Most work on the legacies of violence studies mass repression. In this paper, we explore the longterm effects of selective repression of local elites on ordinary community members who had not been subject to direct repression. Drawing on the literature on the legacy of violence against civilians, we hypothesize that elite-targeted repression creates a political backlash in the affected communities. Examining the legacy of Nazi-era repression of Catholic clergy in Bavaria we ask whether historical repression against Catholic priests is associated with higher support for Christian Democrats after WWII. We find that municipalities where Catholic priests had been repressed are more likely to vote for Christian Democrats in the post-war elections. The legacy of priest repression on voting behavior persists into the present, although its magnitude wanes overtime. These findings suggest that repression of elites leaves lasting intergenerational legacies on mass political and social behavior.
AcharyaA.BlackwellM.SenM. (2016). The political legacy of American slavery. The Journal of Politics, 78(3), 621–641. https://doi.org/10.1086/686631
2.
AlexanderJ.EyermanR.GiesenB.SmelserN.SztompokaP. (2004). Cultural trauma and collective identity. University of California Press.
3.
BalcellsL. (2012). The consequences of victimization on political identities: Evidence from Spain. Politics & Society, 40(3), 311–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329211424721
4.
BeckerS. O.VothH.-H. (2023). From the ‘death of God’ to the rise of Hitler. Technical Report.
5.
BerbenP. (1975). Dachau, 1933-1945: The official history. Norfolk Press.
6.
BesleyT.Reynal-QuerolM. (2014). The legacy of historical conflict: Evidence from Africa. American Political Science Review, 108(2), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055414000161
7.
BlairG.LittmanR.NugentE.WolfeR.BukarM.CrismanB.EtimA.HazlettC.KimJ. (2021). Trusted authorities can change minds and shift norms during conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(42), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2105570118
8.
BowlesS.GintisH. (2013). A cooperative species: Human reciprocity and its evolution. Princeton University Press.
9.
BoydR.RichersonP. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago University Press.
10.
BraunS. T.FrankeR. (2021). A county-level database on expellees in west Germany, 1939–1961. Vierteljahrschrift für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte, 108(4), 522–540. https://doi.org/10.25162/vswg-2021-0017
11.
CampbellA.ConverseP. E.MillerW. E.StokesD. E. (1960). The American voter. John Wiley & Sons.
12.
CanettiD.HallB. J.RapaportC.WayneC. (2013). Exposure to political violence and political extremism. European Psychologist, 18(4), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000158
13.
CanettiD.HirschbergerG.RapaportC.Elad-StrengerJ.Ein-DorT.RosenzveigS.PyszczynskiT.HobfollS. (2018). Collective trauma from the lab to the real world: The effects of the Holocaust on contemporary Israeli political cognitions. Political Psychology, 39(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12384
14.
Cavalli-SforzaL. L.FeldmanM. W.ChenK.-H.DornbuschS. M. (1982). Theory and observation in cultural transmission. Science, 218(4567), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7123211
15.
CharnyshV. (2015). Historical legacies of interethnic competition: Anti-semitism and the EU referendum in Poland. Comparative Political Studies, 48(13), 1711–1745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015598921
16.
CharnyshV.PeisakhinL. (2022). The role of communities in preserving political identities: Evidence from forced population transfers. British Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 238–258. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000447
17.
CharnyshV.PiqueR. (2023). Razing the church: The enduring effect of Nazi repression in Poland. Working Paper. https://t.ly/0bN4n
18.
CondraL.IsaqzadehM.LinardiS. (2019). Clerics and scriptures: Experimentally disentangling the influence of religious authority in Afghanistan. British Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123416000569
EvansR. (2005). The third Reich in power. Penguin.
23.
FalterJ.HänischD. (1990). Wahl-Und Sozialdaten Der Kreise Und Gemeinden Des Deutschen Reiches von 1920 Bis1933. GESIS Datenarchiv. ZA8013 Datenfile Version 1.0.0.
24.
FalterJ. W.ThomasL.SchumannS. (2009). Wahlen und Abstimmungen in der Weimarer Republik: Materialien zum Wahlverhalten, 1919-1933. German. Verlag C.H.BecK.
25.
FerreeM. M. (2005). Soft repression: Ridicule, stigma, and silencing in gender-based movements. In DavenportC.JohnstonH.MuellerC. (Eds.), Repression and mobilization (pp. 138–166). University of Minnesota Press.
26.
ForstnerV. T. (2009). Romisch-katholische und evangelisch-lutherische Kirche in Furstenfeldbruck 1933-1945. In KramerF.LatzinE. (Eds.), Furstenfeldbruck in der NS-Zeit: eine Kleinstadt bei Mu¨nchen in den Jahren 1933 bis 1945 (pp. 224–280). Regensburg Germany: Schnell & Steiner.
27.
FoukaV. (2020). Backlash: The unintended effects of language prohibition in US schools after World War I. The Review of Economic Studies, 87(1), 204–239. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdz024
28.
GabelM.ScheveK. (2007). Estimating the effect of elite communications on public opinion using instrumental variables. American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 1013–1028. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00294.x
29.
GillA. (1998). Rendering unto caeser: The Catholic church and the state in Latin America. Chicago University Press.
30.
GreenD.PalmquistB.SchicklerE. (2004). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. Yale University Press.
31.
GrossboeltingT. (2016). Losing heaven: Religion in Germany since 1954. Berghahn Books.
