Based on a comparative case study of six cross-sector partnerships (CSPs) in global health, we illustrate how a CSP’s aim to address a social issue on the basis of products influences the governance of collective action within the partnership and beyond, at the field level. We show how such product focus, through specialization, influences a CSP’s structures and interaction culture and, as a reflection of the partners’ underlying logics, generates different CSP-field effects. Specifically, if conceived as self-contained and without considering the implications for other field players and programs, a product focus may expedite collective action within the CSP, but spur fragmentation and disruption at the field level. Conversely, if designed to strengthen field capacity and integration at the product-field interlinkages, a product focus may take longer to form but helps avoid the above field effects. On this basis, we advance theory on CSPs’ product focus as a multilevel coordination mechanism and elaborate on the implications for designing product-based CSPs.
AlonsoJ.AndrewsR. (2019). Governance by targets and performance of cross-sector partnerships: Do partner diversity and partnership capabilities matter?Strategic Management Journal, 40, 556–579.
2.
ArslanB.TarakciM. (2022). Negative spillovers across partnerships for responsible innovation: Evidence from the 2014 Ebola outbreak. Journal of Management Studies, 59, 126–162. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12607
3.
BattilanaJ.DoradoS. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1419–1440.
4.
BowenF. E.BansalP.SlawinskiN. (2018). Scale matters: The scale of environmental issues in corporate collective actions. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 1411–1436.
5.
BrysonJ. M.CrosbyB. C.StoneM. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66, 44–55.
6.
BrysonJ. M.CrosbyB. C.StoneM. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75, 647–663.
7.
BullB.McNeillD. (2007). Development issues in global governance: Public-private partnerships and market multilateralism. Routledge.
8.
BuseK.HarmerA. M. (2007). Seven habits of highly effective global public–private health partnerships: Practice and potential. Social Science & Medicine, 64, 259–271.
9.
CaldwellN. D.RoehrichJ. K.GeorgeG. (2017). Social value creation and relational coordination in public-private collaborations. Journal of Management Studies, 54, 906–928.
ClarkeA.CraneA. (2018). Cross-sector partnerships for systemic change: Systematized literature review and agenda for further research. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 303–313.
12.
CloutierC.LangleyA. (2017). Negotiating the moral aspects of purpose in single and cross-sectoral collaborations. Journal of Business Ethics, 141, 103–131.
13.
de BakkerF. G. A.RascheA.PonteS. (2019). Multi-stakeholder initiatives on sustainability: A cross-disciplinary review and research agenda for business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 29, 343–383.
14.
DentoniD.BitzerV.SchoutenG. (2018). Harnessing wicked problems in multi-stakeholder partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 333–356.
15.
DentoniD.PinkseJ.LubberinkR. (2022). Linking sustainable business models to socio-ecological resilience through cross-sector partnerships: A complex adaptive systems view. Business & Society, 60, 1216–1252. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320935015
16.
EdenC.HuxhamC. (2001). The negotiation of purpose in multi-organizational collaborative groups. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 373–391.
17.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.
18.
EisenhardtK. M.GraebnerM. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25–32.
19.
FlyvbjergB. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 219–245.
20.
GoodrickE.ReayT. (2011). Constellations of institutional logics: Changes in the professional work of pharmacists. Work and Occupations, 38(3), 372–416.
21.
GrayB. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. Jossey-Bass.
22.
GrayB.PurdyJ. (2018). Collaborating for our future: Multistakeholder partnerships for solving complex problems. Oxford University Press.
23.
GulatiR.WohlgezogenF.ZhelyazkovP. (2012). The two facets of collaboration: Cooperation and coordination in strategic alliances. The Academy of Management Annals, 6, 531–583.
24.
HoffmanA. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 351–371.
25.
HuxhamC.VangenS. (2004). Doing things collaboratively: Realizing the advantage or succumbing to inertia?Organizational Dynamics, 33, 190–201.
26.
JayJ. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 137–159.
27.
KolkA. (2014). Partnerships as panacea for addressing global problems? On rationale, context, actors, impact and limitations. In SeitanidiM.CraneA. (Eds.), Social partnerships and responsible business (pp. 43–71). Routledge.
28.
KoschmannM. A.KuhnT. R.PfarrerM. D. (2012). A communicative framework of value in cross-sector partnerships. Academy of Management Review, 37, 332–354.
29.
