Civic knowledge and participation are low among all students, but this pattern is even more pronounced for those who are poor, belong to a racial or ethnic minority group, or reside in a disadvantaged community. One remedy for this resulting “civic empowerment gap” is a call for teaching more effective civics classes in urban public schools. An open issue concerns identifying substantive topics to engage these students whose personal experiences may lead them to question the legitimacy of government officials. The present study examines a program that teaches constitutional law with an emphasis on civil liberties in urban public high schools. The findings obtained suggest that regular contact with school security and police increases students’ interest in learning about their rights and ways to empower themselves in these situations. These results may be used to identify course topics to promote civic engagement.
AddingtonL. A. (2009). Cops and cameras: Public school security as a policy response to Columbine. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 1426-1446.
2.
AddingtonL. A. (2014). Surveillance and security approaches across public school levels. In MuschertG.HenryS.BracyN. L.PegueroA. (Eds.), Responding to school violence: Confronting the Columbine effect. (pp. 71-88). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
3.
AddingtonL.A.WatersJ.L. (2012). Public Interest 101: Using the law school curriculum to quell public interest drift and expand students’ public interest commitment. American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy and the Law, 21, 79-108.
4.
AhranjaniM. (2012). High school to law school: Marshall-Brennan and moot court. In RedfieldS.E. (ed.). The education pipeline to the professions: Programs that work to increase diversity (pp. 145-160). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
5.
AhranjaniM. (2009). The Marshall-Brennan Constitutional Literacy Project: A case study in law and social justice. In NybellL. M.ShookJ. J.FinnJ. L. (Eds.), Childhood, youth, and social work in transformation: Implications for policy and practice (pp. 353-363). New York: Columbia University Press.
6.
AtkinsR.HartD. (2003). Neighborhoods, adults, and the development of civic identity in urban youth. Applied Developmental Science, 7, 156-164.
7.
BergB. L. (2008). Qualitative methods for the social sciences (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
8.
BrunsonR. K. (2007). “Police don’t like Black people”: African-American young men’s accumulated police experiences. Criminology & Public Policy, 6, 71-102.
9.
BrunsonR. K.MillerJ. (2006). Young Black men and urban policing in the United States. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 613-640.
10.
BrunsonR. K.WeitzerR. (2009). Police relations with Black and White youths in different urban neighborhoods. Urban Affairs Review, 44, 858-885.
11.
ChungH. L.ProbertS. (2011). Civic engagement in relation to outcome expectations among African American young adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 227-234.
12.
ClearT. R. (2007). Imprisoning communities: How mass incarceration makes disadvantaged neighborhoods worse. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13.
DalyJ. K.Devlin-SchererR.BurroughsG.McCartanW. (2010). The status of civic education: A preservice program response. The Educational Forum, 74, 117-128.
14.
DevineJ. (1996). Maximum security: The culture of violence in inner-city schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
GinwrightS. A. (2007). Black youth activism and the role of critical social capital in Black community organizations. American Behavioral Scientist, 51, 403-418.
18.
GottfredsonD. C. (2001). Schools and delinquency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
GottfredsonD. C.FinkC. M.SkrobanS.GottfredsonG. (1997). Making prevention work. In WeissbergR. P.GullottaT. P.HamptonR. L.AdamsG. R. (Eds.), Healthy Children 2010: Establishing preventative services (pp. 219-252). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
KahneJ.MiddaughE. (2008). High quality civic education: What is it and who gets it?Social Education, 72, 34-39.
21.
KahneJ. E.SporteS. E. (2008). Developing citizens: The impact of civic learning opportunities on students’ commitment to civic participation. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 738-766.
22.
LadenA. S. (2012). Taking the engagement in civic engagement seriously. Chicago: Institute for Policy and Civic Engagement, University of Illinois at Chicago.
23.
LevinsonM. (2010). The civic empowerment gap: Defining the problem and locating solutions. In SherrodL.Torney-PurtaJ.FlannaganC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth (pp. 331-361). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
24.
LevinsonM. (2012). No citizen left behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
MiddaughE.KahneJ. (2008). Civic development in context: The influence of local contexts on high school students’ beliefs about civic engagement. In PaceJ. L.BixbyJ. S. (Eds.), Educating citizens for troubled times: Qualitative studies of current efforts (pp. 156-191). Albany: State University of New York Press.
26.
PachecoJ. S.PlutzerE. (2008). Political participation and cumulative disadvantage: The impact of economic and social hardship on young citizens. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 571-593.
27.
PlantyM.CarlsonD. (2010). Understanding education indicators: A practical primer for research and policy. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
28.
PopeA.StolteL.CohenA. K. (2011). Closing the civic engagement gap: The potential of action civics. Social Education, 75, 265-268.
29.
StraussA. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
30.
UrbanW. J.WagonerJ. L.Jr. (2000). American education: A history (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
31.
U.S. Department of Education. (2011). The nation’s report card: Civics 2010. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
WatkinsA. M.MaumeM. O. (2012). Rethinking the study of juveniles’ attitudes toward the police. Criminal Justice Studies, 25, 279-300.
34.
WilkenfeldB.Torney-PurtaJ. (2012). A cross-context analysis of civic engagement linking CIVED and U.S. Census data. Journal of Social Science Education, 11, 64-80.
35.
WinnM. T.BehizadehN. (2011). The right to be literate: Literacy, education, and the school-to-prison pipeline. Review of Research in Education, 35, 147-173.
36.
ZenkovK. (2010). From “he’s too nice” to “some day”: Using photography to understand what urban students want to learn in school. In JohnsonH. B. (Ed.), Children and youth speak for themselves (pp. 233-263). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
37.
ZenkovK.HarmonJ. (2009). Picturing a writing process: Photovoice and teaching writing to urban youth. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52, 575-584.
