In the research on explaining public goods provision, political competition is usually linked with public goods provision and it is believed that political competition will have a positive or negative impact on public goods provision. However, others suggest that this relationship changes with the influence of other variables. This article which uses data analysis of 165 countries in 2013 to discuss the relationship between state capacity, political competition and public goods provision and its impact on public goods provision. The results show that public goods provision is good when there is only strong state capacity or a high level of political competition, or both. Then, the four cases of Japan, Singapore, Malaysia and Laos are selected to illustrate the mechanism by which the interaction of state capacity and political competition affects public goods provision.
AlesinaAWederB (2002) Do corrupt governments receive less foreign aid?American Economic Review92(4): 1126–1137.
2.
AlesinaAZhuravskayaE (2011) Segregation and the quality of government in a cross section of countries. American Economic Review101(5): 1872–1911.
3.
AndersonM (1996) Frontiers: Territory and State Formation in the Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
ArvatePR (2013) Electoral competition and local government responsiveness in Brazil. World Development43(5): 67–83.
5.
AshworthJGeysBHeyndelsB, et al. (2014) Competition in the political arena and local government performance. Applied Economics46(19): 2264–2276.
6.
AuerbachAM (2016) Clients and communities: The political economy of party network organization and development in India’s urban slums. World Politics68(1): 189–189.
7.
BaldwinKHuberJ (2010) Economic versus cultural differences: Forms of ethnic diversity and public goods provision. American Political Science Review104(4): 644–662.
8.
BanerjeeAIyerLSSomanathanR (2005) History, social divisions, and public goods in rural India. Journal of the European Economic Association3(2–3): 639–647.
9.
BesleyTPandeRRahmanL, et al. (2004) The politics of public good provision: Evidence from Indian local governments. Journal of the European Economic Association2(2–3): 416–426.
10.
BouldingCBrownDS (2014) Political competition and local social spending: Evidence from Brazil. Studies in Comparative International Development49: 197–216.
11.
BoyneGJamesOJohnP, et al. (2012) Party control, party competition and public service performance. British Journal of Political Science42(3): 641–660.
12.
CamõesPJ (2022) Types of decentralization and governance: Evidence from across the world. Journal of Public Affairs22(3): 1472–3891.
13.
ChhibberPNooruddinI (2004) Do party systems count? The number of parties and government performance in the Indian states. Comparative Political Studies37(2): 152–187.
14.
Costa-i-FontJRodriguezELunaplaD (2003) Political competition and pork-barrel politics in the allocation of public investment in Mexico. Public Choice116: 185–204.
15.
CrostBKambhampatiU (2010) Political market characteristics and the provision of educational infrastructure in north India. World Development38 (2): 195–204.
16.
Deacon RT (2009) Public good provision under dictatorship and democracy. Public Choice139: 241–262.
17.
DellMLaneNQuerubinP (2018) The historical state, local collective action, and economic development in Vietnam. Econometrica86(6): 2083–2121.
18.
ErtmanT (1997) Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
EvansRSkocpol (1985) Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
GottliebJKosecK (2019) The countervailing effects of competition on public goods provision: When bargaining inefficiencies lead to bad outcomes. American Political Science Review113(1): 88–107.
21.
HabyarimanaJHumphreysMPosnerD, et al. (2007) Why does ethnic diversity undermine public goods provision?American Political Science Review101(4): 709–725.
22.
HecockRD (2006) Electoral competition, globalization, and subnational education spending in Mexico, 1999–2004. American Journal of Political Science50(4): 950–961.
23.
JohnsonNDKoyamaM (2017) States and economic growth: Capacity and constraints. Explorations in Economic History64: 1–20.
24.
JonesPE (2013) The effect of political competition on democratic accountability. Political Behavior35(3): 481–518.
25.
KnackS (2002) Social capital and the quality of government: Evidence from the United States. American Journal of Political Science46(4): 772–785.
26.
KosecKDavidJFatimaZ (2018) Political competition and rural welfare: Evidence from Pakistan. Oxford Economic Papers70(4): 1036–1061.
27.
KustovAPardelliG (2018) Ethnoracial homogeneity and public outcomes: The (non)effects of diversity. American Political Science Review112(4): 1096–1103.
28.
LambrightGM (2010) Decentralization in Uganda: Explaining Successes and Failures in Local Governance. Boulder, CO: FirstForumPress.
29.
LiHZhouLA (2005) Political turnover and economic performance: The incentive role of personnel control in China. Journal of Public Economics89: 1743–1762.
30.
LijphartA (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31.
LilyT (2007) Accountability Without Democracy: Solidary Groups and Public Goods Provision in Rural China. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
MannM (1986) The Sources of Social Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
MarthaW (2018) The politics of local government performance: Elite cohesion and cross-village constraints in decentralized Senegal. World Development103: 149–161.
34.
MigdalS (1988) Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton,NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
MiguelEGugertyMK (2005) Ethnic diversity, social sanctions, and public goods in Kenya. Journal of Public Economics89(11–12): 2325–2368.
36.
MitchellAMWeiwenY (2022) Political centralization, career incentives, and local economic growth in Edo Japan. Elsevier85: 1090–2457.
37.
MutalibH (2002) Constitutional-electoral reforms and politics in Singapore. Legislative Studies Quarterly27(4): 659–672.
38.
MwangiS (2006) Ethnicity, governance and the provision of public goods. Journal of African Economies15(1): 62–99.
39.
PutnamRD (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
RosenzweigSC (2015) Does electoral competition affect public goods provision in dominant-party regimes? Evidence from Tanzania. Electoral Studies39: 72–84.
41.
SaravanamuttuJ (2021) Malaysia in 2020: Political fragmentation, power plays and shifting coalitions. Southeast Asian Affairs.
42.
ScheinerE (2005) Pipelines of pork: Japanese politics and a model of local opposition party failure. Comparative Political Studies38(7): 799–823.
43.
SinghPVom HauM (2016) Ethnicity in time: Politics, history, and the relationship between ethnic diversity and public goods provision. Comparative Political Studies49(10): 1303–1340.
44.
StasavageD (2005) Democracy and education spending in Africa. American Journal of Political Science49(2): 343–358.
45.
Stuart-FoxM (2007) Laos: Politics in a single-party state. Southeast Asian Affairs: 161–180.
46.
TajimaYOstwaldK (2018) Ethnic segregation and public goods: Evidence from Indonesia. American Political Science Review112(3): 637–653.
47.
TillyC (1975) The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton,NJ: Princeton University Press.
48.
TrounstineJ (2016) Segregation and inequality in public goods. American Journal of Political Science60(3): 709–725.
49.
TurkanFO (2016) An analysis of the notion of a ‘failed state’. International Journal of Social Science Studies4(1): 77–85.
50.
VaccaroA (2022) Measures of state capacity: So similar, yet so different. Quality and Quantity. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-022-01466-x.
51.
WilfahrtM (2018) Precolonial legacies and institutional congruence in public goods delivery: Evidence from decentralized West Africa. World Politics70(2): 239–274.
52.
WrightJ (2008) Political competition and democratic stability in new democracies. British Journal of Political Science38(2): 221–245.
53.
ZhangXFanSZhangL, et al. (2004) Local governance and public goods provision in rural China. Journal of Public Economics88: 2857–2871.
