How do historical inequalities influence modern public goods provision? This paper analyses a new panel dataset of local public goods provision in a single North Indian district with observations at the village-decade level going back to 1905 and detailed information on colonial land tenure institutions and demographics. The presence of large colonial landowners is positively associated with rural public goods provision when the landlord was resident in the early 20th century and has a null effect when the landlord was an absentee. Villages inhabited or owned by upper castes had an advantage in the colonial and immediate post-independence eras, but not afterward. The results suggest that within unequal societies, economic and status inequalities can have positive effects on public goods provision when they link elites to extralocal decision-makers.
AcemogluD.JohnsonS.RobinsonJ. A. (2002). Reversal of fortune: Geography and institutions in the making of the modern world income distribution. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1231–1294. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302320935025
2.
AcemogluD.ReedT.RobinsonJ. A. (2014). Chiefs: Economic development and elite control of civil society in Sierra Leone. Journal of Political Economy, 122(2), 319–368. https://doi.org/10.1086/674988
3.
AndersonM. L. (2008). Multiple inference and gender differences in the effects of early intervention: A reevaluation of the abecedarian, perry preschool, and early training projects. Journal of the American statistical Association, 103(484), 1481–1495. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214508000000841
4.
AndersonS.FrancoisP.KotwalA. (2015). Clientelism in Indian villages. The American Economic Review, 105(6), 1780–1816. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130623
5.
AuerbachA. M.ThachilT. (2018). How clients select brokers: Competition and choice in India’s slums. American Political Science Review, 112(4), 775–791. https://doi.org/10.1017/s000305541800028x
6.
Baden-PowellB. H. (1892). The land-systems of British India: Being a manual of the land-tenures and of the systems of land-revenue administration prevalent in the several Provinces. Clarendon Press.
7.
BalánP.BergeronA.GabrielT.WeigelJ. L. (2022). Local elites as state capacity: How city chiefs use local information to increase tax compliance in the democratic republic of the Congo. American Economic Review, 112(3), 762–797. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20201159
8.
BaldwinK. (2019). Elected MPs, traditional chiefs, and local public goods: Evidence on the role of leaders in co-production from rural Zambia. Comparative Political Studies, 52(12), 1925–1956. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018774372
9.
BaldwinK.HuberJ. D. (2010). Economic versus cultural differences: Forms of ethnic diversity and public goods provision. American Political Science Review, 104(04), 644–662. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055410000419
10.
BanerjeeA.IyerL. (2005). History, institutions, and economic performance: The legacy of colonial land tenure systems in India. The American Economic Review, 95(4), 1190–1213. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828054825574
11.
BanerjeeA.SomanathanR. (2007). The political economy of public goods: Some evidence from India. Journal of Development Economics, 82(2), 287–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.04.005
12.
BenabouR. (2000). Unequal societies: Income distribution and the social contract. American Economic Review, 90(1), 96–129. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.1.96
13.
BhavnaniR. R.LeeA. (2018). Local embeddedness and bureaucratic performance: Evidence from India. The Journal of Politics, 80(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1086/694101
ColellaF.LaliveR.Orcan SakalliS.MathiasT. (2019). Inference with arbitrary clustering. Deutsche Post STIFTUNG.
17.
CruzC.LabonneJ.QuerubinP. (2017). Politician family networks and electoral outcomes: Evidence from the Philippines. American Economic Review, 107(10), 3006–3037. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150343
18.
DasguptaA. (2018). Technological change and political turnover: The democratizing effects of the green revolution in India. American Political Science Review, 112(4), 918–938. https://doi.org/10.1017/s000305541800031x
19.
DellM. (2010). The persistent effects of Peru’s mining mita. Econometrica, 78(6), 1863–1903.
20.
EvansH. F. (1880). Report on the settlement of the Agra district, north-western Provinces. Northwestern Provinces and Oudh Government Press.
21.
GerringJ.ThackerS. C.LuY.HuangW. (2015). Does diversity impair human development? A multi-level test of the diversity debit hypothesis. World Development, 66(1), 166–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.07.019
22.
IversenV.Palmer-JonesR.SenK. (2013). On the colonial origins of agricultural development in India: A re-examination of banerjee and iyer. Journal of Development Studies, 49(12), 1631–1646. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2013.807502
23.
IyerL. (2010). Direct versus indirect colonial rule in India: Long-term consequences. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(4), 693–713. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00023
JayaramR. S. (2016). Caste in space: The Bahujan Samaj party and urban government in Agra and Ghaziabad, 2007-2013. PhD thesis. King’s College.
26.
