Countries in the Global South are particularly vulnerable to social and political violence. This paper suggests that such violence makes certain recalcitrant economic interests more open to taxes and spending on social welfare. Using results from a survey experiment of business owners and operators in Mexico, we show that relative to more innocuous institutional weaknesses, concerns over violence generally increase support for anti-poverty spending and decrease support for tax cuts. To build a theory, we explore heterogeneous effects and textual data. The findings suggest that business interests see anti-poverty spending as a tool for shoring up costs of violence in consumer markets, with some leaders even extending support to welfare-enhancing taxes. However, violence can create challenges in labor markets that increase operational costs, leading some business interests to resist tax policies that ask them to help fund social programs.
AlesinaA.GlaeserE. L. (2004). Fighting poverty in the us and Europe: A world of difference. Oxford University Press.
3.
ASF (2011). Servicio postal mexicano, prestación del servicio social. Auditoría de Desempeño 15-1-09J9E-07-0398 398-DE. Reportes de la Cuenta Pública.
4.
ASF (2013). Servicio postal mexicano, prestación del servicio social. Auditoría financiera y de Cumplimiento: 13-1-09J9E-02-0027 DE-102. Reportes de la Cuenta Pública.
5.
AuyeroJ. (2012). Patients of the state: The politics of waiting in Argentina. Duke University Press.
6.
BartelsL. M. (2016). Unequal democracy: The political economy of the new gilded age. Princeton University Press.
7.
BauerM.CassarA.ChytilováJ.HenrichJ. (2014). War’s enduring effects on the development of egalitarian motivations and in-group biases. Psychological Science, 25(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613493444.
8.
BeberB.RoesslerP.ScaccoA. (2014). Intergroup violence and political attitudes: Evidence from a dividing Sudan. Journal of Politics, 76(3), 649–665. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381614000103.
9.
BerensS.von SchillerA. (2017). Taxing higher incomes: What makes the high-income earners consent to more progressive taxation in Latin America?Political Behavior, 39(3), 703–729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9376-2.
10.
BraumoellerB. F. (2003). Causal complexity and the study of politics. Political Analysis, 11(3), 203–233. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpg012.
CalderonL. Y.HeinleK.Rodriguez FerreiraO.ShirkD. A. (2019). Organized crime and violence in Mexico. Justice in Mexico series. University of San.
15.
CammettM. (2014). Compassionate communalism: Welfare and sectarianism in Lebanon. Cornell University Press.
16.
CarnesM.,MaresI. (2015). Explaining the ‘return of the state’ in middle-income countries employment vulnerability, income, and preferences for social protection in Latin America. Politics & Society, 43(4), 525–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329215602893.
17.
CastilloJ. C.MejíaD.RestrepoP. (2014). Scarcity without leviathan: The violent effects of cocaine supply shortages in the Mexican drug war. Working Paper 356. Center for Global Development.
ChipmanH. A.GeorgeE. I.McCullochR. E. (2010). Bart: Bayesian additive regression trees. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 4(1), 266–298. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-aoas285.
20.
CogerL. (2014). The private sector and public security: The cases of ciudad juárez and monterrey. Working Paper Series on Civic Engagement and Public Security in Mexico. University of San Diego.
CoovadiaH.JewkesR.BarronP.SandersD.McIntyreD. (2009). The health and health system of South Africa: Historical roots of current public health challenges. The Lancet, 374(9692), 817–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60951-X.
25.
Coparmex (2018). Marcaje a mi gobierno. Retrieved August 2, 2019, fromwww.datacoparmex.
CramerB. D.KaufmanR. R. (2011). Views of economic inequality in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies, 44(9), 1206–1237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010392171.
31.
Del ÁngelM.OchoaA.HernándezA.ÁngelJ. D. (2015). Postal mail distribution: An approximation from the problem of the VRP. Working paper. Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Naranjos.
32.
