Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The authors tested an experimental methodology based on time-location and network sampling designs to assess their utility in studying labor trafficking victimization among the construction worker population in the city of Houston, USA. The time-location design commenced with a selection of registered sites followed by a search within proximity to find additional sites. We seeded the network sampling design with these respondents and day laborers recruited at other venues; we observed 903 and 262 individuals respectively. Labor-trafficking prevalence estimates were moderately discrepant between site types in the time-location strategy, and markedly different across the time-location and network strategies. We concluded that the methodology could provide efficient estimates for certain domains, and a hybrid methodology should be considered in future studies.

Keywords

construction worker population forced labor Houston network sampling time-location sampling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barrick

Pfeffer

(2024). Advances in measurement: A scoping review of prior human trafficking prevalence studies and recommendations for future research. Journal of Human Trafficking. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2021.1984721

Barrick

Pfeffer

Tueller

Bradshaw

Aranguren

Vincent

(2024). Measuring human trafficking prevalence in construction: A field test of multiple estimation methods, Final report [OPRE Report No. 2024-251]. Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Battaglia

M. P.

Izrael

Hoaglin

D. C.

Frankel

M. R.

(2004). Tips and tricks for raking survey data (aka sample balancing) (Technical report). Abt Associates. http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/y2004/files/Jsm2004-000074.pdf

Busch-Armendariz

Nale

N. L.

Kammer-Kerwick

Kellison

J. B.

Torres

M. I. M.

Cook-Heffron

Nehme

(2016). Human trafficking by the numbers: The initial benchmark of prevalence and economic impact for Texas. Bureau of Business Research, University of Texas at Austin. http://hdl.handle.net/2152/44597

Center on Human Trafficking Research and Outreach. (n.d.). Prevalence Reduction Innovation Forum. University of Georgia. Retrieved September 24, 2024, from https://cenhtro.uga.edu/prif/about_prif/

Cole

Sahai

Vincent

Rezwan

Iyer

Kysia

Wang

Zhang

(in press). Estimating the number and prevalence of forced labor victims among domestic workers in Casablanca, Morocco: A comparison of mark-recapture strategy and the Vincent link-tracing sampling strategy. Journal of Human Trafficking.

Csardi

Nepusz

(2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems, 1695, 1–9.

Chohaney

M. L.

(2016). Minor and adult domestic sex trafficking risk factors in Ohio. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 7(1),117–141. https://doi.org/10.1086/685108

Dank

Farrell

Zhang

Hughes

Abeyta

Fanarraga

Burke

C. P.

Ortis Solis

(2021). An exploratory study of labor trafficking among U.S. citizen victims. Final research report. U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/302157.pdf

10.

Dank

Zhang

Vincent

Stoeltje

Wang

(in press-a). Estimating the prevalence of domestic servitude among Tanzanian women who have returned from working overseas: A direct comparison of stratified simple random sampling and Vincent link-tracing sampling strategies. Journal of Human Trafficking.

11.

Dank

Zhang

Vincent

Stoeltje

Wang

(in press-b). Estimating the prevalence of forced labor in the fishing industry in Puntarenas, Costa Rica: A direct comparison of multi-state proportional to size and Vincent link-tracing sampling strategies. Journal of Human Trafficking.

12.

Datta

M. N.

Bales

(2013). Slavery in Europe: Part 1, estimating the dark figure. Human Rights Quarterly, 35(4), 817–829. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2013.0051

13.

Elliott

M. R.

Valliant

(2017). Inference for nonprobability samples. Statistical Science, 32(2), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1214/16-sts598

14.

Executive Order No. 13903, 85 FR 6721. (2020). Combating human trafficking and online child exploitation in the United States. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/02/05/2020-02438/combating-human-trafficking-and-online-child-exploitation-in-the-united-states

15.

Fedina

Perdue

Bright

C. L.

Williamson

(2019). An ecological analysis of risk factors for runaway behavior among individuals exposed to commercial sexual exploitation. Journal of Child and Adolescent Trauma, 12(2), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-018-0229-5

16.

Feehan

D. M.

Umubyeyi

Mahy

Hladik

Salganik

M. J.

(2016). Quantity versus quality: A survey experiment to improve the network scale-up method. American Journal of Epidemiology, 183(8), 747–757. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwv287

17.

Galemba

R. B.

(2023). Laboring for justice: The fight against wage theft in an American city. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503635210

18.

Garofalo

(2022). StepBeta: Stepwise procedure for beta, beta-binomial and negative binomial regression models. R package version 2.1.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=StepBeta

19.

Gilbert

Reza

Mercy

Lea

Lee

Marcelin

L. H.

Hast

Vertefeuille

Domercant

J. W.

(2018). The experience of violence against children in domestic servitude in Haiti: Results from the Violence Against Children Survey, Haiti 2012. Child Abuse & Neglect, 76, 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.10.014

20.

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. (2024). Results from the field: Forced labor in the brick kiln industry in Pakistan. Presentation to the Prevalence Reduction Innovation Forum (PRIF) Learning Series. https://cenhtro.uga.edu/_resources/documents/PRIF_LS6_Pakistan%20Forced%20Labor%20Study_JHU_CenHTRO.pdf

21.

