78.

Silvera

D. H.

Josephs

R. A.

Giesler

R. B.

(2002). Bigger is better: The influence of physical size on aesthetic preference judgments. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(3), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.410

79.

Spence

Poortinga

Pidgeon

(2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 32(6), 957–972.

80.

Sutton

(2015). Stage theories. In Conner

Norman

(Eds.), Predicting and changing health behaviour: Research and practice with social cognition models (pp. 279–320). McGraw-Hill.

81.

Thøgersen

(2003). Monetary incentives and recycling: Behavioural and psychological reactions to a performance-dependent garbage fee. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26(2), 197–228. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023633320485

82.

Tomic

Smigic

Udovicki

Djekic

(2024). Influence of drinking cups of different materials on emotional and acceptance responses, and perception of sensory attributes of soft drinks. Food Quality and Preference, 120, 105252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105252

83.

Tonglet

Phillips

P. S.

Read

A. D.

(2004). Using the theory of planned behaviour to investigate the determinants of recycling behaviour: A case study from Brixworth, UK. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 41(3), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2003.11.001

84.

Trope

Liberman

(2010). “Construal-level theory of psychological distance”: Correction to Trope and Liberman (2010). Psychological Review, 117(3), 1024. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020319

85.

van Valkengoed

. (2022). Meta-analyses of factors motivating climate change adaptation behaviour. Nature Climate Change, 9(2), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/G2JC3

86.

White

R. W.

(1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66(5), 297–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040934

87.

Wilson

R. S.

Herziger

Hamilton

Brooks

J. S.

(2020). From incremental to transformative adaptation in individual responses to climate-exacerbated hazards. Nature Climate Change, 10(3), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0691-6

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.51 MB

Small Steps,Big Impact: Increasing Perceived Effectiveness of Sustainable Behavior by Demonstrating Its Cumulative Impact Over Time

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material