This article examines the relationship between democratic representation and spending on education in Latin America. The authors assess the impact that democracy has on the distribution of resources between different levels of schooling and on total spending on education. Specifically, they test whether democratic governments allocate a greater share of resources to primary education, the level that benefits the largest segment of the electorate and that is most critical for human capital formation in developing countries. Using time-series cross-sectional analysis, the authors find that democracies devote a higher percentage of their educational resources to primary education and that they maintain higher absolute spending levels on education in the aggregate, thereby enhancing the prospects of human capital formation.
Achen, Christopher H. (2000, July). Why lagged dependent variables can suppress the explanatory power of other independent variables. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, Los Angeles.
2.
Ames, Barry. (1987). Political survival: Politicians and public policy in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
Baltagi, B. H. (1995). Econometric analysis of panel data. New York: John Wiley.
4.
Beck, Nathaniel, & Katz, Jonathan N. (1995). What to do (and not do) with time-series cross-sectional data. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634-647.
5.
Beck, Nathaniel,& Katz, Jonathan N. (1996). Nuisance vs. substance: Specifying and estimating time-series-cross-section models. Political Analysis, 6, 1-36.
6.
Birdsall, Nancy, Londoño, Juan Luis, & O’Donnell, Lesley. (1998, December). Education in Latin America: Demand and distribution are factors that matter. CEPAL Review, 66, 39-52.
7.
Brazil Ministry of Education. (2000). Education in Brazil: 1995-2000. Brasília, Brazil: Author.
8.
Brown, David S. (1999). Reading, writing and regime type: Democracy’s impact on primary school enrollment. Political Research Quarterly, 52(4), 681-707.
9.
Brown, David, & Hunter, Wendy. (1999). Democracy and social spending in Latin America, 1980-92. American Political Science Review, 93(4), 779-790.
10.
Castañeda, Tarcisio. (1992). Combating poverty: Innovative social reforms in Chile during the 1980s. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
11.
Castro, Claudio Moura. (2000). Education: Way behind but trying to catch up. Daedalus, 129(2), 291-303.
12.
Cominetti, Rossella. (1996, May). Social expenditure in Latin America—An update. Santiago, Chile: Comisión Económica Para América Latina y el Caribe.
13.
Cominetti, Rosella, & Di Gropello, Emanuela. (1994). El gasto social en América Latina: Un examen cuantitativo and cualitativo (Cuadernos de la CEPAL #71). Santiago, Chile: Comisión Económica Para America Latina y el Caribe.
14.
Cominetti, Rosella, & Ruiz, Gonzalo. (1998). Evolución del gasto público social en America Latina: 1980-1995 (Cuadernos de la CEPAL #80). Santiago, Chile: Comisión Económica Para América Latina y el Caribe.
15.
Comisión Económica Para América Latina y el Caribe. (2001). División de desarrollo social: Base de datos sobre gasto social. Santiago, Chile: Author.
16.
Corrales, Javier. (1999). The politics of education reform: Bolstering the supply and demand; overcoming institutional blocks (The Education Reform and Management series, Vol. 2, No. 1). Washington, DC: World Bank.
17.
Dillon, Sam. (2000, April 20). Mexican election spotlights ailing school system. The New York Times, p. A-3.
18.
Frey, Scott R., & Al-Roumi, Ali. (1999). Political democracy and the physical quality of life: The cross-national evidence. Social Indicators Research, 47, 73-97.
19.
Geddes, Barbara. (1995). The politics of economic liberalization. Latin American Research Review, 30(2), 195-214.
20.
González Rozada, Martín, & Menéndez, Alicia. (n.d.). Public university in Argentina: Subsidizing the rich? Unpublished manuscript.
21.
Graham, Carol, & Kane, Cheikh. (1998). Opportunistic government or sustaining reform? Electoral trends and public-expenditure patterns in Peru, 1990-1995. Latin American Research Review, 33(1), 67-104.
22.
Greene, William H. (1993). Econometric analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
23.
Gurr, Ted Robert, & Eckstein, Harry. (1975). Patterns of authority: A structural basis for political inquiry. New York: John Wiley.
24.
Haggard, Stephan, & Kaufman, Robert R. (Eds.). (1992). The politics of economic adjustment: International constraints, distributive conflicts, and the state. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
Heyneman, Stephen P. (1997). Economic growth and the international trade in education reform. Prospects, 27(4), 501-530.
26.
Hsiao, Cheng. (1986). Analysis of panel data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Huntington, Samuel P., & Nelson, Joan M. (1976). No easy choice: Political participation in developing countries. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
28.
Inter-American Development Bank. (1998). Facing up to inequality in Latin America (1998-1999 economic and social progress report). Washington, DC: Author.