Diaz-CayerosA.EstévezF.MagaloniB. (2016). The political logic of poverty relief: Electoral strategies and social policy in Mexico. Cambridge University Press.
33.
EconomistT. (2006). On Mexican time—Mexico’s postal services. The Economist.
34.
Esping-AndersenG. (1985). Politics against markets: The social democratic road to power. Princeton University Press.
35.
Estevez-AbeM.IversenT.SoskiceD. (2001). Social protection and the formation of skills: A reinterpretation of the welfare state. In HallP. A.SoskiceD. (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press.
36.
FeierherdG.SchiumeriniL.StokesS. (2017). When do the wealthy support redistribution? Inequality aversion in Buenos Aires. British Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 793–805. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000588.
37.
FerwerdaJ. (2015). The politics of proximity: Local redistribution in developed democracies (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
38.
GarayC. (2017). Social policy expansion in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
GaviriaA. (2008). Social mobility and preferences for redistribution in Latin America. Economía, 8(1), 55–96. https://doi.org/10.1353/eco.2008.0003.
41.
GelmanA.JakulinA.PittauM. G.SuY.-S. (2008). A weakly informative default prior distribution for logistic and other regression models. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 2(4), 1360–1383. https://doi.org/10.1214/08-aoas191.
42.
GreenwaldB. C.StiglitzJ. E. (1993). Financial market imperfections and business cycles. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(1), 77–114. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118496.
43.
GrimmerJ.MessingS.WestwoodS. J. (2017). Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects and the effects of heterogeneous treatments with ensemble methods. Political Analysis, 25(4), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2017.15.
44.
GuptaA. (2012). Red tape: Bureaucracy, structural violence, and poverty in India. Duke University Press.
45.
HaberS. H.KleinH. S.MaurerN.MiddlebrookK. J. (2008). Mexico since 1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
HaggardS.KaufmanR. R.LongJ. D. (2013). Income, occupation, and preferences for redistribution in the developing world. Studies in Comparative International Development, 48(2), 113–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-013-9129-8.
47.
HartmanA. C.MorseB. S. (2018). Violence, empathy and altruism: Evidence from the Ivorian refugee crisis in Liberia. British Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 731–755. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123417000655.
48.
HastieT.FriedmanJ.TibshiraniR. (2001). The elements of statistical learning. Springer.
49.
HearstM. A.DumaisS. T.OsunaE.PlattJ.ScholkopfB. (1998). Support vector machines. Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, 13(4), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1109/5254.708428.
50.
HollandA. C. (2017). Forbearance as redistribution: The politics of informal welfare in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
51.
HollandA. C. (2018). Diminished expectations: redistributive preferences in truncated welfare states. World Politics, 70(4), 555–594. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887118000096.
52.
HollandB.RíosV. (2021). Replication data for: Violence and business interest in social welfare: Evidence from Mexico. Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/V9X6QG.
53.
INEGI (2016). Encuesta nacional de calidad regulatoria e impacto gubernamental en empresas. INEGI: Aguascalientes.
54.
INEGI (2018). Encuesta nacional de victimización de empresas, aguascalientes. INEGI: Aguascalientes.
55.
IversenT.SoskiceD. (2001). An asset theory of social policy preferences. American Political Science Review, 95(4), 875–893. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055400400079.
56.
JarilloB.MagaloniB.FrancoE.RoblesG. (2016). How the Mexican drug war affects kids and schools? Evidence on effects and mechanisms. International Journal of Educational Development, 51, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.05.008.
KyleJ. (2018). Local corruption and popular support for fuel subsidy reform in Indonesia. Comparative Political Studies, 51(11), 1472–1503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018758755.
59.
LeonG. (2012). Civil conflict and human capital accumulation the long-term effects of political violence in Perú. Journal of Human Resources, 47(4), 991–1022. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2012.0036.
LupuN.PontussonJ. (2011). The structure of inequality and the politics of redistribution. American Political Science Review, 105(2), 316–336. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055411000128.
