Many urban school districts are adopting restorative practices (RP) as a means to reduce suspensions and resolve racial discipline gaps. In this study, we use a sensemaking framework to examine educators’ beliefs about discipline and their perceptions of RP and its implementation. We draw on survey responses (N = 363) administered after educators attended RP trainings in a large, diverse county in California. Our results show the majority of respondents possess beliefs or an understanding of RP that are compatible with the goals of the approach. Survey respondents cite challenges to implementing RP that are at times consistent (e.g., lack of time) and at times at odds (e.g., relatively low emphasis on lack of leadership as a hindrance) with the current literature. As suggested by sensemaking theory, we find attitudes and beliefs are predictors of educators’ experiences implementing RP, including challenges to implementation and effects of the practices.
AnyonY.GregoryA.StoneS.FarrarJ.JensonJ. M.McQueenJ.DowningB.GreerE.SimmonsJ. (2016). Restorative interventions and school discipline sanctions in a large urban school district. American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 1663–1697. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216675719
4.
AnyonY.JensonJ. M.AltschulI.FarrarJ.McQueenJ.GreerE.DowningB.SimmonsJ. (2014). The persistent effect of race and the promise of alternatives to suspension in school discipline outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review, 44, 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.06.025
5.
AnyonY.WileyK.YangJ.PaulineM.GrapentineJ.ValladaresG.BellL.RoschA. (2016). Spotlight on success: Changing the culture of discipline in Denver public schools. Office of Social and Emotional Learning, Division of Student Services, Denver Public Schools.
6.
AshleyJ.BurkeK. (2009). Implementing restorative justice: A guide for schools. Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
7.
AugustineC. H.EngbergJ.GrimmG. E.LeeE.WangE. L.ChristiansonK.JosephA. A. (2018). Can restorative practices improve school climate and curb suspensions? An evaluation of the impact of restorative practices in a mid-sized urban school district. RAND Corporation.
BallS. J.MaguireM.BraunA. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. Taylor & Francis.
10.
BarrettN.McEachinA.MillsJ. N.ValantJ. (2021). Disparities and discrimination in student discipline by race and family income. Journal of Human Resources, 56(3), 711–748.
11.
BraithwaiteJ. (1999). Restorative justice: Assessing optimistic and pessimistic accounts. Crime and Justice, 25, 1–127. https://doi.org/10.1086/449287
12.
BrockM. E.Beaman-DigliaL. E. (2018). Efficacy of coaching preschool teachers to manage challenging behavior. Education and Treatment of Children, 41(1), 31–48.
13.
CarterP. L.SkibaR.ArredondoM. I.PollockM. (2017). You can’t fix what you don’t look at: Acknowledging race in addressing racial discipline disparities. Urban Education, 52(2), 207–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916660350
CoburnC. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145–170. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023002145
16.
CoburnC. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x032006003
17.
CoburnC. E. (2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19(3), 476–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904805276143
18.
CoburnC. E.RussellJ. L.KaufmanJ. H.SteinM. K. (2012). Supporting sustainability: Teachers’ advice networks and ambitious instructional reform. American Journal of Education, 119(1), 137–182. https://doi.org/10.1086/667699
19.
CroneD. A.HornerR. H. (2000). Contextual, conceptual, and empirical foundations of functional behavioral assessment in schools. Functional Behavioral Assessment, 8(3), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327035ex0803_3
20.
CurranF. C. (2016). Estimating the effect of state zero tolerance laws on exclusionary discipline, racial discipline gaps, and student behavior. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(4), 647–668. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716652728
EnnisR. P.RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.DunlapK. D. (2020). The impact of coaching on teacher-delivered behavior-specific praise in Pre-K–12 settings: A systematic review. Behavioral Disorders, 45(3), 148–166.
23.
FreyS. (2014, September 18). New law limits student discipline measure. EdSource, 1–14.
24.
FroniusT.Darling-HammondS.PerssonH.GuckenburgS.HurleyN.PetrosinoA. (2019). Restorative justice in U.S. Schools: An updated research review. West Ed.
GehlbachH.BrinkworthM. E. (2011). Measure twice, cut down error: A process for enhancing the validity of survey scales. Review of General Psychology, 15(4), 380–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025704
27.
GirardetC. (2018). Why do some teachers change and others don’t? A review of studies about factors influencing in-service and pre-service teachers’ change in classroom management. Review of Education, 6(1), 3–36.
28.
GonzálezT. (2012). Keeping kids in schools: Restorative justice, punitive discipline, and the school to prison pipeline. The Journal of Law of Education, 41(2), 281–335.
