Drawing on the theories of Kim’s racial triangulation and Allport’s intergroup contact, this study examined ideological and experiential predictors of Asian Americans’ interracial attitudes and solidarity with Black Americans. In a community sample of 249 Asian Americans, hierarchical multiple regression analyses revealed that the ideological variables of internalized racism and model minority myth were associated with greater anti-Black attitudes. Internalized model minority myth of unrestricted mobility was also related to reduced intergroup solidarity. Conversely, the experiential variables of close and general contact with Black Americans were respectively related to greater pro-Black attitudes and intergroup solidarity. Additionally, higher quality of general contact buffered the negative association between internalized model minority myth and intergroup solidarity. The findings highlight the importance of deconstructing internalized racial beliefs rooted in White supremacy and cultivating quality intergroup contact between Black and Asian Americans. Implications for practice, community intervention, training, and research are discussed.
AhmedS. (2017). News media, movies, and anti-Muslim prejudice: Investigating the role of social contact. Asian Journal of Communication, 27(5), 536–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2017.1339720
2.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications, Inc.
3.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice.Addison-Wesley.
4.
Álvarez CastilloJ. L.EquizábalA. J.CámaraC. P.GonzálezH. G. (2014). The fight against prejudice in older adults: Perspective taking effectiveness. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 46(1-3), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0120-0534(14)70017-2
5.
AtkinA. L.YooH. C.JagerJ.YehC. J. (2018). Internalization of the model minority myth, school racial composition, and psychological distress among Asian American adolescents. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 9(2), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/aap0000096
6.
BaileyT.-K. M.ChungY. B.WilliamsW. S.SinghA. A.TerrellH. K. (2011). Development and validation of the Internalized Racial Oppression Scale for Black individuals. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58(4), 481– 493. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0023585
7.
BikmenN. (2011). Asymmetrical effects of contact between minority groups: Asian and Black students in a small college. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 17(2), 186–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023230
8.
BinderJ.ZagefkaH.BrownR.FunkeF.KesslerT.MummendeyA.MaquilA.DemoulinS.LeyensJ.-P. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis amongst majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 843–856. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013470
9.
ChenJ. L. (1995). The internalization of the model minority stereotype as a predictor of depression among Chinese Americans [Doctoral dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology]. Dissertation Abstracts International.
10.
ChoiA. Y.IsraelT.MaedaH. (2017). Development and evaluation of the Internalized Racism in Asian Americans Scale (IRAAS). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(1), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000183
11.
ChuS. P. (2002). Internalization of the model minority stereotype and its relationship to psychological adjustment [Doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University]. Dissertation Abstracts International.
12.
Darling-HammondS.MichaelsE. K.AllenA. M.ChaeD. H.ThomasM. D.NguyenT.MujahidM. M.JohnsonR. C. (2020). After “The China Virus” went viral: Racially charged coronavirus coverage and trends in bias against Asian Americans. Health Education & Behavior47(6), 870–879. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120957949
13.
DavidE. J. R.OkazakiS. (2006). The Colonial Mentality Scale (CMS) for Filipino Americans: Scale construction and psychological implications. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(2), 241–252. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.2.241
14.
DaviesK.TroppL.AronA.PettigrewT.F.WrightS.C. (2011). Cross-group friendships and intergroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(4), 332–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311411103
15.
DeutschM.CollinsM. E. (1951). Interracial housing: A psychological evaluation of a social experiment. University of Minnesota Press.
16.
DhontK.Van HielA. (2012). Intergroup contact buffers against the intergenerational transmission of authoritarianism and racial prejudice. Journal of Research in Personality,46(2), 231–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.12.008
FrenchB. H.LewisJ. A.MosleyD. V.AdamesH. Y.Chavez-DueñasN. Y.ChenG. A.NevilleH. A. (2020). Toward a psychological framework of radical healing in communities of Color. The Counseling Psychologist, 48(1), 14–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000019843506
19.
FuochiG.VociA.VenezianiC. A.BoinJ.FellB.HewstoneM. (2020). Is negative mass media news always associated with outgroup prejudice? The buffering role of direct contact. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23(2), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219837347
20.
GottschallA. C.WestS. G.EndersC. K. (2012). A comparison of item-level and scale-level multiple imputation for questionnaire batteries. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.640589
21.
GuptaA.SzymanskiD. M.LeongF. L. (2011). The “model minority myth”: Internalized racialism of positive stereotypes as correlates of psychological distress, and attitudes towards help-seeking. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 2(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024183
22.
HorseA. J. Y.KuoK.SeatonE. K.VargasE. D. (2021). Asian Americans’ indifference to Black Lives Matter: The role of nativity, belonging and acknowledgment of anti-Black racism. Social Sciences, 10(5), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10050168
23.
IslamM. R.HewstoneM. (1993). Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability, and out-group attitude: An integrative model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(6), 700–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293196005
KatzI.HassR. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(6), 893–905. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.6.893
26.
KawaiY. (2003). Revisiting the 1966 model minority myth: A narrative criticism of its textual origins. Kaleidoscope: A Graduate Journal of Qualitative Communication Research, 2(1), 1-50.