29.
Kaufman, Robert R., & Segura-Ubiergo, Alex. (2001, July). Globalization, domestic politics, and social spending in Latin America: A time-series cross-section analysis, 1973-97. World Politics, 53, 553-587.
30.
Lake, David, & Baum, Matthew A. (2001). The invisible hand of democracy: Political control and the provision of public services. Comparative Political Studies, 34, 587-621.
31.
Lloyd-Sherlock, Peter. (2000). Failing the needy: Public social spending in Latin America. Journal of International Development, 12, 101-119.
32.
Londregan, John B., & Poole, Keith T. (1996). Does high income promote democracy?World Politics, 49(2), 1-30.
33.
Lott, John R., Jr., & Kenny, Lawrence W. (1999). Did women’s suffrage change the size and scope of government?Journal of Political Economy, 107(6), 1163-1198.
34.
Marshall, Monty G. (2003, December 16). Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800-2002. Retrieved from http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity/
35.
Moon, Bruce E. (1991). The political economy of basic human needs. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
36.
Munck, Gerardo L., & Verkuilen, Jay. (2002). Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: Evaluating alternative ideas. Comparative Political Studies, 35, 5-34.
37.
Murillo, María Victoria. (1999). Recovering political dynamics: Teachers’ unions and the decentralization of education in Argentina and Mexico. Journal of Inter American Studies and World Affairs, 41(1), 31-57.
38.
Paul, Jean Jacques, & Wolff, Laurence. (1996). The economics of higher education. In Nancy Birdsall & Richard Sabot (Eds.), Opportunity foregone: Education in Brazil (pp. 523-554). Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
39.
Plank, David. (1996). The means of our salvation: Public education in Brazil, 1930-1995. Boulder, CO: Westview.
40.
Programto Promote Educational Reform in Latin America and the Caribbean. (1998). The future at stake: Report of the Task Force on Education, Equity and Economic Competitiveness in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: Inter-American Dialogue.
41.
Psacharopoulos, G. (1995). Building human capital for better lives. Washington, DC: World Bank.
42.
Puryear, Jeffrey M. (1997). Education in Latin America: Problems and challenges (Program to Promote Educational Reform in Latin America and the Caribbean, Occasional Paper Series, No. 7). Washington, DC: Inter-American Dialogue.
43.
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E., Cheibub, José Antonio, & Limongi, Fernando. (2000). Democracy and development: Political institutions and well being in the world, 1950-1990. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Remmer, Karen L. (1990, April). Democracy and economic crisis: The Latin American experience. World Politics, 42, 315-335.
45.
Rivero, José. (2000). Educación y exclusion en América Latina: Reformas en tiempos de globalización. Lima, Peru: TAREA.
46.
Sayrs, Lois W. (1989). Pooled time series analysis. London: Sage Ltd.
47.
Schady, Norbert R. (2000). The political economy of expenditures by the Peruvian Social Fund (FONCODES), 1991-95. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 289-304.
48.
Schmitter, Philippe. (1992). The consolidation of democracy and the representation of social groups. American Behavioral Scientist, 35, 422-449.
49.
Schultz, T. W. (1963). The economic value of education. New York: Columbia University Press.
50.
Sen, Amartya. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Knopf.
51.
Sloan, John,& Tedin, Kent L. (1987). The consequences of regime type for public policy outputs. Comparative Political Studies, 20, 98-124.
52.
StataCorp. (1999). Stata statistical software (Release 6.0) [Computer software]. College Station, TX: Author.
53.
Tanzi, Vito, & Schuknecht, Ludger. (2000). Public spending in the 20th century: A global perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
54.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (1999). Statistical yearbook. Paris: Author.
55.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2000). Statistical yearbook. Paris: Author.
56.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2003). World education report 2000: UNESCO’s world education indicators. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/education/information/wer/htmlENG/tablesmenu.htm
57.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2003). International data base. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/idbnew.html
58.
van de Walle, Dominique. (1998). Assessing the welfare impacts of public spending. World Development, 26(3), 365-379.
59.
Vergara, Pilar. (1994). Market economy, social welfare, and democratic consolidation in Chile. In William C. Smith, Carlos H. Acuña, & Eduardo A. Gamarra (Eds.), Democracy, markets, and structural reform in Latin America: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, and Mexico (pp. 237-261). Coral Gables, FL: North-South Center Press.
60.
World Bank. (1991). World development report 1991: The challenge of development. New York: Oxford University Press.
61.
World Bank. (1993). The East Asian miracle: Economic growth and public policy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
62.
World Bank. (2000). World Bank world development indicators [CD-ROM]. Washington, DC: Author.