62.
MaresI. (2003). The sources of business interest in social insurance: Sectoral versus national differences. World Politics, 55(02), 229–258. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2003.0012.
63.
MauriL.D’AgostinoR. B. (2017). Challenges in the design and interpretation of noninferiority trials. New England Journal of Medicine, 377(14), 1357–1367. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra1510063.
64.
MironovaV.WhittS. (2014). Ethnicity and altruism after violence: The contact hypothesis in Kosovo. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 1(02), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1017/xps.2014.18.
65.
MorganJ.KellyN. J. (2017). Social patterns of inequality, partisan competition, and Latin American support for redistribution. The Journal of Politics, 79(1), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1086/687412.
66.
PageB. I.BartelsL. M.SeawrightJ. (2013). Democracy and the policy preferences of wealthy Americans. Perspectives on Politics, 11(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/s153759271200360x.
67.
PasterT. (2013). Business and welfare state development: Why did employers accept social reforms?World Politics, 65(03), 416–451. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043887113000117.
RiosV. (2013). Why did Mexico become so violent? A self-reinforcing violent equilibrium caused by competition and enforcement. Trends in Organized Crime, 16(2), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-012-9175-z.
70.
RobertsM. E.StewartB. M.TingleyD.LucasC.Leder‐LuisJ.GadarianS. K.AlbertsonB.RandD. G. (2014). Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 1064–1082. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12103.
71.
RoblesC. G.MagaloniB. (2018). The economic consequences of drug trafficking violence in Mexico. Poverty and Governance Series Working Paper. Stanford University.
RuedaD.StegmuellerD. (2016). The externalities of inequality: Fear of crime and preferences for redistribution in Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 60(2), 472–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12212.
74.
SchawbK. (2018). The global competitiveness report 2018. Insight report. World Economic Forum.
75.
ScheidelW. (2018). The great leveler: Violence and the history of inequality from the stone age to the twenty-first century. Princeton University Press.
76.
SchneiderB. R (2013). Hierarchical capitalism in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
77.
SchwartzD.LellouchJ. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 20(8), 637–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(67)90041-0.
78.
ShapiroI. (2005). The flight from reality in the human sciences. Princeton University Press.
79.
ShayoM. (2009). A model of social identity with an application to political economy: Nation, class, and redistribution. American Political Science Review, 103(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055409090194.
80.
SilR.KatzensteinP. J. (2010). Analytic eclecticism in the study of world politics: Reconfiguring problems and mechanisms across research traditions. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592710001179.
81.
SinghP. (2015). How solidarity works for welfare: Sub nationalism and social development in India. Cambridge University Press.
82.
SwensonP. (2002). Capitalists against markets: The making of labor markets and welfare states in the United States and Sweden. Oxford University Press.
83.
TunisS. R.StryerD. B.ClancyC. M. (2003). Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. Jama, 290(12), 1624–1632. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.12.1624.
84.
ValenzuelaC. (2019). Falta coordinación entre estado y federación para combatir inseguridad: Consejo coordinador empresarial. Omnia. Retrieved July 31st, 2019, fromhttp://www.omnia.com.mx/noticia/114567.
85.
VernonR. (1963). The dilemma of Mexico's development, the roles of private and public sectors. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
86.
VoorsM. J.NillesenE. E. M.VerwimpP.BulteE. H.LensinkR.SoestD. P. V. (2012). Violent conflict and behavior: A field experiment in Burundi. The American Economic Review, 102(2), 941–964. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.2.941.
87.
WeymouthS. (2012). Firm lobbying and influence in developing countries: A multilevel approach. Business and Politics, 14(4), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1515/bap-2012-0030.
88.
WilkersonJ.CasasA. (2017). Large-scale computerized text analysis in political science: Opportunities and challenges. Annual Review of Political Science, 20(1), 529–544. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052615-025542.