Killworth

P. D.

McCarty

Bernard

H. R.

Shelley

G. A.

Johnsen

E. C.

(1998). Estimation of seroprevalence, rape, and homelessness in the United States using a social network approach. Evaluation Review, 22(2), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X9802200205

22.

Laaksonen

Kemppainen

Stjernberg

Kortteinen

Vaattovaara

Lönnqvist

(2015). Tackling city-regional dynamics in a survey using grid sampling. Survey Research Methods, 9(1), 45–55.

23.

Leon

Jauffret-Roustide

Le Strat

(2015). Design-based inference in time-location sampling. Biostatistics, 16(3), 565–579. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxu061

24.

Levy

Lemeshow

(2011). Sampling of populations: Methods and applications. John Wiley & Sons.

25.

Littenberg

Baldwin

(2017). The ignored exploitation: Labor trafficking in the United States. In Chisolm-Straker

Stoklosa

(Eds.), Human trafficking is a public health issue: A paradigm expansion in the United States (pp. 67–91). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47824-1_5

26.

Lumley

(2004). Analysis of complex survey samples. Journal of Statistical Software, 9(9), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v009.i08

27.

Lumley

(2012). Analysis of complex survey samples. R package (survey). Journal of Statistical Software, 9(8), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v009.i08

28.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2020). Estimating the prevalence of human trafficking in the United States: Considerations and complexities: Proceedings of a workshop. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25614

29.

National Human Trafficking Hotline. (2022). National Human Trafficking Hotline data report: 1/1/2021 – 12/31/2021. https://humantraffickinghotline.org/sites/default/files/2023-01/National%20Report%20For%202021.docx%20%283%29.pdf

30.

Owens

Dank

Breaux

Banuelos

Farrell

Pfeffer

Bright

Heitsmith

McDevitt

(2014). Understanding the organization, operation, and victimization process of labor trafficking in the United States. Urban Institute and Northeastern University. https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/33821/413249-Understanding-the-Organization-Operation-and-Victimization-Process-of-Labor-Trafficking-in-the-United-States.PDF

31.

Pfeffer

Barrick

Dank

Tibaduiza

Scalise

Hughes

Grossman

(2023). Understanding what works in the successful identification, investigation, and prosecution of labor trafficking cases in the United States: Final report. Prepared by RTI International and New York University for the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/308644.pdf

32.

Polaris. (2023). In harm’s way: How systems fail human trafficking survivors. Survey results from the first National Survivor Study. https://polarisproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/In-Harms-Way-How-Systems-Fail-Human-Trafficking-Survivors-by-Polaris-modifed-June-2023.pdf

33.

Prevalence Reduction Innovation Forum. (2020). Human trafficking statistical definitions: Prevalence Reduction Innovation Forum July 2020. https://cenhtro.uga.edu/_resources/documents/HT%20Statistical%20Definitions%20Updated.pdf

34.

R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

35.

Rubin

D. B.

(1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika 63(3), 581–592.

36.

Schroeder

Edgemon

T. G.

Aletraris

Kagotho

Clay-Warner

Okech

(2022). A review of prevalence estimation methods for human trafficking populations. Public Health Reports, 137(1_suppl), 46S–52S. https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549211044010

37.

Shelton

J. F.

(2015). Proposed utilization of the network scale-up method to estimate the prevalence of trafficked persons. In Kangaspunta

(Ed.), Forum on crime and society (Vol. 8, pp. 85–94). United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/Forum/Forum_2015/15-00463_forum_ebook_E.pdf

38.

Sommerfelt

(2015). Child fosterage and child domestic work in Haiti in 2014: Analytical report (FAFO-report 2015:54). FAFO. https://www.fafo.no/zoo-publikasjoner/fafo-rapporter/child-fosterage-and-child-domestic-work-in-haiti-in-2014-analytical-report

39.

Stanford Human Trafficking Data Lab. (2024). Labor trafficking among agricultural workers in Brazil. Presentation to the PRIF Learning Series. https://cenhtro.uga.edu/_resources/documents/Stanford.PRIF.Learning.Series.June.2024.pdf

40.

Thompson

(2006). Adaptive web sampling. Biometrics, 62(4), 1224–1234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00576.x

41.

Thompson

(2020). New estimates for network sampling. arXiv preprint 2002.01350. Cornell University. https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.01350

42.

Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-386, 114 Stat. 1464 (2000). https://www.congress.gov/106/statute/STATUTE-114/STATUTE-114-Pg1464.pdf

43.

Zhang

Vincent

Cole

Rydberg

Rose Thompson

Dank

Sanchez

(in press). Estimating the prevalence of forced labor among domestic workers in Tunis, Tunisia: A direct comparison of time-location sampling and mark-recapture experiment strategies. Journal of Human Trafficking.

44.

Zhang

S. X.

Spiller

M. W

Finch

B. K.

Qin

(2014). Estimating labor trafficking among unauthorized migrant workers in San Diego. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 653(1), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716213519237

45.

Zhang

S. X.

Barrick

Evans

Weber

McMichael

Mosquin

Vincent

Ramirez

(2019). Labor trafficking in North Carolina: A statewide survey using multistage sampling. Final report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/252521.pdf

Innovative Methods for Estimating the Prevalence of Labor Trafficking: A Comparison of Time-Location and Network Sampling Studies on a Construction Worker Population

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References