LiuW. M. (2017). White male power and privilege: The relationship between White supremacy and social class. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(4), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000227
MarableM. (2004). Building coalitions among communities of color: Beyond racial identity politics. In JenningsJ. (Ed.), Blacks, Latinos, and Asians in Urban America: Status and Prospects for Politics and Activism (pp.29–43). Praeger.
32.
MastroD.Behm-MorawitzE.OrtizM. (2007). The cultivation of social perceptions of Latinos: A mental models approach. Media Psychology, 9(2), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701286106
33.
MersethJ. L. (2018). Race-ing solidarity: Asian Americans and support for Black Lives Matter. Politics, Groups & Identities, 6(2), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2018.1494015
34.
NicholsonH. L.JrCarterJ. S.RestarA. (2020). Strength in numbers: Perceptions of political commonality with African Americans among Asians and Asian Americans in the United States. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 6(1), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649218785648
35.
OuchS.MoradiB. (2022). Asian American people’s intragroup and intergroup collective action: Identifying key correlates. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 69(4), 430–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000606
36.
PaoliniS.HarwoodJ.RubinM.HusnuS.JoyceN.HewstoneM. (2014). Positive and extensive intergroup contact in the past buffers against the disproportionate impact of negative contact in the present. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(6), 548– 562. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2029
PettigrewT. F. (2021). Advancing intergroup contact theory: Comments on the issue's articles. Journal of Social Issues, 77(1), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12423
39.
PettigrewT. F.HewstoneM. (2017). The single factor fallacy: Implications of missing critical variables from an analysis of intergroup contact theory. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 8–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12026
40.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta‐ analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 922–934. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.504
41.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R.WagnerU.ChristO. (2011). Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(3). 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.03.001
PoonO.SquireD.KodamaC.ByrdA.ChanJ.ManzanoL.FurrS.BishundatD. (2016). A critical review of the model minority myth in selected literature on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 469–502. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315612205
44.
PykeK. D. (2010). What is internalized racial oppression and why don’t we study it? Acknowledging racism’s hidden injuries. Sociological Perspectives, 53(4), 551–572. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2010.53.4.551
45.
RaeJ. R.Skinner-DorkenooA. L.ReimanA. K.SchmidK.HewstoneM. (2022). Mixed evidence for interactive effects of outgroup proportions and intergroup contact on racial bias in the United States. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(2). 476–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211027756
46.
SchlomerG. L.BaumanS.CardN. A. (2010). Best practices for missing data management in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018082
47.
SellersR. M.RowleyS. A.ChavousT. M.SheltonJ. N.SmithM. A. (1997). Multidimensional Inventory of Black Identity: A preliminary investigation of reliability and construct validity. Journal of personality and social psychology, 73(4), 805. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.805
48.
SelvanathanH. P.LickelB.DasguptaN. (2020). An integrative framework on the impact of allies: How identity‐based needs influence intergroup solidarity and social movements. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(6), 1344–1361. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2697
49.
SidaniusJ.LevinS.Van LaarC.SearsD. O. (2008). The diversity challenge: Social identity and intergroup relations on the college campus.Russell Sage Foundation.
50.
SternC.AxtJ. R. (2019). Group status modulates the associative strength between status quo supporting beliefs and anti-black attitudes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(7), 946–956. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618799067
51.
StevensF. L.AbernethyA. D. (2018). Neuroscience and racism: The power of groups for overcoming implicit bias. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 68(4), 561–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207284.2017.1315583
52.
SueD. W.SueD.NevilleH. A.SmithL. (2019). Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
53.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
54.
TesslerH.ChoiM.KaoG. (2020). The anxiety of being Asian American: Hate crimes and negative biases during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(4), 636–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09541-5
von HippelW.SilverL. A.LynchM. E. (2000). Stereotyping against your will: The role of inhibitory ability in stereotyping and prejudice among the elderly. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(5), 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200267001
57.
WestS. G.FinchJ. F.CurranP. J. (1995). Structural equation models with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies. In HoyleR. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56–75). SAGE Publications.
58.
WongJ.LiuR.Z. (2022). Between empirical data and anti-Blackness: A critical perspective on Anti-Asian hate crimes and hate incidents. Journal of Asian American Studies,25(3), 387-410. https://doi.org/10.1353/jaas.2022.0033
59.
YiJ.ToddN. R. (2021). Internalized model minority myth among Asian Americans: Links to anti-Black attitudes and opposition to affirmative action. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 27(4), 569–578. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000448
60.
YooH. C.BurrolaK. S.StegerM. F. (2010). A preliminary report on a new measure: Internalization of the Model Minority Myth Measure (IM-4) and its psychological correlates among Asian American college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(1), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017871
61.
YooH. C.MillerM. J.YipP. (2015). Validation of the internalization of the Model Minority Myth Measure (IM-4) and its link to academic performance and psychological adjustment among Asian American adolescents. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 21(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037648
62.
YoonE.CabirouL.LiuH.KimD.ChungH.ChangJ. (2023). A content analysis of the literature on immigrants and refugees: A 31-year review. The Counseling Psychologist, 51(4), 470–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/00110000231158291
63.
YoonE.ChoiY.KimD.AdamsP. (2023). Acculturation/enculturation and internalized model minority myth in Korean immigrant families. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/aap0000259
64.
YoonE.LeeR. M.GohM. (2008). Acculturation, social connectedness, and subjective well-being. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14(3), 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.14.3.246
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