29.
GonzálezT. (2015). Socializing schools: Addressing racial disparities in discipline through restorative justice. In LosenD. (Ed.), Closing the school discipline gap: Equitable remedies for excessive exclusion (pp. 1–22). Teachers College Press.
GregoryA.ClawsonK.DavisA.GerewitzJ. (2016). The promise of restorative practices to transform teacher-student relationships and achieve equity in school discipline. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 26(4), 325–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2014.929950
32.
GregoryA.HuangF. L.AnyonY.GreerE.DowningB. (2018). An examination of restorative interventions and racial equity in out-of-school suspensions. School Psychology Review, 47(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.17105/spr-2017-0073.v47-2
33.
HashimA. K.StrunkK. O.DhaliwalT. K. (2018). Justice for all? Suspension bans and restorative justice programs in the los Angeles unified school district. Peabody Journal of Education, 93, 174–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956x.2018.1435040
HershfeldtP. A.PellK.SechrestR.PasE. T.BradshawC. P. (2012). Lessons learned coaching teachers in behavior management: The PBISplusCoaching model. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 22(4), 280–299.
37.
HillH. C. (2004). Professional development standards and practices in elementary school mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 104(3), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1086/499750
38.
HonigM. I. (2006). Complexity and policy implementation. In HonigM. I. (Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity (pp. 1–23). SUNY.
39.
JainS.BasseyH.BrownM. A.KarlaP. (2014). Restorative justice in Oakland schools implementation and impacts: An effective strategy to reduce racially disproportionate discipline, suspensions and improve academic outcomes. Oakland Unified School District.
40.
KarpD. R.BreslinB. (2001). Restorative justice in school communities. Youth & Society, 33(2), 249–272.
41.
KrezmienM. P.LeoneP. E.AchillesG. M. (2006). Suspension, race, and disability: Analysis of statewide practices and reporting. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14(4), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266060140040501
42.
LacoeJ.SteinbergM. P. (2018). Rolling back zero tolerance: The effect of discipline policy reform on suspension usage and student outcomes. Peabody Journal of Education, 93(2), 207–227.
43.
LAUSD. (2014). Discipline foundation policy: School-wide positive behavior intervention and support. Los Angeles Unified School District.
44.
LAUSD Board of Education. (2013). 2013 school discipline policy and school climate bill of rights. Los Angeles Unified School District Board of Education.
45.
LeithwoodK.SteinbachR.JantziD. (2002). School leadership and teachers’ motivation to implement accountability policies. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(1), 94–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x02381005
46.
LewisA. E.DiamondJ. B. (2015). Despite the best intentions: How racial inequality thrives in good schools. Oxford University Press.
LosenD.HodsonC.EeJ.MartinezT. (2014). Disturbing inequities: Exploring the relationship between racial disparities in special education identification and discipline. Journal of Applied Research on Children: Informing Policy for Children at Risk, 5(2), 1–20.
49.
LustickH. (2021). “Restorative justice” or restoring order? Restorative school discipline practices in urban public schools. Urban Education, 56, 1269–1296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085917741725
50.
MaitlisS.ChristiansonM. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.873177
51.
MarshJ. A. (2002). How districts relate to states, schools, and communities: A review of emerging literature. In HightowerA.KnappM. S.MarshJ.McLaughlinM. (Eds.), School districts and instructional renewal (pp. 25–40). Teachers College Press.
McLaughlinM. W. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737009002171
54.
McLaughlinM. W. (2006). Implementation research in education: Lessons learned, lingering questions, and new opportunities. In HonigM. I. (Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity (pp. 209–228). State University of New York Press.
55.
McMorrisB. J.BeckmanK. J.SheaG.BaumgartnerJ.EggertR. C. (2013). Applying restorative practices to Minneapolis public schools students recommended for possible expulsion: A pilot program evaluation of the family and youth restorative conference program. University of Minnesota.
MorrisE. W.PerryB. L. (2016). The punishment gap: School suspension and racial disparities in achievement. Social Problems, 63(1), 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spv026
59.
MorrisonB.BloodP.ThorsborneM. (2005). Practicing restorative justice in school communities: Addressing the challenge of culture change. Public Organization Review, 5(4), 335–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-005-5095-6
60.
NguyenB. M. D.NogueraP.AdkinsN.TeranishiR. T. (2019). Ethnic discipline gap: Unseen dimensions of racial disproportionality in school discipline. American Educational Research Journal, 56(5), 1973–2003. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219833919
61.
