Background.Program management models have raised concerns among occupational therapists about professional standards related to clinical competence, performance review procedures, and quality improvement initiatives.Purpose.This paper describes how a chart-stimulated recall (CSR) peer-review process and interview tool was revised, implemented, and evaluated as a pilot project to assess the clinical competence of occupational therapy staff at a large urban health centre in southern Ontario.Methods.Fourteen pairs (n=28) of occupational therapists representing various practice areas participated in this project. Half served as peer assessors and half as interviewees. Peer assessors conducted an independent chart review followed by a one-hour personal interview with a peer partner to discuss clinical management issues related to the client cases. Each interviewer rated his or her partner's clinical competence in eight areas of performance using a 7-point Likert scale.Findings.Results indicated that the CSR tool could discriminate among occupational therapists in terms of overall levels of clinical competence and also identify specific areas of concern that could be targeted for professional development. Feedback from participants was positive.Conclusions.The CSR tool was found to be useful for assessing clinical competence of occupational therapists in this large health centre as a quality improvement initiative within that discipline group. Further research is needed to establish the reliability and validity of the CSR tool.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists [CAOT]. (1991). Occupational therapy guidelines for client-centered practice. Toronto, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
2.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists [CAOT]. (1997). Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
3.
CunningtonJ. P.HannaE.TurnbullJ.KaigasT. B.NormanG. R. (1997). Defensible assessment of the competency of the practicing physician. Academic Medicine, 72, 9–12.
4.
CyrN.ArturiG.SeguinM.EganM. (2001). Experiencing the change to program management. Occupational Therapy Now, September/October, 14–16.
5.
GouletF.BourbeauD.MenardC. (2002). Performance assessment. Canadian Family Physician, 48, 1337–1344.
6.
HagerP.GoncziA. (1996). What is competence?Medical Teacher, 18, 15–19.
7.
HarriganM. (2000). Quest for quality in Canadian health care: Continuous quality improvement (2nd ed.). Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada.
8.
HaydenS. R.DufelS.ShihR. (2002). Definitions and competencies for practice-based learning and improvement. Academic Emergency Medicine, 9, 1242–1248.
9.
HolmboeE. S.MeehanT. P.LynnL.DoyleP.SherwinT.DuffyF. D. (2006). Promoting physicians' self-assessment and quality improvement: The ABIM diabetes practice improvement module. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26, 109–119.
10.
JennettP.AffleckL. (1998). Chart audit and chart stimulated recall as methods of needs assessment in continuing professional health education. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 18, 163–171.
11.
JennettP. A.ScottS. M.AtkinsonM. A.CrutcherR. A.HoganD. B.ElfordR. W., (1995). Patient charts and physician office management decisions: Chart audit and chart-stimulated recall. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 15, 31–39.
12.
LawM. (1987). Measurement in occupational therapy: Scientific criteria for evaluation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 133–138.
13.
LynchD. C.SwingS. R.HorowitzS. D.HoltK.MesserJ. V. (2004). Assessing practice-based learning and improvement. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 16, 85–92.
14.
MattinglyC.FlemingM.H. (1994), Clinical reasoning: Forms of inquiry in a therapeutic practice. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
15.
MillerP. A.SolomonP. (2002). The influence of a move to program management on physical therapy practice. Physical Therapy, 82, 133–138.
16.
MoyersP. A. (2006). Self-appraisal: Facilitating professional development for targeted needs. OT Practice, 11 (9), 7–8.
17.
NormanG. R.DavisD. A.LambS.HannaE.CaulfordP.KaigaiT. (1993). Competency assessment of primary care physicians as part of a peer review program. Journal of the American Medical Association, 270, 1046–1051.
18.
RappoltS.MitraA. L.MurphyE. (2002). Professional accountability in restructured contexts of occupational therapy practice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69, 293–302.
19.
RudmanD.HallM.LangloisS. (1997). The evolution of a quality programme within a changing environment. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 16–24.
20.
SalvatoriP. (1996). Clinical competence: A review of the health care literature with a focus on occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 260–271.
21.
SalvatoriP.BaptisteS.WardM. (2000). Development of a tool to measure clinical competence in occupational therapy: A pilot study. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 51–60.
22.
StreinerD. L.NormanG. R. (1989). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
VeloskiJ.BoexJ. R.GrasbergerM. J.EvansA.WolfsonD. B. (2006). Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians' clinical performance. Medical Teacher, 28, 117–128.