LawrenceT. B.HardyC.PhillipsN. (2002). Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: The emergence of proto-institutions. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 281–290.
30.
Le BerM. J.BranzeiO. (2010). (Re) forming strategic cross-sector partnerships: Relational processes of social innovation. Business & Society, 49, 140–172.
31.
LeeT. W. (1999). Using qualitative methods in organizational research. SAGE.
32.
LieseA.BeisheimM. (2011). Transnational public-private partnerships and the provision of collective goods in developing countries. In RisseT. (Ed.), Governance without a state? Policies and politics in areas of limited statehood (pp. 115–143). Columbia University Press.
33.
LitricoJ. B.DavidR. J. (2017). The evolution of issue interpretation within organizational fields: Actor positions, framing trajectories, and field settlement. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 986–1015.
34.
LiuG.KoW. W. (2011). An analysis of cause-related marketing implementation strategies through social alliance: Partnership conditions and strategic objectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 253–281.
35.
MaguireS.HardyC.LawrenceT. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 657–679.
36.
McKagueK.ZietsmaC.OliverC. (2015). Building the social structure of a market. Organization Studies, 36, 1063–1093.
37.
Osei-AmponsahC.van PaassenA.KlerkxL. (2018). Diagnosing institutional logics in partnerships and how they evolve through institutional bricolage: Insights from soybean and cassava value chains in Ghana. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 84, 13–26.
38.
PacheA. C.SantosF. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 972–1001.
39.
PowellW. W.WhiteD. R.KoputK. W.Owen-SmithJ. (2005). Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1132–1205.
40.
ProvanK. G.KenisP. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 229–252.
41.
PurtikH.ArenasD. (2019). Embedding social innovation: Shaping societal norms and behaviors throughout the innovation process. Business & Society, 58, 963–1002.
42.
QuélinB. V.KivlenieceI.LazzariniS. (2017). Public-private collaboration, hybridity and social value: Towards new theoretical perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 54, 763–792.
43.
Rivera-SantosM.RufínC. (2010). Odd couples: Understanding the governance of firm–NGO alliances. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 55–70.
44.
RufinC.Rivera-SantosM. (2012). Between commonweal and competition: Understanding the governance of public–private partnerships. Journal of Management, 38, 1634–1654.
45.
SchoutenG.GlasbergenP. (2011). Creating legitimacy in global private governance: The case of the roundtable on sustainable palm oil. Ecological Economics, 70, 1891–1899.
46.
ScottW. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. SAGE.
47.
ScottW. R. (2003). Institutional carriers: Reviewing modes of transporting ideas over time and space and considering their consequences. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1, 879–894.
48.
SelskyJ. W.ParkerB. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 3, 849–873.
49.
StadtlerL.LinH. (2019). Leveraging partnerships for environmental change: The interplay between the partnership mechanism and the targeted stakeholder group. Journal of Business Ethics, 154, 869–891.
50.
StadtlerL.Van WassenhoveL. N. (2016). Coopetition as a paradox: Integrative approaches in a multi-company, cross-sector partnership. Organization Studies, 37, 655–685.
51.
ThorntonP. H.OcasioW.LounsburyM. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: Foundations, research, and theoretical elaboration. Oxford University Press.
Van MaanenJ. (1979). Reclaiming qualitative methods for organizational research: A preface. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 520–526.
56.
van TulderR.KeenN. (2018). Capturing collaborative challenges: Designing complexity-sensitive theories of change for cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 315–332.
57.
van TulderR.SeitanidiM. M.CraneA.BrammerS. (2016). Enhancing the impact of cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 135, 1–17.
58.
van WijkJ.ZietsmaC.DoradoS.de BakkerF. G. A.MartíI. (2019). Social innovation: Integrating micro, meso, and macro level insights from institutional theory. Business & Society, 58, 887–918.
59.
VestergaardA.MurphyL.MorsingM.LangevangT. (2020). Cross-sector partnerships as capitalism’s new development agents: Reconceiving impact as empowerment. Business & Society, 59, 1339–1376.
60.
VurroC.DacinT. (2014). An institutional perspective on cross-sector partnership. In SeitanidiM.CraneA. (Eds.), Social partnerships and responsible business (pp. 306–319). Routledge.
ZietsmaC.GroenewegenP.LogueD. M.HiningsC. R. (2017). Field or fields? Building the scaffolding for cumulation of research on institutional fields. Academy of Management Annals, 11, 391–450.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
