The possibility is examined that school choice programs could be a means to reducing the achievement gap. Data based on meta-analytic research and the examination of nationwide data sets suggest that school choice programs that include private schools could reduce the achievement gap by 25%. The propounding of this possibility is based on research indicating that the achievement gap in faith-based schools is generally 25% narrower than one finds in public schools. Results of these studies suggest that both the racial achievement gap and the socioeconomic achievement gap are reduced by the same degree (25%). The significance of these results is discussed, especially as it pertains to the attitudes that people frequently have toward school choice.
AnittP. (2003). Religion in America since 1945: A history. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
2.
BerlinerD. C.BiddleB. (1995). The manufactured crisis and how our schools create Mediocrity and failure. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
3.
BraceyG. W. (1997). Setting the record straight. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
4.
BraceyG. W. (2002). The war against America’s public schools: Privatizing schools, commercializing education. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
5.
BrykA.LeeV.HollandP. (1993). Catholic sand the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
ChubbJ. E.MoeT. M. (1990). Politics, markets & America’s schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
7.
CooksonP. W. (1994). School choice: The struggle for the soul of American. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8.
Dartmouth College v. Woodward 17 U.S. 518 (1819).
9.
DecterM. (1995). A Jew in Anti-Christian America. First Things, 56(10), 25-31.
10.
DunhamR.WilsonG. (2007). Race, within-family social capital and school drop out: An analysis of Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians. Sociological Spectrum, 27(2), 207-224.
11.
FribourgM. G. (1965). The Supreme Court in American history. Philadelphia, PA: Macrae.
12.
GattoJ. T. (2001). The underground history of American schooling. New York, NY: Oxford Village Press.
13.
GrossM. L. (1999). The conspiracy of ignorance: The failure of American public schools. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
14.
HagelC. T. (2008). America: Our next chapter: Tough questions, straight answers. New York, NY: Ecco.
15.
HarwoodJ.SeibG. (2008). Pennsylvania Avenue: Profiles in backroom power. New York, NY: Random House.
16.
HaycockK. (2001). Closing the achievement gap. Educational Leadership, 58, 6-11.
17.
HofferT. B. (1998). Social background and achievement in public and Catholic high schools. Social Psychology of Education, 2(1), 7-23.
18.
HorowitzH. L. (1987). Campus life: Undergraduate cultures from the end of the eighteenth Century to the present. New York, NY: Knopf.
19.
HudolinG. J. (1994). Lessons from Catholic schools: Promoting quality in Chicago’s public schools. Educational Forum, 58, 282-288.
20.
IrvineJ. J.FosterM. (1996). Growing up African American in Catholic Schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
21.
JeynesW. (1999). The effects of religious commitment on the academic achievement of black and Hispanic children. Urban Education34(4), 458-479.
22.
JeynesW. (2000). Assessing school choice: A balanced perspective. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(2), 223-241.
23.
JeynesW. (2002). Divorce, Family Structure, and the Academic Success of Children. Binghamton, New York: Taylor & Francis.
24.
JeynesW. (2003a). A meta-analysis: the effects of parental involvement on minority children’s academic achievement. Education & Urban Society, 35(2), 202-218.
25.
JeynesW. (2003b). The effects of black and Hispanic twelfth graders living in intact families and being religious on their academic achievement. Urban Education, 38(1), 35-57.
26.
JeynesW. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relation of parental involvement to urban elementary school student academic achievement. Urban Education, 40(3), 237-269.
27.
JeynesW. (2006). Standardized tests and the true meaning of kindergarten and preschool. Teachers College Record, 108(10), 1937-1959.
28.
JeynesW. (2007a). American educational history: School, society, and the common good. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
29.
JeynesW. (2007b). The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary School academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Urban Education42(1), 82-110.
30.
JeynesW. (2008a). “Factors that reduce or eliminate the achievement gap,” Speech given at Harvard University Conference on the Achievement Gap in Cambridge, Massachusetts in February.
31.
JeynesW. (2008b). “The academic contributions of faith-based schools,” Speech given at the White House Conference on inner city children and faith based schools in Washington DC, in April.