KramonE. (2013). Vote Buying and accountability in democratic africa PhD thesis. Stanford University.
27.
KustovA.PardelliG. (2018). Ethnoracial homogeneity and public outcomes: The (non) effects of diversity. American Political Science Review, 112(4), 1096–1103. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055418000308
28.
LanjouwP.SternN. (1998). Economic development in Palanpur over five decades. Oxford University Press.
29.
LeeA. (2017). Redistributive colonialism: Caste, conflict and development in India. Politics & Society.
30.
LeeA. (2018). Ethnic diversity and ethnic discrimination: Explaining local public goods provision. Comparative Political Studies, 51(10), 1351–1383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017740604
31.
LeeA. (2019a). From hierarchy to ethnicity: The politics of caste in twentieth century India. Cambridge Univ Press.
32.
LeeA. (2019b). Land, state capacity, and colonialism: Evidence from India. Comparative Political Studies, 52(3), 412–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018758759
33.
LeeA. (2022). Policing in India: The politics of order in a patronage democracy. Cambridge University Press.
34.
MattinglyD. C. (2016). Elite capture: How decentralization and informal institutions weaken property rights in China. World Politics, 68(3), 383–412. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043887116000083
35.
MetcalfT. R. (1967). Landlords without land: The UP zamindars. Pacific Affairs, 40(1/2), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/2754619
36.
MetcalfT. R. (1979). Land, landlords, and the British Raj: Northern India in the nineteenth century [Uttar Pradesh]. University of California Press.
37.
MooreB. (1966). Social origins of dictatorship and democracy: Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. Beacon Press.
38.
MudieR. F. (1930). Final report of settlement operations in district Agra. Allahabad: Government press.
39.
MukherjeeS. (2018). Colonial origins of Maoist insurgency in India: Historical institutions and civil war. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(10), 2232–2274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002717727818
40.
NevillH. R. (1905). Agra: A gazetteer being vol. VIII of the district gazetteers of the united Provinces of Agra and oudh. Superintendent of Government Press.
41.
OlsonM. (1971). The logic of collective action. Harvard University Press.
42.
ReevesP. (1991). Landlords and governments in Uttar Pradesh: A study of their relations until zamindari abolition. Oxford University Press.
43.
Sánchez-TalanquerM. (2020). One-eyed state: The politics of legibility and property taxation. Latin American Politics and Society, 62(3), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2020.7
44.
SarbahiA. (2016). Land tenure and communist insurgency in India. APSA annual meeting paper.
45.
SchwabB.JanzenS.Magnan and WilliamThompsonN. P. M.ThompsonW. M. (2020). Constructing a summary index using the standardized inverse-covariance weighted average of indicators. The Stata Journal, 20(4), 952–964. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x20976325
46.
SellarsE. A.Alix-GarciaJ. (2018). Labor scarcity, land tenure, and historical legacy: Evidence from Mexico. Journal of Development Economics, 135(1), 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.07.014
SkodaU.BagM. (2018). Royal dynasties, political representation and positive discrimination: A comparison of two constituencies in northwestern odisha. Studies in Indian Politics, 6(2), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/2321023018797454
49.
SokoloffK. L.EngermanS. L. (2000). History lessons: Institutions, factors endowments, and paths of development in the new world. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.217
50.
SrinivasM. N. (1987). The dominant caste and other essays. Oxford University Press.
51.
StokesS. C.DunningT.NazarenoM.BruscoV. (2013). Brokers, voters, and clientelism: The puzzle of distributive politics. Cambridge University Press.
TsaiL. L. (2007). Solidary groups, informal accountability, and local public goods provision in rural China. American Political Science Review, 101(02), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055407070153
54.
TsaiL. L.XuY. (2018). Outspoken insiders: Political connections and citizen participation in authoritarian China. Political Behavior, 40(3), 629–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9416-6
55.
VergheseA.TeitelbaumE. (2019). Conquest and conflict: The colonial roots of maoist violence in India. Politics & Society, 47(1), 55–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329218823120
56.
WaringT. M.BellA. V. (2013). Ethnic dominance damages cooperation more than ethnic diversity: Results from multi-ethnic field experiments in India. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(6), 398–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.07.003
57.
WeingastB. R.ShepsleK. A.JohnsenC. (1981). The political economy of benefits and costs: A neoclassical approach to distributive politics. Journal of Political Economy, 89(4), 642–664. https://doi.org/10.1086/260997
58.
ZerininiJ. (2009). The marginalisation of the savarnas in Uttar Pradesh? In JaffrelotC.KumarS. (Eds.), Rise of Plebians: The changing Face of Indian legislative Assembly. Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