OkonofuaJ. A.PauneskuD.WaltonG. M. (2016). Brief intervention to encourage empathic discipline cuts suspension rates in half among adolescents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(19), 5221–5226.
62.
OrozcoR. (2013). White innocence and Mexican Americans as perpetrators in the school-to-prison pipeline. Association of Mexican-American Educators, 7(3), 75–84.
63.
PegueroA. A.ShekarkharZ. (2011). Latino/a student misbehavior and school punishment. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 33(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986310388021
64.
PoteatV. P.ScheerJ. R.ChongE. S. K. (2016). Sexual orientation-based disparities in school and juvenile justice discipline: A multiple group comparison of contributing factors. Journal of Education & Psychology, 108(2), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000058
RauschM. K.SkibaR. J. (2005). The academic cost of discipline: The relationship between suspension/expulsion and school achievement. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
SandbergJ.TsoukasH. (2015). Making sense of the sensemaking perspective: Its constituents, limitations, and opportunities for further development. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), S6–S32.
SkibaR.EdlH. (2004). The disciplinary practices survey: How do Indiana’s principals feel about discipline. Children left behind policy briefs. Supplementary analysis 2-C. Center for Evaluation and Education Policy, Indiana University. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED488898
71.
SkibaR. J.ArredondoM. I.WilliamsN. T. (2014). More than a metaphor: The contribution of exclusionary discipline to a school-to-prison pipeline. Equity & Excellence in Education, 47(4), 546–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2014.958965
72.
SkibaR. J.KnestingK. K. (2001). Zero tolerance, zero evidence: An analysis of school disciplinary practice. In SkibaR. J.NoamG. G. (Eds.), New directions for youth development: No. 92. Zero tolerance: Can suspension and expulsion keep schools safe? (pp. 17–43). Jossey-Bass.
73.
SkibaR. J.MichaelR. S.NardoA. C.PetersonR. L. (2002). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. The Urban Review, 34(4), 317–342. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021320817372
74.
SkibaR. J.RussellJ.PetersonR. (1999). The dark side of zero tolerance: Can punishment lead to safe schools?Phi Delta Kappan, 80(5), 372–376. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
75.
SkibaR. J.RussellJ.PetersonR. L.WilliamsT. (1997). Office referrals and suspension: Disciplinary intervention in middle schools. Education and Treatment of Children, 20(3), 295–315.
76.
SkinnerM. E.HalesM. R. (1992). Classroom teachers ‘explanations’ of student behavior: One possible barrier to the acceptance and use of applied behavior analysis procedures in the schools. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 3(3), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532768xjepc0303_2
77.
SnappS. D.RussellS. T. (2016). Discipline disparities for LGBTQ youth: Challenges that perpetuate disparities and strategies to overcome them. In SkibaR. J.MedirattaK.RauschM. K. (Eds.), Inequality in school discipline: Research and practice to reduce disparities (pp. 207–223). Palgrave Macmillan US.
78.
SongS. Y.SwearerS. M. (2016). The cart before the horse: The challenge and promise of restorative justice consultation in schools. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 26(4), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2016.1246972
79.
SpillaneJ. P. (2000). Cognition and policy implementation: District policymakers and the reform of mathematics education. Cognition and Instruction, 18(2), 141–179. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1802_01
SpillaneJ. P.ReiserB. J.GomezL. M. (2006). Policy implementation and cognition: The role of human, social, and distributed cognition in framing policy implementation. In HonigM. I. (Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity (pp. 47–64). SUNY Press.
82.
SpillaneJ. P.ThompsonC. L. (1997). Reconstructing conceptions of local capacity: The local education agency’s capacity for ambitious instructional reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737019002185
WallaceJ. M.GoodkindS.WallaceC. M.BachmanJ. G. (2008). Racial, ethnic, and gender differences in school discipline among U.S. High school students: 1991-2005. Negro Educational Review: A Forum for Discussion of Afro-American Issues, 59(1-2), 47–62.
88.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. SAGE Publications Inc.
89.
WeickK. E.SutcliffeK. M.ObstfeldD. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
90.
WelshR. O.LittleS. (2018). The school discipline dilemma: A comprehensive review of disparities and alternative approaches. Review of Educational Research, 88(5), 752–794. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318791582
91.
WinnM. T. (2018). Justice on both sides: Transforming education through restorative justice. Harvard Education Press.
92.
ZehrH. (2005). Changing lenses: A new focus for crime and justice. Herald Press.