32.
Grzymala-BusseA. M. (2015). Nations under God: How churches use moral authority to influence policy. Princeton University Press.
33.
HaffertL. (2022). The long-term effects of oppression: Prussia, political catholicism, and the Alternative für Deutschland. American Political Science Review, 116(2), 595–614. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055421001040
34.
HänischD. (1989). Inhalt und Struktur der Datenbank ‘Wahl-und Sozialdaten der Kreise und Gemeinden des Deutschen Reiches von 1920 bis 1933 (pp. 39–67). Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung.
35.
HoffmannP. (1977). The history of the German resistance, 1933–1945. Macdonald and Janes.
36.
HornD. (1979). The struggle for Catholic youth in Hitler’s Germany: An assessment. The Catholic Historical Review, 65(4), 561–582.
37.
JenningsM. K.StokerL.BowersJ. (2009). Politics across generations: Family transmission reexamined. The Journal of Politics, 71(3), 782–799. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381609090719
38.
JoneH. (1950). Gesetzbuch der lateinischen Kirche. Bd. 1. Allgemeine Normen und Personenrecht. F. Sch¨oningh.
39.
KalyvasS. (1996). The rise of Christian Democracy in Europe. Cornell University Press.
40.
KershawI. (2000). Popular opinion and political dissent in the Third Reich. Oxford University Press. Bavaria 1933-1945.
41.
KoeselK. (2014). Religion and authoritarianism: Cooperation, conflict, and the consequences. Cambridge University Press.
42.
KrakowskiK.SchaubM. (2022). Elite murder and popular resistance. UNU WIDER, Working Paper 2022/148.
43.
LevitskyS.WayL. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge University Press.
44.
LewyG. (2000). The Catholic church and Nazi Germany (2nd ed.). Da Capo Press.
LinzG. (2012). Follow the leader? How voters respond to politicians’ promises and performance. Chicago University Press.
47.
LongerichP. (2011). Heinrich Himmler: A life. Oxford University Press.
48.
LupuN.PeisakhinL. (2017). The legacy of political violence across generations. American Journal of Political Science, 61(4), 836–851. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12327
49.
LynchM. (2012). The Arab uprisings: The unfinished revolutions of the Middle East. Public Affairs.
50.
MartinezS. (2022). Authoritarian indoctrination through selective repression. Working Paper.
51.
McClendonG.Beatty RiedlR. (2019). From pews to politics: Religius sermons and political participation in Africa. Cambridge University Press.
52.
NugentE. R. (2020). After repression: How polarization derails democratic transition. Princeton University Press.
53.
NunnN.LeonardW. (2011). The slave trade and the origins of mistrust in Africa. The American Economic Review, 101(7), 3221–3252. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.7.3221
54.
OsorioJ.SchubigerL. I.WeintraubM. (2018). Disappearing dissent? Repression and state consolidation in Mexico. Journal of Peace Research, 55(2), 252–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343318751035
55.
PeisakhinL.QueraltD. (2025). Replication data for: The political legacy of elite repression. CPS Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/4ZDNJ9
56.
PulejoM. (2024). Religious mobilization and the selection of political elites: Evidence from postwar Italy. American Journal of Political Science, 68(4), 1498–1513. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12820
57.
RozenasA.SchutteS.ZhukovY. (2017). The political legacy of violence: The long-term impact of Stalin’s repression in Ukraine. The Journal of Politics, 79(4), 1147–1161. https://doi.org/10.1086/692964
58.
ShirerW. L. (1960). Rise and fall of the Third Reich. Secker & Warburg.
59.
SpenkuchJ. L.PhilippT. (2018). Elite influence? Religion and the electoral success of the Nazis. American Journal of Political Science, 62(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12328
60.
SpicerK. P. (2004). Resisting the Third Reich: The Catholic clergy in Hitler’s Berlin. Northern Illinois University Press.
61.
SpicerK. P. (2008). Hitler’s priests: Catholic clergy and national socialism. Northern Illinois University Press.
62.
StaubE. (2006). Reconciliation after Genocide, mass killing, or intractable conflict: Understanding the roots of violence, psychological recovery, and steps toward a general theory. Political Psychology, 27(6), 867–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00541.x
63.
ThomsonH. (2022). Authoritarian repression and electoral oposition: Mobilization under Germany’s antisocialist law. Comparative Politics, 54(4), 621–643. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041522x16346476699950
64.
TrejoG. (2009). Religious competition and ethnic mobilization in Latin America: Why the Catholic church promotes indigenous movements in Mexico. American Political Science Review, 103(3), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055409990025
65.
Voigtl¨anderN.VothH.-J. (2012). Persecution perpetuated: The medieval origins of anti-semitic violence in Nazi Germany. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(3), 1339–1392.
66.
VollhardtJ. (2012). Collective victimization. In The Oxford Handbook of intergroup conflict. Oxford University Press.
67.
von HehlU. (1996). Priester unter Hitlers Terror: Eine Biographische und Statistische Erhebung. Schoningh, 37 F.
68.
WayneC.DamannT.FachterS. (2023). The Holocaust, the socialization of victimhood and outgroup political attitudes in Israel. Comparative Political Studies, 0(0), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140231194068
69.
WittenbergJ. (2006). Crucibles of political loyalty: Church institutions and electoral continuity in Hungary. Cambridge University Press.
70.
ZallerJ. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