32.
JeynesW. (2010a). Religiosity, religious schools, and their relationship with the achievement gap: A research synthesis and meta-analysis. Journal of Negro Education, 79(3), 263-279.
33.
JeynesW. (2010b). The salience of the subtle aspects of parental involvement and encouraging that involvement: Implications for school-based programs. Teachers College Record, 112(3). 747-774.
34.
JeynesW. (2011). Parental involvement & academic success. New York: Taylor & Francis/Routledge.
35.
JeynesW. (2012). A meta-analysis on the effects and contributions of public, public charter, and religious schools on student outcomes. Peabody Journal of Education, 87(3).
36.
JohnsonP. (1997). A history of the American people. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
37.
KeithT. Z.PageE. B. (1985). Do Catholic schools improve minority student achievement?American Educational Research Journal, 22, 337-349.
38.
KingE. A. (1964). Shaping of the American high school. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
39.
KingM. L. (1998). The autobiography of Martin Luther King. New York, NY: Warner Books.
40.
KurtzC. (2010). Radical-in-chief: Barack Obama and the untold story of American socialism. New York, NY: Threshold.
41.
LeeV. E. (1986, April). Multilevel causal models for social class and achievement. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association in San Francisco, CA.
42.
LiebermanM. (1993). Public Education: An Autopsy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
McLanahanS.SandefurG. (1994). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
MesserliJ. (1972). Horace Mann: A biography. New York, NY: Knopf.
45.
MorganK. O.MorganS. (2010). State rankings 20190: A statistical view of America. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
46.
NagelS. S. (2002). Handbook of public policy evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
OlaskyM. N. (1988). Prodigal press: The anti-Christian bias of the American news media. Westchester, IL: Crossway Books.
49.
PetersonP. E. (2006). Choice and competition in American education. Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
50.
PortfeliE.WangC.AudetteR.McCollA.AlogozzineB. (2009). Influence of social and community capital of student achievement in a large urban school district. Education & Urban Society, 42(1), 72-95.
51.
RavitchD. (2003). The language police: How pressure groups restrict what children learn. New York, NY: Knopf.
52.
RavitchD. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.
53.
RippeyoungP. L. E. (2009). Is it too late baby? Pinpointing the emergence of a black-white test gap in infancy. Sociological Perspectives, 52, 235-258.
54.
RoachR. (2001). In the academic and think-tank world, pondering achievement-gap remedies take center stage. Black Issues in Higher Education, 18(1), 26-27.
55.
SkaricaD. (2011). The super cycle. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
56.
SlavinR. E.MaddenN. A. (2006). Reducing the gap: Success for all and the achievement of African American students. Journal of Negro Education, 75, 389-400.
57.
SteinfelsP. (2003). A people adrift: The crisis in the Roman Catholic Church in America. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
58.
StevensT.OlivarezA.Jr.HammanD. (2006). The role of cognition, motivation, and emotion in explaining the mathematics achievement gap between Hispanic and White students. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 28, 161-186.
59.
U.S. Department of Education. (2010). Digest of Education Statistics, 2009. Washington, DC: Jeynes.
60.
U.S. Department of Education. (2011). Fast facts. Washington, DC: Jeynes.
WallaceB.GravesW. (1995). Poisoned apple: The bell curve crisis and how our Schools create mediocrity and failure. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
63.
WallersteinJ. S.BlakesleeS. (1989). Second chances: Men, women, and children a decade after divorce. New York, NY: Ticknor and Fields.
64.
WallersteinJ. S.LewisJ. (1998). The long-term impact of divorce on children: A first report from a 25-year study. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 36, 368-383.
65.
WeirR. E. (2007). Class in America An encyclopedia. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
66.
WellsD. K. (2002). School vouchers & privatization: A reference handbook. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
67.
White House. (2008). Preserving a critical national asset. Washington, DC: Jeynes.
68.
WoodsonC. G. (1915). The education of the Negro prior to 1861. New York, NY: G. P. Putnam.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
